Terms and Conditions
-
Dubious contracts can always be overruled by a judge. For example, I recently heard a story about a guy who left his job. His old contract stated he could not work for competitors for at least two years after resignation. He needed a new job though, so he found work... For a competitor. I believe this was a good few months later. Old employer sued, but the judge decided that the man needed a job and this was what he did for a living. So there went the contract... (And rightfully so I think, two years is a looong time!).
It's an OO world.
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}Especially when you are a grunt. I suppose if your are uber-senior it might be different.... but these "agreements" are a pile of hooey. Both sides of the contract / agreement have to have money involved. You want a no-compete for 2 years? Guess what sunshine, you agree to pay me 2 years salary.
Charlie Gilley Stuck in a dysfunctional matrix from which I must escape... "Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783 “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
-
How many of you actually read them? Now, I only took one contract law class in college, but this seems VERY dubious to me: XI. may make changes to these terms at any time without notifying me. As a user, I am solely responsible for reading the most current version of the terms and conditions. This cannot reasonably be considered a contract.
Charlie Gilley Stuck in a dysfunctional matrix from which I must escape... "Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783 “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
The way terms and conditions are dealt with for software has made them virtually unenforceable, anyway -- the fact that major points are not made clear to buyers before they purchase software invalidates most of the cr@p that idiots add thinking "It's in the ToS, so it's LAW!" There have been many, many cases where ridiculous terms have been declared unlawful by courts (you're not allowed to jailbreak your iphone, eh?). The formula is something like this:
OverblownEgo + (LackOfLegalTraining AND/OR CompleteDisdainForCustomers) => PatheticallyUnenforceableTermsAndConditions
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
-
Dubious contracts can always be overruled by a judge. For example, I recently heard a story about a guy who left his job. His old contract stated he could not work for competitors for at least two years after resignation. He needed a new job though, so he found work... For a competitor. I believe this was a good few months later. Old employer sued, but the judge decided that the man needed a job and this was what he did for a living. So there went the contract... (And rightfully so I think, two years is a looong time!).
It's an OO world.
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
} -
How many of you actually read them? Now, I only took one contract law class in college, but this seems VERY dubious to me: XI. may make changes to these terms at any time without notifying me. As a user, I am solely responsible for reading the most current version of the terms and conditions. This cannot reasonably be considered a contract.
Charlie Gilley Stuck in a dysfunctional matrix from which I must escape... "Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783 “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
Terms And Conditions - by reading this you are giving us permission to use brain-to-brain linkage to operate your eyes. Tinfoil hat wearing may void warranty. :laugh:
-
Dubious contracts can always be overruled by a judge. For example, I recently heard a story about a guy who left his job. His old contract stated he could not work for competitors for at least two years after resignation. He needed a new job though, so he found work... For a competitor. I believe this was a good few months later. Old employer sued, but the judge decided that the man needed a job and this was what he did for a living. So there went the contract... (And rightfully so I think, two years is a looong time!).
It's an OO world.
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}Yes, non-compete clauses have to be written very carefully, and quite narrowly, to be enforceable. Courts will generally require that both the time and the extent of the prohibited employment be reasonable. Guidelines I have read suggest that a duration of more than about 6 months is likely to be enforced only in very unusual circumstances. Similarly, prohibiting employment in a substantially identical position for a direct competitor in the same immediate geographical area will probably stand up; prohibiting any employment in the same industry anywhere in the country certainly wouldn't.
-
That's a good trick. The ToC equivalent of a blank cheque. Next month: XII. as a user, I agree to sacrifice my immortal soul to Lord Lucifer.
-
How many of you actually read them? Now, I only took one contract law class in college, but this seems VERY dubious to me: XI. may make changes to these terms at any time without notifying me. As a user, I am solely responsible for reading the most current version of the terms and conditions. This cannot reasonably be considered a contract.
Charlie Gilley Stuck in a dysfunctional matrix from which I must escape... "Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783 “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
You should watch the documentary "Terms and conditions may apply" (currently on UK Netflix) - scary stuff...but fun when they doorstep Zuckerberg
C# has already designed away most of the tedium of C++.
-
How many of you actually read them? Now, I only took one contract law class in college, but this seems VERY dubious to me: XI. may make changes to these terms at any time without notifying me. As a user, I am solely responsible for reading the most current version of the terms and conditions. This cannot reasonably be considered a contract.
Charlie Gilley Stuck in a dysfunctional matrix from which I must escape... "Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783 “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
I remember when buying my last house I signed a code, covenants, and restrictions agreement. Among the terms was the committee was responsible for maintaining common areas. After a year of waiting I started working on it. Ten years later the committee removed that covenant without asking me, then they came to me about a covenants restriction I wasn't obeying. I told them I'll continue paying the yearly dues even though our agreement became null and void the second they changed the agreement without getting me to sign the change of terms. They lost the right to tell me anything I have to do because of that agreement and we can let lawyers determine if I'm wrong or not. Never heard back from them about my "violation". "Your" agreement seems like an agreement to let them build a back-door into your computer and make any change to any software they want without your knowledge or consent.
-
How many of you actually read them? Now, I only took one contract law class in college, but this seems VERY dubious to me: XI. may make changes to these terms at any time without notifying me. As a user, I am solely responsible for reading the most current version of the terms and conditions. This cannot reasonably be considered a contract.
Charlie Gilley Stuck in a dysfunctional matrix from which I must escape... "Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783 “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
What constitutes a valid term depends not only on what you have agreed, but also on the legislation by the parliament and common law principles established by the court. ( Suppose it is within the common law world's jurisprudence ). I think : Generally the terms cannot be changed after the contract is formed, once there is change in terms one must communicate to another party. The later must agree in order to form a 'new contract' if the term is 'important'. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thornton\_v\_Shoe\_Lane\_Parking\_Ltd
-
I've tried to read a couple of times but ADD and lack of lawyerese prevent me from getting anything out of them. I believe they make them that way so the average Joe won't take the time and they can pretty much do anything they want and you'll never know. Now if they they were truthful this would be there Terms and COnditions; We can do whatever we want, when we want without your knowledge or permission and if we don't like these terms we can change them anytime we want. Now that I can understand!
Have you ever just looked at someone and knew the wheel was turning but the hamster was dead? Trying to understand the behavior of some people is like trying to smell the color 9. I'm not crazy, my reality is just different than yours!
Mike Hankey wrote:
We can do whatever we want, when we want without your knowledge or permission and if we don't like these terms we can change them anytime we want.
The problem I find with organizations that make changes to your TOC are the ones in which you have a substantial monetary and software investment. Like Apple with their 87 page contract. If I were to read the thing all the way through and found something I didn't like, am I expected to drop everything I have on my iPad/iPhone and start shelling out more money for apps on an Android just to avoid that one part I don't like?
I'm not a programmer but I play one at the office
-
Mike Hankey wrote:
We can do whatever we want, when we want without your knowledge or permission and if we don't like these terms we can change them anytime we want.
The problem I find with organizations that make changes to your TOC are the ones in which you have a substantial monetary and software investment. Like Apple with their 87 page contract. If I were to read the thing all the way through and found something I didn't like, am I expected to drop everything I have on my iPad/iPhone and start shelling out more money for apps on an Android just to avoid that one part I don't like?
I'm not a programmer but I play one at the office
Exactly and who's going to wade through 87 pages?, it's just ridiculous and they know you won't read it.
New version: WinHeist Version 2.1.0 Beta Have you ever just looked at someone and knew the wheel was turning but the hamster was dead? Trying to understand the behavior of some people is like trying to smell the color 9. I'm not crazy, my reality is just different than yours!
-
That's a good trick. The ToC equivalent of a blank cheque. Next month: XII. as a user, I agree to sacrifice my immortal soul to Lord Lucifer.
harold aptroot wrote:
as a user, I agree to sacrifice my immortal soul to Lord Lucifer.
I plan to bury... User will surrender First Born as well as any and all financial accounts including authorization upon demand. in my EULA.
Psychosis at 10 Film at 11 Those who do not remember the past, are doomed to repeat it. Those who do not remember the past, cannot build upon it.
-
What constitutes a valid term depends not only on what you have agreed, but also on the legislation by the parliament and common law principles established by the court. ( Suppose it is within the common law world's jurisprudence ). I think : Generally the terms cannot be changed after the contract is formed, once there is change in terms one must communicate to another party. The later must agree in order to form a 'new contract' if the term is 'important'. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thornton\_v\_Shoe\_Lane\_Parking\_Ltd
I agree with you and KP. What struck me was the brazen and obvious nonsense the wording represented. Almost an alien mindset to common sense.
Charlie Gilley Stuck in a dysfunctional matrix from which I must escape... "Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783 “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
