Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. 100 novels everyone should read

100 novels everyone should read

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
html
79 Posts 48 Posters 8 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • N Nagy Vilmos

    This list[^] from the Torygraph claims these are the one wot we should read. I consider myself reasonably well read and yet only manage a paltry 12!

    G Offline
    G Offline
    GenJerDan
    wrote on last edited by
    #46

    17 No more than that because a) never heard of it b) feeling barfish just contemplating it or c) too busy with better books Saw the movie "Crash". Can't bear Ballard's writing, so didn't rad the book, but the story was good.

    We won't sit down. We won't shut up. We won't go quietly away. YouTube and My Mu[sic], Films and Windows Programs, etc.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • G Gary Wheeler

      Come now, Marc. This list was for serious literature, not that populist tripe.

      Software Zen: delete this;

      M Offline
      M Offline
      Marc Clifton
      wrote on last edited by
      #47

      Gary Wheeler wrote:

      This list was for serious literature, not that populist tripe.

      And that's why Lord of the Rings was on the list? Serious literature? Well, maybe the elven poems could be considered such. :) Marc

      Imperative to Functional Programming Succinctly

      G 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Marc Clifton

        Gary Wheeler wrote:

        This list was for serious literature, not that populist tripe.

        And that's why Lord of the Rings was on the list? Serious literature? Well, maybe the elven poems could be considered such. :) Marc

        Imperative to Functional Programming Succinctly

        G Offline
        G Offline
        Gary Wheeler
        wrote on last edited by
        #48

        You'll note that Lord of the Rings was entry #100, the bottom of the list. I have a feeling the only reason it was included was that Tolkien was English, and his trilogy has earned more money been read more times than the rest of the entries on the list combined.

        Software Zen: delete this;

        M 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • G Gary Wheeler

          You'll note that Lord of the Rings was entry #100, the bottom of the list. I have a feeling the only reason it was included was that Tolkien was English, and his trilogy has earned more money been read more times than the rest of the entries on the list combined.

          Software Zen: delete this;

          M Offline
          M Offline
          Marc Clifton
          wrote on last edited by
          #49

          Gary Wheeler wrote:

          been read more times than the rest of the entries on the list combined.

          Or at least watched. ;) I'm constantly surprised by how few people I meet haven't actually read the books, even The Hobbit. I obviously run in the wrong crowds! Marc

          Imperative to Functional Programming Succinctly

          G 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Marc Clifton

            Gary Wheeler wrote:

            been read more times than the rest of the entries on the list combined.

            Or at least watched. ;) I'm constantly surprised by how few people I meet haven't actually read the books, even The Hobbit. I obviously run in the wrong crowds! Marc

            Imperative to Functional Programming Succinctly

            G Offline
            G Offline
            Gary Wheeler
            wrote on last edited by
            #50

            I'll admit I haven't read them recently... well, since 1985. That's more of a reflection that I've been reading a lot of 'hard' science fiction lately, and haven't been interested in reading fantasy.

            Software Zen: delete this;

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • N Nagy Vilmos

              This list[^] from the Torygraph claims these are the one wot we should read. I consider myself reasonably well read and yet only manage a paltry 12!

              L Offline
              L Offline
              Lost User
              wrote on last edited by
              #51

              Why don't they just say "Everyone should read 100 novels"?

              Peter Wasser "The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • N Nagy Vilmos

                This list[^] from the Torygraph claims these are the one wot we should read. I consider myself reasonably well read and yet only manage a paltry 12!

                F Offline
                F Offline
                Fran Porretto
                wrote on last edited by
                #52

                Don't feel bad. I have a private library of nearly 13,000 volumes -- yes, I've read them all; I'm a novelist as well as a software engineer, and reading widely is a novelist's occupational requirement -- and of the 100 books on the Telegraph's list I've read only 23. But the list contains quite a number of novels I consider garbage, having read snatches of them and tossed them aside with a snort.

                What comes to mind in this connection is Ambrose Bierce's definition of a classic: "A book everyone wants to have read, but no one wants to read." That applies to quite a number of the most frequently cited "classics," and sometimes for very good reasons!

                (This message is programming you in ways you cannot detect. Be afraid.)

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • N Nagy Vilmos

                  This list[^] from the Torygraph claims these are the one wot we should read. I consider myself reasonably well read and yet only manage a paltry 12!

                  M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Michael Haines
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #53

                  The list is invalid without War and Peace on it. Although, it did have Hitchhiker's Guide... "I am rarely happier than when spending entire day programming my computer to perform automatically a task that it would otherwise take me a good ten seconds to do by hand." - Douglas Adams

                  9 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • N Nagy Vilmos

                    This list[^] from the Torygraph claims these are the one wot we should read. I consider myself reasonably well read and yet only manage a paltry 12!

                    T Offline
                    T Offline
                    trinosaur
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #54

                    17, plus three on the to-read pile. But mostly when I was a teenager, before I had internet.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • N Nagy Vilmos

                      This list[^] from the Torygraph claims these are the one wot we should read. I consider myself reasonably well read and yet only manage a paltry 12!

                      G Offline
                      G Offline
                      gervacleto
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #55

                      For me, 20. I am not a Philosopher so I never read Proust and partners. At this time I think a must did it, but I do not have enough time because I am reading not Philosophy books but novels (Sci-Fi, mystery...) :laugh:

                      9 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • D dandy72

                        Right on. I've read one book from that list, The Lord of the Rings. Which is actually 3 books, but apparently that doesn't matter. I've read plenty of programming books from cover to cover at 1200-1500 pages each. But novels? I simply don't have enough time to sit down and read them. What does he do for a living?

                        9 Offline
                        9 Offline
                        9082365
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #56

                        No Lord Of The Rings is one book. That's how it was written and how it was intended to be read. Tolkien was forced into the rather artificial dividing of the work by his publisher and he was never happy with it. Most modern editions reunite the three parts in a single volume in any event.

                        D 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • N Nagy Vilmos

                          This list[^] from the Torygraph claims these are the one wot we should read. I consider myself reasonably well read and yet only manage a paltry 12!

                          Y Offline
                          Y Offline
                          Ygnaiih
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #57

                          I hit 15 only counting the books I finished. Ulysses is bull s**t on a stick. Get drunk (really drunk), talk into a recorder and you will have made as much readable material. Pseudo-intellectuals sop up this kind for garbage and claim to "so get it" when there is nothing there. Emperor/clothes much?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • L Lost User

                            I see Moby Dick is on the list (as if it's ever not on a list). For anyone who hasn't read it, here's the short version: Rope is awesome. Knots knots, rope, knots, oh yea baby. Also a white whale because reasons.

                            9 Offline
                            9 Offline
                            9082365
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #58

                            Not only on the list but at No 2! I hope nobody sees this list and starts there because it will put them off 'classics' for life. It is the very definition of turgid prose!

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M Michael Haines

                              The list is invalid without War and Peace on it. Although, it did have Hitchhiker's Guide... "I am rarely happier than when spending entire day programming my computer to perform automatically a task that it would otherwise take me a good ten seconds to do by hand." - Douglas Adams

                              9 Offline
                              9 Offline
                              9082365
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #59

                              Well hardly invalid. It's a list of 100 novels that should be read. It doesn't say anywhere that it's the only 100 novels you should read nor indeed that these are the 'best', 'greatest' or any other superlative you care to mention. It doesn't even claim that the list is any kind of definition of 'literature' as we know it.

                              M 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • G gervacleto

                                For me, 20. I am not a Philosopher so I never read Proust and partners. At this time I think a must did it, but I do not have enough time because I am reading not Philosophy books but novels (Sci-Fi, mystery...) :laugh:

                                9 Offline
                                9 Offline
                                9082365
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #60

                                In what way is Proust philosophy? Certainly it's an exploration of the human condition but that's true of pretty much all good writing and especially so of sci-fi. If any genre can be accused of being 'philosophical' then sci-fi is right up there among the usual suspects!

                                S G 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • N Nagy Vilmos

                                  This list[^] from the Torygraph claims these are the one wot we should read. I consider myself reasonably well read and yet only manage a paltry 12!

                                  T Offline
                                  T Offline
                                  Tasadit
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #61

                                  30. I think. but some of them are so boring I'm honestly not sure if I read them or not.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • N Nagy Vilmos

                                    This list[^] from the Torygraph claims these are the one wot we should read. I consider myself reasonably well read and yet only manage a paltry 12!

                                    I Offline
                                    I Offline
                                    irneb
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #62

                                    I count 29 of those I've read at least once. Though I don't agree with some of them as a "must-read" and then omitting some others which I might feel has entertained me much more, taught me some thing interesting, made me think, or any combination.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • N Nagy Vilmos

                                      This list[^] from the Torygraph claims these are the one wot we should read. I consider myself reasonably well read and yet only manage a paltry 12!

                                      C Offline
                                      C Offline
                                      carlospc1970
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #63

                                      11. No "Confederancy of Dunces"?!?

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • N Nagy Vilmos

                                        This list[^] from the Torygraph claims these are the one wot we should read. I consider myself reasonably well read and yet only manage a paltry 12!

                                        A Offline
                                        A Offline
                                        Alexander DiMauro
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #64

                                        Wait, are there developers out there that actually have the time to read...for fun?! :omg: I don't think I've read anything but technical books for years now. Does watching the film count? I'm at 10 without films, up to 25 with films + theater. I've never read/seen Wuthering Heights, but saw plenty of Cathy/Heathcliff jokes on Dave Allen at Large, back in the day. Does that count, too? :cool:

                                        I have always wished for my computer to be as easy to use as my telephone; my wish has come true because I can no longer figure out how to use my telephone - Bjarne Stroustrup The world is going to laugh at you anyway, might as well crack the 1st joke! My code has no bugs, it runs exactly as it was written.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • N Nagy Vilmos

                                          This list[^] from the Torygraph claims these are the one wot we should read. I consider myself reasonably well read and yet only manage a paltry 12!

                                          A Offline
                                          A Offline
                                          agolddog
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #65

                                          11 for sure, a few others I was on the fence about. However, I've seen the movie for lots of others, so that's pretty much the same thing. ;)

                                          9 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups