Moon landing was real and WE CAN PROVE IT, says Nvidia
-
It proves nothing of the sort. It merely means that by changing the data they can simulate the appropriate conditions under which the picture may have been taken. It does not PROVE that the picture was taken there. I do wish non-scientists would not use words they do not understand.
--------------------------------- Obscurum per obscurius. Ad astra per alas porci. Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.
wow I didn't know NASA was that clever, fancy knowing in the early 70s that the stars wouldn't be visible from the surface yet still making sure that they were their and could be enhanced by technology 50 years later kudos to them
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
-
Dalek Dave wrote:
I do wish non-scientists would not use words they do not understand.
Quark.
Richard MacCutchan wrote:
Dalek Dave wrote:
I do wish non-scientists would not use words they do not understand.
Quark.
Come on, pretty much everyone nowadays recognises this a weird vegetarian cheese thing.
Alberto Brandolini:
The amount of energy necessary to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it.
-
Yes, a fake Mars landing is much more better, these days. And, I'd also favor a fake landing on Saturn's rings. That would be exciting at least. Give the audience what they want. I don't want to be mooned any more. :D
-
Yes, a fake Mars landing is much more better, these days. And, I'd also favor a fake landing on Saturn's rings. That would be exciting at least. Give the audience what they want. I don't want to be mooned any more. :D
-
I do hope so
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
-
Honest, LOL going on!!!
RUs123 wrote:
So then Uranus is out of the picture as well ?
But also, I'm scared about why you would even ask!!!!?! Oops, I turned the corner on that one.
-
Honest, LOL going on!!!
RUs123 wrote:
So then Uranus is out of the picture as well ?
But also, I'm scared about why you would even ask!!!!?! Oops, I turned the corner on that one.
-
Richard MacCutchan wrote:
Dalek Dave wrote:
I do wish non-scientists would not use words they do not understand.
Quark.
Come on, pretty much everyone nowadays recognises this a weird vegetarian cheese thing.
Alberto Brandolini:
The amount of energy necessary to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it.
Cheese? I thought he was a bar-tender[^]. ;P
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
-
In normal circumstances I wouldn't ask but with the potential for a bad joke, anything goes. :-D :-D
committed to code 2. [x] committed to online forums related to code 3. [x] committed to bad jokes. -
It's only a product promo, but it's a smart one: Nvidia reckons the judicious application of its graphics technology can debunk one of the world's favourite “moon landing was a hoax conspiracies”.
When asked to remove the demo, a spokesman for the company said "I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that."
Time to re-post the same video, then: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6MOnehCOUw[^] :-D
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
-
committed to code 2. [x] committed to online forums related to code 3. [x] committed to bad jokes.
-
Cheese? I thought he was a bar-tender[^]. ;P
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
No. Captain of a garbage scow.
-
It proves nothing of the sort. It merely means that by changing the data they can simulate the appropriate conditions under which the picture may have been taken. It does not PROVE that the picture was taken there. I do wish non-scientists would not use words they do not understand.
--------------------------------- Obscurum per obscurius. Ad astra per alas porci. Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.
So Dave, you asked for the demo to be removed?:
Quote:
I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that."
Your final sentence:
Quote:
I do wish non-scientists would not use words they do not understand.
has far too many negatives for a Monday morning, I couldn't reduce them with a Karnaugh map, so I'm going home with a headache!
Life is like a s**t sandwich; the more bread you have, the less s**t you eat.
-
Time to re-post the same video, then: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6MOnehCOUw[^] :-D
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
That vid is damned funny, @RichardDeeming!!
-
Yes, a fake Mars landing is much more better, these days. And, I'd also favor a fake landing on Saturn's rings. That would be exciting at least. Give the audience what they want. I don't want to be mooned any more. :D
newton.saber wrote:
I'd also favor a fake landing on Saturn's rings.
Great idea! And just to top the lunar explorers' stunts launching golf balls in low gravity, we can have the team break off one of the smaller rings and fling it like a Frisbee towards Uranus. A ring around Uranus is bound to draw attention. :-D
Will Rogers never met me.
-
It's only a product promo, but it's a smart one: Nvidia reckons the judicious application of its graphics technology can debunk one of the world's favourite “moon landing was a hoax conspiracies”.
When asked to remove the demo, a spokesman for the company said "I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that."
I just spent thirty minutes which I probably should not have spent, in search of a video clip that I know that I have seen before. I cannot find it now. Can anyone help me ? The vid clip is either 30 or 60 seconds long (I think; my last viewing was 5+ years ago) It was on YouTube. You could find it with the search string "Moon Landing Hoax" (back then, not now) In it, the astronaut (putatively Neil Armstrong, highly doubtful to say the least) steps off the space ship (lunar lander) with the famous "...one small step for a man..." comment. At that very instant, a large studio lighting boom/scaffolding/whatever slips off of one of its supporting structures and slams to the ground, in full view of the camera. The moment that happens, stage hands charge onto the scene (in the field of view of the camera which was still going) and run around to put things back in order for the next take. Has anyone else ever seen this ? The fact that it is no longer available is clear evidence that the government is..... (uhm, Just kidding) For a short vid clip, it was one of the best I've ever seen.
-
You are all too late. Landing on planets is now obsolete. People now are landing on the sun.
