The Really Real Real Reason for the Windows 10 name

[TheGreatAndPowerfulOz]

a take on someone else's "pun" Windows 8 Windows 8.1 (8 + 1 = 9) Windows 8.1 Update 1 (8 + 1 + 1 = 10) Windows 10

If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.-John Q. Adams
You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering.-Wernher von Braun
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.-Albert Einstein

[Jeremy Falcon]

To make the adjustment more sensible, I say we just remove the number 9 from the face of the planet. It sucked anyway.

Jeremy Falcon

[Super Lloyd]

Now that[^]... is the real reason! ;P

My programming get away... The Blog... DirectX for WinRT/C# since 2013! Taking over the world since 1371!

[Kent Sharkey]

I think the interwebs may have figured out the true reason, yes. Seems all to believable (and those code search results make it more believable). :thumbsup:

TTFN - Kent

[TheGreatAndPowerfulOz]

holy shit! :omg: :wtf: X|

If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.-John Q. Adams
You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering.-Wernher von Braun
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.-Albert Einstein

[M dHatter]

they should name it windows me 10 :-D

               .'\\   /\`.
             .'.-.\`-'.-.\`.
        ...\_:   .-. .-.   :\_...
      .'    '-.(o ) (o ).-'    \`.
     :  \_    \_ \_\`~(\_)~\`\_ \_    \_  :
    :  /:   ' .-=\_   \_=-. \`   ;\\  :
    :   :|-..\_  '     \`  \_..-|:   :
     :   \`:| |\`:-:-.-:-:'| |:'   :
      \`.   \`.| | | | | | |.'   .'
        \`.   \`-:\_| | |\_:-'   .'
          \`-.\_   \`\`\`\`    \_.-'
              \`\`-------'/xml>

[DJ van Wyk]

Let's all switch to base-8 math. Screw you -9-!!!

My plan is to live forever ... so far so good

[Lost User]

How can they be so sure that all ...

if(version.StartsWith("Windows 1")) // Windows 1.0/1.1/etc.

... code is already out of production ;)

[Paul R Benson]

Since we've already used the digit '8' surely you mean base 9? :confused:

[DJ van Wyk]

In base 8 there is no number 9, same as there is no number 2 in binary.

My plan is to live forever ... so far so good

[Super Lloyd]

he probably means base 10, as in 8 + 1! ;P

My programming get away... The Blog... DirectX for WinRT/C# since 2013! Taking over the world since 1371!

[Paul R Benson]

In base 8 there is also no 8. Hence, since we've already had Windows 8 base 8 doesn't work.

[irneb]

Just wondering ... seeing all the hype about it being SSSSOOOO "wonderful" ... did they think of it i.t.o. "It's a totally 'new' windows - like in Windows 2.0"? ... And then realizing: "That's already been used" ... And then some "brilliant" meeting participant "remembering" that "computers count in 1s & 0s" ... I can just imagine the sort of meeting (having had several of those myself - ending in me just hanging my head)

[Super Lloyd]

That's a damn good question you just raised here! :-D :laugh:

My programming get away... The Blog... DirectX for WinRT/C# since 2013! Taking over the world since 1371!

[DJ van Wyk]

The topic discusses the number 9. In my view the number 8 is irrelevant in this context. But we can start using base-9 math if it will make you feel better.

My plan is to live forever ... so far so good

[RachelMartin]

I think a lot of people are misreading it as "Windows Ten". It's clearly "Windows Two".

[RachelMartin]

I thought that myself, but then I realized that Intel processors are little-endian. Which would make it "Windows One", surely?

[zpinklb]

It's a binary number and part of the new low-numbering scheme. XBOX ONE, Windows TWO. Makes sense. ;-)

[irneb]

Exactly! That's one of the reasons I'd have just hung my head in that meeting ... not worth shaking!

[irneb]

So then you mean we can expect a 360 / 365 in the future (or should that be past)?