Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. I have to say it ...

I have to say it ...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
35 Posts 13 Posters 3 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J jerry0davis

    There is talk in Britain, that if any Iraqi public are killed by any British bombs, that Blair will be prosecuted for war crimes as the war is theoretically illegal.


    I feel like I'm diagonally parked in a parallel universe Jeremy Davis http://www.astad.org
    http://www.jvf.co.uk

    D Offline
    D Offline
    DODO
    wrote on last edited by
    #5

    Comment: :laugh::laugh: hope this is serious although I am sure it is not La ILah Ila allah Mohamed Rasoul Allah

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • J jerry0davis

      There is talk in Britain, that if any Iraqi public are killed by any British bombs, that Blair will be prosecuted for war crimes as the war is theoretically illegal.


      I feel like I'm diagonally parked in a parallel universe Jeremy Davis http://www.astad.org
      http://www.jvf.co.uk

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #6

      Yeh, right. As if that's going to happen. I didn't see the UN rushing to prosecute NATO countries when innocent Serbians were killed during the conflict in 1999 - is anyone actually naive enough to think this situation is going to be any different? When this is over and Saddams stash of WMDs is found, the UN is going to look pretty stupid.


      When I am king, you will be first against the wall.

      K O 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • L Lost User

        Yeh, right. As if that's going to happen. I didn't see the UN rushing to prosecute NATO countries when innocent Serbians were killed during the conflict in 1999 - is anyone actually naive enough to think this situation is going to be any different? When this is over and Saddams stash of WMDs is found, the UN is going to look pretty stupid.


        When I am king, you will be first against the wall.

        K Offline
        K Offline
        KaRl
        wrote on last edited by
        #7

        Robert Edward Caldecott wrote: When this is over and Saddams stash of WMDs is found, the UN is going to look pretty stupid. I don't think anybody pretended SH hadn't WMD, except Iraq. The point was more IMO what was the best way to ensure they would be destroyed.


        Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop

        D 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • K KaRl

          Robert Edward Caldecott wrote: When this is over and Saddams stash of WMDs is found, the UN is going to look pretty stupid. I don't think anybody pretended SH hadn't WMD, except Iraq. The point was more IMO what was the best way to ensure they would be destroyed.


          Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop

          D Offline
          D Offline
          DODO
          wrote on last edited by
          #8

          what was the best way to ensure they would be destroyed. and you think the best way is to invade a country who have all the rights to own any thing and kill innocent women and children does america not own WMD or they are attacking Iraq using icecream sticks who are kidding here 1.Oil 2.mre room for Israel this is what GW is doing and will be doing for the next 20 years La ILah Ila allah Mohamed Rasoul Allah

          K 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • O OCid

            The illegal (the UN didn’t approve the attack) and immoral invasion of Iraq has started. It seems (not confirmed) that right now Iraq is responding with chemical weapons (which by the way were provided by USA some years back) in the border with Iraq. G. Bush promised that if Iraq was going to use chemical weapons, they will respond with a nuke. Yes, I know this should be posted in the soapbox, but I felt I had to say it here.

            A Offline
            A Offline
            Andrew Torrance
            wrote on last edited by
            #9

            If it is legality you seek then what about the legality of gassing your own people ? What about the legality of routine torture and murder of political opponents ? I could go on . Surely the question is not one about narrow definitions of legality , but whether or not the action is justified .After all the quickest way to get 5 opinions is to put 3 laywers in a room . Nukes ? If nukes where used then it would signify such a change in the perception of what nukes are for that the world would become a vastly more dangerous place. Nukes must remain a weapon of last resort . Am I the only one forever playing catch up with technology , while all the juicy opportunites keep rolling by ?

            D S O R 4 Replies Last reply
            0
            • A Andrew Torrance

              If it is legality you seek then what about the legality of gassing your own people ? What about the legality of routine torture and murder of political opponents ? I could go on . Surely the question is not one about narrow definitions of legality , but whether or not the action is justified .After all the quickest way to get 5 opinions is to put 3 laywers in a room . Nukes ? If nukes where used then it would signify such a change in the perception of what nukes are for that the world would become a vastly more dangerous place. Nukes must remain a weapon of last resort . Am I the only one forever playing catch up with technology , while all the juicy opportunites keep rolling by ?

              D Offline
              D Offline
              DODO
              wrote on last edited by
              #10

              are you saying that the war is legal and it is Americas right to attack Iraq La ILah Ila allah Mohamed Rasoul Allah

              A R 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • D DODO

                what was the best way to ensure they would be destroyed. and you think the best way is to invade a country who have all the rights to own any thing and kill innocent women and children does america not own WMD or they are attacking Iraq using icecream sticks who are kidding here 1.Oil 2.mre room for Israel this is what GW is doing and will be doing for the next 20 years La ILah Ila allah Mohamed Rasoul Allah

                K Offline
                K Offline
                KaRl
                wrote on last edited by
                #11

                Samer12 wrote: and you think the best way is to invade a country who have all the rights to own any thing and kill innocent women and children I suppose the "you" is not targetting me, or you didn't read the Soapbox these last weeks :) I would say that some innocents will die, but some guilty ones too. I don't think it's fair, of course, but pragmatically it's not totally negative.


                Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop

                D 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • K KaRl

                  Samer12 wrote: and you think the best way is to invade a country who have all the rights to own any thing and kill innocent women and children I suppose the "you" is not targetting me, or you didn't read the Soapbox these last weeks :) I would say that some innocents will die, but some guilty ones too. I don't think it's fair, of course, but pragmatically it's not totally negative.


                  Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop

                  D Offline
                  D Offline
                  DODO
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #12

                  I haven't read the soap box actualy but why does any one have to die Iraq is suffering since 91 they dont have food or medicine what are they going to do in this stae La ILah Ila allah Mohamed Rasoul Allah

                  K E 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • O OCid

                    The illegal (the UN didn’t approve the attack) and immoral invasion of Iraq has started. It seems (not confirmed) that right now Iraq is responding with chemical weapons (which by the way were provided by USA some years back) in the border with Iraq. G. Bush promised that if Iraq was going to use chemical weapons, they will respond with a nuke. Yes, I know this should be posted in the soapbox, but I felt I had to say it here.

                    D Offline
                    D Offline
                    Davy Mitchell
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #13

                    Kosovo was illegal... Davy Blog for Software Testing, Bugs, Quality, Security and Stability - www.latedecember.com
                    News From Angus, Scotland - The Angus Blog

                    A 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • D DODO

                      I haven't read the soap box actualy but why does any one have to die Iraq is suffering since 91 they dont have food or medicine what are they going to do in this stae La ILah Ila allah Mohamed Rasoul Allah

                      K Offline
                      K Offline
                      KaRl
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #14

                      Samer12 wrote: I haven't read the soap box Generally, we use the Soapbox for political threads, it gives more freedom to expose a point of view, or to start a flame war :) Samer12 wrote: why does any one have to die Iraq is suffering since 91 they dont have food or medicine what are they going to do in this stae Putting the responsability on US alone is IMO a mistake, as absolving them from any responsability. Should SH have resigned 12 years ago would Iraq be in a much healthier state.


                      Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • O OCid

                        The illegal (the UN didn’t approve the attack) and immoral invasion of Iraq has started. It seems (not confirmed) that right now Iraq is responding with chemical weapons (which by the way were provided by USA some years back) in the border with Iraq. G. Bush promised that if Iraq was going to use chemical weapons, they will respond with a nuke. Yes, I know this should be posted in the soapbox, but I felt I had to say it here.

                        N Offline
                        N Offline
                        Nitron
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #15

                        OCid wrote: The illegal (the UN didn’t approve the attack) They don't have to. Not to link this issue with terrorism, but I forgot which UN resolution the approval of attacking the US with hijacked airplanes fell under? Can you remind me? - Nitron


                        "Those that say a task is impossible shouldn't interrupt the ones who are doing it." - Chinese Proverb

                        O 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • A Andrew Torrance

                          If it is legality you seek then what about the legality of gassing your own people ? What about the legality of routine torture and murder of political opponents ? I could go on . Surely the question is not one about narrow definitions of legality , but whether or not the action is justified .After all the quickest way to get 5 opinions is to put 3 laywers in a room . Nukes ? If nukes where used then it would signify such a change in the perception of what nukes are for that the world would become a vastly more dangerous place. Nukes must remain a weapon of last resort . Am I the only one forever playing catch up with technology , while all the juicy opportunites keep rolling by ?

                          S Offline
                          S Offline
                          S Becker
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #16

                          Aaaaj i know whar you are talking about. You mean that tv documentation where they where talking about Mr. Rumsfeld working for an american inteligence agency in the 50s and 60s. He was working on chemical drugs to make a man say everything he knows aren't you ? Yes i remebmer it is the story where another member of this research group "jumped" out of the window of a hotel in america with the little broken glas parts inside the room. But this only happens in banana republics !! Another question: Did Mr. Rumsfeld ask the foreign trading goverment to allow american companys to delvier weapons to the iraq in the early 80s ? Can you answer this ? Regards Sascha

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • N Nitron

                            OCid wrote: The illegal (the UN didn’t approve the attack) They don't have to. Not to link this issue with terrorism, but I forgot which UN resolution the approval of attacking the US with hijacked airplanes fell under? Can you remind me? - Nitron


                            "Those that say a task is impossible shouldn't interrupt the ones who are doing it." - Chinese Proverb

                            O Offline
                            O Offline
                            OCid
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #17

                            Nitron wrote: The illegal (the UN didn’t approve the attack) They don't have to. Yes, they have to, otherwise US is violating the international legality and so invading a country unilaterally. G. Bush should pay his war crimes Nitron wrote: Not to link this issue with terrorism, but I forgot which UN resolution the approval of attacking the US with hijacked airplanes fell under? Can you remind me? UN condoned the 11th sept terrorist attack, but now US is committing another, probably more serious act of terrorism, government terrorism. There was no a single piece of evidence that there was a connection point between Iraq and Al Quaeda. Can you tell me what Iraq has to do with Bin Laden? Perhaps you don't know that it's Saudi Arabia who is supporting terrorist groups.

                            N E 2 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • L Lost User

                              Yeh, right. As if that's going to happen. I didn't see the UN rushing to prosecute NATO countries when innocent Serbians were killed during the conflict in 1999 - is anyone actually naive enough to think this situation is going to be any different? When this is over and Saddams stash of WMDs is found, the UN is going to look pretty stupid.


                              When I am king, you will be first against the wall.

                              O Offline
                              O Offline
                              OCid
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #18

                              Robert Edward Caldecott wrote: When this is over and Saddams stash of WMDs is found, the UN is going to look pretty stupid. When this is over and thousands of innocent citizens had been killed, the US is going to feel as Nazis.

                              L 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • A Andrew Torrance

                                If it is legality you seek then what about the legality of gassing your own people ? What about the legality of routine torture and murder of political opponents ? I could go on . Surely the question is not one about narrow definitions of legality , but whether or not the action is justified .After all the quickest way to get 5 opinions is to put 3 laywers in a room . Nukes ? If nukes where used then it would signify such a change in the perception of what nukes are for that the world would become a vastly more dangerous place. Nukes must remain a weapon of last resort . Am I the only one forever playing catch up with technology , while all the juicy opportunites keep rolling by ?

                                O Offline
                                O Offline
                                OCid
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #19

                                Andrew Torrance wrote: If it is legality you seek then what about the legality of gassing your own people ? What about the legality of routine torture and murder of political opponents ? Sure, but what about the hundred of children that die everyday in Saudi Arabia because the lack of food when their dictators are rotted with money from the oil? Not to mention the situation of women there, many of them are simply slaves… What about North Korea? I could go on as well ... Why US only attacks Iraq and does nothing in the other countries? Andrew Torrance wrote: Nukes must remain a weapon of last resort . So do you really believe that Nukes dropped at Hiroshima and Nagashaki were the last resort?

                                N 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • D DODO

                                  are you saying that the war is legal and it is Americas right to attack Iraq La ILah Ila allah Mohamed Rasoul Allah

                                  A Offline
                                  A Offline
                                  Anna Jayne Metcalfe
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #20

                                  There is no right in a case like this, only wrongs. By his conduct Saddam has betrayed the whole of humanity as well as his own people, and therefore he has brought this upon Iraq, not GWB (much as I dislike him, I think he's sincere). It's too late to point fingers (IMHO most of the diplomats have been acting like children, making war more likely, not less). We should all be praying for an outcome to this war that benefits the people of Iraq and humanity as a whole. Anna :rose: Homepage | My life in tears

                                  "Be yourself - not what others think you should be"
                                  - Marcia Graesch

                                  Trouble with resource IDs? Try the Resource ID Organiser Add-In for Visual C++

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • D Davy Mitchell

                                    Kosovo was illegal... Davy Blog for Software Testing, Bugs, Quality, Security and Stability - www.latedecember.com
                                    News From Angus, Scotland - The Angus Blog

                                    A Offline
                                    A Offline
                                    Anna Jayne Metcalfe
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #21

                                    ...but justified, I think. The UN did themselves no favours by dithering while people died. It should have got involved in the Balkans long before it did. Anna :rose: Homepage | My life in tears

                                    "Be yourself - not what others think you should be"
                                    - Marcia Graesch

                                    Trouble with resource IDs? Try the Resource ID Organiser Add-In for Visual C++

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • O OCid

                                      Nitron wrote: The illegal (the UN didn’t approve the attack) They don't have to. Yes, they have to, otherwise US is violating the international legality and so invading a country unilaterally. G. Bush should pay his war crimes Nitron wrote: Not to link this issue with terrorism, but I forgot which UN resolution the approval of attacking the US with hijacked airplanes fell under? Can you remind me? UN condoned the 11th sept terrorist attack, but now US is committing another, probably more serious act of terrorism, government terrorism. There was no a single piece of evidence that there was a connection point between Iraq and Al Quaeda. Can you tell me what Iraq has to do with Bin Laden? Perhaps you don't know that it's Saudi Arabia who is supporting terrorist groups.

                                      N Offline
                                      N Offline
                                      Nitron
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #22

                                      OCid wrote: Yes, they have to, otherwise US is violating the international legality and so invading a country unilaterally. It is in the interest of our own national security, and is not illegal. OCid wrote: Can you tell me what Iraq has to do with Bin Laden? Perhaps you don't know that it's Saudi Arabia who is supporting terrorist groups. Nothing that I know of. I was just livid at the time over your useless post and should have abstained from responding at all. - Nitron


                                      "Those that say a task is impossible shouldn't interrupt the ones who are doing it." - Chinese Proverb

                                      O 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • O OCid

                                        Andrew Torrance wrote: If it is legality you seek then what about the legality of gassing your own people ? What about the legality of routine torture and murder of political opponents ? Sure, but what about the hundred of children that die everyday in Saudi Arabia because the lack of food when their dictators are rotted with money from the oil? Not to mention the situation of women there, many of them are simply slaves… What about North Korea? I could go on as well ... Why US only attacks Iraq and does nothing in the other countries? Andrew Torrance wrote: Nukes must remain a weapon of last resort . So do you really believe that Nukes dropped at Hiroshima and Nagashaki were the last resort?

                                        N Offline
                                        N Offline
                                        Nitron
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #23

                                        Dude, what about the people here in america that chain their own children to the bed and starve them! Evil and illegality exist everywhere, and if everyone was simply a cannibis sativa plantation owning pacifist, then the world would be even worse than it already is. - Nitron


                                        "Those that say a task is impossible shouldn't interrupt the ones who are doing it." - Chinese Proverb

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • O OCid

                                          Robert Edward Caldecott wrote: When this is over and Saddams stash of WMDs is found, the UN is going to look pretty stupid. When this is over and thousands of innocent citizens had been killed, the US is going to feel as Nazis.

                                          L Offline
                                          L Offline
                                          Lost User
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #24

                                          What about the HUNDREDS of thousands of innocents killed by Saddam? Funny how people conveniently forget about them as they fall over themselves to condemn the US/UK.


                                          When I am king, you will be first against the wall.

                                          O 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups