CP MVP 2015
-
So, that's everybody then? :laugh: When I said that the magic and astronomy spammers would be high on the list... :sigh:
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
-
So, that's everybody then? :laugh: When I said that the magic and astronomy spammers would be high on the list... :sigh:
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
OriginalGriff wrote:
When I said that the magic and astronomy spammers would be high on the list
I love the fact that Josh Smith is on there - nothing posted for at about 3 years.
Slacker007 wrote:
[Dalek] Dave would make a fine American.[^]
-
OriginalGriff wrote:
When I said that the magic and astronomy spammers would be high on the list
I love the fact that Josh Smith is on there - nothing posted for at about 3 years.
Slacker007 wrote:
[Dalek] Dave would make a fine American.[^]
Just proves the Hamsters can make mistakes, like the rest of us. Mind you, they made DD an MVP in 2011, so we already knew that! :laugh: [edit] And me of course, come to think of it... :-O [/edit]
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
-
OriginalGriff wrote:
When I said that the magic and astronomy spammers would be high on the list
I love the fact that Josh Smith is on there - nothing posted for at about 3 years.
Slacker007 wrote:
[Dalek] Dave would make a fine American.[^]
Chris explained this last year. Josh received the award because his articles are still incredibly popular, and attract huge amounts of upvotes. In other words, he's still providing value.
-
I can write articles until the cows come home, but I can't find the link! URGENTZ HLP PLZ! ;) Marc
Imperative to Functional Programming Succinctly Contributors Wanted for Higher Order Programming Project!
-
Chris explained this last year. Josh received the award because his articles are still incredibly popular, and attract huge amounts of upvotes. In other words, he's still providing value.
Oh yes, now I remember the discussion last year & it still doesn't make sense. What the award is saying is someone who probably didn't even log in in 2014 are more "valuable" to the site in that year than people who actually contributed something new because people are still up voting it. I feel able to say this as I've certainly not provided anything useful in the last year, or probably couple of years. I'm not saying Josh hasn't contributed overall, because he clearly has, but that the system is skewed to old hands with multiple articles under their belts.
Slacker007 wrote:
[Dalek] Dave would make a fine American.[^]
-
-
-
Cool - I made it this year :-) Did not get an email notification though.
Regards, Nish
Blog: voidnish.wordpress.com
-
Cool - I made it this year :-) Did not get an email notification though.
Regards, Nish
Blog: voidnish.wordpress.com
Its last year means 2014. I think 2015 CP MVP list will be released this upcoming Friday.. :)
-
This is link that will be update soon, May be this week http://www.codeproject.com/script/Awards/MVPWinners.aspx[^]
-
-
Its last year means 2014. I think 2015 CP MVP list will be released this upcoming Friday.. :)
-
This is link that will be update soon, May be this week http://www.codeproject.com/script/Awards/MVPWinners.aspx[^]
-
I noticed that's why I passed smiley in first response message.
