Account reactivation
-
Hi, munchies_matt (zzebowa(at)hotmail.com) has asked me if I could beg on his behalf for his account to be re-enabled; apparently at least ten people consider his posts to be spam.
-
Hi, munchies_matt (zzebowa(at)hotmail.com) has asked me if I could beg on his behalf for his account to be re-enabled; apparently at least ten people consider his posts to be spam.
Member 3859673 wrote:
apparently at least ten people consider his posts to be spam
I don't think its the case because now a days,name of those who reported his account gets displayed while in this case, it simply says unable to load member's information. Looks like his account got kicked by newly implemented spam filters. I would say, wait for Admins to respond.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
-
Hi, munchies_matt (zzebowa(at)hotmail.com) has asked me if I could beg on his behalf for his account to be re-enabled; apparently at least ten people consider his posts to be spam.
Thanks dude. Well I never, spam eh? At least I know who the perpetrators are! :mad: ;)
Sign a petition calling for the boycott of Israel until it returns to its legal 1967 borders.
-
Thanks dude. Well I never, spam eh? At least I know who the perpetrators are! :mad: ;)
Sign a petition calling for the boycott of Israel until it returns to its legal 1967 borders.
-
Thanks dude. Well I never, spam eh? At least I know who the perpetrators are! :mad: ;)
Sign a petition calling for the boycott of Israel until it returns to its legal 1967 borders.
Your message has just been kicked from the Lounge. Nothing wrong with it at all!
Slacker007 wrote:
[Dalek] Dave would make a fine American.[^]
-
He/they are - see the Lounge. This member[^] despite pretty much solely commenting on the articles has taken exception to Fat Boy's boycott Israel sig in the Lounge. It seems he's gone through FB's posts and immediately flange them, and has done so for about the first 10 in his history. I don't think he has told FB why he has done this, it was only when Mark raised the issue that anything was said.
Slacker007 wrote:
[Dalek] Dave would make a fine American.[^]
-
He/they are - see the Lounge. This member[^] despite pretty much solely commenting on the articles has taken exception to Fat Boy's boycott Israel sig in the Lounge. It seems he's gone through FB's posts and immediately flange them, and has done so for about the first 10 in his history. I don't think he has told FB why he has done this, it was only when Mark raised the issue that anything was said.
Slacker007 wrote:
[Dalek] Dave would make a fine American.[^]
-
He/they are - see the Lounge. This member[^] despite pretty much solely commenting on the articles has taken exception to Fat Boy's boycott Israel sig in the Lounge. It seems he's gone through FB's posts and immediately flange them, and has done so for about the first 10 in his history. I don't think he has told FB why he has done this, it was only when Mark raised the issue that anything was said.
Slacker007 wrote:
[Dalek] Dave would make a fine American.[^]
I see, thanks for the heads up. Surely it needs more than one vote to get a message deleted so I wonder who else agrees with political censorship?
Sign a petition calling for the boycott of Israel until it returns to its legal 1967 borders.
-
Your message has just been kicked from the Lounge. Nothing wrong with it at all!
Slacker007 wrote:
[Dalek] Dave would make a fine American.[^]
I have a stalker or six! :) Clearly my political opinion of Israel upsets some people and rather than allow freedom of expression they decide to try to curtail it in the way Parisien Islamicists do.
Sign a petition calling for the boycott of Israel until it returns to its legal 1967 borders.
-
I see, thanks for the heads up. Surely it needs more than one vote to get a message deleted so I wonder who else agrees with political censorship?
Sign a petition calling for the boycott of Israel until it returns to its legal 1967 borders.
Munchies_Matt wrote:
Surely it needs more than one vote to get a message deleted
I raised the question two threads above this one.
Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello
-
I see, thanks for the heads up. Surely it needs more than one vote to get a message deleted so I wonder who else agrees with political censorship?
Sign a petition calling for the boycott of Israel until it returns to its legal 1967 borders.
And to answer your question, I don't agree with any kind of censorship!
Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello
-
I have a stalker or six! :) Clearly my political opinion of Israel upsets some people and rather than allow freedom of expression they decide to try to curtail it in the way Parisien Islamicists do.
Sign a petition calling for the boycott of Israel until it returns to its legal 1967 borders.
I suspect there are people who object to your signature as it is (under a strict interpretation of the rules) political opinion, and thus should be in the Soapbox. Personally, I don't have a problem with it, even though I disagree with it.
Sign a petition to send Fatboy back to the future. :)
-
I suspect there are people who object to your signature as it is (under a strict interpretation of the rules) political opinion, and thus should be in the Soapbox. Personally, I don't have a problem with it, even though I disagree with it.
Sign a petition to send Fatboy back to the future. :)
Ah, it isn't political, it calls for an enforcement of international law as laid down by the UN! ;P
Sign a petition calling for the boycott of Israel until it returns to its legal 1967 borders.
-
Ah, it isn't political, it calls for an enforcement of international law as laid down by the UN! ;P
Sign a petition calling for the boycott of Israel until it returns to its legal 1967 borders.
-
Paragraph 4 in the sticky.
Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello
-
I suspect there are people who object to your signature as it is (under a strict interpretation of the rules) political opinion, and thus should be in the Soapbox. Personally, I don't have a problem with it, even though I disagree with it.
Sign a petition to send Fatboy back to the future. :)
I know of at least one person who objected to it. The thread on it was quite entertaining to watch yesterday.
-
And to answer your question, I don't agree with any kind of censorship!
Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello
-
Jörgen Andersson wrote:
I don't agree with any kind of censorship!
It's a political link, which is not allowed in the Lounge.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
True, and I don't have any personal problems with that. Which means I don't post politics in the lounge. And if someone does I tell them so, there's the difference. So it doesn't mean I have to agree on censorship. And BTW, neither is spam, do you want to go on a crusade against spammy signatures too? :rolleyes:
Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello
-
True, and I don't have any personal problems with that. Which means I don't post politics in the lounge. And if someone does I tell them so, there's the difference. So it doesn't mean I have to agree on censorship. And BTW, neither is spam, do you want to go on a crusade against spammy signatures too? :rolleyes:
Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello
Jörgen Andersson wrote:
So it doesn't mean I have to agree on censorship.
My point is, there is no such thing as full free speech in the lounge. The lounge rules have specific censorship rules. If someone is not following the rules, there's nothing wrong with reporting them and there's nothing wrong with not reporting them.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.