There is no justice!
-
Why are the good people of USA dropping big bombs on (almost) defenseless Iraq? Oh, you mean it is because they have weapons of mass destruction? Are the WMD they have more powerful and deadly than than those you are using right now? Apparently killing people is fine, as long as you follow the rules set by the western civilization. What kind of crap is that? If I am to fight Mike Typson, I will be a damn fool if I follow any boxing rules. I would use feet, rocks, kitchen utensils, and whatever sharp objects I could find. The biggest mistake the Iraqi leaders made is that they failed to acquire any usable nuclear weapon. If they had, Bush would think twice before selecting Iraq to pick on. The world is a much safer place if every country has at least one nuclear weapon!
-
Why are the good people of USA dropping big bombs on (almost) defenseless Iraq? Oh, you mean it is because they have weapons of mass destruction? Are the WMD they have more powerful and deadly than than those you are using right now? Apparently killing people is fine, as long as you follow the rules set by the western civilization. What kind of crap is that? If I am to fight Mike Typson, I will be a damn fool if I follow any boxing rules. I would use feet, rocks, kitchen utensils, and whatever sharp objects I could find. The biggest mistake the Iraqi leaders made is that they failed to acquire any usable nuclear weapon. If they had, Bush would think twice before selecting Iraq to pick on. The world is a much safer place if every country has at least one nuclear weapon!
Yeah the world started improving the day Iraq got mustard gas and used it on the Kurds .... :rolleyes: Uptight Ex-Military Republican married to a Commie Lib - How weird is that?
-
Why are the good people of USA dropping big bombs on (almost) defenseless Iraq? Oh, you mean it is because they have weapons of mass destruction? Are the WMD they have more powerful and deadly than than those you are using right now? Apparently killing people is fine, as long as you follow the rules set by the western civilization. What kind of crap is that? If I am to fight Mike Typson, I will be a damn fool if I follow any boxing rules. I would use feet, rocks, kitchen utensils, and whatever sharp objects I could find. The biggest mistake the Iraqi leaders made is that they failed to acquire any usable nuclear weapon. If they had, Bush would think twice before selecting Iraq to pick on. The world is a much safer place if every country has at least one nuclear weapon!
Man you are full of it:mad: Perhaps you should move this to the Soapbox. What WMD are we using right now?
$TeVe McLeNiThAn
-
Why are the good people of USA dropping big bombs on (almost) defenseless Iraq? Oh, you mean it is because they have weapons of mass destruction? Are the WMD they have more powerful and deadly than than those you are using right now? Apparently killing people is fine, as long as you follow the rules set by the western civilization. What kind of crap is that? If I am to fight Mike Typson, I will be a damn fool if I follow any boxing rules. I would use feet, rocks, kitchen utensils, and whatever sharp objects I could find. The biggest mistake the Iraqi leaders made is that they failed to acquire any usable nuclear weapon. If they had, Bush would think twice before selecting Iraq to pick on. The world is a much safer place if every country has at least one nuclear weapon!
abc wrote: The biggest mistake the Iraqi leaders made is that they failed to acquire any usable nuclear weapon. If they had, Bush would think twice before selecting Iraq to pick on. yes. that's probably true. but, there's a really good chance the UN or the US would have invaded a long time ago, if they thought Saddam was anywhere near getting nukes. -c
Image tools: ThumbNailer, Bobber, TIFFAssembler
-
Yeah the world started improving the day Iraq got mustard gas and used it on the Kurds .... :rolleyes: Uptight Ex-Military Republican married to a Commie Lib - How weird is that?
"Yeah the world started improving the day Iraq got mustard gas and used it on the Kurds .... " Yes, with the help from USA. But those things are not worth mentioning. Inventing atomic bomb and testing it on real people to ensure quality, that is what I call progress ...
-
"Yeah the world started improving the day Iraq got mustard gas and used it on the Kurds .... " Yes, with the help from USA. But those things are not worth mentioning. Inventing atomic bomb and testing it on real people to ensure quality, that is what I call progress ...
abc wrote: Inventing atomic bomb and testing it on real people to ensure quality, that is what I call progress ... :wtf: No, they did it to end WW2 and we haven't used one since ..... But of course your going to tell me that invading the island of Japan and fighting street to street would have been better ..... Uptight Ex-Military Republican married to a Commie Lib - How weird is that?
-
Man you are full of it:mad: Perhaps you should move this to the Soapbox. What WMD are we using right now?
$TeVe McLeNiThAn
"Perhaps you should move this to the Soapbox." If people can take the live coverage of bombing of Iraq on CNN, then they should be strong enough to read my little post. "What WMD are we using right now?" Well, I forgot the name of it. It is that 2000+ pound thing, plus many other devices that look like thunder and lightening when they explode?
-
abc wrote: Inventing atomic bomb and testing it on real people to ensure quality, that is what I call progress ... :wtf: No, they did it to end WW2 and we haven't used one since ..... But of course your going to tell me that invading the island of Japan and fighting street to street would have been better ..... Uptight Ex-Military Republican married to a Commie Lib - How weird is that?
"No, they did it to end WW2 and we haven't used one since ....." Poor Saddam, if he had two of those babies he could end the war right now. "But of course your going to tell me that invading the island of Japan and fighting street to street would have been better ..... " No I am not going to tell you that. You have always been free to change the rule whenever you feel like it.
-
"Perhaps you should move this to the Soapbox." If people can take the live coverage of bombing of Iraq on CNN, then they should be strong enough to read my little post. "What WMD are we using right now?" Well, I forgot the name of it. It is that 2000+ pound thing, plus many other devices that look like thunder and lightening when they explode?
abc wrote: then they should be strong enough to read my little post True. abc wrote: that 2000+ pound thing Not quite a WMD. It only penetrates the surface to take out bunkers. Not level the surrounding area. abc wrote: devices that look like thunder and lightening That is the whole point of Shock & Awe. To scare the shit out of the enemy.
$TeVe McLeNiThAn
-
"Yeah the world started improving the day Iraq got mustard gas and used it on the Kurds .... " Yes, with the help from USA. But those things are not worth mentioning. Inventing atomic bomb and testing it on real people to ensure quality, that is what I call progress ...
abc wrote: Yes, with the help from USA. The US helped Iraq in their war against Iran. The US didn't do this so they could, or knowing they would, gas the Kurds. Gary Kirkham A working Program is one that has only unobserved bugs I thought I wanted a career, turns out I just wanted paychecks
-
Why are the good people of USA dropping big bombs on (almost) defenseless Iraq? Oh, you mean it is because they have weapons of mass destruction? Are the WMD they have more powerful and deadly than than those you are using right now? Apparently killing people is fine, as long as you follow the rules set by the western civilization. What kind of crap is that? If I am to fight Mike Typson, I will be a damn fool if I follow any boxing rules. I would use feet, rocks, kitchen utensils, and whatever sharp objects I could find. The biggest mistake the Iraqi leaders made is that they failed to acquire any usable nuclear weapon. If they had, Bush would think twice before selecting Iraq to pick on. The world is a much safer place if every country has at least one nuclear weapon!
abc wrote: The world is a much safer place if every country has at least one nuclear weapon! Interesting, I could use the same argument to say that the US, or any country, would be safer if all of its citizens owned a firearm. Gary Kirkham A working Program is one that has only unobserved bugs I thought I wanted a career, turns out I just wanted paychecks
-
"No, they did it to end WW2 and we haven't used one since ....." Poor Saddam, if he had two of those babies he could end the war right now. "But of course your going to tell me that invading the island of Japan and fighting street to street would have been better ..... " No I am not going to tell you that. You have always been free to change the rule whenever you feel like it.
abc wrote: Poor Saddam, if he had two of those babies he could end the war right now No it wouldn't. When I was in the Navy I was stationed on a ballistic missle submarine. The only thing Saddaam would accomplish (or the North Koreans) would be a rapid end of his nation. That was the purpose of having the ballistic missle sub, to act as a deterent to nuclear attack. abc wrote: ou have always been free to change the rule whenever you feel like it Nobody changed any rules, might makes right, its always been that way. The only hope is that people can act with compassion. Uptight Ex-Military Republican married to a Commie Lib - How weird is that?
-
"Perhaps you should move this to the Soapbox." If people can take the live coverage of bombing of Iraq on CNN, then they should be strong enough to read my little post. "What WMD are we using right now?" Well, I forgot the name of it. It is that 2000+ pound thing, plus many other devices that look like thunder and lightening when they explode?
About the same amount of explosive force that might be produce by say a car bomb? Yeah we've seen how the poor innocent terrorists have used them? Why don't you feel bad for the poor people that are oppresed by Sadaam or his sons? What do you really care for the Iraqi people if you are so busy worrying about Sadaam? Uptight Ex-Military Republican married to a Commie Lib - How weird is that?
-
Why are the good people of USA dropping big bombs on (almost) defenseless Iraq? Oh, you mean it is because they have weapons of mass destruction? Are the WMD they have more powerful and deadly than than those you are using right now? Apparently killing people is fine, as long as you follow the rules set by the western civilization. What kind of crap is that? If I am to fight Mike Typson, I will be a damn fool if I follow any boxing rules. I would use feet, rocks, kitchen utensils, and whatever sharp objects I could find. The biggest mistake the Iraqi leaders made is that they failed to acquire any usable nuclear weapon. If they had, Bush would think twice before selecting Iraq to pick on. The world is a much safer place if every country has at least one nuclear weapon!
:laugh: sorry, a little cricket dig, I might as well exploit the fact that this thread is in the lounge and not the soapbox, he he he. abc wrote: Mike Typson Mike Typo abc wrote: Why are the good people of USA dropping big bombs on (almost) defenseless Iraq? Plenty of reasons, one reason is to show to North Korea "Don't Play no freakin games with US!!" we don't play games. Later,
JoeSox
www.joeswammi.com
It's not easy facin' up when your whole world is black
Rolling Stones -
Man you are full of it:mad: Perhaps you should move this to the Soapbox. What WMD are we using right now?
$TeVe McLeNiThAn
Steve McLenithan wrote: What WMD are we using right now? MOAB sounds like a WMD to me. Not in the same class as a nuke, for sure (which Hussein never achieved), but far more destructive than the small amount of chemicals he's been able to deliver.
-
Steve McLenithan wrote: What WMD are we using right now? MOAB sounds like a WMD to me. Not in the same class as a nuke, for sure (which Hussein never achieved), but far more destructive than the small amount of chemicals he's been able to deliver.
Jim A. Johnson wrote: MOAB sounds like a WMD Oh definitly. I'm not say that one isn't. But USA has not used it yet, and may not have to. If/When it is used I would presume it would be on a large complex, and not in any kind of populated area. It would suffocate anyone in the area and level it quite extensively.
$TeVe McLeNiThAn
-
Why are the good people of USA dropping big bombs on (almost) defenseless Iraq? Oh, you mean it is because they have weapons of mass destruction? Are the WMD they have more powerful and deadly than than those you are using right now? Apparently killing people is fine, as long as you follow the rules set by the western civilization. What kind of crap is that? If I am to fight Mike Typson, I will be a damn fool if I follow any boxing rules. I would use feet, rocks, kitchen utensils, and whatever sharp objects I could find. The biggest mistake the Iraqi leaders made is that they failed to acquire any usable nuclear weapon. If they had, Bush would think twice before selecting Iraq to pick on. The world is a much safer place if every country has at least one nuclear weapon!
abc wrote: Oh, you mean it is because they have weapons of mass destruction? What do you mean by WMD? I think chemical, bio-logical and nuclear weapons come under that. As far as I know US haven't used them... abc wrote: The biggest mistake the Iraqi leaders made is that they failed to acquire any usable nuclear weapon. That's reason US attacking Iraq instead of North Korea. World Cup Cricket Final on March 23rd India vs Australia [^]
What is Cricket?[^] -
abc wrote: Yes, with the help from USA. The US helped Iraq in their war against Iran. The US didn't do this so they could, or knowing they would, gas the Kurds. Gary Kirkham A working Program is one that has only unobserved bugs I thought I wanted a career, turns out I just wanted paychecks
Gary Kirkham wrote: The US didn't do this so they could, or knowing they would, gas the Kurds. Even after Saddam attacked the Kurds in 85 (??), why US didn't bomb the Iraq? :suss: World Cup Cricket Final on March 23rd India vs Australia [^]
What is Cricket?[^] -
:laugh: sorry, a little cricket dig, I might as well exploit the fact that this thread is in the lounge and not the soapbox, he he he. abc wrote: Mike Typson Mike Typo abc wrote: Why are the good people of USA dropping big bombs on (almost) defenseless Iraq? Plenty of reasons, one reason is to show to North Korea "Don't Play no freakin games with US!!" we don't play games. Later,
JoeSox
www.joeswammi.com
It's not easy facin' up when your whole world is black
Rolling StonesJoeSox wrote: sorry, a little cricket dig, I might as well exploit the fact that this thread is in the lounge and not the soapbox, he he he. Screw it..Joe.. Nowadays the Lounge and Soapbox doesn't make any difference. :mad: On the othernote, good news for you. Worldcup Cricket will be over by this Sunday. :-O World Cup Cricket Final on March 23rd India vs Australia [^]
What is Cricket?[^] -
JoeSox wrote: sorry, a little cricket dig, I might as well exploit the fact that this thread is in the lounge and not the soapbox, he he he. Screw it..Joe.. Nowadays the Lounge and Soapbox doesn't make any difference. :mad: On the othernote, good news for you. Worldcup Cricket will be over by this Sunday. :-O World Cup Cricket Final on March 23rd India vs Australia [^]
What is Cricket?[^]Kant wrote: On the othernote, good news for you. Worldcup Cricket will be over by this Sunday. woo hoo!:jig: but really I don't care about the cricket posts, I just ignore them:laugh::laugh: post as many as you guys wish, but it sure is fun teasing you guys/gals about it, just like David W and his Elmo games. Later,
JoeSox
www.joeswammi.com
It's not easy facin' up when your whole world is black
Rolling Stones