Thought of the day
-
Never trust atoms: they make up everything.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
You're making it up! Ipso facto, I rest my case.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
-
Never trust atoms: they make up everything.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
-
At the risk of being pedantic :laugh: what about sub-atomic particles? Logically atoms can't make them.
How do you know so much about swallows? Well, you have to know these things when you're a king, you know.
-
Never trust atoms: they make up everything.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
-
-
Quarks are sub-atomic particles ;P
How do you know so much about swallows? Well, you have to know these things when you're a king, you know.
Well in a way, but that would be like saying sub-atomic particles are atoms or atoms are molecules, wouldn't it? :laugh:
You have just been Sharapova'd.
-
Well in a way, but that would be like saying sub-atomic particles are atoms or atoms are molecules, wouldn't it? :laugh:
You have just been Sharapova'd.
"Particle" is a pretty generic term that describes a small amount of matter. A particle can describe sand, dust, atoms, protons, neutrons, quarks, electrons or anything that makes up something larger. :)
How do you know so much about swallows? Well, you have to know these things when you're a king, you know.
-
"Particle" is a pretty generic term that describes a small amount of matter. A particle can describe sand, dust, atoms, protons, neutrons, quarks, electrons or anything that makes up something larger. :)
How do you know so much about swallows? Well, you have to know these things when you're a king, you know.
Didn't someone say "pedantic"? :laugh: In my defense, I would say when one says "sub-atomic", the idea generally converges to protons, electrons and neutrons. Of which, protons and neutrons are composed up of quarks. I was simply going after your post that atoms can't make up sub-atomic particles and simply meant quarks make up sub-atomic particles. :)
You have just been Sharapova'd.
-
Didn't someone say "pedantic"? :laugh: In my defense, I would say when one says "sub-atomic", the idea generally converges to protons, electrons and neutrons. Of which, protons and neutrons are composed up of quarks. I was simply going after your post that atoms can't make up sub-atomic particles and simply meant quarks make up sub-atomic particles. :)
You have just been Sharapova'd.
-
Agent__007 wrote:
Didn't someone say "pedantic"?
Come on, we're software developers - it's part of our job description! :laugh:
How do you know so much about swallows? Well, you have to know these things when you're a king, you know.
:laugh: :thumbsup:
You have just been Sharapova'd.
