Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Friendly Fire always seems to be American

Friendly Fire always seems to be American

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
question
66 Posts 18 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Jason Henderson

    More anti-US crap out of Karl the commie. X|

    Jason Henderson
    "You must be the change you wish to see in the world." - Gandhi

    articles profile

    K Offline
    K Offline
    KaRl
    wrote on last edited by
    #38

    All I describe are historical facts. Where the crap?


    Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • J Jeremy Falcon

      Sean Reilly wrote: In your own paranoid mind. What was it you said .. Just so you can get your stupid insults straight... par·a·noid adj.

      1. Relating to, characteristic of, or affected with paranoia.
      2. Exhibiting or characterized by extreme and irrational fear or distrust of others: a paranoid suspicion that the phone might be bugged.

      Sean Reilly wrote: what of it? Would you like to find hordes of people insulting your homeland without real reason aside from propaganda? Sean Reilly wrote: Is there some rule of law that prohibits people from voicing disquiet over American actions I sorta agree. We should let the Neanderthals kill themselves. Sean Reilly wrote: Is the US Heaven? Does God live in the White House? Inquiring minds want to know ... You're making my job of making you look asinine way too easy. Jeremy Falcon

      S Offline
      S Offline
      Sean Reilly
      wrote on last edited by
      #39

      Jeremy Falcon wrote: Would you like to find hordes of people insulting your homeland without real reason aside from propaganda? You really have swallowed the party line. So, there is nothing that anyone can fairly criticise the US about then? It's all just propoganda. Jeremy Falcon wrote: You're making my job of making you look asinine way too easy. Funny that you would see it that way. Somone makes a fair criticism of the US and you're off on a crusade ... I guess that explains a lot. Jeremy Falcon wrote: I sorta agree. We should let the Neanderthals kill themselves. You were talking about looking asinine ...

      J 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • C Chris Austin

        That is intersting KaЯl. I would venture to guess that the lower number may be a result of the increased use of air power to "shape" targets. But, it does seem like a small force to me. Hey don't worry, I can handle it. I took something. I can see things no one else can see. Why are you dressed like that? - Jack Burton

        K Offline
        K Offline
        KaRl
        wrote on last edited by
        #40

        Whatever the air power, ground forces are needed to occupy the field, especially infantry troops. Air control eases the attack, but doesn't guarantee by itself the victory, IMHO.


        Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop

        D L 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • D Doug Goulden

          Ohhhhhhh....... BTW I don't recall saying I was one of God's own people, not anymore than anyone else anyway, although I am considered quite handsome :-D Uptight Ex-Military Republican married to a Commie Lib - How weird is that?

          S Offline
          S Offline
          Sean Reilly
          wrote on last edited by
          #41

          Doug Goulden wrote: ... although I am considered quite handsome "Mirror, mirror on the wall ..." doesn't count. :| And I don't recall saying that you had referred to yourself as the offspring of a deity ... I was merely "taking the sense" as Maggie was wont to say.

          D 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S Sean Reilly

            Richard Stringer wrote: The guy , Sean, is an idiot anyway so don't cloud is silly little head with any facts. He probably is the type who runs from poodles or anyone over 5' tall. But he is a legend in his own mind. Marvelous wit, not to mention linguistic talent, you display there. Why would this be? Because someone dares to voice an opinion you dislike? I suppose you'll now come and invade my home and "americanise" me.

            R Offline
            R Offline
            Richard Stringer
            wrote on last edited by
            #42

            Won't need to - McDonalds-CNN-Levis-the net - they have already 'americanized' you. However I don't think that there is a cure for the illness that you have. It seems to be particularly European. Oh what the hell - we'll own the whole damn place anyway if a short time so why sweat the small stuff. Richard In Italy for thirty years under the Borgias they had warfare, terror, murder and bloodshed but they produced Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci and the Renaissance. In Switzerland, they had brotherly love; they had five hundred years of democracy and peace and what did that produce? The cuckoo clock. Orson Welles

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • S Sean Reilly

              Jeremy Falcon wrote: Would you like to find hordes of people insulting your homeland without real reason aside from propaganda? You really have swallowed the party line. So, there is nothing that anyone can fairly criticise the US about then? It's all just propoganda. Jeremy Falcon wrote: You're making my job of making you look asinine way too easy. Funny that you would see it that way. Somone makes a fair criticism of the US and you're off on a crusade ... I guess that explains a lot. Jeremy Falcon wrote: I sorta agree. We should let the Neanderthals kill themselves. You were talking about looking asinine ...

              J Offline
              J Offline
              Jeremy Falcon
              wrote on last edited by
              #43

              Sean Reilly wrote: So, there is nothing that anyone can fairly criticise the US about then? I never said that. And there is a difference between constructive criticism and a blithe troll. Sean Reilly wrote: Somone makes a fair criticism of the US Refer to my previous statement. Sean Reilly wrote: You were talking about looking asinine ... Yes I was. :) Jeremy Falcon

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • K KaRl

                Paul Belikian wrote: Maybe it's because most of the 300,000 troops are American? Intersting point. How many Americans are in Iraq and how many of them are fighting troops "on the field" (ie not services, intendance, HQ..) ? US Army is known to have a lot of services to follow the battle core. During WW2, Marshall hoped to make 212 divisions with 8 millions men, but finally could only make 90 (+ the armoured divisions? can't remember), because of the inflation of the services. So I wonder how many troops the US really use. Even 300 000 men seem pretty a pretty low number to take and control such a big country.


                Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop

                P Offline
                P Offline
                Paul Belikian
                wrote on last edited by
                #44

                Well, the object of the war is not to take control of the country; it's to free the Iraqi people. ;P It's very interesting that France wants a huge part in rebuilding Iraq. I wonder if it has anything to do with the fact that they will be losing billions in oil contracts if Saddam is out and the US/UK are in?

                D K B 3 Replies Last reply
                0
                • S Sean Reilly

                  Apologist? For what exactly? Look, pointing out the inhuman lunacy of the Iraqi regime isn't exactly going to alter the fact that over the course of the last half-dozen or so conflicts that allied troops have been involved in, the overwhelming majority of "freindly fire" incidents have been perpetrated by US forces. Next you'll be dragging up Pol Pot as an example of "friendly fire". Human shields are not "friendly fire" in the military sense - as you well know, being an ex-military type!

                  D Offline
                  D Offline
                  Doug Goulden
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #45

                  Didn't mean to imply that it was the same thing, just aggrevated that everything in here is anti-American. Seriously though, and a lot more on topic, I think that there is probably no greater chance of an individual American soldier being killed by friendly fire than there is for anyone else. With body armor and a lot of the training these guys get, the incidence is probably less. I think you cn probably attribute most of the friendly fire incidents into 2 categories. 1. Technical failure - A supposedly high tech automated weapon, like a smart bomb, or Patriot missle going off course. 2. Mistaken identity - Shooting at the wrong person, or being in the wrong place. I seriously doubt the Iraqis have to much problem with smart weapons malfunctioning. And infantrymen don't have to be worried about being involved in vehicle accidents. So I think it really boils down to the reality that the US has had many more troops in the field than most any country with a free media. Do you think that Saddam Hussein or the Taliban would allow there media to report on a "friendly fire" episode? I think friendly fire has probably been around since cavemen started chucking spears at one another, the difference is now we hear about it. Uptight Ex-Military Republican married to a Commie Lib - How weird is that?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S Sean Reilly

                    Doug Goulden wrote: ... although I am considered quite handsome "Mirror, mirror on the wall ..." doesn't count. :| And I don't recall saying that you had referred to yourself as the offspring of a deity ... I was merely "taking the sense" as Maggie was wont to say.

                    D Offline
                    D Offline
                    Doug Goulden
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #46

                    Sean Reilly wrote: I was merely "taking the sense" as Maggie was wont to say I'm afraid I'm not familiar with the phrase, not to be ignorant .... Maggie ? Thatcher, Margaret Thatcher?:confused: Is this some kinda stump the American game?;) Uptight Ex-Military Republican married to a Commie Lib - How weird is that?

                    S 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • K KaRl

                      Whatever the air power, ground forces are needed to occupy the field, especially infantry troops. Air control eases the attack, but doesn't guarantee by itself the victory, IMHO.


                      Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop

                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      Doug Goulden
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #47

                      Karl I'm starting to think you are a war groupie, if I could read your website :wtf: I might be able to tell.:-D Uptight Ex-Military Republican married to a Commie Lib - How weird is that?

                      K 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • P Paul Belikian

                        Well, the object of the war is not to take control of the country; it's to free the Iraqi people. ;P It's very interesting that France wants a huge part in rebuilding Iraq. I wonder if it has anything to do with the fact that they will be losing billions in oil contracts if Saddam is out and the US/UK are in?

                        D Offline
                        D Offline
                        Doug Goulden
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #48

                        Money, self interest, betrayal? Surely not the French? :laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh: Uptight Ex-Military Republican married to a Commie Lib - How weird is that?

                        P 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • S Sean Reilly

                          I'm sure there is the odd incident where the side doing the firing isn't American, but I haven't heard of any. Is this trend due to the sheer prevalence of US forces and arms or due to a wider degree of incompetance? Even rated on a proportional basis, the Americans do seem to screw up a lot. Just goes to show - there's nothing more dangerous than a dumb user.

                          J Offline
                          J Offline
                          JoeSox
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #49

                          Sean Reilly wrote: Is this trend due to the sheer prevalence of US forces and arms or due to a wider degree of incompetance? Looks like its technology that is a main factor. http://news.ft.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=FT.com/StoryFT/FullStory&c=StoryFT&cid=1048313137225[^] Sean Reilly wrote: Even rated on a proportional basis, the Americans do seem to screw up a lot. I am sure you never screw up. Just imagine screwing up when you are in a multi-million dollar aircraft, and mainly because the instruments you trust are wrong.:eek::mad: besides it is just not Americans, looks like the British have fired on there own troops. Later,
                          JoeSox
                          www.joeswammi.com
                          USN Veteran 94-98[^]

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • K KaRl

                            Whatever the air power, ground forces are needed to occupy the field, especially infantry troops. Air control eases the attack, but doesn't guarantee by itself the victory, IMHO.


                            Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop

                            L Offline
                            L Offline
                            Lost User
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #50

                            KaЯl wrote: ground forces are needed to occupy the field We may be going on the assumption (right or wrong) that once liberated the Iraqis won't need to be occupied. Whip some aid on them, help them rebuild and let them go. Mike Mullikin :beer:

                            "I'm not calling you a liar but....I can't think of a way to finish that sentence." - Bart Simpson

                            K 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • D Doug Goulden

                              Sean Reilly wrote: I was merely "taking the sense" as Maggie was wont to say I'm afraid I'm not familiar with the phrase, not to be ignorant .... Maggie ? Thatcher, Margaret Thatcher?:confused: Is this some kinda stump the American game?;) Uptight Ex-Military Republican married to a Commie Lib - How weird is that?

                              S Offline
                              S Offline
                              Sean Reilly
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #51

                              LOL! Yes - Thatcher. Most of the "work" of British Government happens in committee meetings. Maggie would always chair the most important ones. It was a well know fact that at the end of the meeting, the Chair would "take the sense" of the meeting and this summarisation would essentially equate to policy moving forward. It was equally well known that Maggie's "sense" of the meeting was whatever she wanted it to be, regardless of what had really transpired. Of course, when I took the "sense" it was in a non-Maggie like manner, being a true Republican that I am (no - not a US Replublican, a Plato Republican actually [that should stump those who accuse me of "communism"]).

                              D 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • S Sean Reilly

                                Apologist? For what exactly? Look, pointing out the inhuman lunacy of the Iraqi regime isn't exactly going to alter the fact that over the course of the last half-dozen or so conflicts that allied troops have been involved in, the overwhelming majority of "freindly fire" incidents have been perpetrated by US forces. Next you'll be dragging up Pol Pot as an example of "friendly fire". Human shields are not "friendly fire" in the military sense - as you well know, being an ex-military type!

                                J Offline
                                J Offline
                                JoeSox
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #52

                                Sean Reilly wrote: the overwhelming majority of "freindly fire" incidents have been perpetrated by US forces. Who has the most troops over there?:wtf: Man, this happens in war, show me a war this hasn't happened in, and I will show you a cover-up. If you think the Americans are doing it on purpose, your looney. Later,
                                JoeSox
                                www.joeswammi.com
                                USN Veteran 94-98[^]

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • S Sean Reilly

                                  LOL! Yes - Thatcher. Most of the "work" of British Government happens in committee meetings. Maggie would always chair the most important ones. It was a well know fact that at the end of the meeting, the Chair would "take the sense" of the meeting and this summarisation would essentially equate to policy moving forward. It was equally well known that Maggie's "sense" of the meeting was whatever she wanted it to be, regardless of what had really transpired. Of course, when I took the "sense" it was in a non-Maggie like manner, being a true Republican that I am (no - not a US Replublican, a Plato Republican actually [that should stump those who accuse me of "communism"]).

                                  D Offline
                                  D Offline
                                  Doug Goulden
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #53

                                  Sean Reilly wrote: that should stump those who accuse me of "communism"]). I got it...... Not bad for a dumb American heh? So the question,if I have this right is where do you fall in the caste? I wanna be a philosopher-king, but I'm afraid I fall into the commoner caste. Plato the Republican Plato's Republic postulated a perfect aristocracy. It is divided into three castes; the commoners, the guardians, and the philosopher-kings. Their economics and ideologies fit their condition. The commoners compete in a Darwinian free-market environment, and thus provide the economic surplus needed to support the other two castes. The guardians are those who took, but did not pass, a ruling-class exam; they have police, army, and executive duties. The philosopher-kings are the best and the brightest; they run the system, and profit from it. Uptight Ex-Military Republican married to a Commie Lib - How weird is that?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • D Doug Goulden

                                    Money, self interest, betrayal? Surely not the French? :laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh: Uptight Ex-Military Republican married to a Commie Lib - How weird is that?

                                    P Offline
                                    P Offline
                                    Paul Belikian
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #54

                                    Of course not...they just want a peace of the pie! ;P:-D:(:-D;):)

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • S Sean Reilly

                                      I'm sure there is the odd incident where the side doing the firing isn't American, but I haven't heard of any. Is this trend due to the sheer prevalence of US forces and arms or due to a wider degree of incompetance? Even rated on a proportional basis, the Americans do seem to screw up a lot. Just goes to show - there's nothing more dangerous than a dumb user.

                                      M Offline
                                      M Offline
                                      Marc Clifton
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #55

                                      No, no, no. It's not the American firing the missile that's screwing up. It's the geek the Army hired to write the software that GUIDES the missile that's screwing up. Users will always be dumb. That's why we spend most of our time writing software that protects them from themselves. It's just harder to protect yourself from the software engineer and HIS/HER mistakes. Marc Help! I'm an AI running around in someone's f*cked up universe simulator.
                                      Sensitivity and ethnic diversity means celebrating difference, not hiding from it. - Christian Graus
                                      Every line of code is a liability - Taka Muraoka
                                      Microsoft deliberately adds arbitrary layers of complexity to make it difficult to deliver Windows features on non-Windows platforms--Microsoft's "Halloween files"

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • K KaRl

                                        Paul Belikian wrote: Maybe it's because most of the 300,000 troops are American? Intersting point. How many Americans are in Iraq and how many of them are fighting troops "on the field" (ie not services, intendance, HQ..) ? US Army is known to have a lot of services to follow the battle core. During WW2, Marshall hoped to make 212 divisions with 8 millions men, but finally could only make 90 (+ the armoured divisions? can't remember), because of the inflation of the services. So I wonder how many troops the US really use. Even 300 000 men seem pretty a pretty low number to take and control such a big country.


                                        Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop

                                        R Offline
                                        R Offline
                                        Richard Stringer
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #56

                                        KaЯl wrote: So I wonder how many troops the US really use. Even 300 000 men seem pretty a pretty low number to take and control such a big country Last estimate I heard was of about 325000 troops on the ground about 120000 are actual front line combat troops. Another interesting fact that must be worring Saddam just a bit ( if the despot is still capable of worring about anything ) is that our two elite army units - the 101'st Cav and the 82'd Airborne ( My old unit - and my fathers - and my sons ) are not yet , at least as far as published reports are concerned , fully deployeed. Maybe they are being held in reserve for the final push into Baghdad but who knows. Richard In Italy for thirty years under the Borgias they had warfare, terror, murder and bloodshed but they produced Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci and the Renaissance. In Switzerland, they had brotherly love; they had five hundred years of democracy and peace and what did that produce? The cuckoo clock. Orson Welles

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • S Sean Reilly

                                          I'm sure there is the odd incident where the side doing the firing isn't American, but I haven't heard of any. Is this trend due to the sheer prevalence of US forces and arms or due to a wider degree of incompetance? Even rated on a proportional basis, the Americans do seem to screw up a lot. Just goes to show - there's nothing more dangerous than a dumb user.

                                          B Offline
                                          B Offline
                                          Brad Jennings
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #57

                                          Sean Reilly wrote: Is this trend due to the sheer prevalence of US forces and arms or due to a wider degree of incompetance? Yeah, that's it, all Americans are retards. We're so stupid we have trouble feeding ourselves. Oh, by the way, thanks for spreading around the hate, we really needed it.:| Brad Jennings "if the golden arches shut shop, where else are the VB people going to get work." - Colin Davies

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups