Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. Buzzword Bingo
  4. The dictorial "we"

The dictorial "we"

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Buzzword Bingo
7 Posts 6 Posters 19 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Duncan Edwards Jones
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    (Per this definition[^]) I think we are going to need to put some extra time/effort into this deliverable.

    Richard DeemingR B L CPalliniC 4 Replies Last reply
    0
    • D Duncan Edwards Jones

      (Per this definition[^]) I think we are going to need to put some extra time/effort into this deliverable.

      Richard DeemingR Offline
      Richard DeemingR Offline
      Richard Deeming
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Usually forming part of a progression:

      1. I need to do X.
      2. When we do X, we also need to do Y.
      3. Why haven't you done X, Y and Z yet?!

      :rolleyes:


      "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

      "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined" - Homer

      E 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • D Duncan Edwards Jones

        (Per this definition[^]) I think we are going to need to put some extra time/effort into this deliverable.

        B Offline
        B Offline
        BiggerDon
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Know someone who has a boss like this. When she addresses the underlings in an email about that "we" need to do more with less blahblahblah the email leads with "Dear People".

        cat fud heer

        D 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • B BiggerDon

          Know someone who has a boss like this. When she addresses the underlings in an email about that "we" need to do more with less blahblahblah the email leads with "Dear People".

          cat fud heer

          D Offline
          D Offline
          Duncan Edwards Jones
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Ouch..

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • D Duncan Edwards Jones

            (Per this definition[^]) I think we are going to need to put some extra time/effort into this deliverable.

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Lost User
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            When people start talking in plural, then it better be the pluralis majestatis[^], otherwise it's a very bad sign. When someone starts talking about what 'we' do or don't do, just start to address him sarcastically with 'mylord' or something like that. If you can't beat them, confuse them.

            The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
            This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a fucking golf cart.
            "I don't know, extraterrestrial?" "You mean like from space?" "No, from Canada." If software development were a circus, we would all be the clowns.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • D Duncan Edwards Jones

              (Per this definition[^]) I think we are going to need to put some extra time/effort into this deliverable.

              CPalliniC Offline
              CPalliniC Offline
              CPallini
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Been there, heard that. :-D

              In testa che avete, signor di Ceprano?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Richard DeemingR Richard Deeming

                Usually forming part of a progression:

                1. I need to do X.
                2. When we do X, we also need to do Y.
                3. Why haven't you done X, Y and Z yet?!

                :rolleyes:


                "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                E Offline
                E Offline
                Evil Iceblock
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                This is my favorite, and it isn't even limited to work either. It actually reminds me of politicians. They like to say "we" a lot, as if they know what half the country has been through - yet they're the ones with fancy vacations and big houses, etc. Lol.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                Reply
                • Reply as topic
                Log in to reply
                • Oldest to Newest
                • Newest to Oldest
                • Most Votes


                • Login

                • Don't have an account? Register

                • Login or register to search.
                • First post
                  Last post
                0
                • Categories
                • Recent
                • Tags
                • Popular
                • World
                • Users
                • Groups