Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Who/What am I

Who/What am I

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
questiondesign
46 Posts 24 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Sander RosselS Sander Rossel

    Like? Use unsafe code... If I wanted unsafe I wouldn't go with C# either! And there's some stuff VB can do that C# can't too :)

    Visit my blog at Sander's bits - Writing the code you need. Or read my articles at my CodeProject profile.

    Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability. — Edsger W. Dijkstra

    Regards, Sander

    N Offline
    N Offline
    Nicholas Marty
    wrote on last edited by
    #31

    Case sensivity... It's just a horrible mess in VB..

    public class Demo {
    public string Name { get; set; }
    public Demo (string name) {
    Name = name;
    }
    }

    Public Class Demo
    Public Property Name As String
    Public Sub New(name As String)
    Name = name
    End Sub
    End Class

    Guess what? C# assigns the property in the constructor, whereas VB.Net doesn't... :)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Sander RosselS Sander Rossel

      But at least you know what you're ending! :) And really, is all that hatred towards VB because of some End If instead of }?

      Visit my blog at Sander's bits - Writing the code you need. Or read my articles at my CodeProject profile.

      Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability. — Edsger W. Dijkstra

      Regards, Sander

      B Offline
      B Offline
      Brady Kelly
      wrote on last edited by
      #32

      Sander Rossel wrote:

      But at least you know what you're ending

      I should only need to know that I'm ending a code block.

      And really, is all that hatred towards VB because of some End If instead of }?

      It's so much more than that. :laugh:

      No object is so beautiful that, under certain conditions, it will not look ugly. - Oscar Wilde

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Sander RosselS Sander Rossel

        Actually most basics are pretty indispensable! Try becoming a good programmer (or anything) without mastering the basics :)

        Visit my blog at Sander's bits - Writing the code you need. Or read my articles at my CodeProject profile.

        Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability. — Edsger W. Dijkstra

        Regards, Sander

        W Offline
        W Offline
        W Balboos GHB
        wrote on last edited by
        #33

        Sander Rossel wrote:

        Try becoming a good programmer (or anything) without mastering the basics

        Perhaps you're not familiar with the concept of "Management" ? ? ? And, at the risk of being redundantly redundant:   What about those people about whom it is said "He's good for nothing".

        "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein

        "As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error." - Weisert

        "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010

        F 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • A Amarnath S

          IMHO, a good rule is: 1. Make it work. 2. Then make it work better - run faster, use lesser memory, use better algorithms, etc.; essentially optimize. Have seen people creating elaborate UML diagrams, only to find shortcomings in the code. In one extreme case, the code (C++) did not run; then the coder globally replaced all private by public, and it ran; throwing away all encapsulation to the wind; fixing this was a nightmare :-)

          K Offline
          K Offline
          kalberts
          wrote on last edited by
          #34

          The first law of optimization: Don't do it The second law of optimization: If you HAVE to do it, don't do it yet! The only real optimization you can do is to replace your algorithm or data structures (or both). That means you go back to square one (not necessarily for the entire system, but for that part you try to optimize), and the two laws above still applies.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Sander RosselS Sander Rossel

            Well, VB can only do everything C# can. It only has no curly braces and semi-colons. I guess VB isn't for you if you just love those curly braces and semi-colons...

            Visit my blog at Sander's bits - Writing the code you need. Or read my articles at my CodeProject profile.

            Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability. — Edsger W. Dijkstra

            Regards, Sander

            E Offline
            E Offline
            Eric Whitmore
            wrote on last edited by
            #35

            While doing linq in VB.NET is possible it is implemented much better in C#.

            Eric

            Sander RosselS C 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • E Eric Whitmore

              While doing linq in VB.NET is possible it is implemented much better in C#.

              Eric

              Sander RosselS Offline
              Sander RosselS Offline
              Sander Rossel
              wrote on last edited by
              #36

              Eric Whitmore wrote:

              linq in VB.NET is possible

              It's as possible as in C#![^] I don't see how that's better or worse than C#... :confused:

              Visit my blog at Sander's bits - Writing the code you need. Or read my articles at my CodeProject profile.

              Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability. — Edsger W. Dijkstra

              Regards, Sander

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • W W Balboos GHB

                Sander Rossel wrote:

                Try becoming a good programmer (or anything) without mastering the basics

                Perhaps you're not familiar with the concept of "Management" ? ? ? And, at the risk of being redundantly redundant:   What about those people about whom it is said "He's good for nothing".

                "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein

                "As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error." - Weisert

                "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010

                F Offline
                F Offline
                Freak30
                wrote on last edited by
                #37

                W∴ Balboos wrote:

                And, at the risk of being redundantly redundant:   What about those people about whom it is said "He's good for nothing".

                No one is good for nothing. He can always be used as a bad example. :-D

                The good thing about pessimism is, that you are always either right or pleasently surprised.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Sander RosselS Sander Rossel

                  You're right, it does more than C#! :D I've never used that one though :laugh: I wonder if it's just a shorthand for an empty catch block... In that case C# supports it too ;)

                  Visit my blog at Sander's bits - Writing the code you need. Or read my articles at my CodeProject profile.

                  Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability. — Edsger W. Dijkstra

                  Regards, Sander

                  G Offline
                  G Offline
                  greldak
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #38

                  Used properly it allows you to code try catch blocks : : : on error resume next perform_some_action_which_may_generate_an_error on error goto 0 test_and_act_upon_err_object : : : unfortunately most people forget to do the testing part.

                  Sander RosselS 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • E Eric Whitmore

                    While doing linq in VB.NET is possible it is implemented much better in C#.

                    Eric

                    C Offline
                    C Offline
                    crazedDotNetDev
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #39

                    I've used LINQ in both C# and VB.net... a lot. Once again, there is no real difference between the two languages. C# has better syntax; it makes you look smarter. VB.net gives you a better idea of what's actually happening; it educates you. .NET is the magic here. C# and VB.net are just twin languages riding its glory.

                    - great coders make code look easy - When humans are doing things computers could be doing instead, the computers get together late at night and laugh at us. - ¿Neal Ford?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • K kmoorevs

                      Depressed? Relax and On Error Resume Next...get it working, then make it work right! In software there's always room for improvement! :laugh:

                      "Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse

                      C Offline
                      C Offline
                      crazedDotNetDev
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #40

                      Quote:

                      Relax and On Error Resume Next

                      :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: That needs to be on a t-shirt!!!

                      - great coders make code look easy - When humans are doing things computers could be doing instead, the computers get together late at night and laugh at us. - ¿Neal Ford?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • G greldak

                        Used properly it allows you to code try catch blocks : : : on error resume next perform_some_action_which_may_generate_an_error on error goto 0 test_and_act_upon_err_object : : : unfortunately most people forget to do the testing part.

                        Sander RosselS Offline
                        Sander RosselS Offline
                        Sander Rossel
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #41

                        Not sure what that does, but it's possible in C# as well :D

                        Visit my blog at Sander's bits - Writing the code you need. Or read my articles at my CodeProject profile.

                        Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability. — Edsger W. Dijkstra

                        Regards, Sander

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • C codejet

                          I has been said many times that be able to code does not necessarily make you a programmer/developer. I just realised that I am one of those people who can write code that works pretty well. I'm not always proud of my methods (don't mean methods as in procedures) and design, most of the time I do whatever works. I get my code to work by any means necessary. I guess I am not a programmer/developer even though that is the my official position at work. Question is who/what am I?

                          S Offline
                          S Offline
                          StatementTerminator
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #42

                          codejet wrote:

                          Question is who/what am I?

                          This is called a Voight-Kampff machine. You’ve got a little boy. He shows you his butterfly collection plus the killing jar...

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • B Brady Kelly

                            Sander Rossel wrote:

                            f you just love those curly braces and semi-colons...

                            A simple } looks lot better that bloody End IF, End For, End Select, and End Using all over the bloody place.

                            No object is so beautiful that, under certain conditions, it will not look ugly. - Oscar Wilde

                            P Offline
                            P Offline
                            Peter Adam
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #43

                            Except when your code blocks are catchs in ifs in switchs.

                            B 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • C codejet

                              I has been said many times that be able to code does not necessarily make you a programmer/developer. I just realised that I am one of those people who can write code that works pretty well. I'm not always proud of my methods (don't mean methods as in procedures) and design, most of the time I do whatever works. I get my code to work by any means necessary. I guess I am not a programmer/developer even though that is the my official position at work. Question is who/what am I?

                              C Offline
                              C Offline
                              carlospc1970
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #44

                              You are like most of the successful professionals. The best programmers solve problems with whatever is given and provide solutions by any means necessary. So, you solve problems. Be proud!! :cool:

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • P Peter Adam

                                Except when your code blocks are catchs in ifs in switchs.

                                B Offline
                                B Offline
                                Brady Kelly
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #45

                                If you're doing that, you need more help than just a VB.NET End can give. :~

                                No object is so beautiful that, under certain conditions, it will not look ugly. - Oscar Wilde

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Sander RosselS Sander Rossel

                                  There is no finer language on earth!

                                  Visit my blog at Sander's bits - Writing the code you need. Or read my articles at my CodeProject profile.

                                  Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability. — Edsger W. Dijkstra

                                  Regards, Sander

                                  O Offline
                                  O Offline
                                  ozel dedektif
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #46

                                  woww! very fantastic özel dedektif

                                  http://bydedektif.com

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  Reply
                                  • Reply as topic
                                  Log in to reply
                                  • Oldest to Newest
                                  • Newest to Oldest
                                  • Most Votes


                                  • Login

                                  • Don't have an account? Register

                                  • Login or register to search.
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Categories
                                  • Recent
                                  • Tags
                                  • Popular
                                  • World
                                  • Users
                                  • Groups