Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Moon crossing the face of the earth

Moon crossing the face of the earth

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
comfunctionalannouncement
20 Posts 11 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Amarnath S

    :thumbsup: One question: In this picture, the Moon is between Earth and Sun. The camera is between Moon and Sun. Now, the Sun is illuminating both Moon and Earth. Should not the Moon be seen brighter than Earth; the Moon is closer to the Sun, and hence more brightly illuminated. However, the Moon is seen as dull, and the Earth as bright. Can this apparent brightness of Earth be attributed to the blue water all around? Whereas Moon is without water, and may be absorbing more light than it reflects? Is something not correct in the above argument?

    G Offline
    G Offline
    glennPattonWork3
    wrote on last edited by
    #8

    I think if remember the moons actual colour is a sort of dirty grey rather than the yellow commonly associated with it. I seem to remember there was a Mythbusters episode devoted to it. the reoglith does reflect at an angle to seem bright or something!:confused:

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

      Well, yeah. But it's really difficult to measure the albedo of a star or black hole... :laugh:

      Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #9

      Of a star not really, of a black hole yes...very difficult where limes likes to go :laugh:

      OriginalGriffO 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Lost User

        Of a star not really, of a black hole yes...very difficult where limes likes to go :laugh:

        OriginalGriffO Offline
        OriginalGriffO Offline
        OriginalGriff
        wrote on last edited by
        #10

        It's probably the other way round: Albedo of a black hole[^] But a star? The light emitted is so huge that it's going to be really difficult to spot the reflection, even if the star emitting it is pretty close! :laugh: That's my guess, anyway.

        Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

        "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
        "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt

        L 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

          It's probably the other way round: Albedo of a black hole[^] But a star? The light emitted is so huge that it's going to be really difficult to spot the reflection, even if the star emitting it is pretty close! :laugh: That's my guess, anyway.

          Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Lost User
          wrote on last edited by
          #11

          Yes I agree. But fact is Albedo of stars are Facts, Albedo of black hole are theory, at this time. Also looking Forward to _really_ prove the later ones :) Not really the final explanation, but also not the worst one, for an overview good enough: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albedo[^]

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • G glennPattonWork3

            I think if remember the moons actual colour is a sort of dirty grey rather than the yellow commonly associated with it. I seem to remember there was a Mythbusters episode devoted to it. the reoglith does reflect at an angle to seem bright or something!:confused:

            P Offline
            P Offline
            PIEBALDconsult
            wrote on last edited by
            #12

            glennPattonBackInThePUB wrote:

            the moons actual colour is a sort of dirty grey

            Yes, we saw that in the moon landing video. Everythnig's grey up there. :badger:

            G 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • P PIEBALDconsult

              glennPattonBackInThePUB wrote:

              the moons actual colour is a sort of dirty grey

              Yes, we saw that in the moon landing video. Everythnig's grey up there. :badger:

              G Offline
              G Offline
              glennPattonWork3
              wrote on last edited by
              #13

              Yup, but as I recall the 'video' cameras were black & white

              P 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • G glennPattonWork3

                Yup, but as I recall the 'video' cameras were black & white

                P Offline
                P Offline
                PIEBALDconsult
                wrote on last edited by
                #14

                That's all they had to be.

                G 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • P PIEBALDconsult

                  That's all they had to be.

                  G Offline
                  G Offline
                  glennPattonWork3
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #15

                  Point, mind you a neighbour of my parents bought a colour TV to see it!

                  P 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • G glennPattonWork3

                    Point, mind you a neighbour of my parents bought a colour TV to see it!

                    P Offline
                    P Offline
                    PIEBALDconsult
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #16

                    Maybe to see Louis Armstrong? :~

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • J jsc42

                      Avijnata wrote:

                      Can this apparent brightness of Earth be attributed to the blue water all around? Whereas Moon is without water, and may be absorbing more light than it reflects?

                      The reflectiveness of a planet or moon is called its Albedo. If it reflected nothing, it would have an albedo of 0; if it reflected everything, it would have an albedo of 1. The Earth has an albedo of 0.37 whereas the full moon has an albedo of 0.12. So, the Earth reflects about 3 times as much of the light as the moon does. That is why it is brighter in the picture. Your guess that it is the water (but includes clouds as well as oceans) that are the main reflecting agents is correct; on the moon you only have the surface dust etc (called the regolith).

                      V Offline
                      V Offline
                      Vikram A Punathambekar
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #17

                      Very good answer, the only thing is that clouds typically have a far greater albedo than the oceans.

                      Cheers, विक्रम "We have already been through this, I am not going to repeat myself." - fat_boy, in a global warming thread :doh:

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • A Amarnath S

                        :thumbsup: One question: In this picture, the Moon is between Earth and Sun. The camera is between Moon and Sun. Now, the Sun is illuminating both Moon and Earth. Should not the Moon be seen brighter than Earth; the Moon is closer to the Sun, and hence more brightly illuminated. However, the Moon is seen as dull, and the Earth as bright. Can this apparent brightness of Earth be attributed to the blue water all around? Whereas Moon is without water, and may be absorbing more light than it reflects? Is something not correct in the above argument?

                        S Offline
                        S Offline
                        sesc2
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #18

                        I also think you are imagining the Sun as being much closer to us than it is. The Moon is a bit more than a light second away from us. The distance to the Sun is eight light MINUTES, or 500 times as great. So the Moon was one fifth of a percent, a factor of 0.002, closer to the Sun when the image was taken than Earth was. I think you'd be hard pressed to notice the effect of this difference even if the two bodies had exactly the same albedo.

                        A 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • S sesc2

                          I also think you are imagining the Sun as being much closer to us than it is. The Moon is a bit more than a light second away from us. The distance to the Sun is eight light MINUTES, or 500 times as great. So the Moon was one fifth of a percent, a factor of 0.002, closer to the Sun when the image was taken than Earth was. I think you'd be hard pressed to notice the effect of this difference even if the two bodies had exactly the same albedo.

                          A Offline
                          A Offline
                          Amarnath S
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #19

                          Yes, you're right. Agree. But, does the position of the camera also count, in whatever small way? The camera is closer to the Moon than to the Earth. My answer would be: Keeping a much brighter object farther away from the camera would register more on camera film than a dull object kept closer.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • J jsc42

                            Avijnata wrote:

                            Can this apparent brightness of Earth be attributed to the blue water all around? Whereas Moon is without water, and may be absorbing more light than it reflects?

                            The reflectiveness of a planet or moon is called its Albedo. If it reflected nothing, it would have an albedo of 0; if it reflected everything, it would have an albedo of 1. The Earth has an albedo of 0.37 whereas the full moon has an albedo of 0.12. So, the Earth reflects about 3 times as much of the light as the moon does. That is why it is brighter in the picture. Your guess that it is the water (but includes clouds as well as oceans) that are the main reflecting agents is correct; on the moon you only have the surface dust etc (called the regolith).

                            P Offline
                            P Offline
                            PadraigBeirne
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #20

                            So does the Moon absorb more energy than the Earth. We know it doesn't so what happens?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • World
                            • Users
                            • Groups