Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. General Programming
  3. C#
  4. Read Records then Count

Read Records then Count

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved C#
csharpdatabasetutorialquestion
19 Posts 7 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Richard DeemingR Richard Deeming

    Pete O'Hanlon wrote:

    int.TryParse(output, ref retValue);

    That's not going to compile - TryParse expects the first parameter to be a string, not an object. It should be safe to unbox the output variable directly to an int. Otherwise, Convert.ToInt32 should work. Also, it would probably be a good idea to wrap the IDbCommand in a using block, and test whether or not you need to open the connection, since it might already be open.


    "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

    L Offline
    L Offline
    Lost User
    wrote on last edited by
    #6

    Also, the CommandType "text" does not need to be set, it is (very conveniently) the default; since it is not a nullable enum it will always have a value, meaning a default must exist. ..but still bonuspoints, as the code is not tied to a specific IDbCommand implementation, and he's using the factory-method to create a command of the correct type :)

    Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Richard DeemingR Richard Deeming

      Pete O'Hanlon wrote:

      int.TryParse(output, ref retValue);

      That's not going to compile - TryParse expects the first parameter to be a string, not an object. It should be safe to unbox the output variable directly to an int. Otherwise, Convert.ToInt32 should work. Also, it would probably be a good idea to wrap the IDbCommand in a using block, and test whether or not you need to open the connection, since it might already be open.


      "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

      P Offline
      P Offline
      Pete OHanlon
      wrote on last edited by
      #7

      To be fair, I just coded this in the textblock as a minimal version. It's been a long time since I went away from the Db libraries I've built up that hide all this implementation.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

        As Richard says, this is easiest in SQL:

        SELECT SUM(CASE WHEN fieldA IS NOT NULL THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) FROM MyTable

        Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

        M Offline
        M Offline
        Matt T Heffron
        wrote on last edited by
        #8

        Wouldn't just the COUNT function do this?

        SELECT COUNT(fieldA) FROM MyTable

        In this form it counts the NON NULL values. See: SQL COUNT() Function[^] and COUNT (Transact-SQL)[^]

        "Fairy tales do not tell children the dragons exist. Children already know that dragons exist. Fairy tales tell children the dragons can be killed." - G.K. Chesterton

        OriginalGriffO 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Matt T Heffron

          Wouldn't just the COUNT function do this?

          SELECT COUNT(fieldA) FROM MyTable

          In this form it counts the NON NULL values. See: SQL COUNT() Function[^] and COUNT (Transact-SQL)[^]

          "Fairy tales do not tell children the dragons exist. Children already know that dragons exist. Fairy tales tell children the dragons can be killed." - G.K. Chesterton

          OriginalGriffO Offline
          OriginalGriffO Offline
          OriginalGriff
          wrote on last edited by
          #9

          Yes...it would... :-O Sorry about that, it's been one of those weeks...

          Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

          "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
          "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt

          M 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

            Yes...it would... :-O Sorry about that, it's been one of those weeks...

            Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

            M Offline
            M Offline
            macca24
            wrote on last edited by
            #10

            I should have said I am trying to do this using LINQ: I have a 20 records in a database table. Each record has and ID. I want to read a field in each record fieldA. I only want to read the records that have an ID '1'. For each record that has an ID '1' and fieldA Is Not Null I want to return a count of those records. So if 10 records have data in fieldA and have ID '1' then my count for fieldA will be 10. Anyone know how to do this in Linq?

            A 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M macca24

              I should have said I am trying to do this using LINQ: I have a 20 records in a database table. Each record has and ID. I want to read a field in each record fieldA. I only want to read the records that have an ID '1'. For each record that has an ID '1' and fieldA Is Not Null I want to return a count of those records. So if 10 records have data in fieldA and have ID '1' then my count for fieldA will be 10. Anyone know how to do this in Linq?

              A Offline
              A Offline
              Agent__007
              wrote on last edited by
              #11

              How about something like:

              int count = yourDbContext.yourEntityCollection.Where(entity => entity.ID == 1 && entity.FieldA != null).Count();

              You have just been Sharapova'd.

              Richard DeemingR 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • A Agent__007

                How about something like:

                int count = yourDbContext.yourEntityCollection.Where(entity => entity.ID == 1 && entity.FieldA != null).Count();

                You have just been Sharapova'd.

                Richard DeemingR Offline
                Richard DeemingR Offline
                Richard Deeming
                wrote on last edited by
                #12

                Or, more simply:

                int count = yourDbContext.yourEntityCollection.Count(entity => entity.ID == 1 && entity.FieldA != null);

                :)


                "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined" - Homer

                A M 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • Richard DeemingR Richard Deeming

                  Or, more simply:

                  int count = yourDbContext.yourEntityCollection.Count(entity => entity.ID == 1 && entity.FieldA != null);

                  :)


                  "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                  A Offline
                  A Offline
                  Agent__007
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #13

                  Not sure about Linq to SQL, but (for Linq to objects and XML) I have always found Where(predicate).Count() to be performing better than .Count(predicate). --EDIT Here's a StackOverflow question[^] that might interest you. :)

                  You have just been Sharapova'd.

                  Richard DeemingR 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • A Agent__007

                    Not sure about Linq to SQL, but (for Linq to objects and XML) I have always found Where(predicate).Count() to be performing better than .Count(predicate). --EDIT Here's a StackOverflow question[^] that might interest you. :)

                    You have just been Sharapova'd.

                    Richard DeemingR Offline
                    Richard DeemingR Offline
                    Richard Deeming
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #14

                    The optimizations only apply to in-memory LINQ queries (LINQ to Objects and LINQ to XML). With LINQ to SQL and Entity Framework, both versions should produce an identical SQL query.


                    "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                    "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined" - Homer

                    A 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Richard DeemingR Richard Deeming

                      Or, more simply:

                      int count = yourDbContext.yourEntityCollection.Count(entity => entity.ID == 1 && entity.FieldA != null);

                      :)


                      "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                      M Offline
                      M Offline
                      macca24
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #15

                      This is the code that I am looking to get a Count of complexQuery.

                      string refName = entity.GetAttributeValue<string>("contractorname");

                      var complexQuery = (from c in orgContext.CreateQuery<contractorframe>()
                      join e in orgContext.CreateQuery<dcc_eval>()
                      on c.ContractorName equals e.RegardingObjectId.ToString()
                      where e.RegardingObjectId.ToString() == refName
                      and e.QW Is Not Null)

                      A 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Richard DeemingR Richard Deeming

                        The optimizations only apply to in-memory LINQ queries (LINQ to Objects and LINQ to XML). With LINQ to SQL and Entity Framework, both versions should produce an identical SQL query.


                        "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                        A Offline
                        A Offline
                        Agent__007
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #16

                        :thumbsup: Indeed, they should. But I have always used the Where(predicate).Count() version, so that came implicitly when I posted the answer. :)

                        You have just been Sharapova'd.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • M macca24

                          This is the code that I am looking to get a Count of complexQuery.

                          string refName = entity.GetAttributeValue<string>("contractorname");

                          var complexQuery = (from c in orgContext.CreateQuery<contractorframe>()
                          join e in orgContext.CreateQuery<dcc_eval>()
                          on c.ContractorName equals e.RegardingObjectId.ToString()
                          where e.RegardingObjectId.ToString() == refName
                          and e.QW Is Not Null)

                          A Offline
                          A Offline
                          Agent__007
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #17

                          macca24 wrote:

                          I am looking to get a Count of complexQuery

                          Not sure what you mean by that, but if your complexQuery is already working, then you can simply use the Count() method:

                          int complexQueryCount = (from c in orgContext.CreateQuery()
                          join e in orgContext.CreateQuery()
                          on c.ContractorName equals e.RegardingObjectId.ToString()
                          where e.RegardingObjectId.ToString() == refName
                          and e.QW Is Not Null).Count(); // <-- here

                          You have just been Sharapova'd.

                          M 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • A Agent__007

                            macca24 wrote:

                            I am looking to get a Count of complexQuery

                            Not sure what you mean by that, but if your complexQuery is already working, then you can simply use the Count() method:

                            int complexQueryCount = (from c in orgContext.CreateQuery()
                            join e in orgContext.CreateQuery()
                            on c.ContractorName equals e.RegardingObjectId.ToString()
                            where e.RegardingObjectId.ToString() == refName
                            and e.QW Is Not Null).Count(); // <-- here

                            You have just been Sharapova'd.

                            M Offline
                            M Offline
                            macca24
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #18

                            int complexQuery = (from e in mycontext.CreateQuery()

                                                                    where e.new\_QW1 != null
                                                                    select e.new\_QW1).Count();
                            
                                                
                            
                                                
                                               if (complexQuery < 1)
                                                {
                                                    var newQuery = "HasData";
                                                    entity.Attributes.Add("new\_testcomplexquery", newQuery);
                                                }
                                                else
                                                {
                                                    var newQueryToo = "Blank";
                                                    entity.Attributes.Add("new\_testcomplexquery", newQueryToo);
                                                    
                            
                                                }
                            

                            I want to use the results of complexQuery in an If statement but the value of complexQuery doesnt appear to be getting picked up. Anyone know why?

                            A 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M macca24

                              int complexQuery = (from e in mycontext.CreateQuery()

                                                                      where e.new\_QW1 != null
                                                                      select e.new\_QW1).Count();
                              
                                                  
                              
                                                  
                                                 if (complexQuery < 1)
                                                  {
                                                      var newQuery = "HasData";
                                                      entity.Attributes.Add("new\_testcomplexquery", newQuery);
                                                  }
                                                  else
                                                  {
                                                      var newQueryToo = "Blank";
                                                      entity.Attributes.Add("new\_testcomplexquery", newQueryToo);
                                                      
                              
                                                  }
                              

                              I want to use the results of complexQuery in an If statement but the value of complexQuery doesnt appear to be getting picked up. Anyone know why?

                              A Offline
                              A Offline
                              Agent__007
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #19

                              I am not sure what you are trying to do, but shouldn't your if condition be reversed? i.e. it "HasData" if complexQuery > 0 and it's "Blank" if complextQuery == 0. Try this:

                              if (complexQuery != 0) // <-- reverse the condition here
                              {
                              var newQuery = "HasData";
                              entity.Attributes.Add("new_testcomplexquery", newQuery);
                              }
                              else
                              {
                              var newQueryToo = "Blank";
                              entity.Attributes.Add("new_testcomplexquery", newQueryToo);
                              }

                              You have just been Sharapova'd.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • World
                              • Users
                              • Groups