Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. The future has arrived...

The future has arrived...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
30 Posts 22 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Lost User

    That thing is just creepy... :~

    There are two types of people in this world: those that pronounce GIF with a soft G, and those who do not deserve to speak words, ever.

    A Offline
    A Offline
    Amarnath S
    wrote on last edited by
    #8

    :thumbsup: Can't have that creepy thing as a colleague :-)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • K Kevin Marois

      jeron1 wrote:

      They should program it to shovel snow, mow the lawn, and wash the car bring me a beer, you know, useful stuff

      FTFY

      If it's not broken, fix it until it is

      J Offline
      J Offline
      jeron1
      wrote on last edited by
      #9

      Kevin Marois wrote:

      They should program it to shovel snow, mow the lawn, and wash the car, AND bring me a beer, you know, useful stuff

      FTFY :)

      "the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment "Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst "I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle

      K 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • J jeron1

        Kevin Marois wrote:

        They should program it to shovel snow, mow the lawn, and wash the car, AND bring me a beer, you know, useful stuff

        FTFY :)

        "the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment "Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst "I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle

        K Offline
        K Offline
        Kevin Marois
        wrote on last edited by
        #10

        :cool:

        If it's not broken, fix it until it is

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • K Kevin Marois

          jeron1 wrote:

          They should program it to shovel snow, mow the lawn, and wash the car bring me a beer, you know, useful stuff

          FTFY

          If it's not broken, fix it until it is

          K Offline
          K Offline
          Kyle Moyer
          wrote on last edited by
          #11

          That's what the missus is for. Certainly didn't marry her for her cooking! :laugh:

          J 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • K Kyle Moyer

            That's what the missus is for. Certainly didn't marry her for her cooking! :laugh:

            J Offline
            J Offline
            jeron1
            wrote on last edited by
            #12

            I we don't hear from you again, we'll know why! ;P

            "the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment "Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst "I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • R R Giskard Reventlov

              Atlas, The Next Generation - YouTube[^]

              9 Offline
              9 Offline
              9082365
              wrote on last edited by
              #13

              very impressive but I can't help feeling we'd be a lot further on if a little less effort was wasted on human-like characteristics (bipedal walking is a really stupid way of getting around, let's face it). All that work on recovering from stumbles that it really doesn't need to make could surely have been better spent?

              I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!

              R S S P R 5 Replies Last reply
              0
              • 9 9082365

                very impressive but I can't help feeling we'd be a lot further on if a little less effort was wasted on human-like characteristics (bipedal walking is a really stupid way of getting around, let's face it). All that work on recovering from stumbles that it really doesn't need to make could surely have been better spent?

                I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!

                R Offline
                R Offline
                R Giskard Reventlov
                wrote on last edited by
                #14

                Because Skynet?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • 9 9082365

                  very impressive but I can't help feeling we'd be a lot further on if a little less effort was wasted on human-like characteristics (bipedal walking is a really stupid way of getting around, let's face it). All that work on recovering from stumbles that it really doesn't need to make could surely have been better spent?

                  I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!

                  S Offline
                  S Offline
                  Super Lloyd
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #15

                  I dunno about bi pedal, maybe 3 or 4 leg would be a good idea... although bi pedal use less space, smaller surface on the ground so it's not a complete waste.. But recovering from stumble is essential! What's the point of a robot which can't do anything because it can't reach its destination and break fragile stuff as it falls (all the time)?!

                  All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar DirectX for WinRT/C# since 2013! Taking over the world since 1371!

                  9 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • 9 9082365

                    very impressive but I can't help feeling we'd be a lot further on if a little less effort was wasted on human-like characteristics (bipedal walking is a really stupid way of getting around, let's face it). All that work on recovering from stumbles that it really doesn't need to make could surely have been better spent?

                    I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!

                    S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Stefan_Lang
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #16

                    They actually tried a 4-legged robot but found it to be too noisy. They decided to go with only two legs, then, because it would be less conspicuous distracting.:cool:

                    GOTOs are a bit like wire coat hangers: they tend to breed in the darkness, such that where there once were few, eventually there are many, and the program's architecture collapses beneath them. (Fran Poretto)

                    P 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S Stefan_Lang

                      They actually tried a 4-legged robot but found it to be too noisy. They decided to go with only two legs, then, because it would be less conspicuous distracting.:cool:

                      GOTOs are a bit like wire coat hangers: they tend to breed in the darkness, such that where there once were few, eventually there are many, and the program's architecture collapses beneath them. (Fran Poretto)

                      P Offline
                      P Offline
                      Paddington Bear
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #17

                      and besides, it is more difficult to make a four legged version walk round as if it were terminally constipated.

                      It goes without saying

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • R R Giskard Reventlov

                        Atlas, The Next Generation - YouTube[^]

                        P Offline
                        P Offline
                        Plamen Dragiyski
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #18

                        I don't find it creepy. Robots intelligence (created by us) is so less sophisticated that they cannot perform simple walking (until now). Still I think it is kinda slow, since it falls from a push (humans react really fast and do not). And I don't think that energy system is autonomous like ours. And I don't even imagine high-level intellectual functions. We are so far from "intelligent" robots.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • J jeron1

                          They should program it to shovel snow, mow the lawn, and wash the car, you know, useful stuff. :)

                          "the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment "Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst "I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle

                          P Offline
                          P Offline
                          piyush_singh
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #19

                          :thumbsup:

                          Piyush K Singh

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • R R Giskard Reventlov

                            Atlas, The Next Generation - YouTube[^]

                            C Offline
                            C Offline
                            CodeZombie62
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #20

                            I kept waiting for it to get pissed off and hit the guy.

                            A 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • C CodeZombie62

                              I kept waiting for it to get pissed off and hit the guy.

                              A Offline
                              A Offline
                              Alexander DiMauro
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #21

                              Yeah, seriously. It looked like the robot left pissed off...which is exactly how the Terminator is born...thanks hockey stick guy, you just doomed the world... :doh:

                              I have always wished for my computer to be as easy to use as my telephone; my wish has come true because I can no longer figure out how to use my telephone - Bjarne Stroustrup The world is going to laugh at you anyway, might as well crack the 1st joke! My code has no bugs, it runs exactly as it was written.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • S Super Lloyd

                                I dunno about bi pedal, maybe 3 or 4 leg would be a good idea... although bi pedal use less space, smaller surface on the ground so it's not a complete waste.. But recovering from stumble is essential! What's the point of a robot which can't do anything because it can't reach its destination and break fragile stuff as it falls (all the time)?!

                                All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar DirectX for WinRT/C# since 2013! Taking over the world since 1371!

                                9 Offline
                                9 Offline
                                9082365
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #22

                                Recovering from a stumble is only essential if you have a robot that stumbles - which all bipedal robots do (see some of the hilarious footage from robot trials around the world!) My point was that the effort should be going into finding inherently stable configurations which don't stumble rather than slavishly adhering to the bipedal method just because it looks more human. This needn't take up much more space especially if the centre of gravity can be kept low.

                                I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!

                                V 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • 9 9082365

                                  Recovering from a stumble is only essential if you have a robot that stumbles - which all bipedal robots do (see some of the hilarious footage from robot trials around the world!) My point was that the effort should be going into finding inherently stable configurations which don't stumble rather than slavishly adhering to the bipedal method just because it looks more human. This needn't take up much more space especially if the centre of gravity can be kept low.

                                  I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!

                                  V Offline
                                  V Offline
                                  vtokar
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #23

                                  I would guess the problem is the battery use. Because bipedals need several times less energy on the same distance than 4-legged creatures. At least, that's what I read about why humans are bipedals.

                                  9 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • 9 9082365

                                    very impressive but I can't help feeling we'd be a lot further on if a little less effort was wasted on human-like characteristics (bipedal walking is a really stupid way of getting around, let's face it). All that work on recovering from stumbles that it really doesn't need to make could surely have been better spent?

                                    I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!

                                    P Offline
                                    P Offline
                                    Paul Kemner
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #24

                                    Make Tachikomas instead?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • R R Giskard Reventlov

                                      Atlas, The Next Generation - YouTube[^]

                                      H Offline
                                      H Offline
                                      Harrison Pratt
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #25

                                      Oooooh ... you're gonna make it angry!

                                      H 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • V vtokar

                                        I would guess the problem is the battery use. Because bipedals need several times less energy on the same distance than 4-legged creatures. At least, that's what I read about why humans are bipedals.

                                        9 Offline
                                        9 Offline
                                        9082365
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #26

                                        vtokar wrote:

                                        bipedals need several times less energy on the same distance than 4-legged creatures

                                        The study which suggested this compared only humans and chimps. It confirms that human beings walking on two legs are more energy efficient than chimps walking on four and also, for the most part and to a lesser degree, than chimps walking on two. But as chimps are already halfway between quadriped and biped, with their arms significantly far along the track towards becoming useless as legs, all the study really tells us is that humans are better at being humans than primates at a stage of evolution a few steps behind humans which .. you know ... duh! There are so many disadvantages to bipedal walking in terms of wear on joints, the need for additional supporting framework such as ligaments and tendons, pressure on the feet, balance and stability issues caused by raising the centre of gravity, and a dozen other consequences from having our vertebra in a shaky column rather than a nice self-supporting, suspended arch, that it's not easy to believe that a little energy efficiency gain is sufficient evolutionary advantage to explain it entirely if at all.

                                        I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!

                                        C 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • 9 9082365

                                          very impressive but I can't help feeling we'd be a lot further on if a little less effort was wasted on human-like characteristics (bipedal walking is a really stupid way of getting around, let's face it). All that work on recovering from stumbles that it really doesn't need to make could surely have been better spent?

                                          I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!

                                          R Offline
                                          R Offline
                                          regalsoft
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #27

                                          A major reason to make it bipedal is because much of our surrounding is foundationally geared towards human habitation. If all we're going to do is make these things walk about in open space then I see your point. Ultimately the goal is to have these things be among people without having to make special provision for them (think stairs, aisles, doors etc.)

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups