Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Insider News
  4. Apple wants the FBI to reveal how it hacked the San Bernardino killer's iPhone

Apple wants the FBI to reveal how it hacked the San Bernardino killer's iPhone

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Insider News
htmlioscomsecurityhelp
9 Posts 6 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    Jason Cardoza
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    LA Times[^]:

    Apple Inc. refused to give the FBI software the agency desperately wanted. Now Apple is the one that needs the FBI's assistance. The FBI announced Monday that it managed to unlock an iPhone 5c belonging to one of the San Bernardino shooters without the help of Apple. And the agency has shown no interest in telling Apple how it skirted the phone's security features, leaving the tech giant guessing about a vulnerability that could compromise millions of devices.

    We haven't heard the end of this fight just yet!

    L realJSOPR J 4 Replies Last reply
    0
    • J Jason Cardoza

      LA Times[^]:

      Apple Inc. refused to give the FBI software the agency desperately wanted. Now Apple is the one that needs the FBI's assistance. The FBI announced Monday that it managed to unlock an iPhone 5c belonging to one of the San Bernardino shooters without the help of Apple. And the agency has shown no interest in telling Apple how it skirted the phone's security features, leaving the tech giant guessing about a vulnerability that could compromise millions of devices.

      We haven't heard the end of this fight just yet!

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Spoiler: "they didn't."

      Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • J Jason Cardoza

        LA Times[^]:

        Apple Inc. refused to give the FBI software the agency desperately wanted. Now Apple is the one that needs the FBI's assistance. The FBI announced Monday that it managed to unlock an iPhone 5c belonging to one of the San Bernardino shooters without the help of Apple. And the agency has shown no interest in telling Apple how it skirted the phone's security features, leaving the tech giant guessing about a vulnerability that could compromise millions of devices.

        We haven't heard the end of this fight just yet!

        realJSOPR Offline
        realJSOPR Offline
        realJSOP
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Apple doesn't need the FBIs assistance. All they need to do is post a sizeable bounty for anyone that can crack their security. Once they find out how it's done, they can redesign it. Problem solved, and f*ck the FBI.

        ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
        -----
        You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
        -----
        When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

        L 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • J Jason Cardoza

          LA Times[^]:

          Apple Inc. refused to give the FBI software the agency desperately wanted. Now Apple is the one that needs the FBI's assistance. The FBI announced Monday that it managed to unlock an iPhone 5c belonging to one of the San Bernardino shooters without the help of Apple. And the agency has shown no interest in telling Apple how it skirted the phone's security features, leaving the tech giant guessing about a vulnerability that could compromise millions of devices.

          We haven't heard the end of this fight just yet!

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Lost User
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Nice thread title. :rolleyes: Except of course there is no report or quote that indicates Apple has even asked the FBI. Nor is there anything in the article that indicates that the FBI wouldn't provide it if asked. 0) I suspect Apple has at least a couple guesses. 1) Given the recent past I seriously doubt Apple would ask the FBI. 2) Likewise I seriously doubt the FBI would (or should) tell them. 3) I think there is a decent chance that the Feds are lying about the crack.

          There are two types of people in this world: those that pronounce GIF with a soft G, and those who do not deserve to speak words, ever.

          K 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • J Jason Cardoza

            LA Times[^]:

            Apple Inc. refused to give the FBI software the agency desperately wanted. Now Apple is the one that needs the FBI's assistance. The FBI announced Monday that it managed to unlock an iPhone 5c belonging to one of the San Bernardino shooters without the help of Apple. And the agency has shown no interest in telling Apple how it skirted the phone's security features, leaving the tech giant guessing about a vulnerability that could compromise millions of devices.

            We haven't heard the end of this fight just yet!

            J Offline
            J Offline
            jgakenhe
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            My guess is they put together clues and did a brute force on it. For instance, if you save you passwords in your web browser on your PC, you can look at the passwords; such as Firefox. If the passwords are similar or the same, then you've got a pretty good chance out of 10 to guess the right one.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L Lost User

              Nice thread title. :rolleyes: Except of course there is no report or quote that indicates Apple has even asked the FBI. Nor is there anything in the article that indicates that the FBI wouldn't provide it if asked. 0) I suspect Apple has at least a couple guesses. 1) Given the recent past I seriously doubt Apple would ask the FBI. 2) Likewise I seriously doubt the FBI would (or should) tell them. 3) I think there is a decent chance that the Feds are lying about the crack.

              There are two types of people in this world: those that pronounce GIF with a soft G, and those who do not deserve to speak words, ever.

              K Offline
              K Offline
              Kevin McFarlane
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Mike Mullikin wrote:

              I think there is a decent chance that the Feds are lying about the crack.

              Why would they do that? :confused: If they really haven't cracked it why drop the case?

              Kevin

              L 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • realJSOPR realJSOP

                Apple doesn't need the FBIs assistance. All they need to do is post a sizeable bounty for anyone that can crack their security. Once they find out how it's done, they can redesign it. Problem solved, and f*ck the FBI.

                ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
                -----
                You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
                -----
                When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lost User
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                If the data is on a remote and protected server, there would be little use in hacking the phones' hardware. I assume it is about a backup on the Apple-network, because if the data was on the phone it could be retrieved. I'm guessing the FBI wants to save face - we're still waiting for any explanation on "how" they cracked the phone :)

                Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)

                D 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • K Kevin McFarlane

                  Mike Mullikin wrote:

                  I think there is a decent chance that the Feds are lying about the crack.

                  Why would they do that? :confused: If they really haven't cracked it why drop the case?

                  Kevin

                  L Offline
                  L Offline
                  Lost User
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  First of all, they were starting to lose in the court of public opinion. After playing the "terrorism" card and claiming this was a one time request the Feds had public support, but as reality set in and the media actually started reporting opposing opinions things shifted and they lost public support (in the US at least). Secondly, a majority of legal and constitutional scholars predicted a win in actual court by Apple which sets the wrong precedent as far as the Feds are concerned. Thirdly, others in the federal government pointed out that many federal employees use iPhones and by creating such a hack (that will eventually leak to other governments and hackers) the Feds were shooting themselves in the foot over the long haul. Lastly, they might have finally realized that any 4 month old data that might exist on this phone is likely worthless. Better to claim they hacked it and save their legal challenges for another day or another victim.

                  There are two types of people in this world: those that pronounce GIF with a soft G, and those who do not deserve to speak words, ever.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L Lost User

                    If the data is on a remote and protected server, there would be little use in hacking the phones' hardware. I assume it is about a backup on the Apple-network, because if the data was on the phone it could be retrieved. I'm guessing the FBI wants to save face - we're still waiting for any explanation on "how" they cracked the phone :)

                    Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)

                    D Offline
                    D Offline
                    Dan Neely
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    The entire "you must pwn the phone for us" cluster elephant was triggered when a retard at the FBI ordered the icloud password be changed; preventing the phone from being forced into backing itself up to the cloud where they could pillage the data. At the same time they began to back down in court, the FBI paid an Israeli computer forensics company about $20k for unspecified services. Odds are pretty good that company has a zeroday that can execute on a locked phone over USB.

                    Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason? Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful? --Zachris Topelius Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies. -- Sarah Hoyt

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    Reply
                    • Reply as topic
                    Log in to reply
                    • Oldest to Newest
                    • Newest to Oldest
                    • Most Votes


                    • Login

                    • Don't have an account? Register

                    • Login or register to search.
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Categories
                    • Recent
                    • Tags
                    • Popular
                    • World
                    • Users
                    • Groups