Ability to lock QA Questions from being updated
-
Is there a way that a question from the QA could be locked for further editing / adding answers? reason being How to calculate Age using C#[^] lasted updated in 2015, but recently the question has been edited by someone other than the original poster and now it has been jumped back up to the first page. Thanks Simon
Every day, thousands of innocent plants are killed by vegetarians. Help end the violence EAT BACON
-
Is there a way that a question from the QA could be locked for further editing / adding answers? reason being How to calculate Age using C#[^] lasted updated in 2015, but recently the question has been edited by someone other than the original poster and now it has been jumped back up to the first page. Thanks Simon
Every day, thousands of innocent plants are killed by vegetarians. Help end the violence EAT BACON
The fact it's saying that Jibesh edited the question 3 and a bit hours ago is a bug ... reported here at some time. The update was actually Solution 8 being added ... subsequently removed (either voluntarily or due to 3 reports - I don't know which) Trouble is if we lock down questions we're turning into SO. Sometimes (not often granted) there are sensible additions that can be made to older questions. We can't even use the "has an accepted answer" - I've seen plenty of accepted answers that are just downright wrong, and there are several members who will just hit "Accepted" because someone has responded (and then ask no end of follow up questions :sigh: ) [EDIT - Also see Sean's 5 pennorth on it ... Bugs and Suggestions - CodeProject[^]