Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. This is great.

This is great.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
comhelptutorialquestion
81 Posts 15 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P peterchen

    :-D The people prone to say it make me kind of proud :rolleyes:


    "Der Geist des Kriegers ist erwacht / Ich hab die Macht" StS
    sighist | Agile Programming | doxygen

    K Offline
    K Offline
    KaRl
    wrote on last edited by
    #17

    :laugh::cool:


    But I did emphasie techies who I would imagine are brighter than the average freedom fry eating rednecks - Chris Austin

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • L Lost User

      "I think that we believe there are chemical weapons in Syria, for example," Bush said. Does he want to start another war? Also, is the US claiming that they, the Russians, the Chinese etc. don't have chemical weapons, that having chemical weapons became a big issue? AFAIK, whatever their reputation be, Syria has not done a military offensive on a neighbouring country like Iraq did. Anyway, the statement sounds ominous. Thomas My article on a reference-counted smart pointer that supports polymorphic objects and raw pointers

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #18

      I think the US administration is just trying to apply a little "diplomacy" while the memory of Iraq's defeat is fresh in everybody's mind. It's like a parent who smacks child #1 on the butt for doing something bad and then "reminds" child #2 to be good. If GWB does a thing (militarily) in Syria he'll lose any and all support here and get soundly "flushed" out of office at the next election. Mike Mullikin :beer:

      Capitalism - Coming to a Country Near You!!

      K 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Lost User

        I think the US administration is just trying to apply a little "diplomacy" while the memory of Iraq's defeat is fresh in everybody's mind. It's like a parent who smacks child #1 on the butt for doing something bad and then "reminds" child #2 to be good. If GWB does a thing (militarily) in Syria he'll lose any and all support here and get soundly "flushed" out of office at the next election. Mike Mullikin :beer:

        Capitalism - Coming to a Country Near You!!

        K Offline
        K Offline
        KaRl
        wrote on last edited by
        #19

        Mike Mullikin wrote: If GWB does a thing (militarily) in Syria he'll lose any and all support here and get soundly "flushed" out of office at the next election Why wouldn't he have the same support than when invading Iraq? :confused:


        But I did emphasie techies who I would imagine are brighter than the average freedom fry eating rednecks - Chris Austin

        L 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • K KaRl

          I thought size doesn't matter :rolleyes:


          But I did emphasie techies who I would imagine are brighter than the average freedom fry eating rednecks - Chris Austin

          C Offline
          C Offline
          Chris Losinger
          wrote on last edited by
          #20

          we could probably take out Syria in a week. there wouldn't even be time for the news networks to update their graphics. it would be perfect. Iran would take too long, and i don't think the US population is up for yet another war. (of course i'm probably wrong about that) -c


          Image tools: ThumbNailer, Bobber, TIFFAssembler

          K M 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • C Chris Losinger

            we could probably take out Syria in a week. there wouldn't even be time for the news networks to update their graphics. it would be perfect. Iran would take too long, and i don't think the US population is up for yet another war. (of course i'm probably wrong about that) -c


            Image tools: ThumbNailer, Bobber, TIFFAssembler

            K Offline
            K Offline
            KaRl
            wrote on last edited by
            #21

            Ok. So Monaco, Lichtenstein and Luxembourg should worry :)


            But I did emphasie techies who I would imagine are brighter than the average freedom fry eating rednecks - Chris Austin

            F C 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • K KaRl

              Mike Gaskey wrote: The US is the only country I am aware of that isn't dedicated to the obliteration of Israel and the Jewish inhabitants thereof. Wouldn't you have a small tendency to fall sometimes into extremist arguments? :suss: Did Sweden or Switzerland ask for the wipe out of Israel :wtf: ?


              But I did emphasie techies who I would imagine are brighter than the average freedom fry eating rednecks - Chris Austin

              M Offline
              M Offline
              Mike Gaskey
              wrote on last edited by
              #22

              KaЯl wrote: Wouldn't you have a small tendency to fall sometimes into extremist arguments? No. Or, maybe. I tend to see things in black and white, very few shades of grey. KaЯl wrote: Did Sweden or Switzerland ask for the wipe out of Israel OK - this answer should have been read in the context of, "I can already hear the Arab countries claiming the US are an israeli puppet." - not the entire world. Mike

              K 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • K KaRl

                Mike Mullikin wrote: If GWB does a thing (militarily) in Syria he'll lose any and all support here and get soundly "flushed" out of office at the next election Why wouldn't he have the same support than when invading Iraq? :confused:


                But I did emphasie techies who I would imagine are brighter than the average freedom fry eating rednecks - Chris Austin

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lost User
                wrote on last edited by
                #23

                Saddam was a villain, easy to stoke the fires of war against. Syria (while not 100% innocent) would be a much harder sell. Frankly, I think the general populace in the US wants to rebuild Iraq and get on with life. Not to mention, it's time for the UN to step up and prove it's relevence. Sadly, I doubt this will happen. Mike Mullikin :beer:

                Capitalism - Coming to a Country Near You!!

                L K 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • K KaRl

                  Felix Gartsman wrote: Any way, it'll collapse from inside. Why are you so sure it will collapse? :confused:


                  But I did emphasie techies who I would imagine are brighter than the average freedom fry eating rednecks - Chris Austin

                  F Offline
                  F Offline
                  Felix Gartsman
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #24

                  KaЯl wrote: Why are you so sure it will collapse? Many reasons: Young generation (vote from 16 I think) are already a majority, they're secular, know the west (illegal sattelite dishes are common), and want world acceptance The clerics gave some fake democracy, the people liked it and now want more Viable opposition The best overview is Tom Friedman columns from NYTimes from several months ago.

                  K M 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • M Mike Gaskey

                    KaЯl wrote: Wouldn't you have a small tendency to fall sometimes into extremist arguments? No. Or, maybe. I tend to see things in black and white, very few shades of grey. KaЯl wrote: Did Sweden or Switzerland ask for the wipe out of Israel OK - this answer should have been read in the context of, "I can already hear the Arab countries claiming the US are an israeli puppet." - not the entire world. Mike

                    K Offline
                    K Offline
                    KaRl
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #25

                    Mike Gaskey wrote: this answer should have been read in the context of, "I can already hear the Arab countries claiming the US are an israeli puppet." - not the entire world. Ok, sorry. However, Egypt and Jordan have already signed a peace treaty with Israel. With a negociation about the Golan (and the syrian "influence" on Lebanon), I think syria could sign one too


                    But I did emphasie techies who I would imagine are brighter than the average freedom fry eating rednecks - Chris Austin

                    M 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • K KaRl

                      Ok. So Monaco, Lichtenstein and Luxembourg should worry :)


                      But I did emphasie techies who I would imagine are brighter than the average freedom fry eating rednecks - Chris Austin

                      F Offline
                      F Offline
                      Felix Gartsman
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #26

                      Naah, M1A1 can't manuveur in small places:-D

                      K 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Felix Gartsman

                        KaЯl wrote: Why are you so sure it will collapse? Many reasons: Young generation (vote from 16 I think) are already a majority, they're secular, know the west (illegal sattelite dishes are common), and want world acceptance The clerics gave some fake democracy, the people liked it and now want more Viable opposition The best overview is Tom Friedman columns from NYTimes from several months ago.

                        K Offline
                        K Offline
                        KaRl
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #27

                        I agree with your arguments, but not with your conclusions. Iranian evolution to a more democratic state could be peaceful and progressive, without a collapse of Iran. Of course, I suppose for that there wouldn't be external interference like in the past. Would be a democratic Iran pro-US? Not that sure.


                        But I did emphasie techies who I would imagine are brighter than the average freedom fry eating rednecks - Chris Austin

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L Lost User

                          Saddam was a villain, easy to stoke the fires of war against. Syria (while not 100% innocent) would be a much harder sell. Frankly, I think the general populace in the US wants to rebuild Iraq and get on with life. Not to mention, it's time for the UN to step up and prove it's relevence. Sadly, I doubt this will happen. Mike Mullikin :beer:

                          Capitalism - Coming to a Country Near You!!

                          L Offline
                          L Offline
                          Lost User
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #28

                          No one wants UN to have teeth. Then Israel will also have to comply. I don't know whether there are any UN resolutions against Syria. My article on a reference-counted smart pointer that supports polymorphic objects and raw pointers

                          F L 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • L Lost User

                            Saddam was a villain, easy to stoke the fires of war against. Syria (while not 100% innocent) would be a much harder sell. Frankly, I think the general populace in the US wants to rebuild Iraq and get on with life. Not to mention, it's time for the UN to step up and prove it's relevence. Sadly, I doubt this will happen. Mike Mullikin :beer:

                            Capitalism - Coming to a Country Near You!!

                            K Offline
                            K Offline
                            KaRl
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #29

                            Mike Mullikin wrote: Saddam was a villain, easy to stoke the fires of war against Weird, I don't see differences betwwen SH and the Assad dynasty! Mike Mullikin wrote: Not to menetion, it's time for the UN to step up and prove it's relevence. Sadly, I doubt this will happen. I doubt it too, unless the US back for this time the UN policy, even if it doesn't follow strictly the american point of view.


                            But I did emphasie techies who I would imagine are brighter than the average freedom fry eating rednecks - Chris Austin

                            L J 2 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • L Lost User

                              No one wants UN to have teeth. Then Israel will also have to comply. I don't know whether there are any UN resolutions against Syria. My article on a reference-counted smart pointer that supports polymorphic objects and raw pointers

                              F Offline
                              F Offline
                              Felix Gartsman
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #30

                              Thomas George wrote: No one wants UN to have teeth. Then Israel will also have to comply. Well, no. Resolutions regarding Israel are chapter 6 - advisory, so you don't have to implement:)

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • K KaRl

                                Mike Mullikin wrote: Saddam was a villain, easy to stoke the fires of war against Weird, I don't see differences betwwen SH and the Assad dynasty! Mike Mullikin wrote: Not to menetion, it's time for the UN to step up and prove it's relevence. Sadly, I doubt this will happen. I doubt it too, unless the US back for this time the UN policy, even if it doesn't follow strictly the american point of view.


                                But I did emphasie techies who I would imagine are brighter than the average freedom fry eating rednecks - Chris Austin

                                L Offline
                                L Offline
                                Lost User
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #31

                                KaЯl wrote: unless the US back for this time the UN policy, even if it doesn't follow strictly the american point of view. The same can be said about France, Germany & Russia. ;P The UN's irrelevence comes from it's inability to deal with the "Iraqs" of the world not from the lack of backing from the US/UK. Mike Mullikin :beer:

                                Capitalism - Coming to a Country Near You!!

                                K 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • K KaRl

                                  Ok. So Monaco, Lichtenstein and Luxembourg should worry :)


                                  But I did emphasie techies who I would imagine are brighter than the average freedom fry eating rednecks - Chris Austin

                                  C Offline
                                  C Offline
                                  Chris Losinger
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #32

                                  yes, i think they should. we're pretty sick and tired of seeing all those rich people enjoying themselves in Monaco. and, since they have no military, and everyone knows what the US thinks about the French military, it should start thinking about building bunkers. Luxembourg sounds like a dangerous place - they spent $148 million dollars on their military in 2002! what are they planning! Lichtenstein? their obnoxious neutrality and ties to the horrible Swiss make them prime targets for regime change. -c


                                  Image tools: ThumbNailer, Bobber, TIFFAssembler

                                  K 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • F Felix Gartsman

                                    KaЯl wrote: Why are you so sure it will collapse? Many reasons: Young generation (vote from 16 I think) are already a majority, they're secular, know the west (illegal sattelite dishes are common), and want world acceptance The clerics gave some fake democracy, the people liked it and now want more Viable opposition The best overview is Tom Friedman columns from NYTimes from several months ago.

                                    M Offline
                                    M Offline
                                    Maximilien
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #33

                                    I agree with you, it will change, but not collapse, a peacefull revolution might come in a couple of years. I have high hopes for Iran. Max.


                                    Maximilien Lincourt For success one must aquire one's self

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • L Lost User

                                      No one wants UN to have teeth. Then Israel will also have to comply. I don't know whether there are any UN resolutions against Syria. My article on a reference-counted smart pointer that supports polymorphic objects and raw pointers

                                      L Offline
                                      L Offline
                                      Lost User
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #34

                                      Thomas George wrote: No one wants UN to have teeth. Really?! Someone should tell the UN, because they keep making resolutions that are ignored. Thomas George wrote: Then Israel will also have to comply. It always comes back to Israel. Why? Mike Mullikin :beer:

                                      Capitalism - Coming to a Country Near You!!

                                      L 2 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • L Lost User

                                        "I think that we believe there are chemical weapons in Syria, for example," Bush said. Does he want to start another war? Also, is the US claiming that they, the Russians, the Chinese etc. don't have chemical weapons, that having chemical weapons became a big issue? AFAIK, whatever their reputation be, Syria has not done a military offensive on a neighbouring country like Iraq did. Anyway, the statement sounds ominous. Thomas My article on a reference-counted smart pointer that supports polymorphic objects and raw pointers

                                        L Offline
                                        L Offline
                                        Lost User
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #35

                                        What about the chemical, biological and nucelar weapons in Israel, or their violation of UN resolutions ? Oops, can't mention that X| The tigress is here :-D

                                        D F J 3 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • L Lost User

                                          Thomas George wrote: No one wants UN to have teeth. Really?! Someone should tell the UN, because they keep making resolutions that are ignored. Thomas George wrote: Then Israel will also have to comply. It always comes back to Israel. Why? Mike Mullikin :beer:

                                          Capitalism - Coming to a Country Near You!!

                                          L Offline
                                          L Offline
                                          Lost User
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #36

                                          Double standards ! The tigress is here :-D

                                          L 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups