Call of Duty
-
The article Dumping Call Of Duty Fast Files (Explanations in C#)[^] appears to be a covert way of explaining how to decompile a paid for game. I down-voted it but it got approved anyway. It's not clear to follow the article so shouldn't have made it through anyway.
<sig notetoself="think of a better signature"> <first>Jim</first> <last>Meadors</last> </sig>
-
The article Dumping Call Of Duty Fast Files (Explanations in C#)[^] appears to be a covert way of explaining how to decompile a paid for game. I down-voted it but it got approved anyway. It's not clear to follow the article so shouldn't have made it through anyway.
<sig notetoself="think of a better signature"> <first>Jim</first> <last>Meadors</last> </sig>
I agree. Poor quality article whatever the goal and I voted accordingly. Still it appears in the new articles so it seems few others agree. All too common. The standard of a large number of the approved "articles" is IMHO a real cause for concern.
Peter Wasser "The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
-
The article Dumping Call Of Duty Fast Files (Explanations in C#)[^] appears to be a covert way of explaining how to decompile a paid for game. I down-voted it but it got approved anyway. It's not clear to follow the article so shouldn't have made it through anyway.
<sig notetoself="think of a better signature"> <first>Jim</first> <last>Meadors</last> </sig>