I probably shouldn't post this...
-
You sentiments echo mine own regarding American Society certain quaters of American Society (I won't, as you have done so flippentily, write off a whole society). >European community. European Union. The free trade and free movement of people agreement the Northern American Nations recentily agreed upon, where based partially on European Union treaties (treay of Rome) of nearily 30 years ago. In short the US is playing catch up. Regards Ray "Je Suis Mort De Rire"
Another intelligent debate descends into the 'my continent's better than your continent' argument. Will we ever learn :)
-
Another intelligent debate descends into the 'my continent's better than your continent' argument. Will we ever learn :)
er, point taken, the arguement should probabily be, "my contient is not as bad as your contient". :) Regards Ray "Je Suis Mort De Rire"
-
The statistics is subject to different interpretations. Here is one: 1. There are too few people committing suicide or having accidents. 2. The weapons used by the enemies in Korean and Vietnam wars were too inefficient. 3. We definitely need to relax the control on mass destruction weapons and start a few more wars. 4. People have knives, why do they stick to handgun only? Never go to bed if you are mad at each other. It's more fun to stay up and fight. And it's a lot more fun to fight with weapons. ;P ;P ;P ;P ;P
As to number 4 Guy goes into 7-11 with knife to rob store. Store owner pulls out gun.:)
-
As to number 4 Guy goes into 7-11 with knife to rob store. Store owner pulls out gun.:)
Volience begets Volience Regards Ray "Je Suis Mort De Rire"
-
Another intelligent debate descends into the 'my continent's better than your continent' argument. Will we ever learn :)
Oh, I just feel so ashamed. How very non-European of me!
-
Christian, I could throw a rock into any trailer park in Oklahoma and hit someone intelligent enough to, with six weeks of training, program as well or better as you or anyone else on this site. So, please, enough of your analysis of other people's intellect based on their agreement with your political views. I stated that the person involved was intelligent despite his ability to see reason on this painfully obvious issue, this was and is the dichotomy that fascinates me. I'm sorry that your own passion for the issue clouded your ability to read what I said. And while you may consider yourself replaceable by a monkey with six weeks training, I guarantee that I am not. Christian Secrets of a happy marriage #27: Never go to bed if you are mad at each other. It's more fun to stay up and fight.
I think I can safely let that comment stand on its own merit.;) (Monkeys again,hmmm)
-
LOL, of course the Brady people wouldn't have a political agenda. Well, if you exclude the Brady Bill. Since we must outlaw everything the people use to: 1. Kill others 2. Kill themselves 3. Kill others or themselves without intent 4. Or just basically kill Then we must outlaw; Tobacco, autos, airplanes, booze, knives, ladders, water, etc... The problem in America with guns isn't the existence in general, it is the illegal possession and use. Time and time again it has been shown that when the EXISTING laws were properly and aggressively enforced, there was a huge drop in gun related deaths. Of course, enforcement of laws doesn't get you votes. That is why we end up with more and more stupid laws passed every year that go un-enforced. I for one have never hear of a gun holding up a liquor store. There is usually some moron behind the gun. Tim Smith Descartes Systems Sciences, Inc.
>I for one have never hear of a gun holding up a liquor store. >There is usually some moron behind the gun. If you live in the United States, doesn't it disturb you that there are so many gun related deaths? Regardless of your views of gun control, I would be bothered by the fact that either a) Guns kill people and there's far too many deaths because of a lack of gun control. or b) Morons kill people and I'm surrounded by a lot more gun-wielding morons than I would be if I lived somewhere else. Note there is no reference to beer or lighthouses anywhere in this post
-
>I for one have never hear of a gun holding up a liquor store. >There is usually some moron behind the gun. If you live in the United States, doesn't it disturb you that there are so many gun related deaths? Regardless of your views of gun control, I would be bothered by the fact that either a) Guns kill people and there's far too many deaths because of a lack of gun control. or b) Morons kill people and I'm surrounded by a lot more gun-wielding morons than I would be if I lived somewhere else. Note there is no reference to beer or lighthouses anywhere in this post
Yup, it really bothers me when people cry for new gun control, get it, don't enforce it, cry for more, get it, don't enforce it, etc... It has been shown time and time again that we don't need more gun control. We need to actually enforce what laws we have. But, like I said before, that costs money, doesn't have a high political profile and doesn't make people feel like they are 'doing something'. Of course, here in America, we are happy when a president just gives lip service to issues and never does anything. MTV STYLE OVER SUBSTANCE!!!! Tim Smith Descartes Systems Sciences, Inc.
-
Yet, today in Europe you don't find statistically any where near the same number of people, who feel the need to end someone elses life. Our incidence of crime and our criminal population is lower than the US. Yet we share the same ethnically diverse, wealthy and democratic society. With one difference, we can't carry gun. QED. In fact as far as I am aware, no other country has a set of gun control laws similar to that of the US. So am I to understand that everyone else (the other 7 billion of us, are wrong and the US is right ? Regards Ray "Je Suis Mort De Rire"
Our incidence of crime and our criminal population is lower than the US. You/QED/whoever are kind of missing the point that the US is slightly larger than Ireland, and indeed almost any other country on Earth. They are bound to have higher numbers of everything within thier population. There is a saying: "you can use statistics to prove anything". sixty four percent of people know that. (simpsons quote). So am I to understand that everyone else (the other 7 billion of us, are wrong and the US is right? Yes. It's called the American Ego. Get used to it as it will be shoved down your throat by the free, peace loving American public all your life. It all comes down to the fact that they beleive they have a god-given right to do just about anything they want. That's the beauty of religion - everyone is free to interpret it to justify what they want to. That said, I don't want to pick any fights with any of you yanks (I can't possibly win anyway, I am obviously wrong since I am non-American). And I agree with the gist of what Ray was saying. David Wulff dwulff@battleaxesoftware.com
-
Our incidence of crime and our criminal population is lower than the US. You/QED/whoever are kind of missing the point that the US is slightly larger than Ireland, and indeed almost any other country on Earth. They are bound to have higher numbers of everything within thier population. There is a saying: "you can use statistics to prove anything". sixty four percent of people know that. (simpsons quote). So am I to understand that everyone else (the other 7 billion of us, are wrong and the US is right? Yes. It's called the American Ego. Get used to it as it will be shoved down your throat by the free, peace loving American public all your life. It all comes down to the fact that they beleive they have a god-given right to do just about anything they want. That's the beauty of religion - everyone is free to interpret it to justify what they want to. That said, I don't want to pick any fights with any of you yanks (I can't possibly win anyway, I am obviously wrong since I am non-American). And I agree with the gist of what Ray was saying. David Wulff dwulff@battleaxesoftware.com
> It's called the American Ego. Get used to it as it will be shoved down > your throat by the free, peace loving American public all your life. > It all comes down to the fact that they beleive they have a god-given > right to do just about anything they want. I think that is a little broad in scope. We don't think *we* have the right to do "anything we want". We think EVERYBODY has the same rights we do, and we find it incredible to find people in the world that don't think they have those rights too. > I can't possibly win anyway, I am obviously wrong since I am > non-American No, you're wrong because you're just plain out-numbered, and what's worse, we're armed to the freakin teeth because *we can be*. :-)
-
It is funny, Chrisitan, that the NRA's numbers are all propaganda but the "Brady's" numbers are all factual. Its *all* propaganda, dude. It is obviously ridiculous to compare numbers of "gun" deaths out of a population of 270 Million + to war time deaths out of a few hundred thousand troops in combat. Last year, when my wife and I were looking for new homes in East Central Indiana (gag) *every* older home we looked at had weaponry in it. In many cases "assault" rifles, pistols, and equipment for making ammunition were left right out in the open. Last year on a trip back to see my family in Western Oklahoma, I went out target shooting with a cousin of mine, he had two mini-14 "assault" rifles. While out, we were joined by two of his friends with their assault rifles. My point, is that your numbers are meaningless. I grew up around guns, everyone I knew had them. My friends and I were all out hunting with our .22s at age twelve. The effort it would take to disarm the American public would be monumental. Virtually every American I know believes they have a God-given right to own whatever kind of weaponry they please and it is a waste of breath to try to convince them otherwise. I don't own a gun myself, and probably never will, yet I fully believe that a free man does not have to ask permission to defend himself, and I like knowing that, if needed, I could avail myself of weaponry as I please. Could disarming the American public bring gun deaths down? Well, duh! But people who are determined to kill each other will find a way to do it even if they don't have guns. Timothy McViegh killed, what, 180 something - never fired a shot. Yet, you could also bring those numbers down not by getting rid of the 2nd amendment but by getting rid of the 1st. When I was a kid people were heavily armed, and far fewer people were being murdered, because we were a more moral nation (in that regard). The thought of shooting your classmates was simply not an option. Today, after 40 years of the "if it feels good, do it" mentality, people are far more inclined to solve their problems with guns. Shut Hollywood up for a few years, teach Chrisitan morality in school again, and I can assure you those numbers *will* go down. To me, as an American, one option is as onerous as the other. I am a trained combat officer in the U.S. Army (inactive), I have hunted on a regular basis my entire life. I am very familiar with weaponry of virtually every kind. I can assure you that the existence of combat style weaponry in the h
"I am a trained combat officer in the U.S. Army (inactive), I have hunted on a regular basis my entire life. I am very familiar with weaponry of virtually every kind. I can assure you that the existence of combat style weaponry in the hands the citizenry *will* give any government pause when it comes to suppressing a people." The French seem to manage absolutely fine without guns when their government does ANYTHING they don't like. They just bring the tractors into town, blockade the ports, block main roads. Every single time, the government backs down. Cheers, Peter
-
> It's called the American Ego. Get used to it as it will be shoved down > your throat by the free, peace loving American public all your life. > It all comes down to the fact that they beleive they have a god-given > right to do just about anything they want. I think that is a little broad in scope. We don't think *we* have the right to do "anything we want". We think EVERYBODY has the same rights we do, and we find it incredible to find people in the world that don't think they have those rights too. > I can't possibly win anyway, I am obviously wrong since I am > non-American No, you're wrong because you're just plain out-numbered, and what's worse, we're armed to the freakin teeth because *we can be*. :-)
I find it incredible that people would even want some of your rights. With possible expectation to your right to not to say anything if it incriminates you (whoever though that one up certainly wanted Justice to prevail...) For example, that 'thing' (I say thing as I’m not sure offhand if it is law or just an 'accepted thing') whereby you have the right to defend your land by acceptable means (again, "acceptable means" can be what the hell you want it to be) is seriously floored. I can understand the need to protect yourself, your family and to a certain extent your property, but those guys in the films who sit on their porches stroking their shotguns shouting "Geeeeeaaat off of muy lannnd" at everybody that walks past their house is surely taking it a bit too far? Have you ever sat down and wondered why in America the postman leave your mail at the end of your drive? Or why the paperboys just throw the newspaper at your door? It isn’t because their lazy you know. It’s because they like having their legs attached to their body. The fact that you are right and the rest of the world is wrong is purely because you are bigger than most of us, and the ones who are bigger than you are either too scared to do anything about it, or have been bought - er, I mean share the same views. It's the same with schoolyard bullies. And supermarkets and car manufacturers too for that matter. David Wulff dwulff@battleaxesoftware.com
-
"I am a trained combat officer in the U.S. Army (inactive), I have hunted on a regular basis my entire life. I am very familiar with weaponry of virtually every kind. I can assure you that the existence of combat style weaponry in the hands the citizenry *will* give any government pause when it comes to suppressing a people." The French seem to manage absolutely fine without guns when their government does ANYTHING they don't like. They just bring the tractors into town, blockade the ports, block main roads. Every single time, the government backs down. Cheers, Peter
Hmmm, maybe they should have tried that against the Germans.;)
-
I find it incredible that people would even want some of your rights. With possible expectation to your right to not to say anything if it incriminates you (whoever though that one up certainly wanted Justice to prevail...) For example, that 'thing' (I say thing as I’m not sure offhand if it is law or just an 'accepted thing') whereby you have the right to defend your land by acceptable means (again, "acceptable means" can be what the hell you want it to be) is seriously floored. I can understand the need to protect yourself, your family and to a certain extent your property, but those guys in the films who sit on their porches stroking their shotguns shouting "Geeeeeaaat off of muy lannnd" at everybody that walks past their house is surely taking it a bit too far? Have you ever sat down and wondered why in America the postman leave your mail at the end of your drive? Or why the paperboys just throw the newspaper at your door? It isn’t because their lazy you know. It’s because they like having their legs attached to their body. The fact that you are right and the rest of the world is wrong is purely because you are bigger than most of us, and the ones who are bigger than you are either too scared to do anything about it, or have been bought - er, I mean share the same views. It's the same with schoolyard bullies. And supermarkets and car manufacturers too for that matter. David Wulff dwulff@battleaxesoftware.com
> With possible expectation to your right to not to say anything if it incriminates > you (whoever though that one up certainly wanted Justice to prevail...) So, you're saying you'd rather have it like it was in the 1600's when the Court of England *always* found you guilty, but were kind enough to allow you to confess to your crimes? Man, that sounds fair to me. > I can understand the need to protect yourself, your family and to a certain extent > your property, but those guys in the films who sit on their porches stroking their > shotguns shouting "Geeeeeaaat off of muy lannnd" at everybody that walks past their > house is surely taking it a bit too far? "These guys in film" are necessary to the story line, and most of those stories pertain to the past, not present day. Most cities have laws prohibiting firing weapons within city limits, and most states have laws against even displaying a firearm in a threatening manner. Granted, the further out from civilization you get, the less likely it is that the local sheriff is gonna haul you to the pokey for bending the rules a bit, but generally speaking, we don't have the shotgun-stroking toothless redneck to whom you are referring. > Have you ever sat down and wondered why in America the postman leave your mail at > the end of your drive? Not at all. It's called "convenience". Have you ever noticed that the driver's side of the mail jeep is on what we yanks refer to as the "wrong side"? It's so they can just flip down the mailbox door, and slip the mail inside without leaving their vehicle. Not only that, but many rural addresses are usually several hundred yards OFF the road, so I see it as someone doing the mailman a favor by putting a box on a pole down by the road. In ALL of my 45 years, I've lived in houses where the mailbox was either right next to the front door, or was a slot in the door. I recently moved to Texas, and this is honestly the first time I've had a mailbox out by the curb.
-
I find it incredible that people would even want some of your rights. With possible expectation to your right to not to say anything if it incriminates you (whoever though that one up certainly wanted Justice to prevail...) For example, that 'thing' (I say thing as I’m not sure offhand if it is law or just an 'accepted thing') whereby you have the right to defend your land by acceptable means (again, "acceptable means" can be what the hell you want it to be) is seriously floored. I can understand the need to protect yourself, your family and to a certain extent your property, but those guys in the films who sit on their porches stroking their shotguns shouting "Geeeeeaaat off of muy lannnd" at everybody that walks past their house is surely taking it a bit too far? Have you ever sat down and wondered why in America the postman leave your mail at the end of your drive? Or why the paperboys just throw the newspaper at your door? It isn’t because their lazy you know. It’s because they like having their legs attached to their body. The fact that you are right and the rest of the world is wrong is purely because you are bigger than most of us, and the ones who are bigger than you are either too scared to do anything about it, or have been bought - er, I mean share the same views. It's the same with schoolyard bullies. And supermarkets and car manufacturers too for that matter. David Wulff dwulff@battleaxesoftware.com
I can understand the need to protect yourself, your family and to a certain extent your property, but those guys in the films who sit on their porches stroking their shotguns shouting "Geeeeeaaat off of muy lannnd" at everybody that walks past their house is surely taking it a bit too far? LOL :laugh: You watch way too much TV! Jon Sagara "Your schwartz is as big as mine!"
-
Moms are usually right in my expierence.:) Regards Ray "Je Suis Mort De Rire"
-
I can understand the need to protect yourself, your family and to a certain extent your property, but those guys in the films who sit on their porches stroking their shotguns shouting "Geeeeeaaat off of muy lannnd" at everybody that walks past their house is surely taking it a bit too far? LOL :laugh: You watch way too much TV! Jon Sagara "Your schwartz is as big as mine!"
That was an attempt to bring humor into the discussion. Actaully I can't recal a single film that i've seen that in, but I must have got it from somewhere. David Wulff dwulff@battleaxesoftware.com
-
That was an attempt to bring humor into the discussion. Actaully I can't recal a single film that i've seen that in, but I must have got it from somewhere. David Wulff dwulff@battleaxesoftware.com
Yep, I got it. :) Jon Sagara "Your schwartz is as big as mine!"
-
> With possible expectation to your right to not to say anything if it incriminates > you (whoever though that one up certainly wanted Justice to prevail...) So, you're saying you'd rather have it like it was in the 1600's when the Court of England *always* found you guilty, but were kind enough to allow you to confess to your crimes? Man, that sounds fair to me. > I can understand the need to protect yourself, your family and to a certain extent > your property, but those guys in the films who sit on their porches stroking their > shotguns shouting "Geeeeeaaat off of muy lannnd" at everybody that walks past their > house is surely taking it a bit too far? "These guys in film" are necessary to the story line, and most of those stories pertain to the past, not present day. Most cities have laws prohibiting firing weapons within city limits, and most states have laws against even displaying a firearm in a threatening manner. Granted, the further out from civilization you get, the less likely it is that the local sheriff is gonna haul you to the pokey for bending the rules a bit, but generally speaking, we don't have the shotgun-stroking toothless redneck to whom you are referring. > Have you ever sat down and wondered why in America the postman leave your mail at > the end of your drive? Not at all. It's called "convenience". Have you ever noticed that the driver's side of the mail jeep is on what we yanks refer to as the "wrong side"? It's so they can just flip down the mailbox door, and slip the mail inside without leaving their vehicle. Not only that, but many rural addresses are usually several hundred yards OFF the road, so I see it as someone doing the mailman a favor by putting a box on a pole down by the road. In ALL of my 45 years, I've lived in houses where the mailbox was either right next to the front door, or was a slot in the door. I recently moved to Texas, and this is honestly the first time I've had a mailbox out by the curb.
Re: the postmen: That's not entirely true. My sisters ex-boyfriends father (we'll call him Bob) works as a postal worker in the US (I seem to recall it was in Austin, which I beleive is in Texas?). He told us that during his training he was told he was not to deliver post to the property directly, unless it was clear the owner 'allowed' it (i.e. by the presense of a letter slot in their door). If there was no indication then they were to leave the post just inside the property's border. Not knowing much about American towns/cities/whatever, I couldn't tell you if Austin is a city or a rural town (or a cities with rural outskirts), etc. This could be another reason why mailboxes started appearing next to the pavement (sorry - the "curb"). David Wulff dwulff@battleaxesoftware.com
