Sore losers
-
I didn't support him; for reasons that are irrelevant to this post I considered Clinton the marginally better choice. However all this rioting and 'not my president' is a load of bullshit. He was elected - just get the f%ck over it and try to make the best of the situation. What a bunch of w#nkers.
In a harsher world claiming that "he's not my president" and burning things should lead to imprisonment for terrorism (insurretionalists).
DURA LEX, SED LEX GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver When I was six, there were no ones and zeroes - only zeroes. And not all of them worked. -- Ravi Bhavnani
-
I didn't support him; for reasons that are irrelevant to this post I considered Clinton the marginally better choice. However all this rioting and 'not my president' is a load of bullshit. He was elected - just get the f%ck over it and try to make the best of the situation. What a bunch of w#nkers.
Absolutely agree. Pointless. A protest, for like a day, to express discontent, fine, but rioting is basically reinforcing the partisan divide. I'm sure the inauguration will be stripped of dignity by a howling horde of malcontents. Trump nauseates me, but he's in, they should just sit tight, fight for the issues they are concerned about, see what happens and act with dignity. I don't agree with this "heal the divide" crap - the man ran a completely amoral campaign and brought American politics to a new low. For that alone he should be reviled. But ripping up the streets isn't going to achieve anything except strengthen his case. Mind you, it's part of democracy to allow demonstration when you disagree with the politicians. Even when what you're disagreeing with is part of democracy.... ugggh my head hurts.
"This new learning amazes me, Sir Bedivere. Explain to me again how sheep's bladders may be employed to prevent earthquakes"
-
I didn't support him; for reasons that are irrelevant to this post I considered Clinton the marginally better choice. However all this rioting and 'not my president' is a load of bullshit. He was elected - just get the f%ck over it and try to make the best of the situation. What a bunch of w#nkers.
I have to agree - might be a residual of Bernie supporters realizing "Ooops".
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein
"If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010
-
In a harsher world claiming that "he's not my president" and burning things should lead to imprisonment for terrorism (insurretionalists).
DURA LEX, SED LEX GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver When I was six, there were no ones and zeroes - only zeroes. And not all of them worked. -- Ravi Bhavnani
Unfortunate, in Portland, there's a cadre of anarchist who frequent demonstrations and foment violence. Hopefully, one fine day, the demonstrators, themselves will turn on them for hijacking their demonstration . . . well let's just say 'adjust their attitude'.
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein
"If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010
-
Absolutely agree. Pointless. A protest, for like a day, to express discontent, fine, but rioting is basically reinforcing the partisan divide. I'm sure the inauguration will be stripped of dignity by a howling horde of malcontents. Trump nauseates me, but he's in, they should just sit tight, fight for the issues they are concerned about, see what happens and act with dignity. I don't agree with this "heal the divide" crap - the man ran a completely amoral campaign and brought American politics to a new low. For that alone he should be reviled. But ripping up the streets isn't going to achieve anything except strengthen his case. Mind you, it's part of democracy to allow demonstration when you disagree with the politicians. Even when what you're disagreeing with is part of democracy.... ugggh my head hurts.
"This new learning amazes me, Sir Bedivere. Explain to me again how sheep's bladders may be employed to prevent earthquakes"
Have demonstrations they should, by all means. Right now they're just being total a**holes, destroying property and probably doing f#$& all good to their cause, actually they're probably strengthening his side and hurting their own. I bet he's laughing his ass off right now at their moronic behavior. :mad:
-
In a harsher world claiming that "he's not my president" and burning things should lead to imprisonment for terrorism (insurretionalists).
DURA LEX, SED LEX GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver When I was six, there were no ones and zeroes - only zeroes. And not all of them worked. -- Ravi Bhavnani
den2k88 wrote:
In a harsher world claiming that "he's not my president" and burning things should lead to imprisonment for terrorism (insurretionalists).
I agree, including people that imply a president is not legitimate due to misinformation about birth location. And those that call for a revolution on Twitter when they falsely claim the popular vote was lost... Yep, they should be deported immediately or imprisoned immediately.
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet. The interesting thing about software is it can not reproduce, until it can.
-
I have to agree - might be a residual of Bernie supporters realizing "Ooops".
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein
"If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010
W∴ Balboos wrote:
might be a residual of Bernie supporters realizing "Ooops".
Doubt that, most of the Bernies predicted this and were actually "OK" with it versus 8 years of Clinton. The protesters are the ones that were asleep at the wheel during the DNC primaries.
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet. The interesting thing about software is it can not reproduce, until it can.
-
W∴ Balboos wrote:
might be a residual of Bernie supporters realizing "Ooops".
Doubt that, most of the Bernies predicted this and were actually "OK" with it versus 8 years of Clinton. The protesters are the ones that were asleep at the wheel during the DNC primaries.
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet. The interesting thing about software is it can not reproduce, until it can.
That's the OOPS! part - should have thought it through a little further. The damage to be done will follow them through their entire lives (supreme court) - and if they were looking for an outsider? Well, the outsider was always an insider (rubbing elbows with the power elite) and now he's picked their chairman has his gatekeeper. As I said in earlier posts, and with some of it already appearing to come into fruition: the only small hope left is that, with his constant lying he even lied about what he'll do in office.
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein
"If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010
-
den2k88 wrote:
In a harsher world claiming that "he's not my president" and burning things should lead to imprisonment for terrorism (insurretionalists).
I agree, including people that imply a president is not legitimate due to misinformation about birth location. And those that call for a revolution on Twitter when they falsely claim the popular vote was lost... Yep, they should be deported immediately or imprisoned immediately.
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet. The interesting thing about software is it can not reproduce, until it can.
As those who are entitled to State secrets and leave them in open servers, or those who want to simplify the life of criminals by disarming honest citizens. And you know what the irony is? We're both right. In a saner world none of those two entities (I refuse to further categorize them) would have been anywhere but NOT in politics. I hoped, from the EU, for Trump's victory only because if a president with stricter gun laws view was elected it could cause a domino effect on the already extremely strict EU govenrments. From now on, only the facts will talk...
DURA LEX, SED LEX GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver When I was six, there were no ones and zeroes - only zeroes. And not all of them worked. -- Ravi Bhavnani
-
I didn't support him; for reasons that are irrelevant to this post I considered Clinton the marginally better choice. However all this rioting and 'not my president' is a load of bullshit. He was elected - just get the f%ck over it and try to make the best of the situation. What a bunch of w#nkers.
Just like the way the guys who wave Confederate flags have gotten over it?
========================================================= I'm an optoholic - my glass is always half full of vodka. =========================================================
-
That's the OOPS! part - should have thought it through a little further. The damage to be done will follow them through their entire lives (supreme court) - and if they were looking for an outsider? Well, the outsider was always an insider (rubbing elbows with the power elite) and now he's picked their chairman has his gatekeeper. As I said in earlier posts, and with some of it already appearing to come into fruition: the only small hope left is that, with his constant lying he even lied about what he'll do in office.
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein
"If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010
W∴ Balboos wrote:
The damage to be done will follow them through their entire lives (supreme court)
Then you still are not understanding what the Sanders movement was about. Yes justices are important, however getting back the democracy is more important. I have heard this argument over and over (from Hillbots), but NEVER from Sanders backers. Sanders backers want money out first. Then, you can start to address the courts. Both HRC and Trump would nominate corporate backed judges which gets us no where on those policies. Yes, yes yes.. I know you are talking other issues. Again, has nothing to do with the Sanders supporters. I am not seeing any "Oops" from them, only the DNC freaking out.
W∴ Balboos wrote:
Well, the outsider was always an insider (rubbing elbows with the power elite) and now he's picked their chairman has his gatekeeper.
Yep, and again that was preached by the Sanders movement well over a year ago. The prediction was if HRC took the DNC it could fall to the GOP and the elite, so no difference. HOWEVER, the difference lies in who sits there. IF, HRC won then no TRUE progressive agenda could be brought up for another 8 years! In this case, there is likely to be a massive progressive surge in 2 years and then again in 2020. This has and always been what the Sanders crowd pushed. This is WHY, it was argued NO DIFFERENCE. Of course HRC and Trump are different. But not in the polices that are actually speaking to the masses. Here is a CRAZY example. I know a guy that seriously wished Trump and Sanders would have run together. Yeah, not kidding. Why? He didn't want Trump because of Xenophobia etc., but anti establishment that Trump successfully conned his way in. As you pointed out, Trump is an insider. This means over the next two years the surge he got he will lose. He is in all likelyhood going to be a 1 term president. This is not to say he will not accomplish some things, but you can already tell from the people he is pulling in that the "swamp" will not be drained.
W∴ Balboos wrote:
the only small hope left is that, with his constant lying he even lied about what he'll do in office.
That is also coming to light. He has already stepped back on numerous pledges and will likely end up a moderate president, with conservative and establishment advisers milking the system. This will create a progressive wind
-
As those who are entitled to State secrets and leave them in open servers, or those who want to simplify the life of criminals by disarming honest citizens. And you know what the irony is? We're both right. In a saner world none of those two entities (I refuse to further categorize them) would have been anywhere but NOT in politics. I hoped, from the EU, for Trump's victory only because if a president with stricter gun laws view was elected it could cause a domino effect on the already extremely strict EU govenrments. From now on, only the facts will talk...
DURA LEX, SED LEX GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver When I was six, there were no ones and zeroes - only zeroes. And not all of them worked. -- Ravi Bhavnani
den2k88 wrote:
And you know what the irony is? We're both right. In a saner world none of those two entities (I refuse to further categorize them) would have been anywhere but NOT in politics.
Pretty much. Too much money in the system. Media, representatives, even the judges.
den2k88 wrote:
I hoped, from the EU, for Trump's victory only because if a president with stricter gun laws view was elected it could cause a domino effect on the already extremely strict EU govenrments.
I wouldn't count your chickens just yet. Trumps policies are very fascist speaking causing a rise in the EU's fascism politician's favor-ability. Just because he is not anti-gun doesn't mean his comparing politicians in the EU aren't. He is VERY anti media, which I get. The media is corrupt, but his take on it won't work. If he had his way he would get to sue anyone that speaks ill of him from now on. Also, if you watched the market the private prison funds skyrocketed. Go figure.
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet. The interesting thing about software is it can not reproduce, until it can.
-
W∴ Balboos wrote:
The damage to be done will follow them through their entire lives (supreme court)
Then you still are not understanding what the Sanders movement was about. Yes justices are important, however getting back the democracy is more important. I have heard this argument over and over (from Hillbots), but NEVER from Sanders backers. Sanders backers want money out first. Then, you can start to address the courts. Both HRC and Trump would nominate corporate backed judges which gets us no where on those policies. Yes, yes yes.. I know you are talking other issues. Again, has nothing to do with the Sanders supporters. I am not seeing any "Oops" from them, only the DNC freaking out.
W∴ Balboos wrote:
Well, the outsider was always an insider (rubbing elbows with the power elite) and now he's picked their chairman has his gatekeeper.
Yep, and again that was preached by the Sanders movement well over a year ago. The prediction was if HRC took the DNC it could fall to the GOP and the elite, so no difference. HOWEVER, the difference lies in who sits there. IF, HRC won then no TRUE progressive agenda could be brought up for another 8 years! In this case, there is likely to be a massive progressive surge in 2 years and then again in 2020. This has and always been what the Sanders crowd pushed. This is WHY, it was argued NO DIFFERENCE. Of course HRC and Trump are different. But not in the polices that are actually speaking to the masses. Here is a CRAZY example. I know a guy that seriously wished Trump and Sanders would have run together. Yeah, not kidding. Why? He didn't want Trump because of Xenophobia etc., but anti establishment that Trump successfully conned his way in. As you pointed out, Trump is an insider. This means over the next two years the surge he got he will lose. He is in all likelyhood going to be a 1 term president. This is not to say he will not accomplish some things, but you can already tell from the people he is pulling in that the "swamp" will not be drained.
W∴ Balboos wrote:
the only small hope left is that, with his constant lying he even lied about what he'll do in office.
That is also coming to light. He has already stepped back on numerous pledges and will likely end up a moderate president, with conservative and establishment advisers milking the system. This will create a progressive wind
Two points. The big money is in the campaign - and extreme private influence - because of a Supreme Court decision - that will now not be struck down for generations. Thanks a lot! ? ? ?
N_tro_P wrote:
IF, HRC won then no TRUE progressive agenda could be brought up for another 8 years! In this case, there is likely to be a massive progressive surge in 2 years and then again in 2020. This has and always been what the Sanders crowd pushed. This is WHY, it was argued NO DIFFERENCE. Of course HRC and Trump are different. But not in the polices that are actually speaking to the masses.
This logic is, upon analysis, roughly the equivalent to amputating your leg because you stubbed your toe. Now you'll learn to be more careful where you walk! The callousness of the view you espouse is disgusting. Really. The amount of pain and suffering that will occur in the interim, on real people, is going to be horrific. Just collateral damage, I suppose. Note how I underlined "likely to be" - a fierce gamble with people's lives, the potential loss of rights, and "very likely" thousands of lives in war adventures. I've a new idiom for that logic: cut off your face to spite your nose.
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein
"If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010
-
den2k88 wrote:
And you know what the irony is? We're both right. In a saner world none of those two entities (I refuse to further categorize them) would have been anywhere but NOT in politics.
Pretty much. Too much money in the system. Media, representatives, even the judges.
den2k88 wrote:
I hoped, from the EU, for Trump's victory only because if a president with stricter gun laws view was elected it could cause a domino effect on the already extremely strict EU govenrments.
I wouldn't count your chickens just yet. Trumps policies are very fascist speaking causing a rise in the EU's fascism politician's favor-ability. Just because he is not anti-gun doesn't mean his comparing politicians in the EU aren't. He is VERY anti media, which I get. The media is corrupt, but his take on it won't work. If he had his way he would get to sue anyone that speaks ill of him from now on. Also, if you watched the market the private prison funds skyrocketed. Go figure.
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet. The interesting thing about software is it can not reproduce, until it can.
I'll now say something harsh (what-a-new): I hope for some hardass fascism to return. The one which created prison camps, not the neo skinheads full of booze and sh*t that are now around. Why? Because antifascism is dead. The leftist majornace now is the epitome of butt-hurt culture, which resorts to gang violence and censorship - exactly like the fascist, but with a differently coloured shirt. I hope, in Italy at least, for a rapid and huge downfall which wuold set priorities straight - now it's all about changing the grammar (in Italian names have genders, even objects, and the neutral form is 99% male gendered. Radical chics want to radically change a grammar that evolved for millennia and censor those who use the proper one for... nothing) and going vegan / antivax. I hope for the end in order to restart anew. At least here in Italy.
DURA LEX, SED LEX GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver When I was six, there were no ones and zeroes - only zeroes. And not all of them worked. -- Ravi Bhavnani
-
Two points. The big money is in the campaign - and extreme private influence - because of a Supreme Court decision - that will now not be struck down for generations. Thanks a lot! ? ? ?
N_tro_P wrote:
IF, HRC won then no TRUE progressive agenda could be brought up for another 8 years! In this case, there is likely to be a massive progressive surge in 2 years and then again in 2020. This has and always been what the Sanders crowd pushed. This is WHY, it was argued NO DIFFERENCE. Of course HRC and Trump are different. But not in the polices that are actually speaking to the masses.
This logic is, upon analysis, roughly the equivalent to amputating your leg because you stubbed your toe. Now you'll learn to be more careful where you walk! The callousness of the view you espouse is disgusting. Really. The amount of pain and suffering that will occur in the interim, on real people, is going to be horrific. Just collateral damage, I suppose. Note how I underlined "likely to be" - a fierce gamble with people's lives, the potential loss of rights, and "very likely" thousands of lives in war adventures. I've a new idiom for that logic: cut off your face to spite your nose.
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein
"If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010
W∴ Balboos wrote:
Two points. The big money is in the campaign - and extreme private influence - because of a Supreme Court decision - that will now not be struck down for generations. Thanks a lot! ? ? ?
Both main candidates were pro wall street. Thanks a lot? Do you assume I have control over this? If there is anyone to thank it is the media for lieing to the public and jamming both Clinton and Trump down our throats for the last year. Over one year ago, polls floated showing Clinton would have barely a two point lead on Trump. Wow. Go Figure. Days before election, Clinton had a narrow two point lead on Trump. Who had a lead? Oh, right Sanders. He lead by double digits. How many of his speeches did CNN or Fox air in entirety? How many of Clintons and Trumps? They chose it to be between them. Not you. Not I. If you voted for either, you are an idiot IMO.
W∴ Balboos wrote:
This logic is, upon analysis, roughly the equivalent to amputating your leg because you stubbed your toe. Now you'll learn to be more careful where you walk!
You are an idiot. Clinton is not a progressive. Pro fracking. Pro TPP. Pro Private Prison. The list goes on. Stop being so naïve and stop being such a sore loser. It was never a horse race, and just because your vote did get wasted (just as the "Sanders" crowd said it would), doesn't mean you get to whine and stick your head in the sand. Now the actual work begins. America has again fallen off the wagon like a drunken hobo and will need actual progressives to speak up. Stop bitching and blaming and get your head out of your ass.
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet. The interesting thing about software is it can not reproduce, until it can.
-
I'll now say something harsh (what-a-new): I hope for some hardass fascism to return. The one which created prison camps, not the neo skinheads full of booze and sh*t that are now around. Why? Because antifascism is dead. The leftist majornace now is the epitome of butt-hurt culture, which resorts to gang violence and censorship - exactly like the fascist, but with a differently coloured shirt. I hope, in Italy at least, for a rapid and huge downfall which wuold set priorities straight - now it's all about changing the grammar (in Italian names have genders, even objects, and the neutral form is 99% male gendered. Radical chics want to radically change a grammar that evolved for millennia and censor those who use the proper one for... nothing) and going vegan / antivax. I hope for the end in order to restart anew. At least here in Italy.
DURA LEX, SED LEX GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver When I was six, there were no ones and zeroes - only zeroes. And not all of them worked. -- Ravi Bhavnani
den2k88 wrote:
I hope for some hardass fascism to return.
den2k88 wrote:
I hope for the end in order to restart anew
The problem is, it will not correct itself this time. Computers and weaponry are too powerful. Security and surveillance are too easy for a fascist state. If democracy collapses (as it has been to corporatism) it will be a domino effect and there will be no going back. The world will leave the democratic stage of nation states and begin a new corporate era where a few conglomerates use geography to enslave and carrot dangle the masses. There will be no escape from it, for it will be run by a handful of people with the absolute powers of automation and machinery to ensure it. We have about a decade to prevent such nastiness I figure. Either socialism begins a strong rise or we continue the fall into corporate fascism.
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet. The interesting thing about software is it can not reproduce, until it can.
-
W∴ Balboos wrote:
Two points. The big money is in the campaign - and extreme private influence - because of a Supreme Court decision - that will now not be struck down for generations. Thanks a lot! ? ? ?
Both main candidates were pro wall street. Thanks a lot? Do you assume I have control over this? If there is anyone to thank it is the media for lieing to the public and jamming both Clinton and Trump down our throats for the last year. Over one year ago, polls floated showing Clinton would have barely a two point lead on Trump. Wow. Go Figure. Days before election, Clinton had a narrow two point lead on Trump. Who had a lead? Oh, right Sanders. He lead by double digits. How many of his speeches did CNN or Fox air in entirety? How many of Clintons and Trumps? They chose it to be between them. Not you. Not I. If you voted for either, you are an idiot IMO.
W∴ Balboos wrote:
This logic is, upon analysis, roughly the equivalent to amputating your leg because you stubbed your toe. Now you'll learn to be more careful where you walk!
You are an idiot. Clinton is not a progressive. Pro fracking. Pro TPP. Pro Private Prison. The list goes on. Stop being so naïve and stop being such a sore loser. It was never a horse race, and just because your vote did get wasted (just as the "Sanders" crowd said it would), doesn't mean you get to whine and stick your head in the sand. Now the actual work begins. America has again fallen off the wagon like a drunken hobo and will need actual progressives to speak up. Stop bitching and blaming and get your head out of your ass.
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet. The interesting thing about software is it can not reproduce, until it can.
Raving like an infant who didn't get his way. You ought to look up the "Citizens United" decision by the supreme court. Figure out what it means. Figure out why your attitude means that money will keep on flowing to influence politics for decades to come. Then pretend "it's Wall Street". You are a truly rare breed* - a natural born shithead. It suits you well, and, even though you can't help being a shithead, no one will excuse you. It's good that you have embraced it. * Extinction is forever - so what are keeping us waiting?< EOF
-
Raving like an infant who didn't get his way. You ought to look up the "Citizens United" decision by the supreme court. Figure out what it means. Figure out why your attitude means that money will keep on flowing to influence politics for decades to come. Then pretend "it's Wall Street". You are a truly rare breed* - a natural born shithead. It suits you well, and, even though you can't help being a shithead, no one will excuse you. It's good that you have embraced it. * Extinction is forever - so what are keeping us waiting?< EOF
W∴ Balboos wrote:
Raving like an infant who didn't get his way. You ought to look up the "Citizens United" decision by the supreme court.
I do know what it means. I also know that HRC had no intentions of putting anyone up to overturn it. She began to claim she would towards the end of her campaigning. She likes to pander. Annnd I also know that the DNC had money out of their party, until 2012 when HRC began to take it over. :suss: You are pretty naive aren't you?
W∴ Balboos wrote:
You are a truly rare breed* - a natural born sh*thead.
Who is the one whailing like a baby now? You are a naive child and are freaking out now because you didn't get your way. :((
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet. The interesting thing about software is it can not reproduce, until it can.
-
I didn't support him; for reasons that are irrelevant to this post I considered Clinton the marginally better choice. However all this rioting and 'not my president' is a load of bullshit. He was elected - just get the f%ck over it and try to make the best of the situation. What a bunch of w#nkers.
Thank you!!!!
Jeremy Falcon
-
Just like the way the guys who wave Confederate flags have gotten over it?
========================================================= I'm an optoholic - my glass is always half full of vodka. =========================================================
Nobody is telling them to stop using their flag or stop their way of life or beliefs. They have their right to think the the way they do, but denouncing and destruction of flag is not the way to go when your personal freedom isn't attacked, unless you're into treason. I realize they may think their personal freedom's are attacked, but that's because people are too busy listening to the media rather than actually educating themselves, and that goes for both sides. The fact is, it's not under attack and nobody is forcing them to stop being who they are. There's a difference. If you can't see that, then you're part of the problem and not the solution.
Jeremy Falcon