Justice
-
That's not a very Christian thing to say....
F-ES Sitecore wrote:
That's not a very Christian thing to say
Maybe, and also KFC recommends pepsi. However, neither are of any importance as far as this case is concerned.
-
Why would the ethics of your (I presume) religion be relevant to someone else who may not even share it.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH
I was merely pointing out the irony, I guess not many got that :) Bill Hicks said it best...[^]
-
Quote:
Months ago, that team had indicated in court documents that it would present evidence that Roof suffers from a mental defect or similar condition.
Of course he does; he's a &%$#@*^ psychopath! If that's grounds for appeal, we might as well give up on the justice system altogether, and go back to lynch mobs.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
-
The biggest problem with this case is they keep saying white killed black. That is a racist statement in itself. It should be person killed people even if it was a hate crime. Too bad this has to go on for several more years.
Mongo: Mongo only pawn... in game of life.
-
The biggest problem with this case is they keep saying white killed black. That is a racist statement in itself. It should be person killed people even if it was a hate crime. Too bad this has to go on for several more years.
Mongo: Mongo only pawn... in game of life.
Corporal Agarn wrote:
That is a racist statement in itself.
Stating the facts is racist? :wtf: Would you say the same if the hues were reversed? If an insane black guy shot up a church full of white folks, because he didn't like white folks, would you still insist on the "person kills people" headline? Perhaps we should go a step further: "People involved in shooting incident". :doh:
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
-
Corporal Agarn wrote:
That is a racist statement in itself.
Stating the facts is racist? :wtf: Would you say the same if the hues were reversed? If an insane black guy shot up a church full of white folks, because he didn't like white folks, would you still insist on the "person kills people" headline? Perhaps we should go a step further: "People involved in shooting incident". :doh:
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
Yes! If we were not racist then the headline would not indicate race. By-the-way the headline could read "One man kills nine at church".
Mongo: Mongo only pawn... in game of life.
-
Yes! If we were not racist then the headline would not indicate race. By-the-way the headline could read "One man kills nine at church".
Mongo: Mongo only pawn... in game of life.
-
Yes! If we were not racist then the headline would not indicate race. By-the-way the headline could read "One man kills nine at church".
Mongo: Mongo only pawn... in game of life.
So when reporting a story about a racially-motivated killing, the news should avoid any mention of race? :wtf: Do we prohibit the news from mentioning motives for any crime? Or do we just let people deduce that crimes where the motive isn't reported are racially-motivated?
Corporal Agarn wrote:
If we were not racist ...
Then there wouldn't be a crime to report on, because nobody would be killing other people for having different colour skin.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
-
So when reporting a story about a racially-motivated killing, the news should avoid any mention of race? :wtf: Do we prohibit the news from mentioning motives for any crime? Or do we just let people deduce that crimes where the motive isn't reported are racially-motivated?
Corporal Agarn wrote:
If we were not racist ...
Then there wouldn't be a crime to report on, because nobody would be killing other people for having different colour skin.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
We live in a headline society. You can say it was race related in the article but if you wave it around others will copy. Play down the race aspect then people will not see a person of a different race as being objectionally different. We have enough people of the same "colour" killing each other as it is.
Mongo: Mongo only pawn... in game of life.
-
We live in a headline society. You can say it was race related in the article but if you wave it around others will copy. Play down the race aspect then people will not see a person of a different race as being objectionally different. We have enough people of the same "colour" killing each other as it is.
Mongo: Mongo only pawn... in game of life.
OK, I see your point. But that's not quite the same as saying that "a white person killed some black people" is a racist statement. :)
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
-
The biggest problem with this case is they keep saying white killed black. That is a racist statement in itself. It should be person killed people even if it was a hate crime. Too bad this has to go on for several more years.
Mongo: Mongo only pawn... in game of life.
He killed them because they were black. How else should it be reported? Haven’t you seen some of the other sh¨t he’s been saying? Psychology was concocted by Jews to invent disease where none exist? Seriously? I’m sure there’s nothing mentally wrong with him except for being a murderous c¨nt.
-
Why would the ethics of your (I presume) religion be relevant to someone else who may not even share it.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH
I think he's suggesting that they turn the other cheek. ... And stick a lethal injection into that one, too.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
-
Yes! If we were not racist then the headline would not indicate race. By-the-way the headline could read "One man kills nine at church".
Mongo: Mongo only pawn... in game of life.
