Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Insider News
  4. Uncle Bob’s Clean Code: irrelevant in the age of full-stack JavaScript?

Uncle Bob’s Clean Code: irrelevant in the age of full-stack JavaScript?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Insider News
questionjavascriptcomdata-structureslearning
5 Posts 5 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    Kent Sharkey
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Atomic Object[^]:

    But how relevant is the book to the concerns of web development eight years after it was published?

    Because you can't write clean code in JavaScript?

    Yup, headline in the form of a question. You know how that goes.

    M L M J 4 Replies Last reply
    0
    • K Kent Sharkey

      Atomic Object[^]:

      But how relevant is the book to the concerns of web development eight years after it was published?

      Because you can't write clean code in JavaScript?

      Yup, headline in the form of a question. You know how that goes.

      M Offline
      M Offline
      Marc Clifton
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      > full-stack JavaScript application Any combination of those words just makes we want to X| Marc

      V.A.P.O.R.ware - Visual Assisted Programming / Organizational Representation Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • K Kent Sharkey

        Atomic Object[^]:

        But how relevant is the book to the concerns of web development eight years after it was published?

        Because you can't write clean code in JavaScript?

        Yup, headline in the form of a question. You know how that goes.

        L Offline
        L Offline
        Lost User
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Kent Sharkey wrote:

        Because you can't write clean code in JavaScript?

        Admit it, it's worse than VB3.

        Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • K Kent Sharkey

          Atomic Object[^]:

          But how relevant is the book to the concerns of web development eight years after it was published?

          Because you can't write clean code in JavaScript?

          Yup, headline in the form of a question. You know how that goes.

          M Offline
          M Offline
          Master Man1980
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Quote:

          Because you can't write clean code in JavaScript?

          Should be a Christmas wish list for this week survey saying. Please Santa, let my js code work for once and for all, no bug and be work any version of AngularJS, JQuery, BackBone, ...[name all the js frameworks here] :)

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • K Kent Sharkey

            Atomic Object[^]:

            But how relevant is the book to the concerns of web development eight years after it was published?

            Because you can't write clean code in JavaScript?

            Yup, headline in the form of a question. You know how that goes.

            J Offline
            J Offline
            Joe Woodbury
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            I read that book years ago and really disliked it. I thought it poorly written, often self-contradicting and, worst of all, dogmatic. Unfortunately, "his" good ideas are lost in the clutter of "his" bad ones and "his" religious-like ferver. (His in quotes since several chapter were written by other people, hence some of the inconsistency.)

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            Reply
            • Reply as topic
            Log in to reply
            • Oldest to Newest
            • Newest to Oldest
            • Most Votes


            • Login

            • Don't have an account? Register

            • Login or register to search.
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Tags
            • Popular
            • World
            • Users
            • Groups