Bug of the Day
-
Now assume you are really in a production Environment... Sorry to say that, but a lot what happens here is never allowed in production. Bruno
Enlighten us.
cheers Chris Maunder
-
Enlighten us.
cheers Chris Maunder
-
string objectRefGuid = objectRef.ObjectTypeId.ToString() + PartDivider + objectRef.ObjectId;
if (objectRef.VersionNumber > 0)
objectRefGuid += PartDivider + objectRef.VersionNumber;ObjectTypeIdis 1,ObjectIdis 2, andVersionNumberis 3.PartDivideris '_'. The expected result was 1_2_3. The output was 1_298. :doh:cheers Chris Maunder
Care to explain for those (me) who do not C# ? Someone say it is related to "Implicit conversions" ? Thanks.
I'd rather be phishing!
-
Enlighten us.
cheers Chris Maunder
What's wrong is the developer asking "why" questions about their own production code - wrong role. In production the customers/users ask the "why" questions, to which developers are supposed to say "that's what you/they said you wanted/needed." The customer is king, but in their presence the developer is never wrong.
Sin tack ear lol Pressing the any key may be continuate
-
string objectRefGuid = objectRef.ObjectTypeId.ToString() + PartDivider + objectRef.ObjectId;
if (objectRef.VersionNumber > 0)
objectRefGuid += PartDivider + objectRef.VersionNumber;ObjectTypeIdis 1,ObjectIdis 2, andVersionNumberis 3.PartDivideris '_'. The expected result was 1_2_3. The output was 1_298. :doh:cheers Chris Maunder
-
string objectRefGuid = objectRef.ObjectTypeId.ToString() + PartDivider + objectRef.ObjectId;
if (objectRef.VersionNumber > 0)
objectRefGuid += PartDivider + objectRef.VersionNumber;ObjectTypeIdis 1,ObjectIdis 2, andVersionNumberis 3.PartDivideris '_'. The expected result was 1_2_3. The output was 1_298. :doh:cheers Chris Maunder
-
string objectRefGuid = objectRef.ObjectTypeId.ToString() + PartDivider + objectRef.ObjectId;
if (objectRef.VersionNumber > 0)
objectRefGuid += PartDivider + objectRef.VersionNumber;ObjectTypeIdis 1,ObjectIdis 2, andVersionNumberis 3.PartDivideris '_'. The expected result was 1_2_3. The output was 1_298. :doh:cheers Chris Maunder
Oh, you mean this output[^]? I am sure the aftermath of that bug was really very graphical. See the layout.
The shit I complain about It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem ~! Firewall !~
-
Care to explain for those (me) who do not C# ? Someone say it is related to "Implicit conversions" ? Thanks.
I'd rather be phishing!
He's basically doing this:
"1_2" + '_' + 3
Note that the underscore is a character, not a string (Single quotes = char, Double quotes = string). So instead of both parts being converted to strings to form "_3", it's treating the character as a number (ASCII code 95), adding 3 to it, THEN converting it to a string... So it becomes "1_2" + "98" Very subtle. I like it.
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels) -
Oh, you mean this output[^]? I am sure the aftermath of that bug was really very graphical. See the layout.
The shit I complain about It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem ~! Firewall !~
-
He's basically doing this:
"1_2" + '_' + 3
Note that the underscore is a character, not a string (Single quotes = char, Double quotes = string). So instead of both parts being converted to strings to form "_3", it's treating the character as a number (ASCII code 95), adding 3 to it, THEN converting it to a string... So it becomes "1_2" + "98" Very subtle. I like it.
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels) -
So, the pixels flattened due to the empty space, I guess?
The shit I complain about It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem ~! Firewall !~
-
So, the pixels flattened due to the empty space, I guess?
The shit I complain about It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem ~! Firewall !~
Afzaal Ahmad Zeeshan wrote:
So, the pixels flattened due to the empty space, I guess?
No, just forgot to run my Bit Recycler[^]. It is like defragmenting, but for the bits. :rolleyes:
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)
-
Oh, you mean this output[^]? I am sure the aftermath of that bug was really very graphical. See the layout.
The shit I complain about It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem ~! Firewall !~
-
That has nothing to do with the fact that JS is loosely typed, but the fact that JS doesn't have a char type. So '_' is just a string, equivalent to "_", and thus 3 is concatenated as though it was a string. C# would have done the same if '_' was a string and not a char. Basically, it's not loosely typed, but poorly typed :)
Best, Sander arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript SQL Server for C# Developers Succinctly Object-Oriented Programming in C# Succinctly
-
He's basically doing this:
"1_2" + '_' + 3
Note that the underscore is a character, not a string (Single quotes = char, Double quotes = string). So instead of both parts being converted to strings to form "_3", it's treating the character as a number (ASCII code 95), adding 3 to it, THEN converting it to a string... So it becomes "1_2" + "98" Very subtle. I like it.
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)Cute. Thanks.
I'd rather be phishing!
-
That has nothing to do with the fact that JS is loosely typed, but the fact that JS doesn't have a char type. So '_' is just a string, equivalent to "_", and thus 3 is concatenated as though it was a string. C# would have done the same if '_' was a string and not a char. Basically, it's not loosely typed, but poorly typed :)
Best, Sander arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript SQL Server for C# Developers Succinctly Object-Oriented Programming in C# Succinctly
It has everything to do with it bro, there is no char type in JS.... because it's loosely typed. Btw, the sky is blue. ;)
Jeremy Falcon
-
That has nothing to do with the fact that JS is loosely typed, but the fact that JS doesn't have a char type. So '_' is just a string, equivalent to "_", and thus 3 is concatenated as though it was a string. C# would have done the same if '_' was a string and not a char. Basically, it's not loosely typed, but poorly typed :)
Best, Sander arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript SQL Server for C# Developers Succinctly Object-Oriented Programming in C# Succinctly
-
Is that what caused the CSS to go wack-a-doodle? :-D
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data. There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
Which CSS?
cheers Chris Maunder
-
It is.
cheers Chris Maunder
-
Which CSS?
cheers Chris Maunder
Dunno for him, but for me it keeps on resetting the layout like I'm not logged in... going to compact view, back to fixed from fluid, etc. On a Mac in Chrome if that helps.
Jeremy Falcon
