Bug of the Day
-
He's basically doing this:
"1_2" + '_' + 3
Note that the underscore is a character, not a string (Single quotes = char, Double quotes = string). So instead of both parts being converted to strings to form "_3", it's treating the character as a number (ASCII code 95), adding 3 to it, THEN converting it to a string... So it becomes "1_2" + "98" Very subtle. I like it.
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)Subtle indeed. I never use char literals unless absolutely necessary. A one char string is a tad expensive in some cases, but surely not in this one.
Follow my adventures with .NET Core at my new blog, Erisia Information Services.
-
Sander Rossel wrote:
Having said that, JavaScript DOES have types. It has strings, numbers, booleans null, undefined and objects...Why do you persist that JavaScript has no types when the opposite is obviously true?
:sigh: Might wanna read what I wrote.
Sander Rossel wrote:
I'm just human and I won't pass on a chance to bitch about JavaScript.
Fair enough, but as a human, may I humbly suggest you get a woman to occupy your time. ;P
Jeremy Falcon
Just "getting" a woman is not like just getting a Coke.
Follow my adventures with .NET Core at my new blog, Erisia Information Services.
-
I thought that I was the only one who still uses GIMP. ;)
if (Object.DividedByZero == true) { Universe.Implode(); } Meus ratio ex fortis machina. Simplicitatis de formae ac munus. -Foothill, 2016
Yeah, GIMP's no big deal. There's nothing I can't draw with AutoCad, Paint.NET, and InkScape.
Follow my adventures with .NET Core at my new blog, Erisia Information Services.
-
When you say "thread view" do you mean that you were kicked into a different default view on the forums? We did a hefty refactor this week to clean up some debris from 4 years ago. We tested the blazes out of it but no matter what you test you'll always miss something. Unless you're NASA.
cheers Chris Maunder
NASA has historically missed quite a lot, even idiotic things like metric vs. imperial confusion.
Follow my adventures with .NET Core at my new blog, Erisia Information Services.
-
Which CSS?
cheers Chris Maunder
See post below for screenshot, The Lounge[^]. Chrome on linux and win10 for me. The whole screen stretches out and font was smaller.
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data. There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
-
Enlighten us.
cheers Chris Maunder
-
string objectRefGuid = objectRef.ObjectTypeId.ToString() + PartDivider + objectRef.ObjectId;
if (objectRef.VersionNumber > 0)
objectRefGuid += PartDivider + objectRef.VersionNumber;ObjectTypeIdis 1,ObjectIdis 2, andVersionNumberis 3.PartDivideris '_'. The expected result was 1_2_3. The output was 1_298. :doh:cheers Chris Maunder
Brady Kelly wrote:
Subtle indeed. I never use char literals unless absolutely necessary. A one char string is a tad expensive in some cases, but surely not in this one.
I agree with that. Also to me it seems that
PartDivideris meant for only formatting purposes (judging from the name itself, aka it's meant for interpolation or concatenation purposes) so it seems kind-of intuitive to specify it asstring. Nevertheless in this kind of cases I always prefer using interpolated (if you can use a higher C# version) or formattable strings, for example:private const string ObjectRefGuidFormat = "{0}{1:_0}{2:_0}";
// ...
// E.g. "1_2" or "1_2_3".
string objectRefGuid = string.Format(ObjectRefGuidFormat,
objectRef.ObjectTypeId,
objectRef.ObjectId,
objectRef.VersionNumber > 0 ? objectRef.VersionNumber.ToString() : null); -
You know I can't sit around idle when people on the internet say bad things about my favorite programming language. Or positive things about my least favorite programming language. I'm just human and I won't pass on a chance to bitch about JavaScript. Having said that, JavaScript DOES have types. It has strings, numbers, booleans null, undefined and objects... Why do you persist that JavaScript has no types when the opposite is obviously true? ;p
Best, Sander arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript SQL Server for C# Developers Succinctly Object-Oriented Programming in C# Succinctly
mandatory xkcd: Duty Calls[^]
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
-
And obligatory XKCD :) xkcd: Duty Calls[^]
Jeremy Falcon
I was reading the thread and had exact the same idea... but then I saw your post :sigh: :sigh:
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
-
I'm curious, do you know why it end up 1_298?
I'm adding a char and an int and adding that to a string. If it was string + char + int it would all be good, but it's string += char + int whichh gets implicitly cast to string += (string)(int + int). (int) '_' = 95, so '_' + 3 = 98. we get "1_2" + "98" = "1_298"
cheers Chris Maunder
