Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Soapbox
  4. And so it starts....

And so it starts....

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Soapbox
html
103 Posts 17 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Munchies_Matt

    Feel free to point out one fact that is wrong in the article. Waiting....

    Richard DeemingR Offline
    Richard DeemingR Offline
    Richard Deeming
    wrote on last edited by
    #42

    Quote:

    the ‘Climategate’ affair ... suggested they had manipulated and hidden data.

    There's one for a start. The fact that the tabloid press didn't understand the content of the leaked emails doesn't mean they get to make up their own meaning. Now, feel free to point out which part of the article marks the end for "Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming". I assume that's what you're referring to, and not "Citizens Against Government Waste", or "Cultural Alliance of Greater Washington".


    "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

    "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined" - Homer

    M T 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • Richard DeemingR Richard Deeming

      Quote:

      the ‘Climategate’ affair ... suggested they had manipulated and hidden data.

      There's one for a start. The fact that the tabloid press didn't understand the content of the leaked emails doesn't mean they get to make up their own meaning. Now, feel free to point out which part of the article marks the end for "Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming". I assume that's what you're referring to, and not "Citizens Against Government Waste", or "Cultural Alliance of Greater Washington".


      "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

      M Offline
      M Offline
      Munchies_Matt
      wrote on last edited by
      #43

      Thats the best you can do, a weak stab at a side story? What has this got to do with a climate scientist criticising NOAA for using bad data? Nothing of course. You merely display your desperation. (and then compound it by pretending that the contents of the emails are only comprehensible to 'climate scientists' :laugh: )

      Richard DeemingR 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Munchies_Matt

        Sigh. No, CO2 is not a pollutant. Its effect on temperature is muted and entirely beneficial.

        C Offline
        C Offline
        Chris Losinger
        wrote on last edited by
        #44

        :laugh: wtf nonsense is this?

        image processing toolkits | batch image processing

        T M 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • C Chris Losinger

          :laugh: wtf nonsense is this?

          image processing toolkits | batch image processing

          T Offline
          T Offline
          TheGreatAndPowerfulOz
          wrote on last edited by
          #45

          What -- you can't handle truth?[^]

          #SupportHeForShe Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun

          C 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • T TheGreatAndPowerfulOz

            What -- you can't handle truth?[^]

            #SupportHeForShe Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun

            C Offline
            C Offline
            Chris Losinger
            wrote on last edited by
            #46

            we can talk about truth once you get anywhere near it.

            image processing toolkits | batch image processing

            T 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • C Chris Losinger

              we can talk about truth once you get anywhere near it.

              image processing toolkits | batch image processing

              T Offline
              T Offline
              TheGreatAndPowerfulOz
              wrote on last edited by
              #47

              BWAHAHAHA! So you think CO2 is a pollutant?

              #SupportHeForShe Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun

              C 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • C Chris Losinger

                :laugh: wtf nonsense is this?

                image processing toolkits | batch image processing

                M Offline
                M Offline
                Munchies_Matt
                wrote on last edited by
                #48

                You are that unaware of the science? You know Co2 is plant food and makes plants drought resistant? Didnt you do biology at school? You know that warming below 2C will be beneficial? CO2 has a low effect on temperature, at the bottom of the IPCC range. You have heard of the IPCC I take it?

                C 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Richard DeemingR Richard Deeming

                  Quote:

                  the ‘Climategate’ affair ... suggested they had manipulated and hidden data.

                  There's one for a start. The fact that the tabloid press didn't understand the content of the leaked emails doesn't mean they get to make up their own meaning. Now, feel free to point out which part of the article marks the end for "Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming". I assume that's what you're referring to, and not "Citizens Against Government Waste", or "Cultural Alliance of Greater Washington".


                  "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                  T Offline
                  T Offline
                  TheGreatAndPowerfulOz
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #49

                  You are blind.

                  #SupportHeForShe Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun

                  Richard DeemingR 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Munchies_Matt

                    You are that unaware of the science? You know Co2 is plant food and makes plants drought resistant? Didnt you do biology at school? You know that warming below 2C will be beneficial? CO2 has a low effect on temperature, at the bottom of the IPCC range. You have heard of the IPCC I take it?

                    C Offline
                    C Offline
                    Chris Losinger
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #50

                    Munchies_Matt wrote:

                    You know Co2 is plant food

                    know what else is plant food? shit. is shit a pollutant?

                    Munchies_Matt wrote:

                    You know that warming below 2C will be beneficial?

                    to some, not to all. but we're going to plow past 2C pretty quickly.

                    image processing toolkits | batch image processing

                    N M T 3 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • C Chris Losinger

                      Munchies_Matt wrote:

                      You know Co2 is plant food

                      know what else is plant food? shit. is shit a pollutant?

                      Munchies_Matt wrote:

                      You know that warming below 2C will be beneficial?

                      to some, not to all. but we're going to plow past 2C pretty quickly.

                      image processing toolkits | batch image processing

                      N Offline
                      N Offline
                      Nelek
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #51

                      Chris Losinger wrote:

                      is sh*t a pollutant?

                      I would say no, near my house there are some farms using a tone of it as guano to fertilize their fields :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

                      M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • T TheGreatAndPowerfulOz

                        BWAHAHAHA! So you think CO2 is a pollutant?

                        #SupportHeForShe Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun

                        C Offline
                        C Offline
                        Chris Losinger
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #52

                        TheGreatAndPowerfulOz< wrote:

                        So you think CO2 is a pollutant?

                        pollution is in the eye, nose, mouth, bloodstream of the beholder. whether or not C02 is a pollutant depends on the context. if you're a plant (are you a plant?) more C02 isn't necessarily bad - though only up to a certain point; too much CO2 harms plants. if you're a person, more CO2 can be fatal. the dosage makes the poison.

                        image processing toolkits | batch image processing

                        M T 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • C Chris Losinger

                          Munchies_Matt wrote:

                          You know Co2 is plant food

                          know what else is plant food? shit. is shit a pollutant?

                          Munchies_Matt wrote:

                          You know that warming below 2C will be beneficial?

                          to some, not to all. but we're going to plow past 2C pretty quickly.

                          image processing toolkits | batch image processing

                          M Offline
                          M Offline
                          Munchies_Matt
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #53

                          If it is plant food, then to plants no, it isnt. Obviously. And no, the currently anomaly is about 0.8 C, a long way from 2C still.

                          C 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M Munchies_Matt

                            If it is plant food, then to plants no, it isnt. Obviously. And no, the currently anomaly is about 0.8 C, a long way from 2C still.

                            C Offline
                            C Offline
                            Chris Losinger
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #54

                            Munchies_Matt wrote:

                            then to plants no, it isnt.

                            are you a plant?

                            Munchies_Matt wrote:

                            0.8 C, a long way from 2C still

                            a long way for you. not for people born today.

                            image processing toolkits | batch image processing

                            M 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • N Nathan Minier

                              Well that's the problem. There are facts to discuss, but people treat the whole concept like religion, on both sides. Every time this shady crap comes up it calls the whole concept into question. On the other hand, supporters will believe literally anything without proper vetting. I could claim that jerking off caused climate change, with a pretty graph, and half the population would freak out about the masturbation issue, and the other half would exhaust themselves just to prove it false (well, not "just").

                              "There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics." - Benjamin Disraeli

                              N Offline
                              N Offline
                              Nelek
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #55

                              Nathan Minier wrote:

                              There are facts to discuss, but people treat the whole concept like religion, on both sides.

                              The ones who believe, don't need any explanation The ones who not believe, don't want any explanation The theory of evolution can not be proved true, so it has to be false. God's existance can not be proved false, so it must be true. I could continue... but I think I have proved your point :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

                              M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • C Chris Losinger

                                TheGreatAndPowerfulOz< wrote:

                                So you think CO2 is a pollutant?

                                pollution is in the eye, nose, mouth, bloodstream of the beholder. whether or not C02 is a pollutant depends on the context. if you're a plant (are you a plant?) more C02 isn't necessarily bad - though only up to a certain point; too much CO2 harms plants. if you're a person, more CO2 can be fatal. the dosage makes the poison.

                                image processing toolkits | batch image processing

                                M Offline
                                M Offline
                                Munchies_Matt
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #56

                                The level of CO2 in a meeting room can reach a couple of thousand ppm. Do you feel polluted in meetings? Thats the context. Its not toxic to man till much higher levels, at the levels we are looking at reaching it is not a pollutant at all. Surely you understand that 12/100 is very much higher than 400/1,000,000 ?

                                C T 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • M Munchies_Matt

                                  The level of CO2 in a meeting room can reach a couple of thousand ppm. Do you feel polluted in meetings? Thats the context. Its not toxic to man till much higher levels, at the levels we are looking at reaching it is not a pollutant at all. Surely you understand that 12/100 is very much higher than 400/1,000,000 ?

                                  C Offline
                                  C Offline
                                  Chris Losinger
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #57

                                  Munchies_Matt wrote:

                                  Its not toxic to man till much higher levels,

                                  pollution is not only about simple toxicity.

                                  image processing toolkits | batch image processing

                                  M 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • C Chris Losinger

                                    Munchies_Matt wrote:

                                    You know Co2 is plant food

                                    know what else is plant food? shit. is shit a pollutant?

                                    Munchies_Matt wrote:

                                    You know that warming below 2C will be beneficial?

                                    to some, not to all. but we're going to plow past 2C pretty quickly.

                                    image processing toolkits | batch image processing

                                    T Offline
                                    T Offline
                                    The pompey
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #58

                                    Depends. If you shit in my swimming pool, then you would be polluting it, and there would be a serious affect on your health.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • C Chris Losinger

                                      TheGreatAndPowerfulOz< wrote:

                                      So you think CO2 is a pollutant?

                                      pollution is in the eye, nose, mouth, bloodstream of the beholder. whether or not C02 is a pollutant depends on the context. if you're a plant (are you a plant?) more C02 isn't necessarily bad - though only up to a certain point; too much CO2 harms plants. if you're a person, more CO2 can be fatal. the dosage makes the poison.

                                      image processing toolkits | batch image processing

                                      T Offline
                                      T Offline
                                      TheGreatAndPowerfulOz
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #59

                                      Chris Losinger wrote:

                                      too much CO2 harms plants

                                      Any proof to that?

                                      Chris Losinger wrote:

                                      if you're a person, more CO2 can be fatal

                                      Certainly, but not at the levels we're talking about (approximately 0.04%). The atmosphere contains only about 21% oxygen. The O2 percentage would have to decrease to about 6% (that is CO2 increasing to about 15%) in order for it to be fatal to humans. That's an increase of CO2 levels of about 37,500% which is next to impossible for human activity to do.

                                      #SupportHeForShe Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun

                                      C 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • T TheGreatAndPowerfulOz

                                        Chris Losinger wrote:

                                        too much CO2 harms plants

                                        Any proof to that?

                                        Chris Losinger wrote:

                                        if you're a person, more CO2 can be fatal

                                        Certainly, but not at the levels we're talking about (approximately 0.04%). The atmosphere contains only about 21% oxygen. The O2 percentage would have to decrease to about 6% (that is CO2 increasing to about 15%) in order for it to be fatal to humans. That's an increase of CO2 levels of about 37,500% which is next to impossible for human activity to do.

                                        #SupportHeForShe Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun

                                        C Offline
                                        C Offline
                                        Chris Losinger
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #60

                                        TheGreatAndPowerfulOzAny proof to that?

                                        Insects Take A Bigger Bite Out Of Plants In A Higher Carbon Dioxide World -- ScienceDaily[^]

                                        TheGreatAndPowerfulOzThat's an increase of CO2 levels of about 37,500% which is next to impossible for human activity to do.

                                        oh ye of little faith! but if simple respiratory toxicity was all there was to worry about with CO2, we could certainly get away with more of it.

                                        image processing toolkits | batch image processing

                                        T 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • M Munchies_Matt

                                          But the whistleblower, Dr John Bates, a top NOAA scientist with an impeccable reputation, has shown The Mail on Sunday irrefutable evidence that the paper was based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data.[^] So now he can't be sacked by NOAA, because Trump put his own man in charge, he is now free to speak out about data corruption and scientific fraud. This is end for the CAGW bullshit thats mis-formed govt policy for decades and cost the taxpayer billions, because a lot of it has come from US scientists. Personally I think Trump shouldn't try to muzzle scientists, he should just put funding on the table for them to prove CO2 is safe. Nothing will undo CAGW quicker than a volte-face by its former adherents.

                                          W Offline
                                          W Offline
                                          W Balboos GHB
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #61

                                          A different simpleton (or rather, group of them) said the same thing about acid rain. The formation of pristine clear lakes - totally lifeless - surrounded by dying forests was ignored. UNTIL . . . the acid rain began to erode the finish on their pickup - that's when they realized that they couldn't pretend it wasn't there any more. It wasn't there forests or their lakes - but when it was their damn paint; well, that was something different. So - you and your cult of deniers? You've been around before.

                                          1. The earth is flat.
                                          2. Evolution is a hoax.
                                          3. Climate change is just so much BS.

                                          Ravings en masse^

                                          "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein

                                          "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010

                                          Z N 2 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups