Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Plane geek stuff

Plane geek stuff

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
comperformance
44 Posts 13 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F F ES Sitecore

    Just do it when there is no wind. Can't believe NASA hasn't thought of this. Oh wait....maybe it's air resistance that's the problem, not wind resistance... :)

    M Offline
    M Offline
    Munchies_Matt
    wrote on last edited by
    #27

    air+velocity=wind HOw fast is a rocket going? :)

    F 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • J Joan M

      Then it's easy... just wait for non windy days... :rolleyes:

      M Offline
      M Offline
      Munchies_Matt
      wrote on last edited by
      #28

      air doesnt have any resistance until it has velocity relative to the object whereupon it is wind. ;P

      J 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Mel Padden

        Sure I did, I just like it when a random news report makes me remember. I also wasn't aware that there was something atmospheric faster than the X-15, it's been a while since I was totally clued up about this stuff.

        One morning I shot an elephant in my pajamas. How he got in my pajamas, I don't know.

        C Offline
        C Offline
        CodeWraith
        wrote on last edited by
        #29

        For example, I also never saw this[^] before, if we are already looking at the X-15.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Munchies_Matt

          18,000 mph if memory serves me correctly. Puts a bit of wind into perspective eh? :)

          D Offline
          D Offline
          Daniel Pfeffer
          wrote on last edited by
          #30

          Escape velocity at the Earth's surface is about 11.2 km/sec, which is 40,320 km/hr, which is 25,200 mph.

          If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack. --Winston Churchill

          R 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Munchies_Matt

            air+velocity=wind HOw fast is a rocket going? :)

            F Offline
            F Offline
            F ES Sitecore
            wrote on last edited by
            #31

            Munchies_Matt wrote:

            air+velocity=wind

            It's wind if it's the *air* that has velocity, not an object moving through it.

            M 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • D Daniel Pfeffer

              Escape velocity at the Earth's surface is about 11.2 km/sec, which is 40,320 km/hr, which is 25,200 mph.

              If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack. --Winston Churchill

              R Offline
              R Offline
              R Giskard Reventlov
              wrote on last edited by
              #32

              Gravitational Escape Velocity with Saturn V Rocket by Ron Kurtus - Physics Lessons: School for Champions[^]

              D 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F F ES Sitecore

                Munchies_Matt wrote:

                air+velocity=wind

                It's wind if it's the *air* that has velocity, not an object moving through it.

                M Offline
                M Offline
                Munchies_Matt
                wrote on last edited by
                #33

                I see, this is your deffinition of wind is it? What do you call a windscreen then? :laugh:

                F 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Munchies_Matt

                  I see, this is your deffinition of wind is it? What do you call a windscreen then? :laugh:

                  F Offline
                  F Offline
                  F ES Sitecore
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #34

                  If you get your scientific knowledge from badly-named items then it's just as well you don't work at NASA. What kind of food stuff is a peanut? A strawberry? What's your pencil lead made from? What's tin foil made from? What kind of animal is a koala bear? What kind of animal is a horned toad? Where was Chinese checkers invented?

                  M 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Mel Padden

                    http://edition.cnn.com/videos/tech/2015/06/05/high-speed-strike-weapon-hypersonic-jet-orig.cnn[^] The bit at the end about the fastest manmade objects ever had me geeking out.

                    One morning I shot an elephant in my pajamas. How he got in my pajamas, I don't know.

                    J Offline
                    J Offline
                    jeron1
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #35

                    Just goes to show how far ahead of its time the SR-71 was.

                    "the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment "Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst "I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F F ES Sitecore

                      If you get your scientific knowledge from badly-named items then it's just as well you don't work at NASA. What kind of food stuff is a peanut? A strawberry? What's your pencil lead made from? What's tin foil made from? What kind of animal is a koala bear? What kind of animal is a horned toad? Where was Chinese checkers invented?

                      M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Munchies_Matt
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #36

                      Wind Resistance | Definition of Wind Resistance by Merriam-Webster[^] " Definition of wind resistance : the resistance that still air offers to movement especially of a vehicle" :laugh:

                      F 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Munchies_Matt

                        Wind Resistance | Definition of Wind Resistance by Merriam-Webster[^] " Definition of wind resistance : the resistance that still air offers to movement especially of a vehicle" :laugh:

                        F Offline
                        F Offline
                        F ES Sitecore
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #37

                        Now you're getting your scientific info from Merriam Webster? Not much better.

                        M 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R R Giskard Reventlov

                          Gravitational Escape Velocity with Saturn V Rocket by Ron Kurtus - Physics Lessons: School for Champions[^]

                          D Offline
                          D Offline
                          Daniel Pfeffer
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #38

                          I agree that the actual delta-v produced by any practical rocket that reaches escape velocity must be higher than 11.2 km/sec. This is because (a) the acceleration profile is not a step function, and (b) using the highest acceleration that the astronauts were capable of enduring would result in the spacecraft overheating because of air resistance (those pesky Engineering considerations... :) ). This, however, that does not change the fact that the escape velocity at the Earth's surface is approximately 11.2 km/sec. This gives the absolute lower bound on the delta-v that must be given to an object that is to escape the Earth's gravity.

                          If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack. --Winston Churchill

                          R 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • F F ES Sitecore

                            Now you're getting your scientific info from Merriam Webster? Not much better.

                            M Offline
                            M Offline
                            Munchies_Matt
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #39

                            Whereas you get yours from your 'opinion bank'. :laugh: Unlike many people (everyone?) here I studied physics in depth, since my principal formation was in mech/aero engineering. The mistake you make is assuming the earth has some relevance in this. When the object experiencing the wind is not moving relative to the earth you call it 'wind'. When it is you call it 'air'. Earth centric views in science died with the church, you do remember the heresy of Galileo dont you? The correct way to view this is the body and air have different velocities. This creates wind. Period.

                            F 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M Munchies_Matt

                              Whereas you get yours from your 'opinion bank'. :laugh: Unlike many people (everyone?) here I studied physics in depth, since my principal formation was in mech/aero engineering. The mistake you make is assuming the earth has some relevance in this. When the object experiencing the wind is not moving relative to the earth you call it 'wind'. When it is you call it 'air'. Earth centric views in science died with the church, you do remember the heresy of Galileo dont you? The correct way to view this is the body and air have different velocities. This creates wind. Period.

                              F Offline
                              F Offline
                              F ES Sitecore
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #40

                              Munchies_Matt wrote:

                              I studied physics in depth, since my principal formation was in mech/aero engineering.

                              I find that hard to believe when you cite a dictionary as proof.

                              M 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • D Daniel Pfeffer

                                I agree that the actual delta-v produced by any practical rocket that reaches escape velocity must be higher than 11.2 km/sec. This is because (a) the acceleration profile is not a step function, and (b) using the highest acceleration that the astronauts were capable of enduring would result in the spacecraft overheating because of air resistance (those pesky Engineering considerations... :) ). This, however, that does not change the fact that the escape velocity at the Earth's surface is approximately 11.2 km/sec. This gives the absolute lower bound on the delta-v that must be given to an object that is to escape the Earth's gravity.

                                If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack. --Winston Churchill

                                R Offline
                                R Offline
                                R Giskard Reventlov
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #41

                                And plenty of cogent reasons why it would be better to build and launch ships from orbit or a body with a lower escape velocity requirement (putting to one side the practicalities of setting that all up in the first place - nice to dream).

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • F F ES Sitecore

                                  Munchies_Matt wrote:

                                  I studied physics in depth, since my principal formation was in mech/aero engineering.

                                  I find that hard to believe when you cite a dictionary as proof.

                                  M Offline
                                  M Offline
                                  Munchies_Matt
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #42

                                  I find your inability to accept that a dictionary and physics have the same deffinition hard to believe. How about engineering? Here are some pics of wind resistance:wind resistance - Google Search[^]

                                  F 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • M Munchies_Matt

                                    air doesnt have any resistance until it has velocity relative to the object whereupon it is wind. ;P

                                    J Offline
                                    J Offline
                                    Joan M
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #43

                                    Tell that to some underpants out in the wild... :laugh:

                                    https://www.robotecnik.com freelance robots, PLC and CNC programmer.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • M Munchies_Matt

                                      I find your inability to accept that a dictionary and physics have the same deffinition hard to believe. How about engineering? Here are some pics of wind resistance:wind resistance - Google Search[^]

                                      F Offline
                                      F Offline
                                      F ES Sitecore
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #44

                                      Most of those pictures do relate to actual wind though.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • Login

                                      • Don't have an account? Register

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Tags
                                      • Popular
                                      • World
                                      • Users
                                      • Groups