Execs don't trust internal IT (Study).
-
It has been my experience that... You don't trust what you don't understand. Most execs do not understand IT, therefore, they do not trust IT. This will always be the case. Simples.
Well said. :thumbsup:
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment "Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst "I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
-
It has been my experience that... You don't trust what you don't understand. Most execs do not understand IT, therefore, they do not trust IT. This will always be the case. Simples.
Totally agree. Just to play devil's advocate though I'd say the same is true of tech though with not trusting or understanding the business side.
Jeremy Falcon
-
[Study Article] When I read the article above, its typical and make my eyes roll. Execs don't trust their internal IT, but when they go ahead and acquired a solution from 3rd party, 91% of them are useless. One thing comes to mind, most executives don't invested enough in their own organization.
Execs don't trust internal IT I could have told you that without a study.
If it's not broken, fix it until it is. Everything makes sense in someone's mind. Ya can't fix stupid.
-
Totally agree. Just to play devil's advocate though I'd say the same is true of tech though with not trusting or understanding the business side.
Jeremy Falcon
We don't need no stinkin' business side! Coding is art. Coding is love. A pity we waste so much of it on users
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein
"If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010
-
We don't need no stinkin' business side! Coding is art. Coding is love. A pity we waste so much of it on users
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein
"If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010
:-D
Jeremy Falcon
-
Execs don't trust internal IT I could have told you that without a study.
If it's not broken, fix it until it is. Everything makes sense in someone's mind. Ya can't fix stupid.
Yeah, but the word "study" makes it sound all scientific-y. And we loves our scientific-y sounding stuff.
Jeremy Falcon
-
Totally agree. Just to play devil's advocate though I'd say the same is true of tech though with not trusting or understanding the business side.
Jeremy Falcon
Jeremy Falcon wrote:
the same is true of tech though with not trusting or understanding the business side.
I agree with this statement. :thumbsup:
-
[Study Article] When I read the article above, its typical and make my eyes roll. Execs don't trust their internal IT, but when they go ahead and acquired a solution from 3rd party, 91% of them are useless. One thing comes to mind, most executives don't invested enough in their own organization.
I don't know, I think there's something to this. I mean look at your day-to-day; how much do you trust the people that you work with? If you're very lucky, your management vets every candidate so carefully that only the competent get through; but in my normal experience the people that work in IT are often wholly unprepared for the scope or environment before taking a position. I don't know if this is simply due to the prevalence of the canned technical interview or what; I just know that I've seen it more than once. Article like this always remind me of [an essay](http://blog.cleancoder.com/uncle-bob/2015/11/27/OathDiscussion.html) that Robert Martin wrote a couple of years ago about how programmers are an aggregation of individuals rather than members of a profession. Love him or hate him, Uncle Bob makes a point here that is very relevant to management perception of developers and IT guys in general. We are not licenced, bonded, insured, or regulated. There is no clear path that any of us have taken that can be reasonably assumed to be a professional template at this point. There's a certain Wild West feel to that which is nice and all, but doesn't do the perception of the discipline any favors. The final piece of this puzzle is performance. Management is distrusting of internal IT often because they've set expectations that haven't been met. Now for in-house development, this often derives from unrealistic budgetary, personnel, and time constraints; but I would definitely argue that the lack of a professional standard is a major driver for any unrealistic expectations.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics." - Benjamin Disraeli
-
It has been my experience that... You don't trust what you don't understand. Most execs do not understand IT, therefore, they do not trust IT. This will always be the case. Simples.
Unfortunately, the converse is also true... People don't trust what they _do_ understand. They believe that some big corporation (MS, Oracle, CA) must produce better/more reliable products than someone they actually know and can speak with. I can explain to my boss exactly how my code works and handles the unexpected, but he'll still prefer to buy something that doesn't do quite what he needs and requires six months to fix a bug or a add feature.
-
Unfortunately, the converse is also true... People don't trust what they _do_ understand. They believe that some big corporation (MS, Oracle, CA) must produce better/more reliable products than someone they actually know and can speak with. I can explain to my boss exactly how my code works and handles the unexpected, but he'll still prefer to buy something that doesn't do quite what he needs and requires six months to fix a bug or a add feature.
PIEBALDconsult wrote:
but he'll still prefer to buy something that doesn't do quite what he needs
I never understood this behavior either. We all are guilty of purchasing products that only gives us service for a small percentage of what we need, if that. The rest is wasted and hardly ever needed. i.e. MS Word or Excel. I hardly use ALL of its features, ever, yet I have to buy the whole damn thing to get it. Now it is not very expensive these days and you do have cheaper products from other vendors, but most of them suffer from the same software design flaws. I say all software should be Base+. You purchase the base software and pay for additional plugins, etc. Anyhow, I digress.