Plagiarised would be article? - gone
-
Not happy with this one: C# Design Pattern 1 - Singleton Pattern[^] From this: JamesChen777 - Professional Profile[^] As Kewin Rausch - @0x7c00 - noticed, the code is very, very much the same as MSDN sample: Implementing Singleton in C#[^] and even in the same order, with pretty-much-pointless comments added, and some comments around it. And if I remember right, when this was first posted, it was rejected as pretty much just a code dump, defended as "it's part one of a series I'm writing". Plagiarised? I think so, but ... your thoughts, people?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt -
Not happy with this one: C# Design Pattern 1 - Singleton Pattern[^] From this: JamesChen777 - Professional Profile[^] As Kewin Rausch - @0x7c00 - noticed, the code is very, very much the same as MSDN sample: Implementing Singleton in C#[^] and even in the same order, with pretty-much-pointless comments added, and some comments around it. And if I remember right, when this was first posted, it was rejected as pretty much just a code dump, defended as "it's part one of a series I'm writing". Plagiarised? I think so, but ... your thoughts, people?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
He's also posted the same article twice: C# Design Pattern 1 - Singleton Pattern[^] (ID 1206059) C# Design Pattern 1 - Singleton Pattern[^] (ID 801766)
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
-
Not happy with this one: C# Design Pattern 1 - Singleton Pattern[^] From this: JamesChen777 - Professional Profile[^] As Kewin Rausch - @0x7c00 - noticed, the code is very, very much the same as MSDN sample: Implementing Singleton in C#[^] and even in the same order, with pretty-much-pointless comments added, and some comments around it. And if I remember right, when this was first posted, it was rejected as pretty much just a code dump, defended as "it's part one of a series I'm writing". Plagiarised? I think so, but ... your thoughts, people?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
Thanks to have this pointed out... I did not know if it was worth to open a discussion here, but what he is writing about is really basic and already noted less or more anywhere. MSDN documentation about that singleton stuff is also marked as "no more maintained", just to give it and "age", and the Interlocked solution has been posted by various social forums lot of time ago, as I already said on the comments. Honestly it seems like an aggregation of documentation rather than an Article. :thumbsdown:
