Who vs Whome
-
Ok. So I look up the site daily on my phone. I'm not happy that the tag line is "for those who code". It should be whome, right? Just me? Maybe >_<
-
Ok. So I look up the site daily on my phone. I'm not happy that the tag line is "for those who code". It should be whome, right? Just me? Maybe >_<
Andy Lanng wrote:
It should be whome, right?
No, because "whome" is not a word. :-D /ravi
My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com
-
Ok. So I look up the site daily on my phone. I'm not happy that the tag line is "for those who code". It should be whome, right? Just me? Maybe >_<
It is correct. Whome is not a word. Whom is, but is only used in restricted circumstances - either when the he/him rule applies, or when you are doing a Homer Simpson impression to attempt to sneak into a fancy strip club.
-
Ok. So I look up the site daily on my phone. I'm not happy that the tag line is "for those who code". It should be whome, right? Just me? Maybe >_<
For thems what code.
-
Andy Lanng wrote:
It should be whome, right?
No, because "whome" is not a word. :-D /ravi
My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com
My education is older that I am Ok then; whome = whom I guess I should've guessed that replies to my pedantic message would be pedantic
-
It is correct. Whome is not a word. Whom is, but is only used in restricted circumstances - either when the he/him rule applies, or when you are doing a Homer Simpson impression to attempt to sneak into a fancy strip club.
Well, ofc I'm the later!
-
For thems what code.
Can I 5* this
-
Ok. So I look up the site daily on my phone. I'm not happy that the tag line is "for those who code". It should be whome, right? Just me? Maybe >_<
Nah, doesnt sit right with me. "For those whom code"? Sounds like shit man.
-
My education is older that I am Ok then; whome = whom I guess I should've guessed that replies to my pedantic message would be pedantic
Andy Lanng wrote:
I guess I should've guessed that replies to my pedantic message would be pedantic
Sorry, couldn't resist. :) As others have remarked, I think "For those who code" is correct. If the slogan was written for consumers of code (e.g. end users), then the phrase "For whom the code is written" would be preferred over "For who the code is written". /ravi
My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com
-
Ok. So I look up the site daily on my phone. I'm not happy that the tag line is "for those who code". It should be whome, right? Just me? Maybe >_<
Because "For those who spend entirely too many hours squinting at computer screens while doing back-flips to meet untenable demands" was too long.
if (Object.DividedByZero == true) { Universe.Implode(); } Meus ratio ex fortis machina. Simplicitatis de formae ac munus. -Foothill, 2016
-
For thems what code.
FTFY: For thems what codez. /ravi
My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com
-
FTFY: For thems what codez. /ravi
My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com
Fer us wot sndz cdz URGNTZZZZZ!!!!!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
-
Ok. So I look up the site daily on my phone. I'm not happy that the tag line is "for those who code". It should be whome, right? Just me? Maybe >_<
As the sentence indicates that this relates to the subject of the verb, "for those who code" is correct. Try rearranging this to "they code" which sounds about right, as opposed to "them codes" which is what the implied plural form would suggest would be the replacement sentence, and just sounds plain wrong.
This space for rent
-
Fer us wot sndz cdz URGNTZZZZZ!!!!!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
-
Ok. So I look up the site daily on my phone. I'm not happy that the tag line is "for those who code". It should be whome, right? Just me? Maybe >_<
Who - should be used to refer to the subject of a sentence. Whom - should be used to refer to the object of a verb or preposition.
-
Does anyone else see this parody as far too close to truth for many of the QA posts?
Parody? It's probably a quote... :sigh:
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
-
Ok. So I look up the site daily on my phone. I'm not happy that the tag line is "for those who code". It should be whome, right? Just me? Maybe >_<
who code whom -- in a causal world whom code who -- in a acausal world :)
Find more in 1-NET: connects your resources anywhere[^].
-
Ok. So I look up the site daily on my phone. I'm not happy that the tag line is "for those who code". It should be whome, right? Just me? Maybe >_<
Andy Lanng wrote:
for those who code
But [for whom the bell tolls](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bg92QpjRcJk&feature=youtu.be&t=4s)?
-
Andy Lanng wrote:
It should be whome, right?
No, because "whome" is not a word. :-D /ravi
My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com
Ravi Bhavnani wrote:
No, because "whome" is not a word. :-D
Maybe we are just ignorant and it's a word tht we don't know the meaning of. Yet. :-) Perhaps it's something to eat. Pass me the whomes, please.
I am endeavoring, ma'am, to construct a mnemonic memory circuit using stone knives and bearskins.
-
Ravi Bhavnani wrote:
No, because "whome" is not a word. :-D
Maybe we are just ignorant and it's a word tht we don't know the meaning of. Yet. :-) Perhaps it's something to eat. Pass me the whomes, please.
I am endeavoring, ma'am, to construct a mnemonic memory circuit using stone knives and bearskins.
Sorry, whome are you referring to? /ravi
My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com
