Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Why am I not surprised...

Why am I not surprised...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
asp-netarchitecture
23 Posts 10 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Jeremy Falcon

    You know what I enjoy about your posts John... I know every time I read one it's filled with positivity and joy and always brightens my day. It's nice to know you never complain and that you're doing your part to help spread the cheer. Thank you for your service. ;P

    Jeremy Falcon

    realJSOPR Offline
    realJSOPR Offline
    realJSOP
    wrote on last edited by
    #7

    I spread cheer about Qlikview on a regular basis.

    ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
    -----
    You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
    -----
    When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

    D M 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • realJSOPR realJSOP

      First, https has been proven to be almost as insecure as plain text. Second, using https does not encrypt query strings.

      ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
      -----
      You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
      -----
      When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

      raddevusR Offline
      raddevusR Offline
      raddevus
      wrote on last edited by
      #8

      John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:

      First, https has been proven to be almost as insecure as plain text.

      Did I say https wrong? Should I have said TLS? or whatever the current standard is? So I guess you don't buy anything online, right? :laugh: Also, I believe querystrings are encrypted via HTTPS. If you set up HTTPS properly, everything between browser and server are encrypted: Here's just one of many answers you get when you google that: ssl - Is an HTTPS query string secure? - Stack Overflow[^] Here's a quote from the top answer that is returned:

      google knows quote:

      remember, SSL/TLS operates at the Transport Layer, so all the crypto goo happens under the application-layer HTTP stuff. The entire transmission, including the query string, the whole URL, and even the type of request (GET, POST, etc.) is encrypted when using HTTPS

      Richard DeemingR P realJSOPR 3 Replies Last reply
      0
      • raddevusR raddevus

        John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:

        First, https has been proven to be almost as insecure as plain text.

        Did I say https wrong? Should I have said TLS? or whatever the current standard is? So I guess you don't buy anything online, right? :laugh: Also, I believe querystrings are encrypted via HTTPS. If you set up HTTPS properly, everything between browser and server are encrypted: Here's just one of many answers you get when you google that: ssl - Is an HTTPS query string secure? - Stack Overflow[^] Here's a quote from the top answer that is returned:

        google knows quote:

        remember, SSL/TLS operates at the Transport Layer, so all the crypto goo happens under the application-layer HTTP stuff. The entire transmission, including the query string, the whole URL, and even the type of request (GET, POST, etc.) is encrypted when using HTTPS

        Richard DeemingR Offline
        Richard DeemingR Offline
        Richard Deeming
        wrote on last edited by
        #9

        raddevus wrote:

        everything between browser and server are encrypted

        Apart from the domain name, which needs to be sent unencrypted for SNI: Server Name Indication - Wikipedia[^]


        "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

        "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined" - Homer

        raddevusR 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Richard DeemingR Richard Deeming

          raddevus wrote:

          everything between browser and server are encrypted

          Apart from the domain name, which needs to be sent unencrypted for SNI: Server Name Indication - Wikipedia[^]


          "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

          raddevusR Offline
          raddevusR Offline
          raddevus
          wrote on last edited by
          #10

          Richard Deeming wrote:

          Apart from the domain name, which needs to be sent unencrypted for SNI

          Ah, good additional information. So an attacker could at least know which domain you are going against. Interesting. But of course the rest of the info specific URL, querystrings, etc are safe. Thanks for the addt'l info. :thumbsup:

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • raddevusR raddevus

            John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:

            First, https has been proven to be almost as insecure as plain text.

            Did I say https wrong? Should I have said TLS? or whatever the current standard is? So I guess you don't buy anything online, right? :laugh: Also, I believe querystrings are encrypted via HTTPS. If you set up HTTPS properly, everything between browser and server are encrypted: Here's just one of many answers you get when you google that: ssl - Is an HTTPS query string secure? - Stack Overflow[^] Here's a quote from the top answer that is returned:

            google knows quote:

            remember, SSL/TLS operates at the Transport Layer, so all the crypto goo happens under the application-layer HTTP stuff. The entire transmission, including the query string, the whole URL, and even the type of request (GET, POST, etc.) is encrypted when using HTTPS

            P Offline
            P Offline
            Pualee
            wrote on last edited by
            #11

            raddevus wrote:

            Also, I believe querystrings are encrypted via HTTPS.

            link URLs are stored in web server logs - typically the whole URL of each request is stored in a server log. This means that any sensitive data in the URL (e.g. a password) is being saved in clear text on the server

            raddevusR 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • raddevusR raddevus

              John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:

              First, https has been proven to be almost as insecure as plain text.

              Did I say https wrong? Should I have said TLS? or whatever the current standard is? So I guess you don't buy anything online, right? :laugh: Also, I believe querystrings are encrypted via HTTPS. If you set up HTTPS properly, everything between browser and server are encrypted: Here's just one of many answers you get when you google that: ssl - Is an HTTPS query string secure? - Stack Overflow[^] Here's a quote from the top answer that is returned:

              google knows quote:

              remember, SSL/TLS operates at the Transport Layer, so all the crypto goo happens under the application-layer HTTP stuff. The entire transmission, including the query string, the whole URL, and even the type of request (GET, POST, etc.) is encrypted when using HTTPS

              realJSOPR Offline
              realJSOPR Offline
              realJSOP
              wrote on last edited by
              #12

              This query string isn't encrypted: https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Edit.aspx?fid=1159&select=5451820&floc=/Lounge.aspx&action=r

              ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
              -----
              You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
              -----
              When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

              raddevusR 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • P Pualee

                raddevus wrote:

                Also, I believe querystrings are encrypted via HTTPS.

                link URLs are stored in web server logs - typically the whole URL of each request is stored in a server log. This means that any sensitive data in the URL (e.g. a password) is being saved in clear text on the server

                raddevusR Offline
                raddevusR Offline
                raddevus
                wrote on last edited by
                #13

                That's not relevant though. Of course the server can see the decrypted data. Otherwise it couldn't use the data. The point is whether someone along the route of the Internet would be able to read the data. If the server saves the data somewhere after the fact in cleartext has nothing to do with HTTPS. That could be true for __any__ encryption scheme. EDIT Although it is a good point about the IIS logs having querystring values decrypted -- and that is a bit nuts but there may be a setting to handle that on IIS. Ah, just found it. You just turn it off for specific fields (URI Query (cs-uri-query)) then the password via querystring woldn't be logged at all? A gotcha to know though: Select W3C Fields to Log (IIS 7)[^]

                P 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • realJSOPR realJSOP

                  This query string isn't encrypted: https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Edit.aspx?fid=1159&select=5451820&floc=/Lounge.aspx&action=r

                  ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
                  -----
                  You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
                  -----
                  When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

                  raddevusR Offline
                  raddevusR Offline
                  raddevus
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #14

                  If you like, Pualee are talking about encryption on the server side, then you are correct, data is not encrypted by some magical means once it gets to the server. Any scheme you would use will require you to encrypt the data in some way for storage once the data gets to your server. HTTPS is for secure communication over HTTP. Maybe you're looking for an auto-encrypted data stream to storage device? That's a totally different animal, right? EDIT Also, if you're saying because you can see the CP querystrings that proves that HTTPS doesn't encrypt querystrings...well that is because they expose querystrings here to create trackback links. If they didn't expose those then you'd never be able to sniff them out of the HTTP stream, because they are encrypted before they are sent to the server and only the server can decrypt them. That's the point of encryption for communication.

                  realJSOPR 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • realJSOPR realJSOP

                    I spread cheer about Qlikview on a regular basis.

                    ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
                    -----
                    You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
                    -----
                    When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

                    D Offline
                    D Offline
                    dandy72
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #15

                    You're absolutely right, every time I read one of your posts about Qlikview I'm downright giddy with excitement because I've never had to use it (and hopefully never will).

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • raddevusR raddevus

                      That's not relevant though. Of course the server can see the decrypted data. Otherwise it couldn't use the data. The point is whether someone along the route of the Internet would be able to read the data. If the server saves the data somewhere after the fact in cleartext has nothing to do with HTTPS. That could be true for __any__ encryption scheme. EDIT Although it is a good point about the IIS logs having querystring values decrypted -- and that is a bit nuts but there may be a setting to handle that on IIS. Ah, just found it. You just turn it off for specific fields (URI Query (cs-uri-query)) then the password via querystring woldn't be logged at all? A gotcha to know though: Select W3C Fields to Log (IIS 7)[^]

                      P Offline
                      P Offline
                      Pualee
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #16

                      Hidden fields within the form data are the way we go here. They are encrypted with the form, but not logged. You should never be able to reproduce a users password (thus the 1 way comparisons in the DB). If it was safe to have plain text passwords anywhere, there would be no need for this.

                      raddevusR 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • P Pualee

                        Hidden fields within the form data are the way we go here. They are encrypted with the form, but not logged. You should never be able to reproduce a users password (thus the 1 way comparisons in the DB). If it was safe to have plain text passwords anywhere, there would be no need for this.

                        raddevusR Offline
                        raddevusR Offline
                        raddevus
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #17

                        Agree! Great, interesting discussion. :thumbsup:

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • realJSOPR realJSOP

                          I spread cheer about Qlikview on a regular basis.

                          ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
                          -----
                          You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
                          -----
                          When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

                          M Offline
                          M Offline
                          Mycroft Holmes
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #18

                          Yup the local plant life appreciates the shit you heap on Qlikview!

                          Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • N Nish Nishant

                            Hey John, Just use RequireHttps.

                            Nish Nishant Consultant Software Architect Ganymede Software Solutions LLC www.ganymedesoftwaresolutions.com

                            E Offline
                            E Offline
                            Eytukan
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #19

                            :cool:

                            Starting to think people post kid pics in their profiles because that was the last time they were cute - Jeremy Falcon.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • raddevusR raddevus

                              If you like, Pualee are talking about encryption on the server side, then you are correct, data is not encrypted by some magical means once it gets to the server. Any scheme you would use will require you to encrypt the data in some way for storage once the data gets to your server. HTTPS is for secure communication over HTTP. Maybe you're looking for an auto-encrypted data stream to storage device? That's a totally different animal, right? EDIT Also, if you're saying because you can see the CP querystrings that proves that HTTPS doesn't encrypt querystrings...well that is because they expose querystrings here to create trackback links. If they didn't expose those then you'd never be able to sniff them out of the HTTP stream, because they are encrypted before they are sent to the server and only the server can decrypt them. That's the point of encryption for communication.

                              realJSOPR Offline
                              realJSOPR Offline
                              realJSOP
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #20

                              No, I simply don't want people to be able to see the query string in the URL as anything more than a block of encrypted gibberish.

                              ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
                              -----
                              You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
                              -----
                              When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

                              raddevusR 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • N Nish Nishant

                                Hey John, Just use RequireHttps.

                                Nish Nishant Consultant Software Architect Ganymede Software Solutions LLC www.ganymedesoftwaresolutions.com

                                realJSOPR Offline
                                realJSOPR Offline
                                realJSOP
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #21

                                THAT'S.NOT.WHAT.I'M.TALKING.ABOUT.

                                ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
                                -----
                                You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
                                -----
                                When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • realJSOPR realJSOP

                                  No, I simply don't want people to be able to see the query string in the URL as anything more than a block of encrypted gibberish.

                                  ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
                                  -----
                                  You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
                                  -----
                                  When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

                                  raddevusR Offline
                                  raddevusR Offline
                                  raddevus
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #22

                                  Ah I get what you are saying. The QueryString itself should be encrypted in some way so you can pass it along, users could see it and have no idea what the values are. That's interesting.

                                  N 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • raddevusR raddevus

                                    Ah I get what you are saying. The QueryString itself should be encrypted in some way so you can pass it along, users could see it and have no idea what the values are. That's interesting.

                                    N Offline
                                    N Offline
                                    Nish Nishant
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #23

                                    He could just use Post instead of Get, or use something like Angular so the user won't see the QS.

                                    Nish Nishant Consultant Software Architect Ganymede Software Solutions LLC www.ganymedesoftwaresolutions.com

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    Reply
                                    • Reply as topic
                                    Log in to reply
                                    • Oldest to Newest
                                    • Newest to Oldest
                                    • Most Votes


                                    • Login

                                    • Don't have an account? Register

                                    • Login or register to search.
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    0
                                    • Categories
                                    • Recent
                                    • Tags
                                    • Popular
                                    • World
                                    • Users
                                    • Groups