Recommendation on an external HDD for backups
-
Hi all! I own a NAS that has a total capacity of 6TB. More than enough for my business needs. Till today I've been using a 3TB HDD as backup and it worked perfectly... versions... all OK, but of course I'm running out of space. Would you recommend the Seagate STEL6000200 HDD? It's 6TB of capacity and the USB3.0 port seems what I need. Thank you all!
www.robotecnik.com[^] - robots, CNC and PLC programming
According to this review you can't make a bad choice: The Best External Hard Drives of 2018 | PCMag.com[^]
-
Hi all! I own a NAS that has a total capacity of 6TB. More than enough for my business needs. Till today I've been using a 3TB HDD as backup and it worked perfectly... versions... all OK, but of course I'm running out of space. Would you recommend the Seagate STEL6000200 HDD? It's 6TB of capacity and the USB3.0 port seems what I need. Thank you all!
www.robotecnik.com[^] - robots, CNC and PLC programming
Seagate's got such a bad reputation is recent years decades I wouldn't take one even if given to me for free. And that's actually happened - I was given a system that had a set of mirrored Seagate drives - one was already dead, and the other failed within the following month. All Seagate drives I've ever purchased are dead. I've retired functional drives from other companies because they just got too small, not because they stopped working. IMO: If you're going to insist on Seagate as a backup drive, then back up in pairs, at least.
-
Hi all! I own a NAS that has a total capacity of 6TB. More than enough for my business needs. Till today I've been using a 3TB HDD as backup and it worked perfectly... versions... all OK, but of course I'm running out of space. Would you recommend the Seagate STEL6000200 HDD? It's 6TB of capacity and the USB3.0 port seems what I need. Thank you all!
www.robotecnik.com[^] - robots, CNC and PLC programming
Personally I haven't had the bad experience of Seagate, the opposite actually. Their average fail rate is about the same as any other manufacturer. According to (some fairly old) statistics from google, who buys a lot of hard drives from all manufacturers. But what all manufacturers have in common is that they very often have systematic errors, so if one drive fails, usually most drives from the same batch or even model fails at the same time. Therefore my recommendation is to buy a Synology diskstation or a Qnap or something similar, and fill it up with disks from different manufacturers. That said, one should still check out current statistics[^], and you should NOT buy Seagate ST4000DMxxx, and the stats for certain Western digital disks doesn't look to shiny either. At the moment it looks like Hitachi is the way to go. (which I personally have had extremely bad experience with :laugh: )
Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello
-
Hi all! I own a NAS that has a total capacity of 6TB. More than enough for my business needs. Till today I've been using a 3TB HDD as backup and it worked perfectly... versions... all OK, but of course I'm running out of space. Would you recommend the Seagate STEL6000200 HDD? It's 6TB of capacity and the USB3.0 port seems what I need. Thank you all!
www.robotecnik.com[^] - robots, CNC and PLC programming
It may also depend on your NAS too... had one client with a Synology box (admittedly low end) stacked with 2 mirrored WD drives, less than a year in started reporting SMART fails on both drives. Went through the return/replace of drives, but problems kept coming back. I took a look at the forums on Synology's own website, seemed others with sometimes even days old new WD's having problems. Of course Synology's reply "update the software, rebuild the RAID, if that fails change the drives" (just like MS, if the upgrade fails, reinstall). WD - drives are fine but we'll give you another [often refirbished] just to be sure. To save the client spending on more drives (now after warranty) I took the supposed worst of the current 2 drives and threw it in a desktop PC, full reformatted it (many hours), and had it duplicate what they were putting on the NAS (from original sources of course) - been flawless in both work and regular SMART tests while the 2nd (now single drive) still in the NAS is picking up more errors. (Moving that 2nd drive a job for another day.) Summary: 1. check compatibility NAS to drives beyond what manufacturer claims - check forums etc 2. For sure: if it's Synology NAS avoid WD drives, not sure whos fault but it's not a happy mix.
Signature ready for installation. Please Reboot now.
-
Hi all! I own a NAS that has a total capacity of 6TB. More than enough for my business needs. Till today I've been using a 3TB HDD as backup and it worked perfectly... versions... all OK, but of course I'm running out of space. Would you recommend the Seagate STEL6000200 HDD? It's 6TB of capacity and the USB3.0 port seems what I need. Thank you all!
www.robotecnik.com[^] - robots, CNC and PLC programming
-
Hi all! I own a NAS that has a total capacity of 6TB. More than enough for my business needs. Till today I've been using a 3TB HDD as backup and it worked perfectly... versions... all OK, but of course I'm running out of space. Would you recommend the Seagate STEL6000200 HDD? It's 6TB of capacity and the USB3.0 port seems what I need. Thank you all!
www.robotecnik.com[^] - robots, CNC and PLC programming
I'd have to say my experience with Seagate drives is fine: my NAS has 4 * 4TB Seagate drives (ST4000DM000-1F2168) organised as RAID 5 that have run 24/7 since early 2015 and - so far - no problems at all. My USB (air gapped) image backup drives are also Seagate and are all fine as well - I can't remember when I got them, but they well and truly predate the Seagate NAS. In fact, the only HDD failures I've had in the last 15 years have all been Maxtor drives of various sizes.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
-
I'd have to say my experience with Seagate drives is fine: my NAS has 4 * 4TB Seagate drives (ST4000DM000-1F2168) organised as RAID 5 that have run 24/7 since early 2015 and - so far - no problems at all. My USB (air gapped) image backup drives are also Seagate and are all fine as well - I can't remember when I got them, but they well and truly predate the Seagate NAS. In fact, the only HDD failures I've had in the last 15 years have all been Maxtor drives of various sizes.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
OriginalGriff wrote:
I'd have to say my experience with Seagate drives is fine ... In fact, the only HDD failures I've had in the last 15 years have all been Maxtor drives of various sizes.
Quote:
In a deal worth US$1.9 billion, Maxtor was acquired by its rival Seagate in 2006. The Maxtor brand is still in use by Seagate
Hmmm, seagate good / maxtor bad ??? :confused: :laugh:
Signature ready for installation. Please Reboot now.
-
Hi all! I own a NAS that has a total capacity of 6TB. More than enough for my business needs. Till today I've been using a 3TB HDD as backup and it worked perfectly... versions... all OK, but of course I'm running out of space. Would you recommend the Seagate STEL6000200 HDD? It's 6TB of capacity and the USB3.0 port seems what I need. Thank you all!
www.robotecnik.com[^] - robots, CNC and PLC programming
Joan M wrote:
I own a NAS that has a total capacity of 6TB.
If you don't mind my asking, what do you have for a NAS device? How are backups performed / maintained on it? I ask because I just bought a cheap NAS to house my random junk, and its backup mechanism is very limited.
Common sense is admitting there is cause and effect and that you can exert some control over what you understand.
-
Joan M wrote:
I own a NAS that has a total capacity of 6TB.
If you don't mind my asking, what do you have for a NAS device? How are backups performed / maintained on it? I ask because I just bought a cheap NAS to house my random junk, and its backup mechanism is very limited.
Common sense is admitting there is cause and effect and that you can exert some control over what you understand.
I like Hitachi Touros. They (well mine, bought some time ago) came with little caring cases.
-
Joan M wrote:
I own a NAS that has a total capacity of 6TB.
If you don't mind my asking, what do you have for a NAS device? How are backups performed / maintained on it? I ask because I just bought a cheap NAS to house my random junk, and its backup mechanism is very limited.
Common sense is admitting there is cause and effect and that you can exert some control over what you understand.
A double bay Synology. The backups are being done by they hyperbackup solution to an USB external HDD. They have a versioning system that is great to access different states of the files you are interested in recovering. The biggest problem is that it seems they are not capable to handle multiple drives to make backups. This means you are forced to create n backup tasks (n => one per external disk) and program them to use a specific external disk... this is giving you a failure each day (for the missing disk).
-
According to this review you can't make a bad choice: The Best External Hard Drives of 2018 | PCMag.com[^]
-
Seagate's got such a bad reputation is recent years decades I wouldn't take one even if given to me for free. And that's actually happened - I was given a system that had a set of mirrored Seagate drives - one was already dead, and the other failed within the following month. All Seagate drives I've ever purchased are dead. I've retired functional drives from other companies because they just got too small, not because they stopped working. IMO: If you're going to insist on Seagate as a backup drive, then back up in pairs, at least.
-
Personally I haven't had the bad experience of Seagate, the opposite actually. Their average fail rate is about the same as any other manufacturer. According to (some fairly old) statistics from google, who buys a lot of hard drives from all manufacturers. But what all manufacturers have in common is that they very often have systematic errors, so if one drive fails, usually most drives from the same batch or even model fails at the same time. Therefore my recommendation is to buy a Synology diskstation or a Qnap or something similar, and fill it up with disks from different manufacturers. That said, one should still check out current statistics[^], and you should NOT buy Seagate ST4000DMxxx, and the stats for certain Western digital disks doesn't look to shiny either. At the moment it looks like Hitachi is the way to go. (which I personally have had extremely bad experience with :laugh: )
Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello
-
It may also depend on your NAS too... had one client with a Synology box (admittedly low end) stacked with 2 mirrored WD drives, less than a year in started reporting SMART fails on both drives. Went through the return/replace of drives, but problems kept coming back. I took a look at the forums on Synology's own website, seemed others with sometimes even days old new WD's having problems. Of course Synology's reply "update the software, rebuild the RAID, if that fails change the drives" (just like MS, if the upgrade fails, reinstall). WD - drives are fine but we'll give you another [often refirbished] just to be sure. To save the client spending on more drives (now after warranty) I took the supposed worst of the current 2 drives and threw it in a desktop PC, full reformatted it (many hours), and had it duplicate what they were putting on the NAS (from original sources of course) - been flawless in both work and regular SMART tests while the 2nd (now single drive) still in the NAS is picking up more errors. (Moving that 2nd drive a job for another day.) Summary: 1. check compatibility NAS to drives beyond what manufacturer claims - check forums etc 2. For sure: if it's Synology NAS avoid WD drives, not sure whos fault but it's not a happy mix.
Signature ready for installation. Please Reboot now.
:~ Synology + WD... And it works perfectly... at least till today I've not seen a failure/problem... I got a couple of the recommended/compatible drives. Now I'm searching for an use external drive to store the backups from what is stored in the NAS...
www.robotecnik.com[^] - robots, CNC and PLC programming
-
WD External HDDs.Last for ages
Caveat Emptor. "Progress doesn't come from early risers – progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." Lazarus Long
-
I'd have to say my experience with Seagate drives is fine: my NAS has 4 * 4TB Seagate drives (ST4000DM000-1F2168) organised as RAID 5 that have run 24/7 since early 2015 and - so far - no problems at all. My USB (air gapped) image backup drives are also Seagate and are all fine as well - I can't remember when I got them, but they well and truly predate the Seagate NAS. In fact, the only HDD failures I've had in the last 15 years have all been Maxtor drives of various sizes.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
I remember years ago to have a failure in a HDD from an HP server... a super expensive SCSI drive at 15K rpm... I got it replaced by an official HP drive... which was exactly a MAXTOR drive with an HP sticker... X| Never again it failed, but well, I paid almost twice its price for a sticker... :mad: Till today I've been very lucky with HDDs, but I thought asking here first... Thank you for the answer!
www.robotecnik.com[^] - robots, CNC and PLC programming
-
Joan M wrote:
I own a NAS that has a total capacity of 6TB.
If you don't mind my asking, what do you have for a NAS device? How are backups performed / maintained on it? I ask because I just bought a cheap NAS to house my random junk, and its backup mechanism is very limited.
Common sense is admitting there is cause and effect and that you can exert some control over what you understand.
I've been using a D-Link DNS320 (2 bays, max of 3TB discs) (Ethernet) for a few years. It has not had any problems, even though I had been using second hand 1TB discs, but have bought 3TB as I was running out of room. Also, my Acronis backup s/w was up for renewal; so I have followed advice seen over the month to use AOMEI. Thus far, AOMEI looks good - it is different from Acronis. I quite like (but not got used to) the fact that you can open backups as local drives (somewhat more long-winded that the Acronis method of double-clicking the required backup file). I've not been using it long enough to get a feel for how it deals with saving old backups. I am using the free version; thus far, the only Acronis feature that I have used that AOMEI doesn't have is email notifications and one-step cloning (you can clone in two steps and both feature are available if you get the paid version).
-
Seagate's got such a bad reputation is recent years decades I wouldn't take one even if given to me for free. And that's actually happened - I was given a system that had a set of mirrored Seagate drives - one was already dead, and the other failed within the following month. All Seagate drives I've ever purchased are dead. I've retired functional drives from other companies because they just got too small, not because they stopped working. IMO: If you're going to insist on Seagate as a backup drive, then back up in pairs, at least.
I had a very similar experience with 2 Seagate NAS drives. One lasted almost 1 year, the replacement ("free" under warranty) lasted 2 months. Major headache. "A scalded cat is even afraid of cold water" -- I won't be back to SG in a long time.
-
Hi all! I own a NAS that has a total capacity of 6TB. More than enough for my business needs. Till today I've been using a 3TB HDD as backup and it worked perfectly... versions... all OK, but of course I'm running out of space. Would you recommend the Seagate STEL6000200 HDD? It's 6TB of capacity and the USB3.0 port seems what I need. Thank you all!
www.robotecnik.com[^] - robots, CNC and PLC programming
-
I can only offer my own anecdotes, and I realize other people have had no problem with them. To me, Seagate is like Sony: I won't (directly) tell others not to buy them if that's what they want, but I *will* relate my personal experience, and I don't have any praise with them. I didn't start with such prejudice either; I used to be a fan. I'm always on the lookout for good deals on large hard drives. While I've seen better prices on Seagate drives than some of their competition (especially the cutting edge just-out-this-month models), I always move on as soon as I see the name.
