School shooting UK style
-
And he had a trigger, yet didnt use it, thus refuting your 'guns = impulsive = murder' theory.
-
No it isnt my argument. My argument is that there is no correlation OR causation between guns and murder. The tool doesnt cause murder, and the tool used doesnt correlate with murder. (or suicide) Get it?
Sablerz wrote:
My position is easy to find on Google
Yet now you have been asked to produce your data you cant.
-
And he had a trigger, yet didnt use it, thus refuting your 'guns = impulsive = murder' theory.
-
Did yo uread it? "Excluding a large proportion of the general population from gun possession is also not likely to be feasible. Behavioral risk-based approaches to firearms restriction, such as expanding the definition of gun-prohibited persons to include those with violent misdemeanor convictions and multiple DUI convictions, could be a more effective public health policy to prevent gun violence in the population." It states behaviour issues are behind murder. Not outlawing guns, but outlawing certain types of individual from owning guns. This certainly reflects the US, where guns are easy to get, and hence figure in many murders. But take away the guns and that disturbed person will buy a 12 inch carving knife, readily available, or a machete, or samurai sword, and commit murder. All you have done is change the tool. You have not fixed the cause.
-
Well that is not a bad idea. But also, you know, guns are pretty efficient killing machines and easy to get hold of.
Swords are very effective you know. Look how easy samurai swords are to buy.
-
Because populations are not made of individuals... Yeah, right. /sarcasm
-
Did yo uread it? "Excluding a large proportion of the general population from gun possession is also not likely to be feasible. Behavioral risk-based approaches to firearms restriction, such as expanding the definition of gun-prohibited persons to include those with violent misdemeanor convictions and multiple DUI convictions, could be a more effective public health policy to prevent gun violence in the population." It states behaviour issues are behind murder. Not outlawing guns, but outlawing certain types of individual from owning guns. This certainly reflects the US, where guns are easy to get, and hence figure in many murders. But take away the guns and that disturbed person will buy a 12 inch carving knife, readily available, or a machete, or samurai sword, and commit murder. All you have done is change the tool. You have not fixed the cause.
-
Got anything else to do? :)
No. :sigh:
-
No. :sigh:
So I was thinking, what is the act of shooting, what does it represent? Power. Choice. Self assertion. Therefore is it that these acts are carried out by people who have no voice, no control over their lives, no sense that they DO have choices, and can make decisions? Story today of a 14 year old kid who hung himself because his parents took his phone away. This is him losing control. Losing choice. Not making a decision. Just a thought, but what do you think? (since you have nothing to do and this is an interesting discussion :) )
-
Now you’ve seen I’m right and are changing the goalposts again from impulsivity to the feasibility of control. No.
You dont get it do you? Let me repeat, the 'tool is not the cause of murder and the tool used does not correlate with murder'. Take away the gun and the murderer will use another tool. Therefore gun control will not work in the US, as it hasnt worked elsewhere.
-
You dont get it do you? Let me repeat, the 'tool is not the cause of murder and the tool used does not correlate with murder'. Take away the gun and the murderer will use another tool. Therefore gun control will not work in the US, as it hasnt worked elsewhere.
-
These threads are just like school shootings. No-one wants them to happen, everyone agrees they should stop, but no-one knows how to make them stop so they just happen again and again and again.
F-ES Sitecore wrote:
no-one knows how to make them stop
Correction: no one can agree on how to make them stop. Plenty of people know how to make them stop. And plenty of other people think those people are idiots, and that their solution won't make any difference, because bad people will keep starting new "gun control" threads anyway.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
-
So I was thinking, what is the act of shooting, what does it represent? Power. Choice. Self assertion. Therefore is it that these acts are carried out by people who have no voice, no control over their lives, no sense that they DO have choices, and can make decisions? Story today of a 14 year old kid who hung himself because his parents took his phone away. This is him losing control. Losing choice. Not making a decision. Just a thought, but what do you think? (since you have nothing to do and this is an interesting discussion :) )
people kill other people because 1. sense of duty to country or community (military, law enforcement) 2. self defense 3. accident 4. bat shit crazy (too many sub reasons to list) but includes murder. pick one. that is how I feel about this at a super high level. Number 4 is the reason that involves the gun ban debate. Edit: people kill themselves because they are bat shit crazy (many possible reasons here, severe depression being the main one)
-
You dont get it do you? Let me repeat, the 'tool is not the cause of murder and the tool used does not correlate with murder'. Take away the gun and the murderer will use another tool. Therefore gun control will not work in the US, as it hasnt worked elsewhere.
Munchies_Matt wrote:
Take away the gun and the murderer will use another tool.
Name one other commonly (and legally) available "murder tool" which can kill hundreds of people at a distance in a matter of seconds. (And no, "bombs" don't count. Making bombs is illegal. Nobody is trying to argue for the "right to bear bombs".)
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
-
You dont get it do you? Let me repeat, the 'tool is not the cause of murder and the tool used does not correlate with murder'. Take away the gun and the murderer will use another tool. Therefore gun control will not work in the US, as it hasnt worked elsewhere.
-
people kill other people because 1. sense of duty to country or community (military, law enforcement) 2. self defense 3. accident 4. bat shit crazy (too many sub reasons to list) but includes murder. pick one. that is how I feel about this at a super high level. Number 4 is the reason that involves the gun ban debate. Edit: people kill themselves because they are bat shit crazy (many possible reasons here, severe depression being the main one)
Number 3 is an element of the debate too. For example, keeping guns in locked cases so that 3 year olds can't shoot their parents.
-
Number 3 is an element of the debate too. For example, keeping guns in locked cases so that 3 year olds can't shoot their parents.
Agreed, I will give you that. :thumbsup:
-
people kill other people because 1. sense of duty to country or community (military, law enforcement) 2. self defense 3. accident 4. bat shit crazy (too many sub reasons to list) but includes murder. pick one. that is how I feel about this at a super high level. Number 4 is the reason that involves the gun ban debate. Edit: people kill themselves because they are bat shit crazy (many possible reasons here, severe depression being the main one)
Actually, 2, 3, and 4 are all part of the debate, but the fact that a shooting as in self defense never seems to bubble to the surface when gun grabbers present statistics, and accidental shootings are almost as rarely cited.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013 -
Actually, 2, 3, and 4 are all part of the debate, but the fact that a shooting as in self defense never seems to bubble to the surface when gun grabbers present statistics, and accidental shootings are almost as rarely cited.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013The gun ban debate is really rooted from crimes committed by people who are crazy, not military people doing their jobs. Just saying...
-
Actually, 2, 3, and 4 are all part of the debate, but the fact that a shooting as in self defense never seems to bubble to the surface when gun grabbers present statistics, and accidental shootings are almost as rarely cited.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:
gun grabbers present statistics
And this is why statistics should always be scrutinized and viewed with skepticism. You can base both sides of an argument from the exact same set of data. Not to mention, you can create info-graphics from carefully chosen data subsets that support your argument while excluding data that counters it. Typically, the only statistics I believe are the ones that I myself have generated. It's a real shame that all the good data on gun statistics is so hard to collate because not all parts of the U.S. keep the same levels data or report all gun related crimes. Without good data, trying to make sense of the data is futile.
if (Object.DividedByZero == true) { Universe.Implode(); }
