Backup...
-
A friend of my lost years of photos (kids mostly) for a disk failure... He want's to do backup from now - on a single external drive... We all know that is not safer than a single internal disk... I gave him 3 ideas: 1. RAID in the computer 2. RAID outside the computer (NAS) 3. Cloud (from Google Drive to ctera) I would like ideas, that would save him money and burden too...
"The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge". Stephen Hawking, 1942- 2018
-
A friend of my lost years of photos (kids mostly) for a disk failure... He want's to do backup from now - on a single external drive... We all know that is not safer than a single internal disk... I gave him 3 ideas: 1. RAID in the computer 2. RAID outside the computer (NAS) 3. Cloud (from Google Drive to ctera) I would like ideas, that would save him money and burden too...
"The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge". Stephen Hawking, 1942- 2018
4. Backup to a printer
-
A friend of my lost years of photos (kids mostly) for a disk failure... He want's to do backup from now - on a single external drive... We all know that is not safer than a single internal disk... I gave him 3 ideas: 1. RAID in the computer 2. RAID outside the computer (NAS) 3. Cloud (from Google Drive to ctera) I would like ideas, that would save him money and burden too...
"The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge". Stephen Hawking, 1942- 2018
NAS. Cloud has four problems: * Upload speed is much slower than download speed; * Cost is periodical and much more frequent than the occasional replacement for a NAS; * Data are "up in the air" on another one's server. No thanks; * Conditions may vary unilaterally, see OneDrive.
GCS d-- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
-
A friend of my lost years of photos (kids mostly) for a disk failure... He want's to do backup from now - on a single external drive... We all know that is not safer than a single internal disk... I gave him 3 ideas: 1. RAID in the computer 2. RAID outside the computer (NAS) 3. Cloud (from Google Drive to ctera) I would like ideas, that would save him money and burden too...
"The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge". Stephen Hawking, 1942- 2018
Nas, definitely.
-
A friend of my lost years of photos (kids mostly) for a disk failure... He want's to do backup from now - on a single external drive... We all know that is not safer than a single internal disk... I gave him 3 ideas: 1. RAID in the computer 2. RAID outside the computer (NAS) 3. Cloud (from Google Drive to ctera) I would like ideas, that would save him money and burden too...
"The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge". Stephen Hawking, 1942- 2018
NAS is good, but ... it's best when combined with a regimen of air-gapped USB backups. Two 4TB USB3 external HDDs will cost less than a single RAID NAS (think around £150 ~ £200 the pair) and provide much better protection from malware (Ransomware in particular just loves NAS storage). Combine that with twice monthly disk images - alternating between the two drives - via AOMEI Backupper and he can't lose much data regardless of what happens.
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640 Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
-
A friend of my lost years of photos (kids mostly) for a disk failure... He want's to do backup from now - on a single external drive... We all know that is not safer than a single internal disk... I gave him 3 ideas: 1. RAID in the computer 2. RAID outside the computer (NAS) 3. Cloud (from Google Drive to ctera) I would like ideas, that would save him money and burden too...
"The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge". Stephen Hawking, 1942- 2018
I use both an external drive and Microsoft OneDrive for backing up my photo's.
-
NAS is good, but ... it's best when combined with a regimen of air-gapped USB backups. Two 4TB USB3 external HDDs will cost less than a single RAID NAS (think around £150 ~ £200 the pair) and provide much better protection from malware (Ransomware in particular just loves NAS storage). Combine that with twice monthly disk images - alternating between the two drives - via AOMEI Backupper and he can't lose much data regardless of what happens.
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640 Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
I see... And I can set AOMEI up to do that alone? Say one week to disk A and the other on Disk B? My friend is not so technical and I do not wish to visit him that frequently...
"The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge". Stephen Hawking, 1942- 2018
-
I see... And I can set AOMEI up to do that alone? Say one week to disk A and the other on Disk B? My friend is not so technical and I do not wish to visit him that frequently...
"The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge". Stephen Hawking, 1942- 2018
No - the whole idea is that backups should be air-gapped, so having them permanently plugged in renders the backups themselves vulnerable. For example, if they are plugged into a PC and the PSU breaks down, it can do enormous damage to all connected devices (I've had HDD's and mice fried when PSUs fail and pump too many volts down th +5 and +12 lines). Simplest way is label them: "1st of month" and "15th of month" and he just plugs in the appropriate drive to do the backup. (You can Schedule Windows Backup with AOMEI Backupper Software[^] - I don't know if it's in the free version, but it comes up on BitsDuJour quite often as a free, legal, and licenced download if it isn't).
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640 Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
-
A friend of my lost years of photos (kids mostly) for a disk failure... He want's to do backup from now - on a single external drive... We all know that is not safer than a single internal disk... I gave him 3 ideas: 1. RAID in the computer 2. RAID outside the computer (NAS) 3. Cloud (from Google Drive to ctera) I would like ideas, that would save him money and burden too...
"The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge". Stephen Hawking, 1942- 2018
Get a blueray external writer and some blueray disks LG Super Multi Blue External USB 3.0 14x Blu-ray Disc Rewriter | LG USA[^]
Caveat Emptor. "Progress doesn't come from early risers – progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." Lazarus Long
-
NAS is good, but ... it's best when combined with a regimen of air-gapped USB backups. Two 4TB USB3 external HDDs will cost less than a single RAID NAS (think around £150 ~ £200 the pair) and provide much better protection from malware (Ransomware in particular just loves NAS storage). Combine that with twice monthly disk images - alternating between the two drives - via AOMEI Backupper and he can't lose much data regardless of what happens.
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640 Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
Is it plausible that your suggested setup would be massive overkill for some photos of the kids? If you were talking about operational data in a business, then possibly, but hey, it's not..... If it was me (and obviously depending on the quantity), then copying them between a coupe of phones (mine, Mrs Wife's, grandma's etc) would do me - but then I don't have any kids and if I did they'd likely be so ugly nobody would want to keep photos of them... Point I'm making is that not everything has to be military grade hardened, fireproof, malware proof and hacker proof at all times..
C# has already designed away most of the tedium of C++.
-
Is it plausible that your suggested setup would be massive overkill for some photos of the kids? If you were talking about operational data in a business, then possibly, but hey, it's not..... If it was me (and obviously depending on the quantity), then copying them between a coupe of phones (mine, Mrs Wife's, grandma's etc) would do me - but then I don't have any kids and if I did they'd likely be so ugly nobody would want to keep photos of them... Point I'm making is that not everything has to be military grade hardened, fireproof, malware proof and hacker proof at all times..
C# has already designed away most of the tedium of C++.
And there's the rub: you never know how valuable your pictures are until they are gone ... And "formalizing" backup procedures means they are more likely to be followed - which means future memories are protected as well.
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640 Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
-
No - the whole idea is that backups should be air-gapped, so having them permanently plugged in renders the backups themselves vulnerable. For example, if they are plugged into a PC and the PSU breaks down, it can do enormous damage to all connected devices (I've had HDD's and mice fried when PSUs fail and pump too many volts down th +5 and +12 lines). Simplest way is label them: "1st of month" and "15th of month" and he just plugs in the appropriate drive to do the backup. (You can Schedule Windows Backup with AOMEI Backupper Software[^] - I don't know if it's in the free version, but it comes up on BitsDuJour quite often as a free, legal, and licenced download if it isn't).
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640 Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
I've been experimenting with AOMEI backup (free version) and, thus far, every repeated backup in a sequence is an Incremental or Differential. I have not managed to persuade it to always do Full backups. That doesn't mean that it can't do it; it just means that if it is possible, then I haven't yet cracked how to do it. It is a slow exploration as I wait for the once-a-week cycles as I haven't enough disc space to do dailies. FWIW: NAS unit with pair 3TB drives (largest size the NAS unit can handle) in the garage on homeplug Ethernet network. The PC is at the other side of the house.
-
Is it plausible that your suggested setup would be massive overkill for some photos of the kids? If you were talking about operational data in a business, then possibly, but hey, it's not..... If it was me (and obviously depending on the quantity), then copying them between a coupe of phones (mine, Mrs Wife's, grandma's etc) would do me - but then I don't have any kids and if I did they'd likely be so ugly nobody would want to keep photos of them... Point I'm making is that not everything has to be military grade hardened, fireproof, malware proof and hacker proof at all times..
C# has already designed away most of the tedium of C++.
RichardGrimmer wrote:
or some photos of the kids
I have about 2TB of family pictures (my family :) ). It would take me probably one year non stop to watch them all, but hey, I cannot delete a single one.
-
A friend of my lost years of photos (kids mostly) for a disk failure... He want's to do backup from now - on a single external drive... We all know that is not safer than a single internal disk... I gave him 3 ideas: 1. RAID in the computer 2. RAID outside the computer (NAS) 3. Cloud (from Google Drive to ctera) I would like ideas, that would save him money and burden too...
"The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge". Stephen Hawking, 1942- 2018
One backup concept that's very often overlooked: You need to have a copy of your valuable stuff off-site! All the backups in the world, and the NAS, and the airgaps - won't mean a thing if they're all in your house and then comes fire or flood (or other). In US, financial institutions are required by law to have an offsite backup location. The cloud, however, doesn't cut it. Access is at the mercy of the cloud owner and if they go out of business (I've seen it), then what? Or they decide to up your fees 1000%, prepaid a year in advance - they've got your data. Pay or cry. Or, make that air-gapped copy and keep it somewhere else that's not subject to the same vicissitudes of as your dwelling.
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein
"If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010
-
A friend of my lost years of photos (kids mostly) for a disk failure... He want's to do backup from now - on a single external drive... We all know that is not safer than a single internal disk... I gave him 3 ideas: 1. RAID in the computer 2. RAID outside the computer (NAS) 3. Cloud (from Google Drive to ctera) I would like ideas, that would save him money and burden too...
"The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge". Stephen Hawking, 1942- 2018
-
A friend of my lost years of photos (kids mostly) for a disk failure... He want's to do backup from now - on a single external drive... We all know that is not safer than a single internal disk... I gave him 3 ideas: 1. RAID in the computer 2. RAID outside the computer (NAS) 3. Cloud (from Google Drive to ctera) I would like ideas, that would save him money and burden too...
"The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge". Stephen Hawking, 1942- 2018
The first thing you need to tell your friend is that RAID isn't for backup purposes; it's for redundancy. And I've sworn off of RAID when my onboard RAID controller died. Which meant unless I happened to have an identical motherboard, nothing would recover *anything* off of all four 4TB drives that were part of my fancy RAID-10. And yes, I had backups - as I do understand the difference between "redundancy" and "backup". My general rule: I tend to buy drives (all in the same capacity) in sets of 4: The live one, the offline backup sitting next to it, the off-site backup that I swap every month, and the fourth one is a spare ready to go at a moment's notice if any of the other three dies. When the capacity is exceeded, I replace the whole set for a higher-capacity set of disks, and the older ones can be reused in other machines (they're great candidates for a multi-drive RAID...although I've shot down that argument myself above). It's not a cheap solution. But, unlike cloud storage, I remain totally in control of my own data, which IMO makes it worth it (otherwise it would mean I didn't place any value on that).
-
RichardGrimmer wrote:
or some photos of the kids
I have about 2TB of family pictures (my family :) ). It would take me probably one year non stop to watch them all, but hey, I cannot delete a single one.
I have about 1tb and the same problem, retirement project is to clean out the rubbish in the photo folders.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH
-
A friend of my lost years of photos (kids mostly) for a disk failure... He want's to do backup from now - on a single external drive... We all know that is not safer than a single internal disk... I gave him 3 ideas: 1. RAID in the computer 2. RAID outside the computer (NAS) 3. Cloud (from Google Drive to ctera) I would like ideas, that would save him money and burden too...
"The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge". Stephen Hawking, 1942- 2018
RAID isn't a good replacement for a backup, especially internal RAID. A backup on an external RAID 1 isn't a horrible idea though. A backup on a single external drive is, as a matter of fact, way safer, than to a single internal drive. Since the drive isn't powered up all the time, it doesn't wear out as fast as the internal drive. Unless he keeps plugged it in 24/7, then it's indeed a dumb idea. My GF runs backups with Windows' built-in backupper on her external USB 3.0 drive which she plugs in roughly once a week. While that's definitly not enterprise-grade, it's far from a bad backup strategy.
-
One backup concept that's very often overlooked: You need to have a copy of your valuable stuff off-site! All the backups in the world, and the NAS, and the airgaps - won't mean a thing if they're all in your house and then comes fire or flood (or other). In US, financial institutions are required by law to have an offsite backup location. The cloud, however, doesn't cut it. Access is at the mercy of the cloud owner and if they go out of business (I've seen it), then what? Or they decide to up your fees 1000%, prepaid a year in advance - they've got your data. Pay or cry. Or, make that air-gapped copy and keep it somewhere else that's not subject to the same vicissitudes of as your dwelling.
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein
"If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010
Yep, many people miss this. I had a client who kept his A/B set of weekly backups in the trunk of his car. He had a calendar reminder (or 3) to swap them in monday. Ransomware should be a good reminder about air-gapping. But I have used NAS specific backup to a NAS Specific (not accessible from the network) USB Device. Just to make my life easier.
-
RAID isn't a good replacement for a backup, especially internal RAID. A backup on an external RAID 1 isn't a horrible idea though. A backup on a single external drive is, as a matter of fact, way safer, than to a single internal drive. Since the drive isn't powered up all the time, it doesn't wear out as fast as the internal drive. Unless he keeps plugged it in 24/7, then it's indeed a dumb idea. My GF runs backups with Windows' built-in backupper on her external USB 3.0 drive which she plugs in roughly once a week. While that's definitly not enterprise-grade, it's far from a bad backup strategy.
Kirill Illenseer wrote:
Since the drive isn't powered up all the time, it doesn't wear out as fast as the internal drive. Unless he keeps plugged it in 24/7, then it's indeed a dumb idea.
This point can't be stressed enough for some people, and it's not just about drives wearing out. You have to ensure the data can't get modified when your system is infected with some ransomware that encrypts everything within its reach. Or deleted altogether. So yeah, it's got to be offline.