Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. The potato paradox

The potato paradox

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
htmlcomquestion
53 Posts 18 Posters 2 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

    Nope: you cut 'em, you simmer them until soft, then cool and into the fridge for 4 or 5 hours. When they come out, they are already smaller as the fridge has reduced the water content. Low temperature fry - 130C - cool, and back in the fridge for another 4 to 5 hours. When they come out, they are significantly smaller than they started! Then the high temp fry - 190C - drain and serve. Damn good chips - but quite a palaver (especially making enough room in the damn fridge).

    Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640 Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

    W Offline
    W Offline
    W Balboos GHB
    wrote on last edited by
    #33

    Now you're doing this by eyeball (volume) rather than weight (at least as described). Let's consider another mechanism to the volume loss: internal hot air pockets which contract dramatically when cooled (liquids, not so much). It might be even more interesting if you froze them between rounds - water can expand and pool during the freezing, changing the qualities dramatically, to wit: If one takes some firm ToFu and whilst still packaged in water, freezes it for a few days, it will be observed that it turns from white-to-yellow. Upon defrosting, one will find that it has transformed into a tough yet spongy mass. You can literally ring it out and sop up all sorts of flavors - then cook it and properly chew your food (I digress). The point being that the water is forced out of the ToFu structure, aggregates in small pockets, and freezes. This modifies the structure severely both where the water collected and from where it was collected. So - could you, as an aficionado of the potato process, perceive a parallel path (to a lesser degree) in you potato concoction? None of this is judgmental on the utility/futility of the process or flavor.

    Ravings en masse^

    "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein

    "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010

    OriginalGriffO 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • J Jorgen Andersson

      What oil do you use?

      Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello

      OriginalGriffO Offline
      OriginalGriffO Offline
      OriginalGriff
      wrote on last edited by
      #34

      Sunflower, in my (Industrial) deep fat fryer - it holds 8l of oil, so it doesn't vary much in temp when food is added, plus it's big enough to double up as the "pot" for my Sous Vide circulator when it's not frying. (Plus it has a built in tab to drain it when it's cooled to stop the oil going nasty between uses.)

      Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640 Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

      "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
      "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • W W Balboos GHB

        Now you're doing this by eyeball (volume) rather than weight (at least as described). Let's consider another mechanism to the volume loss: internal hot air pockets which contract dramatically when cooled (liquids, not so much). It might be even more interesting if you froze them between rounds - water can expand and pool during the freezing, changing the qualities dramatically, to wit: If one takes some firm ToFu and whilst still packaged in water, freezes it for a few days, it will be observed that it turns from white-to-yellow. Upon defrosting, one will find that it has transformed into a tough yet spongy mass. You can literally ring it out and sop up all sorts of flavors - then cook it and properly chew your food (I digress). The point being that the water is forced out of the ToFu structure, aggregates in small pockets, and freezes. This modifies the structure severely both where the water collected and from where it was collected. So - could you, as an aficionado of the potato process, perceive a parallel path (to a lesser degree) in you potato concoction? None of this is judgmental on the utility/futility of the process or flavor.

        Ravings en masse^

        "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein

        "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010

        OriginalGriffO Offline
        OriginalGriffO Offline
        OriginalGriff
        wrote on last edited by
        #35

        W∴ Balboos wrote:

        If one takes some firm ToFu and whilst still packaged in water, freezes it for a few days, it will be observed that it turns from white-to-yellow. Upon defrosting, one will find that it has transformed into a tough yet spongy mass. You can literally ring it out and sop up all sorts of flavors - then cook it and properly chew your food (I digress). The point being that the water is forced out of the ToFu structure, aggregates in small pockets, and freezes. This modifies the structure severely both where the water collected and from where it was collected. throws it in the bin in favour of BACON

        FTFY!

        Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640 Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

        "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
        "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt

        W 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

          W∴ Balboos wrote:

          If one takes some firm ToFu and whilst still packaged in water, freezes it for a few days, it will be observed that it turns from white-to-yellow. Upon defrosting, one will find that it has transformed into a tough yet spongy mass. You can literally ring it out and sop up all sorts of flavors - then cook it and properly chew your food (I digress). The point being that the water is forced out of the ToFu structure, aggregates in small pockets, and freezes. This modifies the structure severely both where the water collected and from where it was collected. throws it in the bin in favour of BACON

          FTFY!

          Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640 Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

          W Offline
          W Offline
          W Balboos GHB
          wrote on last edited by
          #36

          I'll enjoy some crispy ToFu fries in memory of your clogged arteries and severely limited sense of taste.   A consequence of living on those hog-infested islands, I suppose.

          Ravings en masse^

          "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein

          "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • W W Balboos GHB

            Richard MacCutchan wrote:

            So if you lose 1% of the water,

            That's the point that sets you in the wrong direction. You didn't lose 1% of the water, but rather, changed the calculated (relative) percent of water to the whole, not to itself. (yes - you had other explanations, but this is just a thought-process notice)

            Ravings en masse^

            "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein

            "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Lost User
            wrote on last edited by
            #37

            Thank you, you are of course correct. That is exactly why I went down a blind alley.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • D Dr Walt Fair PE

              Well idf they are 99% water, the water weighs 1v lb and the rest weighs 99lb. so if you extract 2% of the watere, the remaining weight would be 99 +0. 98= 99.98 lb.

              CQ de W5ALT

              Walt Fair, Jr., P. E. Comport Computing Specializing in Technical Engineering Software

              N Offline
              N Offline
              Nelek
              wrote on last edited by
              #38

              read it again. You don't extract 2% of water. You dry them until water makes a 98% of the weight. It is not the same.

              M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • J Jorgen Andersson

                Luckily I didn't write anything about pints in the post.

                Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello

                Richard DeemingR Offline
                Richard DeemingR Offline
                Richard Deeming
                wrote on last edited by
                #39

                I assumed you'd sunk a few before coming up with the question. :D


                "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined" - Homer

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • J Jorgen Andersson

                  You have 100 lb of "mathematical" potatoes, which are 99 percent water by weight. You let them dehydrate until they're 98 percent water. How much do they weigh now? No googling, ok.

                  Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello

                  K Offline
                  K Offline
                  kalberts
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #40

                  Sorry, I have the (usually good) habit of at least quickly glancing through all the replies before I add a comment. So I saw the answer before starting to consider the problem myself. But the problem is a good one! (Although not a true paradox.) Semi off track (but only semi!): It reminds me of a Norwegian sausage maker boasting his sausages having a 133% meat content. Advertising authorities protested: No product, not even a boneless steak, can contain more than 100% meat. This slaughter insisted that he used 1,33 kg meat to make 1 kg of these cured (smoked and dried) sausages. This went to court, where it was pointed out: When the meat is weighed, it contains a lot of water that weighs as meat. In the production process, when the sausages are dried, some of this water is removed. If that water was labeled as meat when you weighed the ingredients before you started, it is actually part of the meat that is removed during the drying. You can't claim that all of the meat is a part of the product when you have removed some of it. So the slaughter lost the case, and had to change the wording from "contains 133% meat" to "For each kg of sausage, 1,33 kg of meat is used". Which isn't too bad - the sausages are tasty! :-)

                  E 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • J Jorgen Andersson

                    You have 100 lb of "mathematical" potatoes, which are 99 percent water by weight. You let them dehydrate until they're 98 percent water. How much do they weigh now? No googling, ok.

                    Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello

                    U Offline
                    U Offline
                    User 13897974
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #41

                    it's 50 lb

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L Lost User

                      Forgive me for being thick but I cannot get my head round that. In 100lb there is 1lb of starch and 99 lbs of water (yes?). So if you lose 1% of the water, isn't that just 1lb less than before?

                      M Offline
                      M Offline
                      maze3
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #42

                      Richard MacCutchan wrote:

                      So if you lose 1% of the water, isn't that just 1lb less than before?

                      lets work through this. if this were the case. 100lb total, 1lb startch, 99lb water water = 99/100 = 99% of total - 1lb water = 1lb startch, 98lb water, total 99lb water = 98/99 = 98.9898989... % it is not 98.0% yet.

                      L 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M maze3

                        Richard MacCutchan wrote:

                        So if you lose 1% of the water, isn't that just 1lb less than before?

                        lets work through this. if this were the case. 100lb total, 1lb startch, 99lb water water = 99/100 = 99% of total - 1lb water = 1lb startch, 98lb water, total 99lb water = 98/99 = 98.9898989... % it is not 98.0% yet.

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        Lost User
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #43

                        I think you also misunderstand. See the explanation by OriginalGriff above.

                        M 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L Lost User

                          I think you also misunderstand. See the explanation by OriginalGriff above.

                          M Offline
                          M Offline
                          maze3
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #44

                          I was quoting @Richard-MacCutchan and was trying to help explain (to myself aswell) that losing only 1lb water would NOT give 98.0% but only works out to 98.98...% and that the correct number is something else.

                          L 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M maze3

                            I was quoting @Richard-MacCutchan and was trying to help explain (to myself aswell) that losing only 1lb water would NOT give 98.0% but only works out to 98.98...% and that the correct number is something else.

                            L Offline
                            L Offline
                            Lost User
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #45

                            You are trying to answer a different question. The water content is reduced to only 98%, so the amount of starch is now 2% of the total weight. And if 1lb of starch is 2% then the total weight is 50lbs. Hence the title "the potato paradox".

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • J Jorgen Andersson

                              You have 100 lb of "mathematical" potatoes, which are 99 percent water by weight. You let them dehydrate until they're 98 percent water. How much do they weigh now? No googling, ok.

                              Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello

                              M Offline
                              M Offline
                              MKJCP
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #46

                              The algebra (which doesn't over think it). Givens: A. There is 1 pound of starch (1% of 100) B. 98% water What is total weight X? 0.98 = (X-1)/X and X = 50

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • J Jorgen Andersson

                                You have 100 lb of "mathematical" potatoes, which are 99 percent water by weight. You let them dehydrate until they're 98 percent water. How much do they weigh now? No googling, ok.

                                Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello

                                B Offline
                                B Offline
                                BinaryReason
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #47

                                WEIGHT_OF_POTATOES = 100 lbs

                                WEIGHT_OF_WATER / WEIGHT_OF_POTATOES = 0.99
                                WEIGHT_OF_WATER = WEIGHT_OF_POTATOES * 0.99

                                WEIGHT_OF_WATER = 99 lbs;

                                (WEIGHT_OF_WATER - weight_to_evaporate) / (WEIGHT_OF_POTATOES - weight_to_evaporate) = 0.98
                                (99 - weight_to_evaporate) / (100 - weight_to_evaporate) = 0.98
                                weight_to_evaporate = 50 lbs;

                                So the final answer is WEIGHT_OF_POTATOES - weight_to_evaporate = 100lbs - 50lbs = 50lbs

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • J Jorgen Andersson

                                  You have 100 lb of "mathematical" potatoes, which are 99 percent water by weight. You let them dehydrate until they're 98 percent water. How much do they weigh now? No googling, ok.

                                  Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello

                                  E Offline
                                  E Offline
                                  englebart
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #48

                                  Trust the math. Given 100lb = 99lb-water + 1lb-potato w = weight of water in lbs % water = w / (w + 1lb-potato) Initial condition = 99%. Check. Now solve for 98% water .98 = w / (w + 1lb-potato) w = 49 lb Check: 49 / (49 + 1) -> .98 add back the 1 lb of potato and the total is 50 lb total

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • K kalberts

                                    Sorry, I have the (usually good) habit of at least quickly glancing through all the replies before I add a comment. So I saw the answer before starting to consider the problem myself. But the problem is a good one! (Although not a true paradox.) Semi off track (but only semi!): It reminds me of a Norwegian sausage maker boasting his sausages having a 133% meat content. Advertising authorities protested: No product, not even a boneless steak, can contain more than 100% meat. This slaughter insisted that he used 1,33 kg meat to make 1 kg of these cured (smoked and dried) sausages. This went to court, where it was pointed out: When the meat is weighed, it contains a lot of water that weighs as meat. In the production process, when the sausages are dried, some of this water is removed. If that water was labeled as meat when you weighed the ingredients before you started, it is actually part of the meat that is removed during the drying. You can't claim that all of the meat is a part of the product when you have removed some of it. So the slaughter lost the case, and had to change the wording from "contains 133% meat" to "For each kg of sausage, 1,33 kg of meat is used". Which isn't too bad - the sausages are tasty! :-)

                                    E Offline
                                    E Offline
                                    englebart
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #49

                                    I would side with the sausage maker on this one! (Unless I had to code it!) If you buy a quarter of a pound hamburger at a fast food restaurant, it probably weighs one eighth of a pound when they serve it to you.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

                                      Quote:

                                      You let them dehydrate until they're 98 percent water.

                                      That's pretty clear!

                                      Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640 Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

                                      P Offline
                                      P Offline
                                      PhilipOakley
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #50

                                      Quote: "let them dehydrate until" The trick is hidden right there. Our brain expects the word to be "rehydrate", so we think it's rehydrating the original 1% dehydrated solids. Caught out by being too quick ...

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • L Lost User

                                        Forgive me for being thick but I cannot get my head round that. In 100lb there is 1lb of starch and 99 lbs of water (yes?). So if you lose 1% of the water, isn't that just 1lb less than before?

                                        N Offline
                                        N Offline
                                        normcoder
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #51

                                        A: 100lb total, 1lb startch, 99lb water water = 99/100 = 99% of total B: MATH YOUR BRAIN WANTS TO DO BECAUSE OF 100lb: 100lb total, 2lb startch, 98lb water water = 98/100 = 98% of total so far the math makes sense, now the thing is; you did not gain a pound of starch. The startch stays the same so the final answer is: 50lb total, 1lb starch, 49lb water water = 98/100 = 98% of total Norm

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • J Jorgen Andersson

                                          You have 100 lb of "mathematical" potatoes, which are 99 percent water by weight. You let them dehydrate until they're 98 percent water. How much do they weigh now? No googling, ok.

                                          Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello

                                          A Offline
                                          A Offline
                                          Atin Agrawal
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #52

                                          100 lb of potatoes have 99% water and so 1% other stuff i.e. 1 lb. After dehydrating, water is lost but other stuff is still in same quantity i.e. 1 lb. Since water is now 98%, the remaining 2% of the total weight is 1 lb. Hence, 1 lb is 2 % of the total weight. So, the total weight is 50 lb.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups