UK economy grows
-
I didnt mention 'tourism'.
That's what is largely influenced by warm weather, in a postive note. Already explained that in terms of production, things look a bit differently.
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
-
That's what is largely influenced by warm weather, in a postive note. Already explained that in terms of production, things look a bit differently.
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
you: "[tourism] is largely influenced by warm weather, in a postive note. " you: "I'm not convinced that the "growing" of the economy was caused that much by increase in shopping during tourist-season" Feel free to argue with yourself, just leave me out of it. I find it hard to follow what you mean! The article I quoted made no mention of tourism, and neither did I. Just to restate that again. TO be clear.
-
you: "[tourism] is largely influenced by warm weather, in a postive note. " you: "I'm not convinced that the "growing" of the economy was caused that much by increase in shopping during tourist-season" Feel free to argue with yourself, just leave me out of it. I find it hard to follow what you mean! The article I quoted made no mention of tourism, and neither did I. Just to restate that again. TO be clear.
That's why I am educating you on the subject :) Since you want to imply that "warming" is always good, and that even the economy benefits directly from it - which is utter nonsense ofcourse.
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
-
That's why I am educating you on the subject :) Since you want to imply that "warming" is always good, and that even the economy benefits directly from it - which is utter nonsense ofcourse.
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
No, you are confusing yourself from one post to the next. As usual.
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
you want to imply that "warming" is always good, and that even the economy benefits directly from it
It is good of course, up to a point which is so much warmer than today it will be impossible to reach. In many ways. Which this article alluded to. None of which was tourism by the way, just in case you decide to start arguing with yourself about it again.
-
UK economy grows by 0.6%[^] "This was driven by warm weather and a boom in housebuilding, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) said. Rob Kent Smith, from the ONS, said: 'Growth in the economy picked up in the three months to July. Services grew particularly strongly, with retail sales performing well, boosted by warm weather and the World Cup. 'The construction sector also bounced back after a weak start to the year." Global warming, good for growth. :cool:
Munchies_Matt wrote:
"This was driven by warm weather
Please be considerate of others. While some sales have been up, the sales of blankets and jackets are down causing widespread panic in some areas.
Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it. Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
-
UK economy grows by 0.6%[^] "This was driven by warm weather and a boom in housebuilding, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) said. Rob Kent Smith, from the ONS, said: 'Growth in the economy picked up in the three months to July. Services grew particularly strongly, with retail sales performing well, boosted by warm weather and the World Cup. 'The construction sector also bounced back after a weak start to the year." Global warming, good for growth. :cool:
I have repeatedly asked you to support your claims and each time you have been unable to do so. Here is another such case. Based on what little information you provided, there is no apparent relationship between the small growth in the economy and global warming. So where are the facts that support global warming is good for growth? Why do you persist is making unsubstantiated claims? This begs the question, what is your purpose here? To me, your behavior here is the very definition of trolling?
History is the joke the living play on the dead.
-
I have repeatedly asked you to support your claims and each time you have been unable to do so. Here is another such case. Based on what little information you provided, there is no apparent relationship between the small growth in the economy and global warming. So where are the facts that support global warming is good for growth? Why do you persist is making unsubstantiated claims? This begs the question, what is your purpose here? To me, your behavior here is the very definition of trolling?
History is the joke the living play on the dead.
Ian Bell, #2 wrote:
support your claims
Newspaper link to a report showing increased growth in the hot summer. There is support. Of course if you knew anything about science you would know warmer/CO2 richer = more crops = GDP growth. Do you need 'support' for that too? :laugh:
-
UK economy grows by 0.6%[^] "This was driven by warm weather and a boom in housebuilding, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) said. Rob Kent Smith, from the ONS, said: 'Growth in the economy picked up in the three months to July. Services grew particularly strongly, with retail sales performing well, boosted by warm weather and the World Cup. 'The construction sector also bounced back after a weak start to the year." Global warming, good for growth. :cool:
0.6%! They are really scraping the bottom of the barrel there and I bet you could spin the figure some other way quite easily.
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
-
0.6%! They are really scraping the bottom of the barrel there and I bet you could spin the figure some other way quite easily.
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
Thats 2.4% a year, not bad in this (economic) climate! :)
-
Ian Bell, #2 wrote:
support your claims
Newspaper link to a report showing increased growth in the hot summer. There is support. Of course if you knew anything about science you would know warmer/CO2 richer = more crops = GDP growth. Do you need 'support' for that too? :laugh:
Unless you can demonstrate otherwise, there is link to report and there is no support for your claim. Moreover, until you can demonstrate otherwise, it seems clear you know very little about science and the little you do reveal is no tantamount to phrenology.
History is the joke the living play on the dead.
-
Unless you can demonstrate otherwise, there is link to report and there is no support for your claim. Moreover, until you can demonstrate otherwise, it seems clear you know very little about science and the little you do reveal is no tantamount to phrenology.
History is the joke the living play on the dead.
Ian Bell, #2 wrote:
there is link to report and there is no support for your claim
:wtf: Nice logic Bell end.
Ian Bell, #2 wrote:
you know very little about science
Where do you want to start, EM penetration of water and that it negates the theory of ocean uptake of GW heat?