Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Soapbox
  4. Article 13

Article 13

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Soapbox
comdesignquestionannouncement
34 Posts 18 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P Pete OHanlon

    I think, as this is about the EU, this could become fractious and would best be discussed in the SoapBox.

    This space for rent

    M Offline
    M Offline
    megaadam
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    Perhaps, but perhaps it is just a sleeping pill :zzz:

    "If we don't change direction, we'll end up where we're going"

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • D Dominic Burford

      Article 13 has now been approved by the EU. I can't work out if this is a good thing or a bad thing. I've been reading articles about it, and there seem to be both pros and cons to this new EU legislation. European Parliament backs copyright changes - BBC News[^] What do others think?

      "There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter

      G Offline
      G Offline
      glennPattonWork3
      wrote on last edited by
      #4

      Interesting, I get feeling it is one of those laws which will cause more problems while not solving the intended issue... like most of my plans works in theory only...

      C M 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • D Dominic Burford

        Article 13 has now been approved by the EU. I can't work out if this is a good thing or a bad thing. I've been reading articles about it, and there seem to be both pros and cons to this new EU legislation. European Parliament backs copyright changes - BBC News[^] What do others think?

        "There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter

        D Offline
        D Offline
        Dar Brett 0
        wrote on last edited by
        #5

        I can't help feeling like it's an attempt by the EU to get the social media out of their politics, they seem somewhat opaque to me. I'm not really a fan of social media though, so I don't really know what to think. Probably going to replace it with some state owned propaganda news outlet. Guess we'll see what happens.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • D Dominic Burford

          Article 13 has now been approved by the EU. I can't work out if this is a good thing or a bad thing. I've been reading articles about it, and there seem to be both pros and cons to this new EU legislation. European Parliament backs copyright changes - BBC News[^] What do others think?

          "There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter

          P Offline
          P Offline
          PeejayAdams
          wrote on last edited by
          #6

          What he said:

          Quote:

          Earlier this week, YouTube's chief business officer Robert Kyncl said that endorsement of Article 13 risked "discouraging or even prohibiting platforms from hosting user-generated content."

          What he meant:

          Quote:

          Earlier this week, YouTube's chief business officer Robert Kyncl said that endorsement of Article 13 risked "Discouraging or even prohibiting platforms from hosting content stolen by users and in so doing messing up a business plan that has always been based upon and thrived upon wholesale copyright abuse."

          Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect. - Mark Twain

          Richard DeemingR 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • P PeejayAdams

            What he said:

            Quote:

            Earlier this week, YouTube's chief business officer Robert Kyncl said that endorsement of Article 13 risked "discouraging or even prohibiting platforms from hosting user-generated content."

            What he meant:

            Quote:

            Earlier this week, YouTube's chief business officer Robert Kyncl said that endorsement of Article 13 risked "Discouraging or even prohibiting platforms from hosting content stolen by users and in so doing messing up a business plan that has always been based upon and thrived upon wholesale copyright abuse."

            Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect. - Mark Twain

            Richard DeemingR Offline
            Richard DeemingR Offline
            Richard Deeming
            wrote on last edited by
            #7

            Except YouTube already has the infrastructure in place to comply. In fact, they comply with it so efficiently that they'll take down content you own just because a large media corp claims that they own it. :doh: Family Guy Used NES Game Footage From YouTube, Then Claimed Copyright on Same Video - GameSpot[^] Smaller companies trying to challenge YouTube probably wouldn't be able to afford to implement a similar automated enforcement tool, making it almost impossible for them to compete. (Assuming the regulations actually apply to small sites. But who decides what's "small"?) I'm still waiting to see whether it will apply to sites like CodeProject, and how the hamsters will cope with having to run every single word anyone posts through a massive database of copyright claims before allowing it to appear. :~


            "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

            "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined" - Homer

            M F F 3 Replies Last reply
            0
            • D Dominic Burford

              Article 13 has now been approved by the EU. I can't work out if this is a good thing or a bad thing. I've been reading articles about it, and there seem to be both pros and cons to this new EU legislation. European Parliament backs copyright changes - BBC News[^] What do others think?

              "There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter

              H Offline
              H Offline
              HobbyProggy
              wrote on last edited by
              #8

              Well, i guess the internet dieded a bit now.

              Rules for the FOSW ![^]

              if(!string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(_signature))
              {
              MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + _signature);
              }
              else
              {
              MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
              }

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Richard DeemingR Richard Deeming

                Except YouTube already has the infrastructure in place to comply. In fact, they comply with it so efficiently that they'll take down content you own just because a large media corp claims that they own it. :doh: Family Guy Used NES Game Footage From YouTube, Then Claimed Copyright on Same Video - GameSpot[^] Smaller companies trying to challenge YouTube probably wouldn't be able to afford to implement a similar automated enforcement tool, making it almost impossible for them to compete. (Assuming the regulations actually apply to small sites. But who decides what's "small"?) I'm still waiting to see whether it will apply to sites like CodeProject, and how the hamsters will cope with having to run every single word anyone posts through a massive database of copyright claims before allowing it to appear. :~


                "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                M Offline
                M Offline
                megaadam
                wrote on last edited by
                #9

                Richard Deeming wrote:

                every single word

                ALARM! ALARM! Trademark infringement detected. Call the FBI!

                "If we don't change direction, we'll end up where we're going"

                F 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Richard DeemingR Richard Deeming

                  Except YouTube already has the infrastructure in place to comply. In fact, they comply with it so efficiently that they'll take down content you own just because a large media corp claims that they own it. :doh: Family Guy Used NES Game Footage From YouTube, Then Claimed Copyright on Same Video - GameSpot[^] Smaller companies trying to challenge YouTube probably wouldn't be able to afford to implement a similar automated enforcement tool, making it almost impossible for them to compete. (Assuming the regulations actually apply to small sites. But who decides what's "small"?) I'm still waiting to see whether it will apply to sites like CodeProject, and how the hamsters will cope with having to run every single word anyone posts through a massive database of copyright claims before allowing it to appear. :~


                  "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                  F Offline
                  F Offline
                  Foothill
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #10

                  Richard Deeming wrote:

                  I'm still waiting to see whether it will apply to sites like CodeProject

                  I don't see how it could. A reasonable court would see compliance as an undue burden to a very small company, one would hope. In terms of audience, Developer Media isn't on the same playing field as Google or Facebook.

                  if (Object.DividedByZero == true) { Universe.Implode(); }

                  Richard DeemingR D 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • M megaadam

                    Richard Deeming wrote:

                    every single word

                    ALARM! ALARM! Trademark infringement detected. Call the FBI!

                    "If we don't change direction, we'll end up where we're going"

                    F Offline
                    F Offline
                    Foothill
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #11

                    I can see the look on some poor programmer's face after being served litigation papers... "What!? Someone patented the do while loop!? #@$&*$! Quick! Go file a patent for the Iterator.Next() method!"

                    if (Object.DividedByZero == true) { Universe.Implode(); }

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • G glennPattonWork3

                      Interesting, I get feeling it is one of those laws which will cause more problems while not solving the intended issue... like most of my plans works in theory only...

                      C Offline
                      C Offline
                      Clifford Nelson
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      Pretty sure you are right. How the hell do you manage the content. How do you figure out what is legit and what is not. Did the politicians really consider the impact. Did the do a TRUMP.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • D Dominic Burford

                        Article 13 has now been approved by the EU. I can't work out if this is a good thing or a bad thing. I've been reading articles about it, and there seem to be both pros and cons to this new EU legislation. European Parliament backs copyright changes - BBC News[^] What do others think?

                        "There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter

                        R Offline
                        R Offline
                        R Giskard Reventlov
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #13

                        I think the EU is a veritable walking dead man, brought to its knees by Poland and not the UK. Article 7 was invoked and is unenforceable since Hungary (which has gone the same route politically as Poland) will veto any further action. This makes the EU, as a political entity, untenable. So glad that the UK is leaving. EU gives Poland new deadline for rule of law deal | Reuters[^] Poland will just keep ignoring the diktats of Brussels since it knows they can't do anything about it other than posture. What a shambles. [admins] feel free to move to soapbox - an interesting subject to debate, possibly.

                        Keep your friends close. Keep Kill your enemies closer. The End

                        L 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R R Giskard Reventlov

                          I think the EU is a veritable walking dead man, brought to its knees by Poland and not the UK. Article 7 was invoked and is unenforceable since Hungary (which has gone the same route politically as Poland) will veto any further action. This makes the EU, as a political entity, untenable. So glad that the UK is leaving. EU gives Poland new deadline for rule of law deal | Reuters[^] Poland will just keep ignoring the diktats of Brussels since it knows they can't do anything about it other than posture. What a shambles. [admins] feel free to move to soapbox - an interesting subject to debate, possibly.

                          Keep your friends close. Keep Kill your enemies closer. The End

                          L Offline
                          L Offline
                          Lost User
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #14

                          Hungary might actually lose their voting rights, so that will take care of the veto. [EU Parliament votes to trigger Article 7 sanctions procedure against Hungary | News | DW | 12.09.2018](https://www.dw.com/en/eu-parliament-votes-to-trigger-article-7-sanctions-procedure-against-hungary/a-45459720)

                          Quote:

                          The move means that Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban's government could eventually lose its EU voting rights.

                          They buy shoes, then they wear them! They make them sound old! Dairy! Dairy!

                          R 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • F Foothill

                            Richard Deeming wrote:

                            I'm still waiting to see whether it will apply to sites like CodeProject

                            I don't see how it could. A reasonable court would see compliance as an undue burden to a very small company, one would hope. In terms of audience, Developer Media isn't on the same playing field as Google or Facebook.

                            if (Object.DividedByZero == true) { Universe.Implode(); }

                            Richard DeemingR Offline
                            Richard DeemingR Offline
                            Richard Deeming
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #15

                            Foothill wrote:

                            A reasonable court ...

                            That seems to be quite a rare thing. :-D


                            "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                            "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined" - Homer

                            F 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • L Lost User

                              Hungary might actually lose their voting rights, so that will take care of the veto. [EU Parliament votes to trigger Article 7 sanctions procedure against Hungary | News | DW | 12.09.2018](https://www.dw.com/en/eu-parliament-votes-to-trigger-article-7-sanctions-procedure-against-hungary/a-45459720)

                              Quote:

                              The move means that Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban's government could eventually lose its EU voting rights.

                              They buy shoes, then they wear them! They make them sound old! Dairy! Dairy!

                              R Offline
                              R Offline
                              R Giskard Reventlov
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #16

                              and Poland will just veto that. They will support each other making a mockery of the EU.

                              Keep your friends close. Keep Kill your enemies closer. The End

                              M 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • Richard DeemingR Richard Deeming

                                Foothill wrote:

                                A reasonable court ...

                                That seems to be quite a rare thing. :-D


                                "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                                F Offline
                                F Offline
                                Foothill
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #17

                                Yea, I guess "reasonable court" depends more on geographic location and demographics than anything else now-a-days.

                                if (Object.DividedByZero == true) { Universe.Implode(); }

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • F Foothill

                                  Richard Deeming wrote:

                                  I'm still waiting to see whether it will apply to sites like CodeProject

                                  I don't see how it could. A reasonable court would see compliance as an undue burden to a very small company, one would hope. In terms of audience, Developer Media isn't on the same playing field as Google or Facebook.

                                  if (Object.DividedByZero == true) { Universe.Implode(); }

                                  D Offline
                                  D Offline
                                  Dominic Burford
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #18

                                  I fear you could be wrong. I was reading that the legislation applies to ALL sites up to a certain size (a certain number of registered users is being touted as the benchmark for implementing the legislation). Above that size, you must implement it.

                                  "There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter

                                  F G 2 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • D Dominic Burford

                                    I fear you could be wrong. I was reading that the legislation applies to ALL sites up to a certain size (a certain number of registered users is being touted as the benchmark for implementing the legislation). Above that size, you must implement it.

                                    "There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter

                                    F Offline
                                    F Offline
                                    Foothill
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #19

                                    Since you put it that way, it could very well put CodeProject square inside their limits. But, to counter that, automatically filtering all content we post on this site in regards to code is physically impossible unless all code with a copywrite is known before hand and I doubt and of the FAANG companies or Microsoft will give up any of their secrets.

                                    if (Object.DividedByZero == true) { Universe.Implode(); }

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • Richard DeemingR Richard Deeming

                                      Except YouTube already has the infrastructure in place to comply. In fact, they comply with it so efficiently that they'll take down content you own just because a large media corp claims that they own it. :doh: Family Guy Used NES Game Footage From YouTube, Then Claimed Copyright on Same Video - GameSpot[^] Smaller companies trying to challenge YouTube probably wouldn't be able to afford to implement a similar automated enforcement tool, making it almost impossible for them to compete. (Assuming the regulations actually apply to small sites. But who decides what's "small"?) I'm still waiting to see whether it will apply to sites like CodeProject, and how the hamsters will cope with having to run every single word anyone posts through a massive database of copyright claims before allowing it to appear. :~


                                      "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                                      F Offline
                                      F Offline
                                      F ES Sitecore
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #20

                                      Richard Deeming wrote:

                                      I'm still waiting to see whether it will apply to sites like CodeProject, and how the hamsters will cope with having to run every single word anyone posts through a massive database of copyright claims before allowing it to appear.

                                      "Sorry but copyright on 'Object not set to an instance of an object' belongs to someone else." Might not be a bad thing...

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • D Dominic Burford

                                        Article 13 has now been approved by the EU. I can't work out if this is a good thing or a bad thing. I've been reading articles about it, and there seem to be both pros and cons to this new EU legislation. European Parliament backs copyright changes - BBC News[^] What do others think?

                                        "There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter

                                        Richard DeemingR Offline
                                        Richard DeemingR Offline
                                        Richard Deeming
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #21

                                        Well, this take on it doesn't sound particularly promising: Europe just voted to wreck the internet, spying on everything and censoring vast swathes of our communications / Boing Boing[^]


                                        "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                                        "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined" - Homer

                                        D 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • Richard DeemingR Richard Deeming

                                          Well, this take on it doesn't sound particularly promising: Europe just voted to wreck the internet, spying on everything and censoring vast swathes of our communications / Boing Boing[^]


                                          "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                                          D Offline
                                          D Offline
                                          Dominic Burford
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #22

                                          :omg: :omg:

                                          "There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups