Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Soapbox
  4. Allons enfants de la patrie!

Allons enfants de la patrie!

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Soapbox
comquestion
29 Posts 9 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Munchies_Matt

    If renewable fuels were a viable alternative then free market capitalism would have put them at the customers disposal. Instead they arent, so taxes are used to force people to change, and they dont like being screwed.

    Mark Parity wrote:

    you disagree with the need to decrease our reliance on fossil fuels

    Of course I disagree. CO2 is good for the planet.

    L Offline
    L Offline
    Lost User
    wrote on last edited by
    #5

    Munchies_Matt wrote:

    Of course I disagree. CO2 is good for the planet beer.

    FTFY

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Munchies_Matt

      Anti-Carbon-Tax Revolt Threatens To Paralyse France | Watts Up With That?[^] The French tell Macron where to stick his carbon tax.

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #6

      They're upset about a tax which is designed in part to reduce car usage. And they express this by blocking roads thereby reducing their ability to use their cars. How very French.

      M 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Lost User

        They're upset about a tax which is designed in part to reduce car usage. And they express this by blocking roads thereby reducing their ability to use their cars. How very French.

        M Offline
        M Offline
        Munchies_Matt
        wrote on last edited by
        #7

        We did the same in the UK. It was effective.

        L F 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • M Munchies_Matt

          We did the same in the UK. It was effective.

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Lost User
          wrote on last edited by
          #8

          Yet the UK has a carbon tax. And from what I've read it has led to a significant reduction in use of coal for power. Well done you lot.

          M 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L Lost User

            Yet the UK has a carbon tax. And from what I've read it has led to a significant reduction in use of coal for power. Well done you lot.

            M Offline
            M Offline
            Munchies_Matt
            wrote on last edited by
            #9

            Calling me a liar? Fuel protests in the United Kingdom - Wikipedia[^]

            L 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F F ES Sitecore

              Was it? Petrol is still sky-high and when the costs of oil drop the price stays the same, but the second the cost of oil goes up the price of petrol does too. Almost everyone agrees we are being ripped off but no-one wants to do anything about it. When you charge people £100 to fill up their car and the only profit you make is from the Mars bar they buy at the same time then something is very wrong.

              M Offline
              M Offline
              Munchies_Matt
              wrote on last edited by
              #10

              It had an immediate effect if you recall.

              F 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Munchies_Matt

                We did the same in the UK. It was effective.

                F Offline
                F Offline
                F ES Sitecore
                wrote on last edited by
                #11

                Was it? Petrol is still sky-high and when the costs of oil drop the price stays the same, but the second the cost of oil goes up the price of petrol does too. Almost everyone agrees we are being ripped off but no-one wants to do anything about it. When you charge people £100 to fill up their car and the only profit you make is from the Mars bar they buy at the same time then something is very wrong.

                M 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Munchies_Matt

                  Calling me a liar? Fuel protests in the United Kingdom - Wikipedia[^]

                  L Offline
                  L Offline
                  Lost User
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #12

                  No, I said well done.

                  M 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L Lost User

                    No, I said well done.

                    M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Munchies_Matt
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #13

                    Might have been sarcasm. :)

                    L 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L Lost User

                      Is some of the extra money raised via taxation being used to fund renewable energy to some extent though? (minus costs for fees and paying bribes etc. :laugh: ) If it is then its somewhat ok-ish, unless you disagree with the need to decrease our reliance on fossil fuels and switch over to more sustainable energy sources. That would be very shortsighted.

                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      Daniel Pfeffer
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #14

                      Mark Parity wrote:

                      the need to decrease our reliance on fossil fuels and switch over to more sustainable energy sources. That would be very shortsighted.

                      In the short run, fossil fuels are by far the most economical. That is why the market hasn't developed viable alternatives. (I don't consider "renewable energy" funded by massive subsidies to be viable.) In the medium term, fossil fuels will run out sometime. They will need to be replaced by something, but that is not necessarily wind power, tidal power, or Earth-bound solar power. Nuclear power has zero emissions, and there are viable methods of disposal (e.g. encasing in glass and then burying the glass cases in very deep mines). In the long term, the most likely form of power is solar power. Efficient collection of solar power requires technological advances (e.g. in space technology), but no major scientific advances. For example, if we set up solar collectors in space, we would have a constant supply of power that is not dependent on the weather. I leave the problem of transmitting the power to Earth as an exercise for the student. :)

                      Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.

                      L 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Munchies_Matt

                        Might have been sarcasm. :)

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        Lost User
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #15

                        Well done again!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • D Daniel Pfeffer

                          Mark Parity wrote:

                          the need to decrease our reliance on fossil fuels and switch over to more sustainable energy sources. That would be very shortsighted.

                          In the short run, fossil fuels are by far the most economical. That is why the market hasn't developed viable alternatives. (I don't consider "renewable energy" funded by massive subsidies to be viable.) In the medium term, fossil fuels will run out sometime. They will need to be replaced by something, but that is not necessarily wind power, tidal power, or Earth-bound solar power. Nuclear power has zero emissions, and there are viable methods of disposal (e.g. encasing in glass and then burying the glass cases in very deep mines). In the long term, the most likely form of power is solar power. Efficient collection of solar power requires technological advances (e.g. in space technology), but no major scientific advances. For example, if we set up solar collectors in space, we would have a constant supply of power that is not dependent on the weather. I leave the problem of transmitting the power to Earth as an exercise for the student. :)

                          Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.

                          L Offline
                          L Offline
                          Lost User
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #16

                          I agree with most of your reply. I don't believe nuclear power is a viable option though, unless it can be made 100% safe (can it ever be 100% safe?), if it goes wrong the consequences are substantial as the world has already seen a couple of times. Solar has to be the way forward, its our solar system's safest most reliable nuclear power plant and its already up and running. :-)

                          F 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • L Lost User

                            I agree with most of your reply. I don't believe nuclear power is a viable option though, unless it can be made 100% safe (can it ever be 100% safe?), if it goes wrong the consequences are substantial as the world has already seen a couple of times. Solar has to be the way forward, its our solar system's safest most reliable nuclear power plant and its already up and running. :-)

                            F Offline
                            F Offline
                            Foothill
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #17

                            Ahem, <BeginSalesmanVoice> I give you the breeder reactor[^]. </EndSalesmandVoice> Edit** I know it's not perfect but it is still far better then those light water reactors that we built thousands of.

                            if (Object.DividedByZero == true) { Universe.Implode(); }

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M Munchies_Matt

                              It had an immediate effect if you recall.

                              F Offline
                              F Offline
                              F ES Sitecore
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #18

                              Yeah, to p*** off an entire country and actually turn them against the protesters.

                              M 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • F F ES Sitecore

                                Yeah, to p*** off an entire country and actually turn them against the protesters.

                                M Offline
                                M Offline
                                Munchies_Matt
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #19

                                Gordon changed his fuel tax policy as I recall it.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • M Munchies_Matt

                                  Anti-Carbon-Tax Revolt Threatens To Paralyse France | Watts Up With That?[^] The French tell Macron where to stick his carbon tax.

                                  M Offline
                                  M Offline
                                  Mycroft Holmes
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #20

                                  A couple of years ago the big miners in Oz mounted a major media scare campaign against a carbon tax, lobby groups, paid for pollies, funded academics the lot. They spent multi millions to get the tax scrapped. 2018 and the very same miners are calling for a carbon tax. I do wonder what has changed in the last couple of years to make it advantageous to the miners to have such a tax.

                                  Never underestimate the power of human stupidity - RAH I'm old. I know stuff - JSOP

                                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • M Mycroft Holmes

                                    A couple of years ago the big miners in Oz mounted a major media scare campaign against a carbon tax, lobby groups, paid for pollies, funded academics the lot. They spent multi millions to get the tax scrapped. 2018 and the very same miners are calling for a carbon tax. I do wonder what has changed in the last couple of years to make it advantageous to the miners to have such a tax.

                                    Never underestimate the power of human stupidity - RAH I'm old. I know stuff - JSOP

                                    L Offline
                                    L Offline
                                    Lost User
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #21

                                    Mycroft Holmes wrote:

                                    2018 and the very same miners are calling for a carbon tax. I do wonder what has changed in the last couple of years to make it advantageous to the miners to have such a tax.

                                    Too many Prime Minister's in a row rolled too quickly. It was the miners and their campaign that started Kev down the slippery slope to begin with.

                                    Michael Martin Australia "I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible." - Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004

                                    M 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • M Munchies_Matt

                                      If renewable fuels were a viable alternative then free market capitalism would have put them at the customers disposal. Instead they arent, so taxes are used to force people to change, and they dont like being screwed.

                                      Mark Parity wrote:

                                      you disagree with the need to decrease our reliance on fossil fuels

                                      Of course I disagree. CO2 is good for the planet.

                                      L Offline
                                      L Offline
                                      Lost User
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #22

                                      Munchies_Matt wrote:

                                      If renewable fuels were a viable alternative then free market capitalism would have put them at the customers disposal. Instead they arent, so taxes are used to force people to change, and they dont like being screwed.

                                      Come on, you know as well as I do that it's just one big conspiracy. As we all know engines that will run on water have been around since the 40's but the big end of town is keeping the man down so they can reap the fortunes from fossil fuels.

                                      Michael Martin Australia "I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible." - Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004

                                      M J 2 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • L Lost User

                                        Mycroft Holmes wrote:

                                        2018 and the very same miners are calling for a carbon tax. I do wonder what has changed in the last couple of years to make it advantageous to the miners to have such a tax.

                                        Too many Prime Minister's in a row rolled too quickly. It was the miners and their campaign that started Kev down the slippery slope to begin with.

                                        Michael Martin Australia "I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible." - Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004

                                        M Offline
                                        M Offline
                                        Mycroft Holmes
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #23

                                        There is something despicable when an interest group, the miners, can roll the govt.

                                        Never underestimate the power of human stupidity - RAH I'm old. I know stuff - JSOP

                                        L 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • M Munchies_Matt

                                          Anti-Carbon-Tax Revolt Threatens To Paralyse France | Watts Up With That?[^] The French tell Macron where to stick his carbon tax.

                                          D Offline
                                          D Offline
                                          DRHuff
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #24

                                          In the days prior to the evacuation of Dunkirk, newly minted Prime Minister Winston Churchill had English intelligence begin spreading rumours in France that Hitler would be raising gasoline taxes and removing farm subsidies. One week later the enraged French populace had defeated the entire German army and were marching on Berlin... :laugh: :laugh:

                                          Socialism is the Axe Body Spray of political ideologies: It never does what it claims to do, but people too young to know better keep buying it anyway. (Glenn Reynolds)

                                          M F 2 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups