Calling people ‘users’ is unethical and outdated
-
At this pace, we won't be able to use terms such as "server", "thread", or "service".
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013 -
I’ve worked in UX for the better part of a decade. From now on, I plan to remove the word “user” and any associated terms—like “UX” and “user experience”—from my vocabulary.
I know, let's replace it with 'victim'
:sigh:
In the great scheme of things, calling them 'users' and :elephant:ing nicer than what I call them most of the time.
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein
"If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010
-
I’ve worked in UX for the better part of a decade. From now on, I plan to remove the word “user” and any associated terms—like “UX” and “user experience”—from my vocabulary.
I know, let's replace it with 'victim'
:sigh:
Why first thought was that the author is an idiot. Then, I wondered if he was being ironic and read the article. The author is an idiot.
-
I’ve worked in UX for the better part of a decade. From now on, I plan to remove the word “user” and any associated terms—like “UX” and “user experience”—from my vocabulary.
I know, let's replace it with 'victim'
:sigh:
-
This is a sign of the times, when we have people constantly on the lookout for something new to be offended about.
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP.
I find that point of view offensive!
-
I shall make an effort not to prevaricate too much, in future.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
Calling him idiot from the very beginning?
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
-
I find that point of view offensive!
Write a blog and cry us a river :rolleyes:
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
-
SomeIdiot wrote:
I can either keep using language I disagree with, or I can begin to search for what’s next. I choose to search.
That is so extremely idiotic I need to mail the author. Either you use the terminology of the field, or you sod off and go flip hamburgers.
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
SomeIdiot wrote:
I can either keep using language I disagree with, or I can begin to search for what’s next. I choose to search.
Stunning and brave :cool:
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
-
I’ve worked in UX for the better part of a decade. From now on, I plan to remove the word “user” and any associated terms—like “UX” and “user experience”—from my vocabulary.
I know, let's replace it with 'victim'
:sigh:
Brain dead stupid.
Quote:
In product design, “user” and the other U-words have been foundational to defining the relationship between humans and tech. The former uses. The latter is used. But labeling people as users strips them of complexity. It reduces humans to a single behavior, effectively supporting a view of people as more like robots whose sole function is to use a product or feature.
That's a strong hint that he is useless as someone in the UX/Usability field. The entire field is about defining users, and understanding what behaviors they most commonly expose (hint: it's almost never a single one). His writing clearly shows that he did not understand his job, or role in the industry.
I only have a signature in order to let @DalekDave follow my posts.
-
I’ve worked in UX for the better part of a decade. From now on, I plan to remove the word “user” and any associated terms—like “UX” and “user experience”—from my vocabulary.
I know, let's replace it with 'victim'
:sigh:
I always thought the word "user" was a bit odd. "Users" to me were drug addicts. Oh, wait...
Latest Article - Slack-Chatting with you rPi Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802
-
I always thought the word "user" was a bit odd. "Users" to me were drug addicts. Oh, wait...
Latest Article - Slack-Chatting with you rPi Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802
If all you've got is lemons, make lemonade. If all you've got is junkies, give 'em junk.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
-
I find that point of view offensive!
-
I had an (ex-)fellow developer complain that I wrote code referring to "master" and "slave" components!
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
It's on a PC ... right? You gotta have them social correct PC's! None of your gradfather's PC's. They didn't know what they were doing wrong. You should always have only peer-to-peer without any governing control! All PC's must be equal, only some of tem needs to be more equal than others.
-
It's on a PC ... right? You gotta have them social correct PC's! None of your gradfather's PC's. They didn't know what they were doing wrong. You should always have only peer-to-peer without any governing control! All PC's must be equal, only some of tem needs to be more equal than others.
-
It's OK. I changed them to be "Mistress" and "Slave" and they never said another word about it!
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
