Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Installation softwares (PC desktop)

Installation softwares (PC desktop)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
toolshelptutorialquestiondiscussion
38 Posts 26 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Maximilien

    Once in a while we start having a discussion on how to improve our workflow when creating installers for our software (large, but non complex installer) We are using InstallShield; it is a beast, it works, but hard to use and integrate into our Continuous Integration tools; but it has all the features we need (EXE, redistributables, chained MSI...) Someone always ask if there is something better that we can use; so I go on the internets and look around and go to this [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List\_of\_installation\_software) page. I'm always surprised at how few installer software there are. I'm surprised that even Microsoft does not offer a good packaging tool. What are you using to package your software? Are we stuck on what we have right now ?

    I'd rather be phishing!

    M Offline
    M Offline
    Mike Hankey
    wrote on last edited by
    #8

    I second WIX, it is a bit tedious. It works on a small install don't know about a complex one.

    Got my site back up after my time in the woods! JaxCoder.com

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Mike Hankey

      I second WIX, it is a bit tedious. It works on a small install don't know about a complex one.

      Got my site back up after my time in the woods! JaxCoder.com

      M Offline
      M Offline
      Maximilien
      wrote on last edited by
      #9

      I looked at WiX; It might work for a simple installation, but for a large installation (23,000 files) it will be hard to maintain; at least create the first iteration, adding add the components/features/files.

      I'd rather be phishing!

      M M J 3 Replies Last reply
      0
      • S Shuqian Ying

        We use WIX[^]. Albeit it could be tedious to write the xml installer creation scripts by hand, it fits better in an automated workflow where the said scripts are generated by higher level software ... Haven't tried to use it in the more complex scenarios (like the ones mentioned in OP) though ...

        Find more in V-NET: connects your resources anywhere[^].

        M Offline
        M Offline
        Maximilien
        wrote on last edited by
        #10

        Yep. Creating the first iteration of the installation project is hard, in our case, for over 23,000 files it is a burden.

        I'd rather be phishing!

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Maximilien

          Once in a while we start having a discussion on how to improve our workflow when creating installers for our software (large, but non complex installer) We are using InstallShield; it is a beast, it works, but hard to use and integrate into our Continuous Integration tools; but it has all the features we need (EXE, redistributables, chained MSI...) Someone always ask if there is something better that we can use; so I go on the internets and look around and go to this [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List\_of\_installation\_software) page. I'm always surprised at how few installer software there are. I'm surprised that even Microsoft does not offer a good packaging tool. What are you using to package your software? Are we stuck on what we have right now ?

          I'd rather be phishing!

          T Offline
          T Offline
          Tim Deveaux
          wrote on last edited by
          #11

          Installed the VS 2019 preview and noticed it has a 'built in' installer project type (Setup Project) - just poking at it now as your post reminded me of it. Had played with WIX VS plugin and was intending to use that (for what is a pretty simple install) but must say I get a little confused by some of the WIX dialog specifications/properties. This new thing might be worth a look. [EDIT] My bad - old news - and judging by the font on the dialogs this goes back a ways in some form or another. dang. [/EDIT]

          M 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • T Tim Deveaux

            Installed the VS 2019 preview and noticed it has a 'built in' installer project type (Setup Project) - just poking at it now as your post reminded me of it. Had played with WIX VS plugin and was intending to use that (for what is a pretty simple install) but must say I get a little confused by some of the WIX dialog specifications/properties. This new thing might be worth a look. [EDIT] My bad - old news - and judging by the font on the dialogs this goes back a ways in some form or another. dang. [/EDIT]

            M Offline
            M Offline
            Mark_Wallace
            wrote on last edited by
            #12

            Tim Deveaux wrote:

            Installed the VS 2019 preview and noticed it has a 'built in' installer project type (Setup Project)

            Didn't it always? I'm pretty sure that a setup maker was in VS as far back as VS3 or VS4 -- but it didn't work as well as inno setup, so I stopped using it, and never looked for it again (so maybe they took it out and have put it back).

            I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

            T 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Maximilien

              I looked at WiX; It might work for a simple installation, but for a large installation (23,000 files) it will be hard to maintain; at least create the first iteration, adding add the components/features/files.

              I'd rather be phishing!

              M Offline
              M Offline
              Mike Hankey
              wrote on last edited by
              #13

              Kinda thought that would be the case.

              Got my site back up after my time in the woods! JaxCoder.com

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Mark_Wallace

                Tim Deveaux wrote:

                Installed the VS 2019 preview and noticed it has a 'built in' installer project type (Setup Project)

                Didn't it always? I'm pretty sure that a setup maker was in VS as far back as VS3 or VS4 -- but it didn't work as well as inno setup, so I stopped using it, and never looked for it again (so maybe they took it out and have put it back).

                I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

                T Offline
                T Offline
                Tim Deveaux
                wrote on last edited by
                #14

                You could be right - wondered about that - I hadn't seen it though. [Edit] I think you're right - but weren't those extensions Installshield trojans? :| [/edit]

                M 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • T Tim Deveaux

                  You could be right - wondered about that - I hadn't seen it though. [Edit] I think you're right - but weren't those extensions Installshield trojans? :| [/edit]

                  M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Mark_Wallace
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #15

                  Tim Deveaux wrote:

                  weren't those extensions Installshield trojans?

                  Could be. I do remember people complaining about something like that (but I've read so many complaints about so many products, on the Interwebs, that it's tricky to remember which was about what). And as I say, as soon as I saw how easy (and logical) it was to knock up a script with inno, I never even thought about the built-in one again.

                  I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

                  T 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Mark_Wallace

                    Tim Deveaux wrote:

                    weren't those extensions Installshield trojans?

                    Could be. I do remember people complaining about something like that (but I've read so many complaints about so many products, on the Interwebs, that it's tricky to remember which was about what). And as I say, as soon as I saw how easy (and logical) it was to knock up a script with inno, I never even thought about the built-in one again.

                    I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

                    T Offline
                    T Offline
                    Tim Deveaux
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #16

                    But no msi, right? hmmm...

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M Maximilien

                      Once in a while we start having a discussion on how to improve our workflow when creating installers for our software (large, but non complex installer) We are using InstallShield; it is a beast, it works, but hard to use and integrate into our Continuous Integration tools; but it has all the features we need (EXE, redistributables, chained MSI...) Someone always ask if there is something better that we can use; so I go on the internets and look around and go to this [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List\_of\_installation\_software) page. I'm always surprised at how few installer software there are. I'm surprised that even Microsoft does not offer a good packaging tool. What are you using to package your software? Are we stuck on what we have right now ?

                      I'd rather be phishing!

                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      David Crow
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #17

                      Maximilien wrote:

                      What are you using to package your software?

                      Back when I was doing that sort of thing, I used Wise. It was easy to use and did the job. Not an option these days.

                      "One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson

                      "Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons

                      "You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles

                      B 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Maximilien

                        Once in a while we start having a discussion on how to improve our workflow when creating installers for our software (large, but non complex installer) We are using InstallShield; it is a beast, it works, but hard to use and integrate into our Continuous Integration tools; but it has all the features we need (EXE, redistributables, chained MSI...) Someone always ask if there is something better that we can use; so I go on the internets and look around and go to this [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List\_of\_installation\_software) page. I'm always surprised at how few installer software there are. I'm surprised that even Microsoft does not offer a good packaging tool. What are you using to package your software? Are we stuck on what we have right now ?

                        I'd rather be phishing!

                        T Offline
                        T Offline
                        Tomaz Koritnik
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #18

                        Have anyone used WixSharp? I've used it only once on a small project and it was simple to use. But I cannot say anything more.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • M Maximilien

                          Once in a while we start having a discussion on how to improve our workflow when creating installers for our software (large, but non complex installer) We are using InstallShield; it is a beast, it works, but hard to use and integrate into our Continuous Integration tools; but it has all the features we need (EXE, redistributables, chained MSI...) Someone always ask if there is something better that we can use; so I go on the internets and look around and go to this [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List\_of\_installation\_software) page. I'm always surprised at how few installer software there are. I'm surprised that even Microsoft does not offer a good packaging tool. What are you using to package your software? Are we stuck on what we have right now ?

                          I'd rather be phishing!

                          M Offline
                          M Offline
                          Member 9167057
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #19

                          Using Ghost Installer myself. Dunno if it's THE BEST EVA, but it works. There's also ClickOnce (which is actually what MS offers, that's integrated into Visual Studio).

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M Maximilien

                            I looked at WiX; It might work for a simple installation, but for a large installation (23,000 files) it will be hard to maintain; at least create the first iteration, adding add the components/features/files.

                            I'd rather be phishing!

                            M Offline
                            M Offline
                            Mark I
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #20

                            I've not used them myself, but WiX includes command line tools to "harvest" the details of the files to be included, that can be built into your workflow.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • D David Crow

                              Maximilien wrote:

                              What are you using to package your software?

                              Back when I was doing that sort of thing, I used Wise. It was easy to use and did the job. Not an option these days.

                              "One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson

                              "Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons

                              "You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles

                              B Offline
                              B Offline
                              Bob1000
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #21

                              Yes Wise was the easiest and best of the bunch to use. Plus it could be run on the command line (batch file). Wonder whatever happened to it? Thought - Perhaps when a product is no longer supported commercially it should be legally put into the public domain, rather than leaving users high and dry?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • M Maximilien

                                Once in a while we start having a discussion on how to improve our workflow when creating installers for our software (large, but non complex installer) We are using InstallShield; it is a beast, it works, but hard to use and integrate into our Continuous Integration tools; but it has all the features we need (EXE, redistributables, chained MSI...) Someone always ask if there is something better that we can use; so I go on the internets and look around and go to this [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List\_of\_installation\_software) page. I'm always surprised at how few installer software there are. I'm surprised that even Microsoft does not offer a good packaging tool. What are you using to package your software? Are we stuck on what we have right now ?

                                I'd rather be phishing!

                                G Offline
                                G Offline
                                Gary Wheeler
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #22

                                Yet another vote for Inno Setup[^]. Basic setups are handled using the built-in facilities, starting from a text file script. It includes competent scripting support based on Pascal. For really heavy lifting you can call out to DLL's. Scripts can be compiled from the command line. It receives pretty steady support from its author. As others have mentioned, Inno Setup's only lack is that it doesn't support MSI. For my money, that's a benefit. MSI and the Windows Installer are over-engineered and poorly documented and supported for the task they are meant to accomplish. Most of the installer-building apps based around MSI are just expensive lipstick on a pig. You mentioned you're using InstallShield. Be advised that they are #2 on my list of development teams first-against-the-wall-when-the-revolution-comes. We bought their 'international' edition for over $1K a little over ten years ago after the salesperson told us that it supported most European languages, along with Japanese, Korean, and Chinese. Come to find out, the international edition only supports English. You had to pay an additional $500 for each language you wanted to localize your install to. We chucked those ripoff fuckers and went with Inno Setup.

                                Software Zen: delete this;

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • R Ravi Bhavnani

                                  I use Advanced Installer[^].  Its project file is plain text and can therefore be maintained under version control.  The installer creation is command line driven, allowing you to integrate it into your CI process[^]. /ravi

                                  My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com

                                  D Offline
                                  D Offline
                                  Davyd McColl
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #23

                                  InnoSetup has all of these advantages and you can write custom install steps (in Pascal, but still, it's doable). In addition, there are multiple ways to interact with the file, from plain-old-text editor to the Inno editor, to a wizard & something with property panes and all that if you're not a coder.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • M Maximilien

                                    Once in a while we start having a discussion on how to improve our workflow when creating installers for our software (large, but non complex installer) We are using InstallShield; it is a beast, it works, but hard to use and integrate into our Continuous Integration tools; but it has all the features we need (EXE, redistributables, chained MSI...) Someone always ask if there is something better that we can use; so I go on the internets and look around and go to this [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List\_of\_installation\_software) page. I'm always surprised at how few installer software there are. I'm surprised that even Microsoft does not offer a good packaging tool. What are you using to package your software? Are we stuck on what we have right now ?

                                    I'd rather be phishing!

                                    R Offline
                                    R Offline
                                    rtischer8277
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #24

                                    I've used .msi installers forever, but had to give them up a few years ago because of their basic clumsiness, their lack of bigcorp support and the fact that they throw security principles to the wind. Advanced Installer was my last one used. It took me more than 3 years to develop my distributed installer called Hiveware. It overcomes the security issues and the ease-of-use problem as the user only sees the asked-for app functionality. The platform was finished in December, 2017.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • S Shuqian Ying

                                      We use WIX[^]. Albeit it could be tedious to write the xml installer creation scripts by hand, it fits better in an automated workflow where the said scripts are generated by higher level software ... Haven't tried to use it in the more complex scenarios (like the ones mentioned in OP) though ...

                                      Find more in V-NET: connects your resources anywhere[^].

                                      D Offline
                                      D Offline
                                      Davyd McColl
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #25

                                      I found WIX to be a major PITA to set up an install and slow as hell when running the install. InnoSetup was easy, fast to install, free, etc, etc, (: If you can move away from WIX, I highly suggest InnoSetup

                                      S 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • M Maximilien

                                        Once in a while we start having a discussion on how to improve our workflow when creating installers for our software (large, but non complex installer) We are using InstallShield; it is a beast, it works, but hard to use and integrate into our Continuous Integration tools; but it has all the features we need (EXE, redistributables, chained MSI...) Someone always ask if there is something better that we can use; so I go on the internets and look around and go to this [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List\_of\_installation\_software) page. I'm always surprised at how few installer software there are. I'm surprised that even Microsoft does not offer a good packaging tool. What are you using to package your software? Are we stuck on what we have right now ?

                                        I'd rather be phishing!

                                        P Offline
                                        P Offline
                                        Peter R Fletcher
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #26

                                        Another vote for Advanced Installer. It has an unbelievable range of options but the defaults are sensible, and support for occasional bugs is excellent.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • M Maximilien

                                          Once in a while we start having a discussion on how to improve our workflow when creating installers for our software (large, but non complex installer) We are using InstallShield; it is a beast, it works, but hard to use and integrate into our Continuous Integration tools; but it has all the features we need (EXE, redistributables, chained MSI...) Someone always ask if there is something better that we can use; so I go on the internets and look around and go to this [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List\_of\_installation\_software) page. I'm always surprised at how few installer software there are. I'm surprised that even Microsoft does not offer a good packaging tool. What are you using to package your software? Are we stuck on what we have right now ?

                                          I'd rather be phishing!

                                          A Offline
                                          A Offline
                                          agolddog
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #27

                                          My first question is, what about this application cannot be delivered over the internet? Make it a webapp, just deploy it to servers you control.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups