vs2019 users
-
I'm using 16.0.3, and it seems faster to load than 2017 was, but a little slower to compile.
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640 Never throw anything away, Griff Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
I'd kind of agree. It definitely starts faster than VS 2017, and feels a bit snappier in use. Beyond that it's not very different. One good thing about it.. There are a LOT of bugs (regressions) that Microsoft caused in the C++ compiler from VS 2017 update 8 onwards that are either unfixed in the latest VS 2017 compiler (15.9.12) that are fixed in VS 2019. That said apparently MS are working to push another VS 2017 update in July to fix up all the stuff that VS 15.8 broken in C++ - and there are some significant bugs there!
-
Seems to be - and I'm only running a i5/8GB - I suspect that it's the SSD that makes the load time acceptable.
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640 Never throw anything away, Griff Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
-
Seems to be - and I'm only running a i5/8GB - I suspect that it's the SSD that makes the load time acceptable.
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640 Never throw anything away, Griff Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
lol, i have basically the same machine
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
-
any vs2019 users..installed it..updated it to 16.1.2..after removing vs2017 .... seems faster.?..or is it just perception?
Caveat Emptor. "Progress doesn't come from early risers – progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." Lazarus Long
I find it somewhat quicker to load but intellisense seems a little slower. It still finds my bugs pretty quick but since I type eyes on keyboard and only stop to look at what I have actually typed and how much the intellisense has modified my typing when I run out of typing steam this might also be perception. Additionally, they gone broke how good EF used to was. Often I have to use the custom tool to propogate the database changes. OR WORSE, if I use .NET CORE I gotta scaffold the buggers in the package manager console every time I make a small DB change.
-
any vs2019 users..installed it..updated it to 16.1.2..after removing vs2017 .... seems faster.?..or is it just perception?
Caveat Emptor. "Progress doesn't come from early risers – progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." Lazarus Long
I installed in 3 weeks ago. Haven't face any issue so far. The start page is faster so it take less time to open the VS2019. I can say they do have improved the performance.
If you are not criticized, you may not be doing much.
-
any vs2019 users..installed it..updated it to 16.1.2..after removing vs2017 .... seems faster.?..or is it just perception?
Caveat Emptor. "Progress doesn't come from early risers – progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." Lazarus Long
i7 with 8G RAM, non-SSD Drive (need to change that): I have both VS 2017 and VS 2019 installed. When loading the same project in each, it does feel like VS 2019 is faster in loading itself and the solution. As far as the actual build and intellisense and such, I don't see that great a difference. On a different note, I would say that the quality of the editor and such is somewhat better. I have been moving my code to .Net Core 3.0, and it seems make this a straightforward (if not automatic) process.
-
i7 with 8G RAM, non-SSD Drive (need to change that): I have both VS 2017 and VS 2019 installed. When loading the same project in each, it does feel like VS 2019 is faster in loading itself and the solution. As far as the actual build and intellisense and such, I don't see that great a difference. On a different note, I would say that the quality of the editor and such is somewhat better. I have been moving my code to .Net Core 3.0, and it seems make this a straightforward (if not automatic) process.
I haven't noticed much difference really. (then again i7-5820K at 3.3Ghz and 128GB ram on a 1TB SSD :wtf: ;P)
-
any vs2019 users..installed it..updated it to 16.1.2..after removing vs2017 .... seems faster.?..or is it just perception?
Caveat Emptor. "Progress doesn't come from early risers – progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." Lazarus Long
VS2019 is definitely no worse than VS2017 and I like VS2017. Updated to 16.1.3 today and the grump I had, which was slow intellisense (to the point where you have to wait 5-10 seconds for red marks to disappear - or stay), seems to have evaporated. So, yeah, I'll adopt it (again).
-
any vs2019 users..installed it..updated it to 16.1.2..after removing vs2017 .... seems faster.?..or is it just perception?
Caveat Emptor. "Progress doesn't come from early risers – progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." Lazarus Long
Vs 2017 ver. 15.9.12 blew up my existing installation of VS 2017 and I was unable to get VS 2019 installed at all, no matter what I tried. VS 2017 stopped being able to compile projects and VS 2019 couldn't open them. It appears that I am the only technician on the planet who had trouble with all these recent upgrades... at least according to Microsoft's Installation techs... :( I went back to VS 2015...
Steve Naidamast Sr. Software Engineer Black Falcon Software, Inc. blackfalconsoftware@outlook.com
-
I haven't noticed much difference really. (then again i7-5820K at 3.3Ghz and 128GB ram on a 1TB SSD :wtf: ;P)
As a matter of interest, what's your motherboard?
-
As a matter of interest, what's your motherboard?
ASROCK X99 Extreme4/3.1... uses the 2011 cpu socket and has 8 ram slots that can hold a 16GB module each. It's an older board but still good... I think they are up to X299 for the Intel chipset now, tho that is a 2066 socket instead of the 2011. AMD beat them to the punch by registering X399 so no idea what the next Intel x?99 will be.
-
ASROCK X99 Extreme4/3.1... uses the 2011 cpu socket and has 8 ram slots that can hold a 16GB module each. It's an older board but still good... I think they are up to X299 for the Intel chipset now, tho that is a 2066 socket instead of the 2011. AMD beat them to the punch by registering X399 so no idea what the next Intel x?99 will be.
Many thanks for the specs.
