Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. python - tail stuck under the rocks?

python - tail stuck under the rocks?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
helppythonbusinesstutorialquestion
38 Posts 18 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    Nand32
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Okay, that was an analogy. I was trying a little piece of Python code. Got a bit surprised with the "positional"-indentation requirements in code. Just like how it used to be in older programming languages like Cobol. (I'm not sure if any other recent programming languages enforce these) For example,

    If x is a:
    do //indented & works

    is different from

    if x is a:
    do //Non-indented & throws error

    It's funny, and doesn't this sound rudimentary and a bit annoying? :)

    L OriginalGriffO P Sander RosselS G 13 Replies Last reply
    0
    • N Nand32

      Okay, that was an analogy. I was trying a little piece of Python code. Got a bit surprised with the "positional"-indentation requirements in code. Just like how it used to be in older programming languages like Cobol. (I'm not sure if any other recent programming languages enforce these) For example,

      If x is a:
      do //indented & works

      is different from

      if x is a:
      do //Non-indented & throws error

      It's funny, and doesn't this sound rudimentary and a bit annoying? :)

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      The first version will not work as it has a syntax error. It should be:

      if x is a: # note the trailing colon

      N 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • N Nand32

        Okay, that was an analogy. I was trying a little piece of Python code. Got a bit surprised with the "positional"-indentation requirements in code. Just like how it used to be in older programming languages like Cobol. (I'm not sure if any other recent programming languages enforce these) For example,

        If x is a:
        do //indented & works

        is different from

        if x is a:
        do //Non-indented & throws error

        It's funny, and doesn't this sound rudimentary and a bit annoying? :)

        OriginalGriffO Offline
        OriginalGriffO Offline
        OriginalGriff
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        It sorta makes sense, and in theory at least should encourage correct indentation. But ... that won't save it. Survey Results - If you know C, C++, C#, Objective C or Java do you also know Python?[^] Just the "no need to declare variables" sends a shiver down my spine. That's actually worse than VB could manage - and that takes some doing!

        Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640 Never throw anything away, Griff Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

        "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
        "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt

        L 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • N Nand32

          Okay, that was an analogy. I was trying a little piece of Python code. Got a bit surprised with the "positional"-indentation requirements in code. Just like how it used to be in older programming languages like Cobol. (I'm not sure if any other recent programming languages enforce these) For example,

          If x is a:
          do //indented & works

          is different from

          if x is a:
          do //Non-indented & throws error

          It's funny, and doesn't this sound rudimentary and a bit annoying? :)

          P Offline
          P Offline
          PIEBALDconsult
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Supporting and encouraging good (consistent) formatting is a good thing, but requiring it isn't. (In my opinion) one of the strengths of C-like languages is that whitespace is pretty much unimportant. With C and C# -- unless you have directives -- each sequence of whitespace can be reduced to a single SPACE without affecting the meaning of the code. When I write C, I try to put all the directives in their own files, away from the actual C code.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L Lost User

            The first version will not work as it has a syntax error. It should be:

            if x is a: # note the trailing colon

            N Offline
            N Offline
            Nand32
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            :) fixed ! Thanks

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

              It sorta makes sense, and in theory at least should encourage correct indentation. But ... that won't save it. Survey Results - If you know C, C++, C#, Objective C or Java do you also know Python?[^] Just the "no need to declare variables" sends a shiver down my spine. That's actually worse than VB could manage - and that takes some doing!

              Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640 Never throw anything away, Griff Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

              L Offline
              L Offline
              Lost User
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              OriginalGriff wrote:

              "no need to declare variables" sends a shiver down my spine.

              Er, isn't that exactly why the "var" keyword was invented? A few years from now no one will be using proper typed variables any more.

              OriginalGriffO R 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • L Lost User

                OriginalGriff wrote:

                "no need to declare variables" sends a shiver down my spine.

                Er, isn't that exactly why the "var" keyword was invented? A few years from now no one will be using proper typed variables any more.

                OriginalGriffO Offline
                OriginalGriffO Offline
                OriginalGriff
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Oh, no, no, no, no! Python's version is worse: you don't need to declare the variable using "var", or "Dim", or anything - just pick a name and assign a value. So if you misspell it ... that's a new variable. Just like FORTRAN was back in the day (1977). And that caused a probe to miss the planet Venus completely, so what it does in a banking app, or a Boeing 737 Max is not something you want to think about too hard, really. Strongly typed variables should be mandatory in all languages used in the 21st century!

                Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640 Never throw anything away, Griff Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

                "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
                "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt

                L G 3 Replies Last reply
                0
                • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

                  Oh, no, no, no, no! Python's version is worse: you don't need to declare the variable using "var", or "Dim", or anything - just pick a name and assign a value. So if you misspell it ... that's a new variable. Just like FORTRAN was back in the day (1977). And that caused a probe to miss the planet Venus completely, so what it does in a banking app, or a Boeing 737 Max is not something you want to think about too hard, really. Strongly typed variables should be mandatory in all languages used in the 21st century!

                  Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640 Never throw anything away, Griff Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

                  L Offline
                  L Offline
                  Lost User
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  OriginalGriff wrote:

                  Python's version is worse

                  I agree, but you can still do quite a bit of damage with var.

                  OriginalGriff wrote:

                  Strongly typed variables should be mandatory in all languages used in the 21st century!

                  That is definitely true; but will teachers explain that properly to their students?

                  Sander RosselS 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L Lost User

                    OriginalGriff wrote:

                    "no need to declare variables" sends a shiver down my spine.

                    Er, isn't that exactly why the "var" keyword was invented? A few years from now no one will be using proper typed variables any more.

                    R Offline
                    R Offline
                    r_hyde
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    But a `var` (as in C#, say) isn't at all the same thing as an untyped (or rather, dynamically-typed) variable (as in Python). When you write `var x = 5;`, `x` is still an `int` just the same as if you'd written `int x = 5;`, you're just helping yourself save some keystrokes and letting the compiler infer the type (ok, you're not saving any keystrokes in that example, but not every type name is as succinct as `int` ;P ). You can't then turn around and write `x = "snuggles";` or the compiler will throw a fit, unlike Python where it would be perfectly legal. More and more people might be using `var`, but let's not confuse that with "no one will be using proper typed variables any more!"

                    Sander RosselS 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

                      Oh, no, no, no, no! Python's version is worse: you don't need to declare the variable using "var", or "Dim", or anything - just pick a name and assign a value. So if you misspell it ... that's a new variable. Just like FORTRAN was back in the day (1977). And that caused a probe to miss the planet Venus completely, so what it does in a banking app, or a Boeing 737 Max is not something you want to think about too hard, really. Strongly typed variables should be mandatory in all languages used in the 21st century!

                      Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640 Never throw anything away, Griff Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

                      L Offline
                      L Offline
                      Lost User
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      OriginalGriff wrote:

                      just pick a name and assign a value. So if you misspell it ... that's a new variable

                      but how do you misspell "i"

                      Message Signature (Click to edit ->)

                      OriginalGriffO K 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • L Lost User

                        OriginalGriff wrote:

                        just pick a name and assign a value. So if you misspell it ... that's a new variable

                        but how do you misspell "i"

                        Message Signature (Click to edit ->)

                        OriginalGriffO Offline
                        OriginalGriffO Offline
                        OriginalGriff
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        'j'? 'u', 'o', 'k'? All easy to do, especially on a "soft keyboard". :laugh:

                        Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640 Never throw anything away, Griff Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

                        "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
                        "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt

                        D 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

                          'j'? 'u', 'o', 'k'? All easy to do, especially on a "soft keyboard". :laugh:

                          Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640 Never throw anything away, Griff Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

                          D Offline
                          D Offline
                          David ONeil
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          Use Cryllic. Word doesn't match the second as 'sit': sit sіt

                          The forgotten roots of science | C++ Programming | DWinLib

                          OriginalGriffO 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • D David ONeil

                            Use Cryllic. Word doesn't match the second as 'sit': sit sіt

                            The forgotten roots of science | C++ Programming | DWinLib

                            OriginalGriffO Offline
                            OriginalGriffO Offline
                            OriginalGriff
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            There is also the "Extra quote character": ''' which looks just like the ones around it, but will not compile in other peoples code - not that you would replace any, I'm sure ... :laugh:

                            Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640 Never throw anything away, Griff Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

                            "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
                            "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt

                            D 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • L Lost User

                              OriginalGriff wrote:

                              Python's version is worse

                              I agree, but you can still do quite a bit of damage with var.

                              OriginalGriff wrote:

                              Strongly typed variables should be mandatory in all languages used in the 21st century!

                              That is definitely true; but will teachers explain that properly to their students?

                              Sander RosselS Offline
                              Sander RosselS Offline
                              Sander Rossel
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              Richard MacCutchan wrote:

                              I agree, but you can still do quite a bit of damage with var.

                              In what language? JavaScript? Certainly, but JavaScript doesn't really get much better than that... In C# it's still a typed variable, so it's exactly the same thing as explicitly using the type name except instead of the type name you use var. So no damage there, except to readability.

                              Best, Sander sanderrossel.com Continuous Integration, Delivery, and Deployment arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript Object-Oriented Programming in C# Succinctly

                              F 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • R r_hyde

                                But a `var` (as in C#, say) isn't at all the same thing as an untyped (or rather, dynamically-typed) variable (as in Python). When you write `var x = 5;`, `x` is still an `int` just the same as if you'd written `int x = 5;`, you're just helping yourself save some keystrokes and letting the compiler infer the type (ok, you're not saving any keystrokes in that example, but not every type name is as succinct as `int` ;P ). You can't then turn around and write `x = "snuggles";` or the compiler will throw a fit, unlike Python where it would be perfectly legal. More and more people might be using `var`, but let's not confuse that with "no one will be using proper typed variables any more!"

                                Sander RosselS Offline
                                Sander RosselS Offline
                                Sander Rossel
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                Dictionary<string, IEnumerable<IEnumerable<SomeValue>>> valuesPerLineFromACsvFileByKey = new Dictionary<string, IEnumerable<IEnumerable<SomeValue>>>();

                                or:

                                var valuesPerLineFromACsvFileByKey = new Dictionary<string, IEnumerable<IEnumerable<SomeValue>>>();

                                :D

                                Best, Sander sanderrossel.com Continuous Integration, Delivery, and Deployment arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript Object-Oriented Programming in C# Succinctly

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • N Nand32

                                  Okay, that was an analogy. I was trying a little piece of Python code. Got a bit surprised with the "positional"-indentation requirements in code. Just like how it used to be in older programming languages like Cobol. (I'm not sure if any other recent programming languages enforce these) For example,

                                  If x is a:
                                  do //indented & works

                                  is different from

                                  if x is a:
                                  do //Non-indented & throws error

                                  It's funny, and doesn't this sound rudimentary and a bit annoying? :)

                                  Sander RosselS Offline
                                  Sander RosselS Offline
                                  Sander Rossel
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  I know Haskell has it too. I know, because I had a school assignment that I've been looking at for two hours because I mixed up a few spaces with a tab... X|

                                  if x is a:
                                  do //...

                                  Isn't the same as:

                                  if x is a:
                                  do //...

                                  :rolleyes: It does produce some really clean and concise code though!

                                  Best, Sander sanderrossel.com Continuous Integration, Delivery, and Deployment arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript Object-Oriented Programming in C# Succinctly

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

                                    There is also the "Extra quote character": ''' which looks just like the ones around it, but will not compile in other peoples code - not that you would replace any, I'm sure ... :laugh:

                                    Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640 Never throw anything away, Griff Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

                                    D Offline
                                    D Offline
                                    David ONeil
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #17

                                    OriginalGriff wrote:

                                    - not that you would replace any, I'm sure

                                    If I wasn't using a strongly-typed language, and had an asshole for a coworker that needed a lesson, I certainly would! Send him a copy in which a variable has unicode changes but looks the same: "It works for me, I can't understand why you are having problems!" :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

                                    The forgotten roots of science | C++ Programming | DWinLib

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • N Nand32

                                      Okay, that was an analogy. I was trying a little piece of Python code. Got a bit surprised with the "positional"-indentation requirements in code. Just like how it used to be in older programming languages like Cobol. (I'm not sure if any other recent programming languages enforce these) For example,

                                      If x is a:
                                      do //indented & works

                                      is different from

                                      if x is a:
                                      do //Non-indented & throws error

                                      It's funny, and doesn't this sound rudimentary and a bit annoying? :)

                                      G Offline
                                      G Offline
                                      GuyThiebaut
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #18

                                      I started looking at Python in my home hobby time around 6 months ago and while it is a bit strange at first, I now find the indentation makes the code easier to read without brackets. I know IDEs allow you to indent bracketed languages but I find that Python easier to read. If you find the indentation strange, wait until you get on to the coding standards where lines should not exceed 79 characters in length.

                                      “That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”

                                      ― Christopher Hitchens

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

                                        Oh, no, no, no, no! Python's version is worse: you don't need to declare the variable using "var", or "Dim", or anything - just pick a name and assign a value. So if you misspell it ... that's a new variable. Just like FORTRAN was back in the day (1977). And that caused a probe to miss the planet Venus completely, so what it does in a banking app, or a Boeing 737 Max is not something you want to think about too hard, really. Strongly typed variables should be mandatory in all languages used in the 21st century!

                                        Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640 Never throw anything away, Griff Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

                                        G Offline
                                        G Offline
                                        GuyThiebaut
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #19

                                        Which is why I see Python as a poor choice for teaching beginners to 'code'. Take this class definition containing a function:

                                        class StringFormat(object):

                                        @staticmethod
                                        def FloatToStringFormat(num: float, decimalPlaces: int) -> str:
                                            return "{:.{}f}".format(num, decimalPlaces)
                                        

                                        Calling it like this:

                                        resultAsString = StringFormat.FloatToStringFormat(20.123, "2")

                                        I would expect to get an error as I am passing in a string rather than an integer for decimalPlaces. But no, Python happily sets resultAsString to "20.12"

                                        “That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”

                                        ― Christopher Hitchens

                                        M 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • G GuyThiebaut

                                          Which is why I see Python as a poor choice for teaching beginners to 'code'. Take this class definition containing a function:

                                          class StringFormat(object):

                                          @staticmethod
                                          def FloatToStringFormat(num: float, decimalPlaces: int) -> str:
                                              return "{:.{}f}".format(num, decimalPlaces)
                                          

                                          Calling it like this:

                                          resultAsString = StringFormat.FloatToStringFormat(20.123, "2")

                                          I would expect to get an error as I am passing in a string rather than an integer for decimalPlaces. But no, Python happily sets resultAsString to "20.12"

                                          “That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”

                                          ― Christopher Hitchens

                                          M Offline
                                          M Offline
                                          Mike Winiberg
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #20

                                          It's interesting to see in this discussion that one of python's more attractive features is seen as a disadvantage 8) Once again, the debate here about whether the language is 'good' or not seems to have nothing to do with whether it actually is good or otherwise, but simply amounts to 'does it fit my idea of how a language should work'. If I've learnt anything from over 40 years of software development, it is that (with a few domain specific exceptions) the skill of writing good software - don't mistake me here, I'm not saying that I write good software! - has almost nothing to do with the language you write it in, and everything to do with domain knowledge and the skill of the programmer(s). Every language has rules; every language has flaws. Being aware of both and using/avoiding them so you produce good code is what it's all about. The behaviour cited above as being 'problematic' is exactly why I use Python for certain types of project. 8)

                                          G 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups