Solutions
-
I am so tired of the "Solutions" buzz-word! Every company in the world is using it to describe their products. I wouldn't be surprised if McDonalds starts labeling their menus as "Lunch Solutions". I was completely bummed when I saw that MS used it to desribed their projects in VC7.:mad: Does anyone else get bothered by these buzz-words (and their over-usage), or am I alone in this? Dave
-
jdunlap wrote: Then they'll get mixed up with your real features. That's why I love dealing with Nortel on 'issues'. They call thier service packs 'PEPs' Product Enhancement Pacakges
Paul Watson wrote: "At the end of the day it is what you produce that counts, not how many doctorates you have on the wall." George Carlin wrote: "Don't sweat the petty things, and don't pet the sweaty things." Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote: If the physicists find a universal theory describing the laws of universe, I'm sure the asshole constant will be an integral part of that theory.
:laugh: In other words, we don't want you to know that we're only fixing the bugs we should have gotten rid of before release, so we're calling them enhancements.
"Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God." - Jesus
"You must be the change you wish to see in the world." - Mahatma Gandhi -
Dave_ wrote: Does anyone else get bothered by these buzz-words (and their over-usage), or am I alone in this? No, you are not alone. Actually, I think that these big enterprise companies should leverage their CRM software and, focusing on increased customer satisfaction, develop a scalable architecture based on an interoperable XML paradigm, so they could increate customer loyalty. This, obviously, should be envisioned in a way that doesn't conflict with the company mission statements, and its implications should be properly described in the enterprise balanced scorecard. On a serious note, look at the demo of this software; the beauty on it is that the demo is so generic that it is reusable, it could be the demo of almost any software on Earth. http://www.microsoft.com/BusinessSolutions/Navision/Demos/navision_crmservice_demo.mspx[^] Kant wrote: Actually she replied back to me "You shouldn't fix the bug. You should kill it"
-
I am so tired of the "Solutions" buzz-word! Every company in the world is using it to describe their products. I wouldn't be surprised if McDonalds starts labeling their menus as "Lunch Solutions". I was completely bummed when I saw that MS used it to desribed their projects in VC7.:mad: Does anyone else get bothered by these buzz-words (and their over-usage), or am I alone in this? Dave
The solution is to ignore it. That will be $5,000 please.
"I was in a computer game. Funny as hell, it was the most horrible thing I could think of."
-
I am so tired of the "Solutions" buzz-word! Every company in the world is using it to describe their products. I wouldn't be surprised if McDonalds starts labeling their menus as "Lunch Solutions". I was completely bummed when I saw that MS used it to desribed their projects in VC7.:mad: Does anyone else get bothered by these buzz-words (and their over-usage), or am I alone in this? Dave
I work with a guy who loves telling everyone who will listen that we need a new "strategy". From AOE, to the projects we work on, to lunch, etc. Drives me nuts :mad:
So few words, and yet so precise! Megan, you're a poet of mathematical accuracy! - Jörgen Sigvardsson
-
I am so tired of the "Solutions" buzz-word! Every company in the world is using it to describe their products. I wouldn't be surprised if McDonalds starts labeling their menus as "Lunch Solutions". I was completely bummed when I saw that MS used it to desribed their projects in VC7.:mad: Does anyone else get bothered by these buzz-words (and their over-usage), or am I alone in this? Dave
Yup. It's a form of thought control. By encouraging people to use the words you want them to use, you make it harder for them to think in a different way. Other annoying examples: - Managed C++ - Weapons of Mass Destruction - Regime Change - Reinventing - Leverage
-
Dave_ wrote: Does anyone else get bothered by these buzz-words (and their over-usage), or am I alone in this? No, you are not alone. Actually, I think that these big enterprise companies should leverage their CRM software and, focusing on increased customer satisfaction, develop a scalable architecture based on an interoperable XML paradigm, so they could increate customer loyalty. This, obviously, should be envisioned in a way that doesn't conflict with the company mission statements, and its implications should be properly described in the enterprise balanced scorecard. On a serious note, look at the demo of this software; the beauty on it is that the demo is so generic that it is reusable, it could be the demo of almost any software on Earth. http://www.microsoft.com/BusinessSolutions/Navision/Demos/navision_crmservice_demo.mspx[^] Kant wrote: Actually she replied back to me "You shouldn't fix the bug. You should kill it"
Daniel Turini wrote: _On a serious note, look at the demo of this software; the beauty on it is that the demo is so generic that it is reusable, it could be the demo of almost any software on Earth. http://www.microsoft.com/BusinessSolutions/Navision/Demos/navision\_crmservice\_demo.mspx\[^\]_ :omg: are they actually selling something there or did somebody at MS discover flash? Matt Newman
-
Daniel Turini wrote: _On a serious note, look at the demo of this software; the beauty on it is that the demo is so generic that it is reusable, it could be the demo of almost any software on Earth. http://www.microsoft.com/BusinessSolutions/Navision/Demos/navision\_crmservice\_demo.mspx\[^\]_ :omg: are they actually selling something there or did somebody at MS discover flash? Matt Newman
Reminds me of those older car commercials (Lexus I belive) where all you saw was rocks and rain but never any car. [EDIT] I have to stop listening to this demo or I wil falllll a sleeeeeeee........ :zzz: :zzz: :zzz:[/EDIT]
Paul Watson wrote: "At the end of the day it is what you produce that counts, not how many doctorates you have on the wall." George Carlin wrote: "Don't sweat the petty things, and don't pet the sweaty things." Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote: If the physicists find a universal theory describing the laws of universe, I'm sure the asshole constant will be an integral part of that theory.
-
Dave_ wrote: Does anyone else get bothered by these buzz-words (and their over-usage), or am I alone in this? No, you are not alone. Actually, I think that these big enterprise companies should leverage their CRM software and, focusing on increased customer satisfaction, develop a scalable architecture based on an interoperable XML paradigm, so they could increate customer loyalty. This, obviously, should be envisioned in a way that doesn't conflict with the company mission statements, and its implications should be properly described in the enterprise balanced scorecard. On a serious note, look at the demo of this software; the beauty on it is that the demo is so generic that it is reusable, it could be the demo of almost any software on Earth. http://www.microsoft.com/BusinessSolutions/Navision/Demos/navision_crmservice_demo.mspx[^] Kant wrote: Actually she replied back to me "You shouldn't fix the bug. You should kill it"
-
I am so tired of the "Solutions" buzz-word! Every company in the world is using it to describe their products. I wouldn't be surprised if McDonalds starts labeling their menus as "Lunch Solutions". I was completely bummed when I saw that MS used it to desribed their projects in VC7.:mad: Does anyone else get bothered by these buzz-words (and their over-usage), or am I alone in this? Dave
Dave_ wrote: I wouldn't be surprised if McDonalds starts labeling their menus as "Lunch Solutions". thats actually a really good marketting idea, taking the p*SS out of IT etc in a fairly subtle way. U should email maccers with it Bryce --- Publitor, making Pubmed easy. http://www.sohocode.com/publitor
-
Yup. It's a form of thought control. By encouraging people to use the words you want them to use, you make it harder for them to think in a different way. Other annoying examples: - Managed C++ - Weapons of Mass Destruction - Regime Change - Reinventing - Leverage
Jim A. Johnson wrote: Managed C++ I don't mind "managed C++", however I do mind "unmanaged C++". To counter this, I use the non-buzzwordy and more accurate phrase, "normal C++" ;) --Mike-- Latest blog entry: *drool* (Alyson) [May 10] Ericahist | Homepage | RightClick-Encrypt | 1ClickPicGrabber "You have Erica on the brain" - Jon Sagara to me
-
Jim A. Johnson wrote: Managed C++ I don't mind "managed C++", however I do mind "unmanaged C++". To counter this, I use the non-buzzwordy and more accurate phrase, "normal C++" ;) --Mike-- Latest blog entry: *drool* (Alyson) [May 10] Ericahist | Homepage | RightClick-Encrypt | 1ClickPicGrabber "You have Erica on the brain" - Jon Sagara to me
"Normal C++" is accurate?? Would that be including or excluding STL, ATL, MFC, WFC, COM, OWL, etc.. etc.. :confused:
-
I am so tired of the "Solutions" buzz-word! Every company in the world is using it to describe their products. I wouldn't be surprised if McDonalds starts labeling their menus as "Lunch Solutions". I was completely bummed when I saw that MS used it to desribed their projects in VC7.:mad: Does anyone else get bothered by these buzz-words (and their over-usage), or am I alone in this? Dave
-
Jim A. Johnson wrote: Managed C++ I don't mind "managed C++", however I do mind "unmanaged C++". To counter this, I use the non-buzzwordy and more accurate phrase, "normal C++" ;) --Mike-- Latest blog entry: *drool* (Alyson) [May 10] Ericahist | Homepage | RightClick-Encrypt | 1ClickPicGrabber "You have Erica on the brain" - Jon Sagara to me
how about "Free C++" or "Freedom C++"? :-) My article on a reference-counted smart pointer that supports polymorphic objects and raw pointers