Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. I'm just wondering why my article has gained no interest or popularity ?

I'm just wondering why my article has gained no interest or popularity ?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
comalgorithmstutorialquestion
40 Posts 15 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Jon McKee

    The primary subject is still "Optimal K-Means Clustering Algorithm" which before I clicked and read a bit of your article because of this post, I had zero idea what on Earth that even was. If I was busy and skimming for articles to read later from the front page I would probably pass to be honest. I think if you somehow hint in the title it relates to AI you'd get way more interest. Edit: Of course I don't really do AI stuff, so maybe that's a common algorithm? This is all just my perspective as an AI noob ;P

    A Offline
    A Offline
    Arthur V Ratz
    wrote on last edited by
    #15

    Quote:

    I think if you somehow hint in the title it relates to AI you'd get way more interest.

    I'm just working on it. Specifically, K-Means clustering is a very popular AI Machine Learning algorithm, I've already discussed in my previous articles years ago. Anyway, I'll try to change the title to something AI and machine learning related. :)

    J 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • A Arthur V Ratz

      Recently, I published an article A Gentle Introduction To Optimal K-Means Clustering, and I'm just wondering why my article has gained no interest or popularity? I've reverse-engineered an article published at Analytics Vidhya (The Most Comprehensive Guide to K-Means Clustering You’ll Ever Need) by providing an even more a detailed explanation of the k-means clustering algorithm. Finally, I'd like to know if this article requires to be re-worked. Can you guide me please, what's wrong with this article?

      A Offline
      A Offline
      Amarnath S
      wrote on last edited by
      #16

      If you are concerned about votes, perhaps it will take some more time.

      A 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • A Arthur V Ratz

        Quote:

        I think if you somehow hint in the title it relates to AI you'd get way more interest.

        I'm just working on it. Specifically, K-Means clustering is a very popular AI Machine Learning algorithm, I've already discussed in my previous articles years ago. Anyway, I'll try to change the title to something AI and machine learning related. :)

        J Offline
        J Offline
        Jon McKee
        wrote on last edited by
        #17

        It's a really good article from the parts I understand :thumbsup: I didn't notice it mentioned but what's the Big-Oh performance of the sub-optimal k-means clustering algorithm? O(k)?

        A 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • D dan sh

          honey the codewitch wrote:

          people only do if coerced

          This is why you won. ;P

          "It is easy to decipher extraterrestrial signals after deciphering Javascript and VB6 themselves.", ISanti[^]

          honey the codewitchH Offline
          honey the codewitchH Offline
          honey the codewitch
          wrote on last edited by
          #18

          You're saying my binding spell worked, then. That's not against the rules. I read them.

          Real programmers use butterflies

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • J Jon McKee

            It's a really good article from the parts I understand :thumbsup: I didn't notice it mentioned but what's the Big-Oh performance of the sub-optimal k-means clustering algorithm? O(k)?

            A Offline
            A Offline
            Arthur V Ratz
            wrote on last edited by
            #19

            Quote:

            I didn't notice it mentioned but what's the Big-Oh performance of the sub-optimal k-means clustering algorithm? O(k)? Quote Selected Text

            The complexity of the sub-optimal (!) k-means algorithm is typically very high (e.g. it's NP-hard). That's actually why I've used the number of algorithm optimizations such as k-means++ initialization algorithm, thoroughly discussed in this article, as well as the ability of the initialization process to produce the number of initial clusters prior to performing the actual clustering, and that really helps to reduce the computational complexity of the k-means algorithm.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • J Jon McKee

              It's a really good article from the parts I understand :thumbsup: I didn't notice it mentioned but what's the Big-Oh performance of the sub-optimal k-means clustering algorithm? O(k)?

              A Offline
              A Offline
              Arthur V Ratz
              wrote on last edited by
              #20

              Finally, I've re-composed the article's title: "

              Quote:

              How To Implement The AI Supervised Learning K-Means Clustering Algorithm And Use It For Solving Data Classification Problems"

              So, what's about this one?

              J 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • A Arthur V Ratz

                Finally, I've re-composed the article's title: "

                Quote:

                How To Implement The AI Supervised Learning K-Means Clustering Algorithm And Use It For Solving Data Classification Problems"

                So, what's about this one?

                J Offline
                J Offline
                Jon McKee
                wrote on last edited by
                #21

                Definitely peaks my interest more :thumbsup: CodeProject is gonna cut off the title on listings somewhere around the middle but all the important keywords are in the first half anyways.

                A 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • A Amarnath S

                  If you are concerned about votes, perhaps it will take some more time.

                  A Offline
                  A Offline
                  Arthur V Ratz
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #22

                  Thanks for your reply. The number of votes normally indicates an article's popularity. :)

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • A Arthur V Ratz

                    Finally, I've re-composed the article's title: "

                    Quote:

                    How To Implement The AI Supervised Learning K-Means Clustering Algorithm And Use It For Solving Data Classification Problems"

                    So, what's about this one?

                    J Offline
                    J Offline
                    Jon McKee
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #23

                    Definitely peaks my interest more :thumbsup: CodeProject is gonna cut off the title on listings somewhere around the middle but all the important keywords are in the first half anyways.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • J Jon McKee

                      Definitely peaks my interest more :thumbsup: CodeProject is gonna cut off the title on listings somewhere around the middle but all the important keywords are in the first half anyways.

                      A Offline
                      A Offline
                      Arthur V Ratz
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #24

                      Yes of course. I'll compact the beginning of the article's title right now.

                      J 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • A Arthur V Ratz

                        Yes of course. I'll compact the beginning of the article's title right now.

                        J Offline
                        J Offline
                        Jon McKee
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #25

                        Actually I realized you'd have to change "Use" to "Using" if you did that which doesn't really save much space. English - ain't it fun? Could just use "Implement" though in the imperative sense.

                        A 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • J Jon McKee

                          Definitely peaks my interest more :thumbsup: CodeProject is gonna cut off the title on listings somewhere around the middle but all the important keywords are in the first half anyways.

                          A Offline
                          A Offline
                          Arthur V Ratz
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #26

                          Finally, I've corrected the title :)

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • J Jon McKee

                            Actually I realized you'd have to change "Use" to "Using" if you did that which doesn't really save much space. English - ain't it fun? Could just use "Implement" though in the imperative sense.

                            A Offline
                            A Offline
                            Arthur V Ratz
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #27

                            Excuse me, but if I don't understand which word I should use in the imperative sense "Implement" or "Use", or both?? :)

                            J 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • A Arthur V Ratz

                              Excuse me, but if I don't understand which word I should use in the imperative sense "Implement" or "Use", or both?? :)

                              J Offline
                              J Offline
                              Jon McKee
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #28

                              Implement and Use, yea. Haha. I swear I'm a native speaker and it's just really late! :laugh:

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • J Jon McKee

                                Actually I realized you'd have to change "Use" to "Using" if you did that which doesn't really save much space. English - ain't it fun? Could just use "Implement" though in the imperative sense.

                                A Offline
                                A Offline
                                Arthur V Ratz
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #29

                                Here's a couple of variants of the same title: Implement The AI Supervised Learning K-Means Clustering Algorithm And Use It For Solving Data Classification Problems Implementing the AI Supervised Learning K-Means Clustering Algorithm and Be Using It for Solving Data Classification Problems Which one seems to you the most correct?

                                J 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • A Arthur V Ratz

                                  Here's a couple of variants of the same title: Implement The AI Supervised Learning K-Means Clustering Algorithm And Use It For Solving Data Classification Problems Implementing the AI Supervised Learning K-Means Clustering Algorithm and Be Using It for Solving Data Classification Problems Which one seems to you the most correct?

                                  J Offline
                                  J Offline
                                  Jon McKee
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #30

                                  The first one. The second one works too without the "Be" but it's longer :thumbsup:

                                  A 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • J Jon McKee

                                    The first one. The second one works too without the "Be" but it's longer :thumbsup:

                                    A Offline
                                    A Offline
                                    Arthur V Ratz
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #31

                                    Thanks for the guidance. :)

                                    J 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • A Arthur V Ratz

                                      Thanks for the guidance. :)

                                      J Offline
                                      J Offline
                                      Jon McKee
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #32

                                      No problem. It's a good article! Thanks for the contribution :)

                                      A 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • J Jon McKee

                                        No problem. It's a good article! Thanks for the contribution :)

                                        A Offline
                                        A Offline
                                        Arthur V Ratz
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #33

                                        You're very welcome. :)

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • A Arthur V Ratz

                                          Recently, I published an article A Gentle Introduction To Optimal K-Means Clustering, and I'm just wondering why my article has gained no interest or popularity? I've reverse-engineered an article published at Analytics Vidhya (The Most Comprehensive Guide to K-Means Clustering You’ll Ever Need) by providing an even more a detailed explanation of the k-means clustering algorithm. Finally, I'd like to know if this article requires to be re-worked. Can you guide me please, what's wrong with this article?

                                          F Offline
                                          F Offline
                                          F ES Sitecore
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #34

                                          I like turtles.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups