Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Google Chrome Doesn't Follow Symbolic Links

Google Chrome Doesn't Follow Symbolic Links

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
help
13 Posts 7 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D David A Gray

    Google Chrome doesn't follow symbolic links. For an image to be rendered, it must be either a hard link or a copy of the original that is stored elsewhere. This I discovered when I attempted to use a symlink to an image, to avoid making a copy of it.

    David A. Gray Delivering Solutions for the Ages, One Problem at a Time Interpreting the Fundamental Principle of Tabular Reporting

    D Offline
    D Offline
    Dar Brett 0
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    That's probably why I can't download files in Chromium anymore, I symlinked my ~/Downloads directory a larger spinning drive to save space on my SSD - then started getting permissions errors when I try to download anything. The problem was easily resolved by not using Chromium anymore.

    H D 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • D Dar Brett 0

      That's probably why I can't download files in Chromium anymore, I symlinked my ~/Downloads directory a larger spinning drive to save space on my SSD - then started getting permissions errors when I try to download anything. The problem was easily resolved by not using Chromium anymore.

      H Offline
      H Offline
      honey the codewitch
      wrote on last edited by
      #3

      Find their online support forums and submit that as a fix. :laugh:

      Real programmers use butterflies

      M 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • H honey the codewitch

        Find their online support forums and submit that as a fix. :laugh:

        Real programmers use butterflies

        M Offline
        M Offline
        Mark_Wallace
        wrote on last edited by
        #4

        So the only use for chrome, now, is to download firefox?

        I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

        N 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Mark_Wallace

          So the only use for chrome, now, is to download firefox?

          I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

          N Offline
          N Offline
          Nelek
          wrote on last edited by
          #5

          Another task where google is taking over microsoft? I thought that was the usage of edge...

          M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

          M 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • N Nelek

            Another task where google is taking over microsoft? I thought that was the usage of edge...

            M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

            M Offline
            M Offline
            Mark_Wallace
            wrote on last edited by
            #6

            The jealousy of the greedy knows no bounds.  Not even sensible ones.

            I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • D David A Gray

              Google Chrome doesn't follow symbolic links. For an image to be rendered, it must be either a hard link or a copy of the original that is stored elsewhere. This I discovered when I attempted to use a symlink to an image, to avoid making a copy of it.

              David A. Gray Delivering Solutions for the Ages, One Problem at a Time Interpreting the Fundamental Principle of Tabular Reporting

              K Offline
              K Offline
              kalberts
              wrote on last edited by
              #7

              Did they make this (not) work both with Linux and Windows symbolic links? If that is the case, is is truly impessing!

              D 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • K kalberts

                Did they make this (not) work both with Linux and Windows symbolic links? If that is the case, is is truly impessing!

                D Offline
                D Offline
                David A Gray
                wrote on last edited by
                #8

                Since I'm not running Chrome on Linux, I can't say. Maybe somebody else knows.

                David A. Gray Delivering Solutions for the Ages, One Problem at a Time Interpreting the Fundamental Principle of Tabular Reporting

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • D Dar Brett 0

                  That's probably why I can't download files in Chromium anymore, I symlinked my ~/Downloads directory a larger spinning drive to save space on my SSD - then started getting permissions errors when I try to download anything. The problem was easily resolved by not using Chromium anymore.

                  D Offline
                  D Offline
                  David A Gray
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #9

                  There is a setting that you can use to directly change the default downloads directory; it's in the Advanced settings on the main Settings page.

                  David A. Gray Delivering Solutions for the Ages, One Problem at a Time Interpreting the Fundamental Principle of Tabular Reporting

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • D David A Gray

                    Google Chrome doesn't follow symbolic links. For an image to be rendered, it must be either a hard link or a copy of the original that is stored elsewhere. This I discovered when I attempted to use a symlink to an image, to avoid making a copy of it.

                    David A. Gray Delivering Solutions for the Ages, One Problem at a Time Interpreting the Fundamental Principle of Tabular Reporting

                    D Offline
                    D Offline
                    dandy72
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    You're using Chrome to browse...your local file system?

                    D 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • D dandy72

                      You're using Chrome to browse...your local file system?

                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      David A Gray
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      Yes, I am, to test HTML documents that I develop for use as templates for use in the [SalesTalk](https://salesrelevance.com/) application that I began supporting last summer.

                      David A. Gray Delivering Solutions for the Ages, One Problem at a Time Interpreting the Fundamental Principle of Tabular Reporting

                      D 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • D David A Gray

                        Yes, I am, to test HTML documents that I develop for use as templates for use in the [SalesTalk](https://salesrelevance.com/) application that I began supporting last summer.

                        David A. Gray Delivering Solutions for the Ages, One Problem at a Time Interpreting the Fundamental Principle of Tabular Reporting

                        D Offline
                        D Offline
                        dandy72
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #12

                        Carry on then. I thought somebody was making it out to be a better file system browser than Explorer. :-) (not that Explorer isn't without its faults...)

                        D 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • D dandy72

                          Carry on then. I thought somebody was making it out to be a better file system browser than Explorer. :-) (not that Explorer isn't without its faults...)

                          D Offline
                          D Offline
                          David A Gray
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #13

                          No, but it's handy from time to time for reviewing HTML documents and document fragments intended to be embedded in something bugger.

                          David A. Gray Delivering Solutions for the Ages, One Problem at a Time Interpreting the Fundamental Principle of Tabular Reporting

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups