By age 25
-
Greg Utas wrote:
Essential is very limited and would include
A house/mortgage? And when you want to get a mortgage, a phone subscription and credit card are considered debt too, at least in the Netherlands X| Having the possibility to go negative on your bank account as well (even when your balance isn't and has never been negative). Needless to say not many people are without debt :laugh:
Greg Utas wrote:
if an employer mistreats you, you can give them the finger knowing that you don't have to find something else tomorrow
I haven't given anyone the finger (never burn bridges), but I did quit a job without having a new one and took a week of unpaid leave to boot. I really didn't want to work there anymore and I think I got that message across :D
Best, Sander sanderrossel.com Migrating Applications to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript Object-Oriented Programming in C# Succinctly
Sander Rossel wrote:
A house/mortgage?
I'm sure this will find disfavor, but a house is just a consumer good, especially when so many housing markets are overvalued, even insanely so. If you like the house and are planning to stay for, say, at least 5 years, then buying it is a consideration. If not, the transaction costs could easily wipe out any gains and more. Having all your net worth tied up in a house is putting all your eggs in one basket. Houses also have maintenance costs, and property taxes in some cities are increasing at loanshark rates because, let's face it, you can't move your house to another jurisdiction. The experience of many people is that houses always go up in value. With interest rates at historic lows, and with the possibility of economic upheaval continuing, I hope they don't get hurt. Coronavirus was just the pin; various bubbles, inflated by ten years of central bank arseholery, were already waiting to run into one.
Robust Services Core | Software Techniques for Lemmings | Articles
<p><a href="https://github.com/GregUtas/robust-services-core/blob/master/README.md">Robust Services Core</a>
<em>The fox knows many things, but the hedgehog knows one big thing.</em></p> -
Sander Rossel wrote:
A house/mortgage?
I'm sure this will find disfavor, but a house is just a consumer good, especially when so many housing markets are overvalued, even insanely so. If you like the house and are planning to stay for, say, at least 5 years, then buying it is a consideration. If not, the transaction costs could easily wipe out any gains and more. Having all your net worth tied up in a house is putting all your eggs in one basket. Houses also have maintenance costs, and property taxes in some cities are increasing at loanshark rates because, let's face it, you can't move your house to another jurisdiction. The experience of many people is that houses always go up in value. With interest rates at historic lows, and with the possibility of economic upheaval continuing, I hope they don't get hurt. Coronavirus was just the pin; various bubbles, inflated by ten years of central bank arseholery, were already waiting to run into one.
Robust Services Core | Software Techniques for Lemmings | Articles
Greg Utas wrote:
houses always go up in value
And the ignore that it's at best irrelevant (where are you going to live if you sell it for a profit?) and at worse a disaster (when you sell because the family needs more space and find all the bigger ones have increased in "value" at a proportionate rate and your are suddenly miles behind teh curve and way out of your financial depth). High and rising house prices help only real estate agents, solicitors, and government tax departments ...
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
-
You should have: - a houseplant - an ex you're not over - the overwhelming feeling that you're not making as much progress in life as you would have liked - debt ;P
1. I've buried too many houseplants. Never again! :sigh: 2. No comment :) 3. You're about 7 years too late. IMO, the idea that you aren't doing the best that you could is the strongest motivator to leave the nest. 4. With the exception of debt incurred to make your living (education, a car to get to work, etc.), all debt is bad. If you can't pay cash - do without! A mortgage on a house is an investment in a lifestyle, not an asset.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.
-
Sander Rossel wrote:
A house/mortgage?
I'm sure this will find disfavor, but a house is just a consumer good, especially when so many housing markets are overvalued, even insanely so. If you like the house and are planning to stay for, say, at least 5 years, then buying it is a consideration. If not, the transaction costs could easily wipe out any gains and more. Having all your net worth tied up in a house is putting all your eggs in one basket. Houses also have maintenance costs, and property taxes in some cities are increasing at loanshark rates because, let's face it, you can't move your house to another jurisdiction. The experience of many people is that houses always go up in value. With interest rates at historic lows, and with the possibility of economic upheaval continuing, I hope they don't get hurt. Coronavirus was just the pin; various bubbles, inflated by ten years of central bank arseholery, were already waiting to run into one.
Robust Services Core | Software Techniques for Lemmings | Articles
So what's the alternative? Rent? :laugh: Rent is often more expensive than mortgage except when you pay rent your money is gone forever. Depends on how long you're going to live in a house, of course, but five years of rent is easily €50,000 down the drain. If I currently bought a €300,000 house and got that money from the bank and paid that back over 30 years, I'd "only" pay €40,000 in the next five years. That's a €10,000 difference on the highest interest I can get. Meanwhile, rent is rising while my interest is not. Then when I sell my house after five years I probably get €300,000 or more back for it. This is all very dependent on where you live though. When you live in a city renting is probably your only option unless you're a millionaire or very lucky. And rent or buying may be cheaper or more expensive in different countries or even different areas (€300,000 will buy you a box in Amsterdam, but it'll buy you a huge estate in Gelderland, so to speak).
Best, Sander sanderrossel.com Migrating Applications to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript Object-Oriented Programming in C# Succinctly
-
So what's the alternative? Rent? :laugh: Rent is often more expensive than mortgage except when you pay rent your money is gone forever. Depends on how long you're going to live in a house, of course, but five years of rent is easily €50,000 down the drain. If I currently bought a €300,000 house and got that money from the bank and paid that back over 30 years, I'd "only" pay €40,000 in the next five years. That's a €10,000 difference on the highest interest I can get. Meanwhile, rent is rising while my interest is not. Then when I sell my house after five years I probably get €300,000 or more back for it. This is all very dependent on where you live though. When you live in a city renting is probably your only option unless you're a millionaire or very lucky. And rent or buying may be cheaper or more expensive in different countries or even different areas (€300,000 will buy you a box in Amsterdam, but it'll buy you a huge estate in Gelderland, so to speak).
Best, Sander sanderrossel.com Migrating Applications to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript Object-Oriented Programming in C# Succinctly
Sander Rossel wrote:
So what's the alternative? Rent? :laugh:
I've been renting for almost 20 years. ;P
Robust Services Core | Software Techniques for Lemmings | Articles
-
1. I've buried too many houseplants. Never again! :sigh: 2. No comment :) 3. You're about 7 years too late. IMO, the idea that you aren't doing the best that you could is the strongest motivator to leave the nest. 4. With the exception of debt incurred to make your living (education, a car to get to work, etc.), all debt is bad. If you can't pay cash - do without! A mortgage on a house is an investment in a lifestyle, not an asset.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.
Daniel Pfeffer wrote:
I've buried too many houseplants. Never again!
That's called Gardening, apparently.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
-
You should have: - a houseplant - an ex you're not over - the overwhelming feeling that you're not making as much progress in life as you would have liked - debt ;P
-
You should have: - a houseplant - an ex you're not over - the overwhelming feeling that you're not making as much progress in life as you would have liked - debt ;P
-
Greg Utas wrote:
Essential is very limited and would include
A house/mortgage? And when you want to get a mortgage, a phone subscription and credit card are considered debt too, at least in the Netherlands X| Having the possibility to go negative on your bank account as well (even when your balance isn't and has never been negative). Needless to say not many people are without debt :laugh:
Greg Utas wrote:
if an employer mistreats you, you can give them the finger knowing that you don't have to find something else tomorrow
I haven't given anyone the finger (never burn bridges), but I did quit a job without having a new one and took a week of unpaid leave to boot. I really didn't want to work there anymore and I think I got that message across :D
Best, Sander sanderrossel.com Migrating Applications to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript Object-Oriented Programming in C# Succinctly
Sander Rossel wrote:
a phone subscription and credit card are considered debt too,
A credit card is a debt-based card. I never owned one, just the normal debit-card. As for phone-subsciption, that must be a plan where you "buy" a package and then have down-payments disguised as an abo. Also; relocating for work is a weird idea for yearly or half-year contracts. I can see how Canadians and Americans need a car with those distances, but we got good public transportation.
Sander Rossel wrote:
I haven't given anyone the finger (never burn bridges)
..but if you ever do, do it well. Don't just burn the bridge, but torch every village along the river.
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
-
Sander Rossel wrote:
a phone subscription and credit card are considered debt too,
A credit card is a debt-based card. I never owned one, just the normal debit-card. As for phone-subsciption, that must be a plan where you "buy" a package and then have down-payments disguised as an abo. Also; relocating for work is a weird idea for yearly or half-year contracts. I can see how Canadians and Americans need a car with those distances, but we got good public transportation.
Sander Rossel wrote:
I haven't given anyone the finger (never burn bridges)
..but if you ever do, do it well. Don't just burn the bridge, but torch every village along the river.
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
A credit card is a debt-based card
Yeah, and those crazy Americans can't get enough of them :~ I got one for Microsoft specifically. It's just crazy that you need one for an Azure subscription or an exam :~
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
Also; relocating for work is a weird idea for yearly or half-year contracts.
I think relocating is a weird idea for any job. I look for a job where I live, not for a life where I work. Unless you really want to work for a specific company I guess, but I don't.
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
but if you ever do, do it well.
A story I heard from an ex-coworker. One of his coworkers had a week off work, but one day he came in the office. His boss asked him "you just can't live without us, can you?" The guy replied "nope, but I'm going to try anyway!" and he slammed his resignation letter on the boss' desk :laugh:
Best, Sander sanderrossel.com Migrating Applications to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript Object-Oriented Programming in C# Succinctly
-
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
A credit card is a debt-based card
Yeah, and those crazy Americans can't get enough of them :~ I got one for Microsoft specifically. It's just crazy that you need one for an Azure subscription or an exam :~
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
Also; relocating for work is a weird idea for yearly or half-year contracts.
I think relocating is a weird idea for any job. I look for a job where I live, not for a life where I work. Unless you really want to work for a specific company I guess, but I don't.
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
but if you ever do, do it well.
A story I heard from an ex-coworker. One of his coworkers had a week off work, but one day he came in the office. His boss asked him "you just can't live without us, can you?" The guy replied "nope, but I'm going to try anyway!" and he slammed his resignation letter on the boss' desk :laugh:
Best, Sander sanderrossel.com Migrating Applications to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript Object-Oriented Programming in C# Succinctly
Sander Rossel wrote:
It's just crazy that you need one for an Azure subscription or an exam :~
Hehe, let my boss do that; I don't need an azure subscription. HE needs me to have one.
Sander Rossel wrote:
I think relocating is a weird idea for any job. I look for a job where I live, not for a life where I work.
Depends on what they pay :) Still, I think it is more common in the US, where they easily drive a few hours to family.
Sander Rossel wrote:
A story I heard from an ex-coworker. One of his coworkers had a week off work, but one day he came in the office. His boss asked him "you just can't live without us, can you?" The guy replied "nope, but I'm going to try anyway!" and he slammed his resignation letter on the boss' desk :laugh:
:D
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
-
Sander Rossel wrote:
It's just crazy that you need one for an Azure subscription or an exam :~
Hehe, let my boss do that; I don't need an azure subscription. HE needs me to have one.
Sander Rossel wrote:
I think relocating is a weird idea for any job. I look for a job where I live, not for a life where I work.
Depends on what they pay :) Still, I think it is more common in the US, where they easily drive a few hours to family.
Sander Rossel wrote:
A story I heard from an ex-coworker. One of his coworkers had a week off work, but one day he came in the office. His boss asked him "you just can't live without us, can you?" The guy replied "nope, but I'm going to try anyway!" and he slammed his resignation letter on the boss' desk :laugh:
:D
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
HE needs me to have one.
I needed one to stay attractive for possible employers ;) When I took one, my employer was not at all interested in Azure. My next employer got me a subscription with €130 credit a month, which I still have for some reason (and not from my previous employer). Anyway, I'm currently self-employed so I DO let my boss handle my subscription :D
Best, Sander sanderrossel.com Migrating Applications to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript Object-Oriented Programming in C# Succinctly
-
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
HE needs me to have one.
I needed one to stay attractive for possible employers ;) When I took one, my employer was not at all interested in Azure. My next employer got me a subscription with €130 credit a month, which I still have for some reason (and not from my previous employer). Anyway, I'm currently self-employed so I DO let my boss handle my subscription :D
Best, Sander sanderrossel.com Migrating Applications to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript Object-Oriented Programming in C# Succinctly
Sander Rossel wrote:
I needed one to stay attractive for possible employers ;)
So do I; but I cannot take financial liabilities for work, being an employee.
Sander Rossel wrote:
Anyway, I'm currently self-employed so I DO let my boss handle my subscription :-D
Well, he wouldn't be the boss if he didn't know what he was doing :rolleyes:
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
-
So what's the alternative? Rent? :laugh: Rent is often more expensive than mortgage except when you pay rent your money is gone forever. Depends on how long you're going to live in a house, of course, but five years of rent is easily €50,000 down the drain. If I currently bought a €300,000 house and got that money from the bank and paid that back over 30 years, I'd "only" pay €40,000 in the next five years. That's a €10,000 difference on the highest interest I can get. Meanwhile, rent is rising while my interest is not. Then when I sell my house after five years I probably get €300,000 or more back for it. This is all very dependent on where you live though. When you live in a city renting is probably your only option unless you're a millionaire or very lucky. And rent or buying may be cheaper or more expensive in different countries or even different areas (€300,000 will buy you a box in Amsterdam, but it'll buy you a huge estate in Gelderland, so to speak).
Best, Sander sanderrossel.com Migrating Applications to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript Object-Oriented Programming in C# Succinctly
Sander Rossel wrote:
Rent is often more expensive than mortgage except when you pay rent your money is gone forever.
So, there's another I just need to interrupt. Costs of rent or buying are similar if you take in account the subsidies. If one had to pay the entire interest on the loan without our government paying a part, it would be more expensive than now; and you are also responsible for maintenance and your end-value is a bit uncertain. You dismissed both risc and cost (of ownership). Your money isn't "gone" when renting. You're not from the generation that ever rented a video-tape, eh? Renting doesn't mean your money is "gone"; that's bullshit that financial experts spout. If you rent, you pay someone for the luxury of using an item without any risc or costs associated of owning that item. SaaS is built on the idea of renting software instead of buying it. And yes, that usually kills the conversation at the party with so-called financial expert.
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
-
Sander Rossel wrote:
Rent is often more expensive than mortgage except when you pay rent your money is gone forever.
So, there's another I just need to interrupt. Costs of rent or buying are similar if you take in account the subsidies. If one had to pay the entire interest on the loan without our government paying a part, it would be more expensive than now; and you are also responsible for maintenance and your end-value is a bit uncertain. You dismissed both risc and cost (of ownership). Your money isn't "gone" when renting. You're not from the generation that ever rented a video-tape, eh? Renting doesn't mean your money is "gone"; that's bullshit that financial experts spout. If you rent, you pay someone for the luxury of using an item without any risc or costs associated of owning that item. SaaS is built on the idea of renting software instead of buying it. And yes, that usually kills the conversation at the party with so-called financial expert.
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
If one had to pay the entire interest on the loan without our government paying a part, it would be more expensive than now
Yes, and fortunately we're going to stop this "hypotheekrenteaftrek". Getting a subsidy on a loan of which the already rich have a lot more profit than those who actually need it, crazy X| No doubt it's one of the reasons houses are so crazy expensive right now!
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
Renting doesn't mean your money is "gone"; that's bullshit that financial experts spout. If you rent, you pay someone for the luxury of using an item without any risc or costs associated of owning that item.
That's a lot of money to mitigate some risk!
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
SaaS is built on the idea of renting software instead of buying it.
So are lease cars, which I have exactly because of what you said :laugh: A lease car of €350 a month or a house for €1000 a month is quite a price difference though. Plus that a car is rarely a good investment while a house usually is. Especially now that interest is so low. Anyway, I bought a house some six years ago and it costs me close to nothing now :) My car is actually more expensive than my house ever was X|
Best, Sander sanderrossel.com Migrating Applications to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript Object-Oriented Programming in C# Succinctly
-
Sander Rossel wrote:
Rent is often more expensive than mortgage except when you pay rent your money is gone forever.
So, there's another I just need to interrupt. Costs of rent or buying are similar if you take in account the subsidies. If one had to pay the entire interest on the loan without our government paying a part, it would be more expensive than now; and you are also responsible for maintenance and your end-value is a bit uncertain. You dismissed both risc and cost (of ownership). Your money isn't "gone" when renting. You're not from the generation that ever rented a video-tape, eh? Renting doesn't mean your money is "gone"; that's bullshit that financial experts spout. If you rent, you pay someone for the luxury of using an item without any risc or costs associated of owning that item. SaaS is built on the idea of renting software instead of buying it. And yes, that usually kills the conversation at the party with so-called financial expert.
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
Costs of rent or buying are similar if you take in account the subsidies. If one had to pay the entire interest on the loan without our government paying a part, it would be more expensive than now
Only if you can itemize. I haven't been able to itemize for five years (note - this predates President Trump's tax cuts). I'm also not paying the entire interest as spelled out in the loan paperwork because I've payed so far ahead.
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
Your money isn't "gone" when renting. You're not from the generation that ever rented a video-tape, eh?
Actually, it's gone from the perspective that it's no longer your money.
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
Renting doesn't mean your money is "gone"; that's bullshit that financial experts spout. If you rent, you pay someone for the luxury of using an item without any risc or costs associated of owning that item.
Not entirely true - if you lease or rent a car you still must carry insurance to cover the loss of the vehicle. You've taken 100% responsibility for the item and then paid a third party to cover your responsibility.
-
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
Costs of rent or buying are similar if you take in account the subsidies. If one had to pay the entire interest on the loan without our government paying a part, it would be more expensive than now
Only if you can itemize. I haven't been able to itemize for five years (note - this predates President Trump's tax cuts). I'm also not paying the entire interest as spelled out in the loan paperwork because I've payed so far ahead.
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
Your money isn't "gone" when renting. You're not from the generation that ever rented a video-tape, eh?
Actually, it's gone from the perspective that it's no longer your money.
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
Renting doesn't mean your money is "gone"; that's bullshit that financial experts spout. If you rent, you pay someone for the luxury of using an item without any risc or costs associated of owning that item.
Not entirely true - if you lease or rent a car you still must carry insurance to cover the loss of the vehicle. You've taken 100% responsibility for the item and then paid a third party to cover your responsibility.
obermd wrote:
Only if you can itemize. I haven't been able to itemize for five years (note - this predates President Trump's tax cuts). I'm also not paying the entire interest as spelled out in the loan paperwork because I've payed so far ahead.
Not commenting on stuff I don't know about; there's a lot of stuff that works differently for Americans. Not sure if one can pay ahead interest here.
obermd wrote:
Actually, it's gone from the perspective that it's no longer your money.
That is equally true for buying. No service or product is for free.
obermd wrote:
Not entirely true - if you lease or rent a car you still must carry insurance to cover the loss of the vehicle. You've taken 100% responsibility for the item and then paid a third party to cover your responsibility.
The insurance is for usage, not ownership. Same goes for my house; most of the cost is for the owner, but there's still some minor things that are mine to pay, since I'm the user.
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
-
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
If one had to pay the entire interest on the loan without our government paying a part, it would be more expensive than now
Yes, and fortunately we're going to stop this "hypotheekrenteaftrek". Getting a subsidy on a loan of which the already rich have a lot more profit than those who actually need it, crazy X| No doubt it's one of the reasons houses are so crazy expensive right now!
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
Renting doesn't mean your money is "gone"; that's bullshit that financial experts spout. If you rent, you pay someone for the luxury of using an item without any risc or costs associated of owning that item.
That's a lot of money to mitigate some risk!
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
SaaS is built on the idea of renting software instead of buying it.
So are lease cars, which I have exactly because of what you said :laugh: A lease car of €350 a month or a house for €1000 a month is quite a price difference though. Plus that a car is rarely a good investment while a house usually is. Especially now that interest is so low. Anyway, I bought a house some six years ago and it costs me close to nothing now :) My car is actually more expensive than my house ever was X|
Best, Sander sanderrossel.com Migrating Applications to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript Object-Oriented Programming in C# Succinctly
Sander Rossel wrote:
Yes, and fortunately we're going to stop this "hypotheekrenteaftrek". Getting a subsidy on a loan of which the already rich have a lot more profit than those who actually need it, crazy X| No doubt it's one of the reasons houses are so crazy expensive right now!
That was intended to stimulate house-ownership, and it works. High housing prices are normal if interest is low, and modern houses in the Netherlands have to adhere to more laws than 60 years ago. Laws for the environment, requirements in safety, all adding to the costs.
Sander Rossel wrote:
That's a lot of money to mitigate some risk!
I remember a time when interest was at 6.7% for a house-loan, and a familymember who needed a new roof. The risc is there, as are extra costs. Like (and this is weird) extra taxes (eigenwoningforfait). So on one hand we give money to stimulate it, on the other hand we tax it extra. Then there's the surprises, like asbestsanering and replacing lead waterpipes. And I not only pay for those, but also for the comfort of not-worrying about it :)
Sander Rossel wrote:
Anyway, I bought a house some six years ago and it costs me close to nothing now :) My car is actually more expensive than my house ever was X|
:laugh: Then you did well :)
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
