Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Works right the first time! :confused:

Works right the first time! :confused:

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
question
39 Posts 21 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • raddevusR raddevus

    +1 for the musical reply. :laugh:

    5 Offline
    5 Offline
    5teveH
    wrote on last edited by
    #26

    raddevus wrote:

    +1 for the musical reply.

    and such a good one too. Love that song. What a great start to my morning. :)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • P PIEBALDconsult

      "If you get a different error message, you're making progress."

      enhzflepE Offline
      enhzflepE Offline
      enhzflep
      wrote on last edited by
      #27

      That quite possibly, is more help than we were given when first introduced to c++ templates at uni.

      E 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Lost User

        Surprise-driven development.

        It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it. ― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food

        raddevusR Offline
        raddevusR Offline
        raddevus
        wrote on last edited by
        #28

        Gerry Schmitz wrote:

        Surprise-driven development.

        :laugh: SDD - The oldest and best Software Methodology! :laugh:

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Lost User

          COBOL at least had a cross-reference listing.

          It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it. ― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food

          raddevusR Offline
          raddevusR Offline
          raddevus
          wrote on last edited by
          #29

          Gerry Schmitz wrote:

          COBOL at least

          COBOL! COBOL! I'm triggered! :laugh:

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • raddevusR raddevus

            Greg Utas wrote:

            Of course, it's usually the opposite, at least for me. This'll fix it. [runs test] :mad: WTF!!

            :thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup: Haha! Yeah, me too. That's why I'm sitting here shocked that it worked. :-D

            K Offline
            K Offline
            Keefer S
            wrote on last edited by
            #30

            Me too!

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

              You realize that if it ever needs an upgrade ... you'll be unable to touch it just in case ... :-D

              "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

              F Offline
              F Offline
              Forogar
              wrote on last edited by
              #31

              I once wrote this expert system (in Fortran 77) for flight analysis. It was several thousand lines of code with a built in macro language to define state models and events to detect. It worked pretty much first time and I had 100 engineers using it for years without problems except for adding more features to make things easier to define, etc. I left the company a few years after implementing it but the system ran on and on. After I left they assigned a team of three programmers to update and or rewrite it but they apparently were too scared of breaking it to change anything. They attempted once to modify a small part of it and broke the whole thing - instant rollback time! They did managed to port it - with no code changes - to a newer mainframe but that was it for 20 years! Next time I might do more documentation than auto-generated flowcharts! ;-)

              - I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • raddevusR raddevus

                When you're writing code and you're like, we'll I'll just try this... :~ Write a bunch of code, add a function, etc. Ok, let's try it out... ...then it works!!! What!?! This is why I'll always enjoy software development. Because, every once in a while, I get something to work. :laugh: It's just enough that it keeps leading me on to keep on going. :laugh: :laugh:

                A Offline
                A Offline
                agolddog
                wrote on last edited by
                #32

                It's kinda like golf. Frustration, frustration, frustration...then you smoke a 3-wood and really enjoy it again...

                raddevusR 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • A agolddog

                  It's kinda like golf. Frustration, frustration, frustration...then you smoke a 3-wood and really enjoy it again...

                  raddevusR Offline
                  raddevusR Offline
                  raddevus
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #33

                  agolddog wrote:

                  It's kinda like golf. Frustration, frustration, frustration...then you smoke a 3-wood and really enjoy it again...

                  Great comparison. :thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup: Really is very similar. Just as you're about to give up on it for life, (and you've thrown a couple clubs into the frog pond) you make a nice shot. "Well, I probably shouldn't quit now." :rolleyes:

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • raddevusR raddevus

                    Greg Utas wrote:

                    Of course, it's usually the opposite, at least for me. This'll fix it. [runs test] :mad: WTF!!

                    :thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup: Haha! Yeah, me too. That's why I'm sitting here shocked that it worked. :-D

                    E Offline
                    E Offline
                    englebart
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #34

                    Silly you! You forgot to add new tests to cover that code. Try it now.

                    raddevusR 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • raddevusR raddevus

                      When you're writing code and you're like, we'll I'll just try this... :~ Write a bunch of code, add a function, etc. Ok, let's try it out... ...then it works!!! What!?! This is why I'll always enjoy software development. Because, every once in a while, I get something to work. :laugh: It's just enough that it keeps leading me on to keep on going. :laugh: :laugh:

                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      Don Hughes
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #35

                      If it works the very first time you tried it, then you

                      definitely got something wrong that will come back and bite you on the ass in a few months.

                      raddevusR 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • enhzflepE enhzflep

                        That quite possibly, is more help than we were given when first introduced to c++ templates at uni.

                        E Offline
                        E Offline
                        englebart
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #36

                        The old STL error messages were impressive! (and indecipherable)

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • raddevusR raddevus

                          When you're writing code and you're like, we'll I'll just try this... :~ Write a bunch of code, add a function, etc. Ok, let's try it out... ...then it works!!! What!?! This is why I'll always enjoy software development. Because, every once in a while, I get something to work. :laugh: It's just enough that it keeps leading me on to keep on going. :laugh: :laugh:

                          S Offline
                          S Offline
                          Steve Naidamast
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #37

                          If it works the first time through, there is definitely something wrong... :)

                          Steve Naidamast Sr. Software Engineer Black Falcon Software, Inc. blackfalconsoftware@outlook.com

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • D Don Hughes

                            If it works the very first time you tried it, then you

                            definitely got something wrong that will come back and bite you on the ass in a few months.

                            raddevusR Offline
                            raddevusR Offline
                            raddevus
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #38

                            Don Hughes wrote:

                            definitely got something wrong

                            Many people are posting this. :laugh:

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • E englebart

                              Silly you! You forgot to add new tests to cover that code. Try it now.

                              raddevusR Offline
                              raddevusR Offline
                              raddevus
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #39

                              englebart wrote:

                              You forgot to add new tests to cover that code.

                              Yes, yes, forgot. That's the ticket. Forgot the tests. :laugh: Steve Martin: How many times do we let ourselves get into terrible situations because we don't say, "i forgot"? You Can Be a Millionaire - YouTube[^]

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • World
                              • Users
                              • Groups