At the end...
-
I decided to go for KeePass[^]. It's ugly. But all is stored locally with high encryption, no need to connect to any server somewhere. And even Bitwarden seems much nicer (aesthetically) I should have installed a docker container in my NAS to act as my personal server to avoid sending all my passwords into the cloud which seems too much overkill to me. THANK YOU VERY MUCH everybody who posted an answer and a hint. :beer:
www.robotecnik.com[^] - robots, CNC and PLC programming
-
I decided to go for KeePass[^]. It's ugly. But all is stored locally with high encryption, no need to connect to any server somewhere. And even Bitwarden seems much nicer (aesthetically) I should have installed a docker container in my NAS to act as my personal server to avoid sending all my passwords into the cloud which seems too much overkill to me. THANK YOU VERY MUCH everybody who posted an answer and a hint. :beer:
www.robotecnik.com[^] - robots, CNC and PLC programming
Joan M wrote:
It's ugly.
Take that back! The interface can be considered "old school" by today's standard, but it's compact and functional. To me it's the peak usability. None of that modern big flat and empty surfaces crap taking valuable screen real estate. Look at [this crap](https://www.thewindowsclub.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Bitwarden-review.png)! Something like 70% of the screen is nothing. I understand developers not caring about performance and expecting users to throw more hardware at the problem, but that does not work with monitors... I mean at some point user's room will not be large enough to fit the screen needed to display your damn application.
-
I decided to go for KeePass[^]. It's ugly. But all is stored locally with high encryption, no need to connect to any server somewhere. And even Bitwarden seems much nicer (aesthetically) I should have installed a docker container in my NAS to act as my personal server to avoid sending all my passwords into the cloud which seems too much overkill to me. THANK YOU VERY MUCH everybody who posted an answer and a hint. :beer:
www.robotecnik.com[^] - robots, CNC and PLC programming
The reason I like Keeper is that it stores my passwords in the cloud and then I can access them from any device on earth. laptop, phone, pc, doesn't matter. It has browser extensions, stand alone desktop app, and mobile apps. Good luck with KeePass! :thumbsup: If you ever want something better (overall) IMHO, try Keeper.
-
Joan M wrote:
It's ugly.
Take that back! The interface can be considered "old school" by today's standard, but it's compact and functional. To me it's the peak usability. None of that modern big flat and empty surfaces crap taking valuable screen real estate. Look at [this crap](https://www.thewindowsclub.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Bitwarden-review.png)! Something like 70% of the screen is nothing. I understand developers not caring about performance and expecting users to throw more hardware at the problem, but that does not work with monitors... I mean at some point user's room will not be large enough to fit the screen needed to display your damn application.
Luckily Ultra-Wide monitors are getting more and more affordable! :-\
-
Joan M wrote:
It's ugly.
Take that back! The interface can be considered "old school" by today's standard, but it's compact and functional. To me it's the peak usability. None of that modern big flat and empty surfaces crap taking valuable screen real estate. Look at [this crap](https://www.thewindowsclub.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Bitwarden-review.png)! Something like 70% of the screen is nothing. I understand developers not caring about performance and expecting users to throw more hardware at the problem, but that does not work with monitors... I mean at some point user's room will not be large enough to fit the screen needed to display your damn application.
-
I decided to go for KeePass[^]. It's ugly. But all is stored locally with high encryption, no need to connect to any server somewhere. And even Bitwarden seems much nicer (aesthetically) I should have installed a docker container in my NAS to act as my personal server to avoid sending all my passwords into the cloud which seems too much overkill to me. THANK YOU VERY MUCH everybody who posted an answer and a hint. :beer:
www.robotecnik.com[^] - robots, CNC and PLC programming
i used KeePass for a long time. kept it on a thumb drive on my keyring. now i just use LastPass, because it's available on all the OS's i use.
-
Clearly you've not seen those futuristic films about hacking where the password occupies the whole 9000 inches screen the hacker has to use a command line interface. :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
www.robotecnik.com[^] - robots, CNC and PLC programming
God bless Mr. Robot for at least breaking from that mold somewhat.
Real programmers use butterflies
-
Joan M wrote:
It's ugly.
Take that back! The interface can be considered "old school" by today's standard, but it's compact and functional. To me it's the peak usability. None of that modern big flat and empty surfaces crap taking valuable screen real estate. Look at [this crap](https://www.thewindowsclub.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Bitwarden-review.png)! Something like 70% of the screen is nothing. I understand developers not caring about performance and expecting users to throw more hardware at the problem, but that does not work with monitors... I mean at some point user's room will not be large enough to fit the screen needed to display your damn application.
Mladen Janković wrote:
peak usability.
I like that. I agree it's what a Win32 desktop app can be expected to look like. I think some people have just developed a twisted view of what an app should look like because they spend so much time on a freakin' phone.
-
God bless Mr. Robot for at least breaking from that mold somewhat.
Real programmers use butterflies
