Somebody mentioned Darwinism...
-
...in a recent reply to a post. The only problem I have with Darwinism is that it doesn't work fast enough so we are stuck with millions of idiots we can't get rid of! Note: This post may seem to be political (and therefore verboten) but it isn't meant to be; just a sad reflection on the human race today.
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
� Forogar � wrote:
Darwinism is that it doesn't work fast enough
Aahhh! The joy you feel when wishing death upon millions of people. Everyone responding is so sure that when you chlorinate the gene pool they will of course not be affected by that chlorine. And they are also certain that they are better than average drivers. As for accusing 74 million people of being fascists - you better hope you are wrong. But if you want to characterize your political opponents of being worthy of death - don't be surprised when the dying starts... :sigh: X| X| X| :doh:
If you can't laugh at yourself - ask me and I will do it for you.
-
There are times when I feel the gene pool could use some chlorine ... :sigh:
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
-
� Forogar � wrote:
Darwinism is that it doesn't work fast enough
Aahhh! The joy you feel when wishing death upon millions of people. Everyone responding is so sure that when you chlorinate the gene pool they will of course not be affected by that chlorine. And they are also certain that they are better than average drivers. As for accusing 74 million people of being fascists - you better hope you are wrong. But if you want to characterize your political opponents of being worthy of death - don't be surprised when the dying starts... :sigh: X| X| X| :doh:
If you can't laugh at yourself - ask me and I will do it for you.
I am going to answer to the parts of your post that points to things I said and you comment about it.
DRHuff wrote:
Aahhh! The joy you feel when wishing death upon millions of people.
Correction... I am not whishing the death of anyone. I only expect them to get what they search for. I know real people that shouted "it is all a hoax" really loud, wore no mask, didn't reduced contacts, etc... then they got the virus (some of them even spreaded it into family and friends that not necessarily share their convictions). Then they had the damn luck to get to the hospital a bit before they got full. They were / are now occuping beds that were / are being denied to people that has been trying to comply and to be careful, reducing contacts and so on, but still got infected, two of them (elder people friends of my family) died. Sorry but... in that case, they are the ones that deserve to get through the illnes solo at home and not puting more people in risk just because their idiocy. If they survive... I will be happy about it and hope they learnt the lesson. If they don't... I won't be happy, but I won't be sad either.
DRHuff wrote:
Everyone responding is so sure that when you chlorinate the gene pool they will of course not be affected by that chlorine.
Correction again: If it affects me, I will accept it. As the world is going, it wouldn't surprise me if we trigger something that drastically decimates our population. And seeing how the world is going... if it really happens, we will deserve it. I only hope the following generations have a chance to survive and they learn about our errors.
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
-
...in a recent reply to a post. The only problem I have with Darwinism is that it doesn't work fast enough so we are stuck with millions of idiots we can't get rid of! Note: This post may seem to be political (and therefore verboten) but it isn't meant to be; just a sad reflection on the human race today.
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
"Survival of the Fittest" does not mean survival of those {you | we | they} consider fittest. It means that those who survive are, by definition, considered the fittest. There is no evidence, as yet, that intelligence has a long-term survival benefit. :sigh: :(
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.
-
OriginalGriff wrote:
There are times when I feel the gene pool could use some chlorine ...
didn't you want to say clorhidric acid?
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
I think you meant "Chloric acid", and no, the gene pool can do quite well without it. :)
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.
-
Darwinism does not work any more. It's predicated on the weak dying but in a civilised society, that does not happen
-
I think you meant "Chloric acid", and no, the gene pool can do quite well without it. :)
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.
Daniel Pfeffer wrote:
I think you meant "Chloric acid"
Not sure. In Spanish we have "ácido clórico" (HClO3) and "ácido Clorhídrico" (HCl) I meant the second one. If I got the translation wrong, then I stand corrected.
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
-
"Survival of the Fittest" does not mean survival of those {you | we | they} consider fittest. It means that those who survive are, by definition, considered the fittest. There is no evidence, as yet, that intelligence has a long-term survival benefit. :sigh: :(
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.
some would argue that "intelligence" is what got us here in the first place. :rolleyes:
-
Daniel Pfeffer wrote:
I think you meant "Chloric acid"
Not sure. In Spanish we have "ácido clórico" (HClO3) and "ácido Clorhídrico" (HCl) I meant the second one. If I got the translation wrong, then I stand corrected.
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
I was wrong, too. In English, HCl is _Hydro_chloric Acid. :-O HClO3 is Chloric Acid.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.
-
some would argue that "intelligence" is what got us here in the first place. :rolleyes:
Do you mean: Stupidity got us into this mess; why can't it get us out? :sigh:
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.
-
� Forogar � wrote:
Darwinism is that it doesn't work fast enough
Aahhh! The joy you feel when wishing death upon millions of people. Everyone responding is so sure that when you chlorinate the gene pool they will of course not be affected by that chlorine. And they are also certain that they are better than average drivers. As for accusing 74 million people of being fascists - you better hope you are wrong. But if you want to characterize your political opponents of being worthy of death - don't be surprised when the dying starts... :sigh: X| X| X| :doh:
If you can't laugh at yourself - ask me and I will do it for you.
-
Daniel Pfeffer wrote:
I think you meant "Chloric acid"
Not sure. In Spanish we have "ácido clórico" (HClO3) and "ácido Clorhídrico" (HCl) I meant the second one. If I got the translation wrong, then I stand corrected.
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
Not to worry . . . Chloric acid is extremely unstable and will likely blow the owner to itty bitty pieces almost immediately. It's sister, Perchloric acid (HCLO4 is stable enough to keep in bottles - also highly explosive on its own. Something I've actually worked with. It makes an insoluble potassium salt (rather rare) and is a very strong oxidizing acid - used to "fume" things, i.e., break them down chemically by boiling them in the acid. If something organic falls in during this process, well, it tends to crumble things when it goes off with astounding violence. Salts of both of these are common fireworks ingredients. Shock sensitive, although you usually need a hammer (unless mixed with red phosphorus as in matches). Hydrochloric acid (HCL)? Who's got a stomach to handle that? Actually, all of us - diluted quite a bit it's the acid in your stomach used for digestion. Concentrated (=37% 12.0 molar) is how it's sold. One of the strongest acids known - but I'm sorry to say it doesn't work like acid in the movies. Not at all. Acid strength is based upon degree of ionization in solution and this stuff is about 100% ionized. Way more than you need to know but it brought back my very early youth, when I used to make my own fireworks.
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein
"If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010
-
Those are fascists
Actually, just morons looking for someone else to blame their failure upon. As their deity would describe them: Losers! But really, who else would losers follow, and who else would depend upon losers for a following? See, the world is amazingly orderly in its design.
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein
"If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010
-
I was wrong, too. In English, HCl is _Hydro_chloric Acid. :-O HClO3 is Chloric Acid.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.
Daniel Pfeffer wrote:
HCl is _Hydro_chloric Acid.
Interesting. I did a check in google and my version was identified / suggested in the search bar, I supposed it was right. Clicking on search, there is a high number of site titles with you option. But I found this: chlorhydric acid[^] Looks like "Hydrochloric acid" is the official name (and the most extended one) but "chlorhydric acid" (I wrote it wrongly in the previous message) is accepted as a synonym too.
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
-
"Survival of the Fittest" does not mean survival of those {you | we | they} consider fittest. It means that those who survive are, by definition, considered the fittest. There is no evidence, as yet, that intelligence has a long-term survival benefit. :sigh: :(
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.
For humans, as a group, only intelligence allowed the group to survive. We lack fangs. We lack claws. We cannot run very fast. Basically, an easy meal and the carnivore's don't even get much hair stuck in their teeth. Until the clever one figured out how to pick up a stick and sharpen the ends . . .
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein
"If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010
-
Not to worry . . . Chloric acid is extremely unstable and will likely blow the owner to itty bitty pieces almost immediately. It's sister, Perchloric acid (HCLO4 is stable enough to keep in bottles - also highly explosive on its own. Something I've actually worked with. It makes an insoluble potassium salt (rather rare) and is a very strong oxidizing acid - used to "fume" things, i.e., break them down chemically by boiling them in the acid. If something organic falls in during this process, well, it tends to crumble things when it goes off with astounding violence. Salts of both of these are common fireworks ingredients. Shock sensitive, although you usually need a hammer (unless mixed with red phosphorus as in matches). Hydrochloric acid (HCL)? Who's got a stomach to handle that? Actually, all of us - diluted quite a bit it's the acid in your stomach used for digestion. Concentrated (=37% 12.0 molar) is how it's sold. One of the strongest acids known - but I'm sorry to say it doesn't work like acid in the movies. Not at all. Acid strength is based upon degree of ionization in solution and this stuff is about 100% ionized. Way more than you need to know but it brought back my very early youth, when I used to make my own fireworks.
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein
"If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010
Thank you for the info.
W∴ Balboos, GHB wrote:
Hydrochloric acid (HCL)? Who's got a stomach to handle that? Actually, all of us - diluted quite a bit it's the acid in your stomach used for digestion.
That's something I still remembered from the biology lessons.
W∴ Balboos, GHB wrote:
One of the strongest acids known
I knew it, that's why I "suggested" it, but... I might have thought wrongly (based on your following comment)
W∴ Balboos, GHB wrote:
but I'm sorry to say it doesn't work like acid in the movies. Not at all. Acid strength is based upon degree of ionization in solution and this stuff is about 100% ionized.
I don't know exactly what you mean, care to expand?
W∴ Balboos, GHB wrote:
Way more than you need to know
I don't mind learning new things in "conversations". Thanks
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
-
...in a recent reply to a post. The only problem I have with Darwinism is that it doesn't work fast enough so we are stuck with millions of idiots we can't get rid of! Note: This post may seem to be political (and therefore verboten) but it isn't meant to be; just a sad reflection on the human race today.
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
I am guilty of that allusion. Evolution takes it's time because it gets and :elephant:ing laugh out of watching us scramble, trying to cope.
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein
"If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010
-
� Forogar � wrote:
so we are stuck with millions of idiots
74+ million by chance?
-
Actually, just morons looking for someone else to blame their failure upon. As their deity would describe them: Losers! But really, who else would losers follow, and who else would depend upon losers for a following? See, the world is amazingly orderly in its design.
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein
"If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010
-
Thank you for the info.
W∴ Balboos, GHB wrote:
Hydrochloric acid (HCL)? Who's got a stomach to handle that? Actually, all of us - diluted quite a bit it's the acid in your stomach used for digestion.
That's something I still remembered from the biology lessons.
W∴ Balboos, GHB wrote:
One of the strongest acids known
I knew it, that's why I "suggested" it, but... I might have thought wrongly (based on your following comment)
W∴ Balboos, GHB wrote:
but I'm sorry to say it doesn't work like acid in the movies. Not at all. Acid strength is based upon degree of ionization in solution and this stuff is about 100% ionized.
I don't know exactly what you mean, care to expand?
W∴ Balboos, GHB wrote:
Way more than you need to know
I don't mind learning new things in "conversations". Thanks
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
OK. Any complaints about these lessons is "on you !" Stomach protects itself - prostaglandin 1 if I recall correctly. Without it, you would slowly digest your own stomach. Many NSAID's (like aspirin, but NOT acetaminophen) have a side effect of suppressing your prostaglandins and that's how chronic use can end up giving you ulcers. It's not the aspirin, an extremely weak acid, that does the damage (at least not directly). Although it doesn't have to be water, acid strength is typically considered how completely the acid ionizes in water. That is, HCL become H+ and Cl- when in aqueous solution. There is no HCL left. This is facilitated by water being very polar. Water is a bent molecule (CO2 is straight). Because it is bent, the local charges are asymmetric on the molecule even though it's net neutral. Like a magnet, in a way, it has poles (hence "polar"). The O in H2O holds the more negative charge, the H's, the more positive charge. They can thus "solvate" ionic species and stabilize their charge. It is for this same reason that salt (NaCl) dissolves in water and is only in existence as Na+ and Cl-. Solvation is a pretty powerful force as it has to, in the case of salt, break up the the salt crystal lattice. (At this point, it gets more complicated as we would talk about Gibbs vs Helmholtz free Energies and Entropy). Anyway, it's for this same reason oil and water don't mix: the water molecules are attracted to one another rather strongly and will not let the oil molecules intervene. Intermediate substances, such as alcohols are polar. Small molecules, such as methanol, ethanol, and propanol are polar enough where entropy will make the totally miscible with water. The randomization of the molecules overcomes the mutual attraction. Longer chain alcohols are not totally miscible (but are soluble) with water, less and less so as the organic part dominates its properties. Soap . . . a magic substance (look up micelles) ! Note, back to the original topic, if you were to dissolve HCL in something totally non-polar, like hexane, then it would not be ionized. Other definitions of acid in other contexts: Bronsted Acid: Based upon the ability of a substance to "donate" or "accept" protons (H+) Lewis Acid: Based upon the substance's ability to donate or accept electrons There are other definitions for other contexts - these two are often relevant in Organic chemistry. Anyway, that's more than enough for now. And then some "solvate" implies they surround the
