Old age?
-
I actually used the term subroutine. Is there anyone who actually uses it anymore? In the age of OOP everywhere and fictional functional programming isn't the word itself an anathema on par of "Ni"?
GCS d--(d+) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
den2k88 wrote:
Ni
:omg: it's now Ekke-ekke-ekke-ekke-ptang-zoo-boing.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.
-
This gives me flashbacks of 'learning' GWBASIC (I was too young and inexperienced to actually learn something from only the reference book given with the computer itself).
GCS d--(d+) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
AMSTRAD 6128 BASIC, actually. I installed an emulator recently - brought a lot of memories back !
-
den2k88 wrote:
Ni
:omg: it's now Ekke-ekke-ekke-ekke-ptang-zoo-boing.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.
We demand : a shrubbery.
-
We demand : a shrubbery.
Rage wrote:
We demand : another shrubbery.
FTFY
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.
-
I actually used the term subroutine. Is there anyone who actually uses it anymore? In the age of OOP everywhere and fictional functional programming isn't the word itself an anathema on par of "Ni"?
GCS d--(d+) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
Sometimes. I sometimes refer generally to subroutines of any sort. Also, if I remember correctly in Clarion, a subroutine is specifically an internal routine within a function or procedure. It only took about 25 years for C# to get this feature compared to Clarion.
-
Sometimes. I sometimes refer generally to subroutines of any sort. Also, if I remember correctly in Clarion, a subroutine is specifically an internal routine within a function or procedure. It only took about 25 years for C# to get this feature compared to Clarion.
-
Sometimes. I sometimes refer generally to subroutines of any sort. Also, if I remember correctly in Clarion, a subroutine is specifically an internal routine within a function or procedure. It only took about 25 years for C# to get this feature compared to Clarion.
Wow, wow, wow.. some Googling later I learned that Clarion is a 4th generation, multiparadigm programming language! I expect nothing less now! :O :laugh:
A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!
-
I actually used the term subroutine. Is there anyone who actually uses it anymore? In the age of OOP everywhere and fictional functional programming isn't the word itself an anathema on par of "Ni"?
GCS d--(d+) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
-
Sometimes. I sometimes refer generally to subroutines of any sort. Also, if I remember correctly in Clarion, a subroutine is specifically an internal routine within a function or procedure. It only took about 25 years for C# to get this feature compared to Clarion.
-
I actually used the term subroutine. Is there anyone who actually uses it anymore? In the age of OOP everywhere and fictional functional programming isn't the word itself an anathema on par of "Ni"?
GCS d--(d+) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
I would if anyone would talk to me. :(
-
This gives me flashbacks of 'learning' GWBASIC (I was too young and inexperienced to actually learn something from only the reference book given with the computer itself).
GCS d--(d+) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
My first programming was in time-shared BASIC on an HP 3000. Imagine the teacher's surprise when I was writing a substitution cipher encoder and decoder as a freshman after one week in the class. The look on the teacher's face when he found out was truly priceless. That was in about 1975.
"They have a consciousness, they have a life, they have a soul! Damn you! Let the rabbits wear glasses! Save our brothers! Can I get an amen?"
-
I farking despise lambda functions used in that way.
GCS d--(d+) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
It's not a lambda as such (as I understand the term). Clarion way back in 1991 didn't have the concept of lambdas. Clarion's routines are just subroutines embedded within parent subroutines (i.e. a procedure or function) such that they are local to their parent. Yeah, I suppose they share some characteristics with lambdas but 'mentally' and syntactically they aren't like them.
-
Clarion... Now that's a name I have not heard in a long time... I used it for many years, not that template stuff, but real coding. It really wasn't that bad.
Yes, I liked it a lot. I found it extremely pleasant to code in and very productive. Drawing screen layouts within the source and very easy database design were real pleasures of productivity.
-
Sometimes. I sometimes refer generally to subroutines of any sort. Also, if I remember correctly in Clarion, a subroutine is specifically an internal routine within a function or procedure. It only took about 25 years for C# to get this feature compared to Clarion.